Quote:

---

Austria officially confirmed this week that the British Government’s allegation that Novichok, a Russian chemical warfare agent, was used in England by GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, in March 2018, was a British invention.

Investigations in Vienna by four Austrian government ministries, the BVT intelligence agency, and by Austrian prosecutors have revealed that secret OPCW reports on the blood testing of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, copies of which were transferred to the Austrian government, did not reveal a Russian-made nerve agent.

Two reports, published in Vienna this week by the OE media group and reporter Isabelle Daniel, reveal that the Financial Times publication of the cover-page of one of the OPCW reports exposed a barcode identifying the source of the leaked documents was the Austrian government. The Austrian Foreign Ministry and the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz und Terrorismusbekämpfung (BVT), the domestic intelligence agency equivalent to MI5 or FBI, have corroborated the authenticity of the documents.

The Austrian disclosures also reveal that in London the Financial Times editor, Roula Khalaf, four of the newspaper’s reporters, and the management of the Japanese-owned company have fabricated a false and misleading version of the OPCW evidence and have covered up British government lying on the Skripal blood testing and the Novichok evidence.

On Wednesday afternoon this week, OE24, a news portal of the OE media group in Vienna, broke the first story (lead image, right) that the barcode found on the OPCW document photograph published in London had been traced to several Austrian state ministries. The next day, OE political editor Isabelle Daniel reported the Austrian Foreign, Defence and Economics Ministries had received copies of the barcoded OPCW dossier, and that the Justice Ministry and prosecutors were investigating “potential moles”.

Daniel also quoted a Foreign Ministry source as saying its copy of the documents had been securely stored in its disarmament department safe, and that there were “no tips” the leak had come from there. Daniel also quoted a BVT spokesman as confirming the authenticity of the OPCW file had been verified. “We have checked it recently. Officially it has not come to us.”

The leak had been an “explosive secret betrayal” and a criminal investigation was under way, OE24 reported. OE is a privately owned Austrian media group, based in Vienna. It publishes a newspaper, the news portal OE.at, radio and television.

The Financial Times report first exposing the OPCW documents appeared on July 9. Details of how the newspaper fabricated the interpretation the OPCW had corroborated Russian involvement in the Novichok attack can be read here.

At an OPCW Executive Council meeting on April 14, 2018, five weeks after the Skripal attack, the British Government confirmed that a few days earlier “all States parties” had received copies of the OPCW dossier. This included Austria, as the Viennese sources now acknowledge.

Source: https://www.opcw.org/

“The OPCW responded promptly to our request to send their experts to the United Kingdom,” declared Peter Wilson, the British representative to the OPCW on April 14, 2018. “They conducted a highly professional mission. The OPCW’s designated laboratories have also responded professionally and promptly. What the Director-General said was really important on this, and the Technical Secretariat’s presentation shows how professional that work was. The report the Technical Secretariat presented to us on 11 April was thorough and methodical. The Technical Secretariat responded quickly to our request to share that report with all States Parties. All have had the chance to see the quality of that work.”

Wilson went on to say: “As you know, on 4 March Yulia and Sergei Skripal were poisoned in Salisbury, the United Kingdom, with a chemical weapon, which United Kingdom experts established to be a Novichok. OPCW has now clearly verified those findings.”

The Austrian copy of the OPCW file now confirms this was a misrepresentation of the chemical formula and other evidence the OPCW had gathered.

Wilson went on to conclude: “the identification of the nerve agent used is an essential piece of technical evidence in our investigation, neither DSTL’s [Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down] analysis, nor the OPCW’s report, identifies the country or laboratory of origin of the agent used in this attack. So let me also set out the wider picture, which leads the United Kingdom to assess that there is no plausible alternative explanation for what happened in Salisbury than Russian State responsibility. We believe that only the Russian Federation had the technical means, operational experience, and the motive to target the Skripals.”

The first qualifying sentence was the British truth; the conclusion was the British lie. The Austrian evidence now verifies there was no evidence of a Russian source in the blood and other test samples; no evidence of Novichok; and no evidence to corroborate the British allegations of a Russian chemical warfare attack.
MORE AT http://johnhelmer.net/austria-confirms-opcw-report-on-skripal-faking-b
y-the-british-vienna-exposes-financial-times-lies-and-cover-up/

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Austria officially confirmed this week that the British Government’s allegation that Novichok, a Russian chemical warfare agent, was used in England by GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, in March 2018, was a British invention.

Investigations in Vienna by four Austrian government ministries, the BVT intelligence agency, and by Austrian prosecutors have revealed that secret OPCW reports on the blood testing of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, copies of which were transferred to the Austrian government, did not reveal a Russian-made nerve agent.

