Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


This is true. But Wikipedia is run by a bunch of leftist cunts who hate Trump and are trying desperately to WRONGLY tie the words Nationalism and Fascism together, so we've got the false info up there.

---

Now it's "big wiki" whooo .

I think I understand. He can't work together with anyone else on the planet due to all his brain malfunctions, so any people that CAN work together MUST be conspiring against him

The whole world is out to get HIM. Narcissist playbook, again.


https://refusefascism.org/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yeah. Here's how Wikipedia works. EVERYBODY gets to edit it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
YOU could have put that it was "far right". In fact, let's take a look at an edit of the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fascism&oldid=976154877

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

This is true. But Wikipedia is run by a bunch of leftist cunts who hate Trump and are trying desperately to WRONGLY tie the words Nationalism and Fascism together, so we've got the false info up there.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Seems that you don't know what the definition of simp is either, cunt.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

How many hours did it take you to find that?

---

Five seconds.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

NO citation for that statement, whatsoever. Nor is there even a name of whoever authored that editorialism. If dictionary.com was really willing to go on record stating matter-of-factually that fascism is Right Wing, they would have put it in the definition itself.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Fuck you. You're the illiterate piece of shit here who can't read a news article past the headline. When I go to a dictionary for a definition, I don't stick around to read more than a few lines!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Since you don't approve of dictionary.com,

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

here's Mirriam Webster's definition of the word...

Nope. Nothing about right-wing there either.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
Conveniently, no body cam footage exists of his execution. Fascists don't like evidence.

https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/crime/article245503570.html


https://refusefascism.org/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Sounds to me like somebody screaming "Black Lives Matter" that has a problem with somebody saying "All Lives Matter" is a perfect case study for collective narcissism, by Marcos' definition that he got from ultra-left-wing-not-at-all-a-legitimate-encyclopedia Wikipedia.

This shit is just too easy.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Sounds to me like somebody screaming "Black Lives Matter" that has a problem with somebody saying "All Lives Matter" is a perfect case study for collective narcissism, by Marcos' definition that he got from ultra-left-wing-not-at-all-a-legitimate-encyclopedia Wikipedia.

This shit is just too easy.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Laughing at your low IQ and delusional non-thinking is what's easy.

---

Quote:

---

Trumpism is collective narcissism.

Collective narcissism (or group narcissism) extends the concept of individual narcissism onto the social level of self. It is a tendency to exaggerate the positive image and importance of a group the individual belongs to, be it defined by, religion, social class, race, political stance, language group, nationalism, employment status, education level or cultural values– i.e. the ingroup.[1][2] While the classic definition of narcissism focuses on the individual, collective narcissism asserts that one can have a similar excessively high opinion of a group, and that a group can function as a narcissistic entity.[1] Collective narcissism is related to ethnocentrism. However, ethnocentrism primarily focuses on self-centeredness at an ethnic or cultural level, while collective narcissism is extended to any type of ingroup, beyond just cultures and ethnicities.[1][3] While ethnocentrism is an assertion of the ingroup's supremacy, collective narcissism is a self-defensive tendency to invest unfulfilled self-entitlement into a belief about ingroup's uniqueness and greatness. Thus, the ingroup is expected to become a vehicle of actualisation of frustrated self-entitlement.[2] When applied to a national group, collective narcissism is similar to nationalism: a desire for national supremacy.[4] Positive overlap between ingroup satisfaction and collective narcissism suppresses collective narcissistic intergroup hostility.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_narcissism

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

This is a literal definition of BLM.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

This is a literal definition of BLM.

---

Projection from the brainwashed idiot.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


Period.

---

Quote:

---

Trumptardism is caused by low cognitive ability coupled with delusional narcissism.

---

Quote:

---

... For one thing, the definition of fascism commonly attributed to Mussolini is “the merging of the state and corporate power,” not “the corporation,” as McKay presents it. Second, it’s not clear that Mussolini — or even his ghostwriter, the philosopher Giovanni Gentile — ever actually gave this precise definition of fascism.

... Corporatism (“corporativismo” in Italian) was one of the cornerstone principles in Mussolini’s fascism, and had to do with the way society and the economy would be organized, with state power at the head of a system of guilds or corporations (“corporazione”) representing each major industry.

In his Dictionary of Political Thought, Roger Scruton describes corporatism in this way:

The economy was divided into associations (called ‘syndicates’) of workers, employers and the professions; only one syndicate was allowed in each branch of industry, and all officials were either fascist politicians or else loyal to the fascist cause. According to law the syndicates were autonomous, but in fact they were run by the state. The ‘corporations’ united the syndicates in a given industry, but made no pretence at autonomy from the state.

---

Quote:

---

What constitutes a definition of fascism and fascist governments has been a complicated and highly disputed subject concerning the exact nature of fascism and its core tenets debated amongst historians, political scientists, and other scholars since Benito Mussolini first used the term in 1915.

A significant number of scholars agree that a "fascist regime" is foremost an authoritarian form of government, although not all authoritarian regimes are fascist. Authoritarianism is thus a defining characteristic, but most scholars will say that more distinguishing traits are needed to make an authoritarian regime fascist.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

Similarly, fascism as an ideology is also hard to define. Originally, it referred to a totalitarian political movement linked with corporatism which existed in Italy from 1922 to 1943 under the leadership of Benito Mussolini. Many scholars use the word "fascism" without capitalization in a more general sense, to refer to an ideology (or group of ideologies) which was influential in many countries at many different times. For this purpose, they have sought to identify what Roger Griffin calls a "fascist minimum"—that is, the minimum conditions that a certain political movement must meet in order to be considered "fascist".[3]

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yup.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CAPTAINCRUNCH:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yup.

---

What a little kiss ass -

---

Quote:

---

thought you hated Wikipedia, said it was nothing but liberal soy cnts, or some stupid sh@t. Did you lie? Yup.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by CAPTAINCRUNCH:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Yup.

---

What a little kiss ass -

---

I reliped "Yup." to this quote by Sigs:

Quote:

---

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for evidence of that "execution" that TWITCHY posted about, and REAVERBOT climbed on board with. So far, all I'm reading is froth, hysteria, and lies.

When will they recognize the REAL executions that Obama conducted? (Along with all of the other Constitution-shredding that he engaged in, including being the most secretive President ever.)

Probably .... never.

---

No mention of Wikipedia here. Just calling you faggots out for your froth, hysteria and lies, and telling the truth about Obama's legacy.

Quote:

---

thought you hated Wikipedia, said it was nothing but liberal soy cnts, or some stupid sh@t. Did you lie? Yup.

---

Wikipedia is run by Leftist soy cunts. So is Snopes and most of the Legacy Media that you've been played by.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
Way to derail my question, CC!

So, where is evidence of that so- called "execution" that TWITCHY and REAVERBOT are frothing about?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Personally. I'm still waiting to find out specifically how it was that Trump 'executed' somebody - yanno, signed the execution order and had someone killed à la Obama.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

---