Two reports, published in Vienna this week by the OE media group and reporter Isabelle Daniel, reveal that the Financial Times publication of the cover-page of one of the OPCW reports exposed a barcode identifying the source of the leaked documents was the Austrian government. The Austrian Foreign Ministry and the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz und Terrorismusbekämpfung (BVT), the domestic intelligence agency equivalent to MI5 or FBI, have corroborated the authenticity of the documents.

The Austrian disclosures also reveal that in London the Financial Times editor, Roula Khalaf, four of the newspaper’s reporters, and the management of the Japanese-owned company have fabricated a false and misleading version of the OPCW evidence and have covered up British government lying on the Skripal blood testing and the Novichok evidence.

On Wednesday afternoon this week, OE24, a news portal of the OE media group in Vienna, broke the first story (lead image, right) that the barcode found on the OPCW document photograph published in London had been traced to several Austrian state ministries. The next day, OE political editor Isabelle Daniel reported the Austrian Foreign, Defence and Economics Ministries had received copies of the barcoded OPCW dossier, and that the Justice Ministry and prosecutors were investigating “potential moles”.

Daniel also quoted a Foreign Ministry source as saying its copy of the documents had been securely stored in its disarmament department safe, and that there were “no tips” the leak had come from there. Daniel also quoted a BVT spokesman as confirming the authenticity of the OPCW file had been verified. “We have checked it recently. Officially it has not come to us.”

The leak had been an “explosive secret betrayal” and a criminal investigation was under way, OE24 reported. OE is a privately owned Austrian media group, based in Vienna. It publishes a newspaper, the news portal OE.at, radio and television.

The Financial Times report first exposing the OPCW documents appeared on July 9. Details of how the newspaper fabricated the interpretation the OPCW had corroborated Russian involvement in the Novichok attack can be read here.

At an OPCW Executive Council meeting on April 14, 2018, five weeks after the Skripal attack, the British Government confirmed that a few days earlier “all States parties” had received copies of the OPCW dossier. This included Austria, as the Viennese sources now acknowledge.

Source: https://www.opcw.org/

“The OPCW responded promptly to our request to send their experts to the United Kingdom,” declared Peter Wilson, the British representative to the OPCW on April 14, 2018. “They conducted a highly professional mission. The OPCW’s designated laboratories have also responded professionally and promptly. What the Director-General said was really important on this, and the Technical Secretariat’s presentation shows how professional that work was. The report the Technical Secretariat presented to us on 11 April was thorough and methodical. The Technical Secretariat responded quickly to our request to share that report with all States Parties. All have had the chance to see the quality of that work.”

Wilson went on to say: “As you know, on 4 March Yulia and Sergei Skripal were poisoned in Salisbury, the United Kingdom, with a chemical weapon, which United Kingdom experts established to be a Novichok. OPCW has now clearly verified those findings.”

The Austrian copy of the OPCW file now confirms this was a misrepresentation of the chemical formula and other evidence the OPCW had gathered.

Wilson went on to conclude: “the identification of the nerve agent used is an essential piece of technical evidence in our investigation, neither DSTL’s [Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down] analysis, nor the OPCW’s report, identifies the country or laboratory of origin of the agent used in this attack. So let me also set out the wider picture, which leads the United Kingdom to assess that there is no plausible alternative explanation for what happened in Salisbury than Russian State responsibility. We believe that only the Russian Federation had the technical means, operational experience, and the motive to target the Skripals.”

The first qualifying sentence was the British truth; the conclusion was the British lie. The Austrian evidence now verifies there was no evidence of a Russian source in the blood and other test samples; no evidence of Novichok; and no evidence to corroborate the British allegations of a Russian chemical warfare attack.
MORE AT http://johnhelmer.net/austria-confirms-opcw-report-on-skripal-faking-b
y-the-british-vienna-exposes-financial-times-lies-and-cover-up/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SIX, I know the M$Mers are a bunch of lying shitholes. You can discard 90% of what they report, and what they DON'T report is almost always more important than what they do.

But once in a while they stumble onto something real. It's up to you to figure out what's what.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Son, could you possibly be MORE stupid? The OPCW (last I checked, not Russian) information on the Skripal poisoning was kept secret, and was only revealed accidentally. It was reported by the FT (Financial Times of London. Last I checked, not Russian) and confirmed by Austria (last I checked, not Russian)

You're a great example of what not to do: Deny facts and maintain delusion.

Keep posting, son. Someone will learn something of value from it, just not you.

---

Oops, Sigs upset. That said comrade, says who. I've already debunked this claim. But, I'll tell you what. Go to the London times and cut and paste the part of the story that excoriates Russia in a post here. Good luck...

T

Quote:

---

THUGR: I've already debunked this claim

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

THUGR: I've already debunked this claim

---

Oh, you mean you've repeated the [old]lie that has been shown to be false by recently revealed internal documents?

Yep!

Now, tell me again how Trump "colluded" with Russia. Go back to the earliest NYT/WaPo/MSNBC reportage and tell me all about it!

---

Come on comrade. It should be easy for you to produce the part of the London times article absolving Russia of responsibility. I believe if you could you would, instead of deflecting.

So, come on comrade sig. Produce the section of the article that absolves Russia of the poisoning. Hey, get comrade kiki to help.

Oops, another one of your bullshit Russian propaganda threads shot to shit by facts. What a shame aye comrade?

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
But, I'll tell you what. Go to the London times ...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
But, I'll tell you what. Go to the London times ...

---

snicker

I'll tell YOU what. Do an 'edit' find' 'london times' on this entire page and find that reference!!!

I'll wait.

Jeeze louise what a stupid piece of lying crap you are.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Son, could you possibly be MORE stupid? The OPCW (last I checked, not Russian) information on the Skripal poisoning was kept secret, and was only revealed accidentally. It was reported by the FT (Financial Times of London. Last I checked, not Russian) and confirmed by Austria (last I checked, not Russian)

You're a great example of what not to do: Deny facts and maintain delusion.

Keep posting, son. Someone will learn something of value from it, just not you.

---

Why don't you two stop deflecting and produce the document absolving Russia of the poisoning? As you claim in the title of the thread "Oh look, ANOTHER thing that Russians didn't do! (Skripal poisoning)."

Come on comrades, it's stated in the title of the thread for Christ's sake. Produce the documentation.

If you're going to call someone stupid, you better be on the winning side of the facts assholes.



T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
If you're going to call someone stupid, you better be on the winning side of the facts assholes.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
OE media group and reporter Isabelle Daniel - not Russian.


https://www.oe24.at/tv

https://www.oe24.at/tv/news/oesterreich-politik-insiderin-isabelle-dan
iel-ueber-puehringer/268464536

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
But, I'll tell you what. Go to the London times ...

---

Quote:

---

“As you know, on 4 March Yulia and Sergei Skripal were poisoned in Salisbury, the United Kingdom, with a chemical weapon, which United Kingdom experts established to be a Novichok. OPCW has now clearly verified those findings.”

---

Quote:

---

The Austrian copy of the OPCW file now confirms this was a misrepresentation of the chemical formula and other evidence the OPCW had gathered.

---

Quote:

---

Wilson went on to conclude: “the identification of the nerve agent used is an essential piece of technical evidence in our investigation, neither DSTL’s [Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down] analysis, nor the OPCW’s report, identifies the country or laboratory of origin of the agent used in this attack. So let me also set out the wider picture, which leads the United Kingdom to assess that there is no plausible alternative explanation for what happened in Salisbury than Russian State responsibility. We believe that only the Russian Federation had the technical means, operational experience, and the motive to target the Skripals.”

---

Quote:

---

The first qualifying sentence was the British truth; the conclusion was the British lie. The Austrian evidence now verifies there was no evidence of a Russian source in the blood and other test samples; no evidence of Novichok; and no evidence to corroborate the British allegations of a Russian chemical warfare attack.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Yep, you two Russian trolls will post every possible angle and spin you can think of. What you won't and can't do, is provide any documents proving you aren't lying.

Been here done this before. Thanks for this little bit of fun comrades. We really must do this again sometime. Oh yeah, you need to change the title of this propaganda thread to Putin, Russia guilty of poisonings. <

---

Thanks for the libel, THUGR. But it's not me saying this, it's the Austrian government and the Financial Times (of London)


Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Yep, you two Russian trolls will post every possible angle and spin you can think of. What you won't and can't do, is provide any documents proving you aren't lying.

Been here done this before. Thanks for this little bit of fun comrades. We really must do this again sometime. Oh yeah, you need to change the title of this propaganda thread to Putin, Russia guilty of poisonings. <

---

. Thanks for the libel, THUGR. But it's not me saying this, it's the Austrian government and the Financial Times (of London)

---

This is just too simple. Post the part of the article that states Putin and Russia aren't responsible for the poisonings. Because as it stands the evidence shows they did it. And no, I'm not going to dig up all the evidence we've seen in real time exposing Putin. As for England the United States and most others, this is a done deal. Have links to post. Keep them unless you can post a paragraph stating Putin and Russia's' innocence.

Putin, Russia guilty comrade.

T

Stupid people don't know they're stupid, and they certainly don't realize how obvious it is to others.