Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
A sports executive who was a major donor to the Clinton Foundation and whose firm paid Bill Clinton millions of dollars in consulting fees wanted help getting a visa for a British soccer player with a criminal past.

The crown prince of Bahrain, whose government gave more than $50,000 to the Clintons’ charity and who participated in its glitzy annual conference, wanted a last-minute meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

U2 rocker and philanthropist Bono, also a regular at foundation events, wanted high-level help broadcasting a live link to the International Space Station during concerts.

In each case, according to emails released Monday from Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state, the requests were directed to Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and confidante, Huma Abedin, who engaged with other top aides and sometimes Clinton herself about how to respond.

The emails show that, in these and similar cases, the donors did not always get what they wanted, particularly when they sought anything more than a meeting.

But the exchanges, among 725 pages of correspondence from Abedin disclosed as part of a lawsuit by the conservative group Judicial Watch, illustrate the way the Clintons’ international network of friends and donors was able to get access to Hillary Clinton and her inner circle during her tenure running the State Department.

The release of the correspondence follows previous disclosures of internal emails showing a similar pattern of access for foundation contributors, and it comes as Republicans allege that Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, used her perch in the Obama administration to trade favors for donations. Clinton and the foundation have vigorously denied the charge.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/emails-reveal-how-foundation-d
onors-got-access-to-clinton-and-her-close-aides-at-state-dept/2016/08/22/345b5200-6882-11e6-8225-fbb8a6fc65bc_story.html

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The fact that you keep saying that I'm a Russian troll (paid, even!) despite my provable long history here, and despite the fact that I've been saying pretty much the same things since I started posting ... long before "putin" and "russia" became the bogeymen under your bed... just speaks to the fact that YOU live in an alternate reality!

And, you're a troll!

---

Quote:

---

And as for trolling, it is you who always start these doom and gloom threads.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I always wondered why Hillary gave me a big case of the willies every time she tried to be charming. Now I know why:


HILLARY CLINTON, WARMONGER

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Clinton Campaign and DNC Caught Inciting Violence at Trump Rallies

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
There are many, many problems with hillary. She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes. Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming a Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election.

hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.

hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.

And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.


But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Are polls = reality?

---

They are your worst reality


President: National poll results

Hillary Clinton (D) 45% (+7.00)

Donald Trump (R) 38%

Gary Johnson (L) 6%

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
ANOTHER HILLARY LEAKER, ANOTHER DEAD BODY

Wikileaks' Assange Hints Murdered DNC Staffer Was Email-Leaker, Offers $20k Reward For Info

Quote:

---

The mysterious circumstances surrounding the death of 27-year-old Democratic-staffer Seth Rich (shot multiple times, and not robbed, at 420am near his home in Washington D.C., where no homicides have been reported within 1500 feet) have stirred Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to offer a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction. But it is Assange's comments during a Dutch TV interview that are most disturbing as he hinted that Rich - who was in charge of DNC voter expansion data - was the email-leaker and his death was a politically-motivated assassination.

---

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-10/wikileaks-assange-hints-murde
red-dnc-staffer-was-email-leaker-offers-20k-reward-info

Along those same lines ...

U.N. Official 'Accidentally' Crushes Own Throat Right Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton

Quote:

---

...And as you might have guessed, there are major inconsistencies with Ashe’s death. It was not only conveniently timed because Ashe died just a few days before being set to testify against Clinton in a corruption case, but official reports indicated he died of a heart attack.
The problem, however, is that police on the scene reported Ashe died when his throat was crushed during a work-out accident.

The New York Post’s Page Six reported that after Ashe was found dead Wednesday, the U.N. claimed that he had died from a heart attack. Local police officers in Dobbs Ferry, New York, later disputed that claim, saying instead that he died from a workout accident that crushed his throat.

Adding to the mysterious nature of Ashe’s death was the fact that he had been slated to be in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, from whom he reportedly received over $1 billion in donations during his term as president of the U.N. General Assembly.

And then there was this: During the presidency of Bill Clinton, Seng illegally funneled several hundred thousand dollars to the Democrat National Committee.

Source: The Conservative Tribune via The Daily Sheeple

It must be coincidence, right?

---

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-02/un-official-accidentally-crus
hes-own-throat-right-testifying-against-hillary-clinton

AND ....

Quote:

---

Amid the media-hyped furor over Donald Trump's 2nd Amendment comments and Wikileaks' suggestions about the untimely death of DNC-staffer Seth Rich, we thought it perhaps of note that Democratic strategist, and CNN host, has publicly called for the "illegal assassination of that son-of-a-bitch" Julian Assange...[in 2010]

---

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

---

Thank you SIG. Some of us here address your posts in ways that show you as someone who conspires to spread lies and mistruths. This post is a good example of that. I remember you insisting to G it was you who relied on reliable news sources not he. The rest of us had a good laugh over that. Here is the truth concerning your sources. Zerohedge “The news portion of the site is written by a group of editors who collectively write under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden" (a character from the novel and film Fight club).” There is no way a news source can be trusted when the writers hide behind pseudonyms. That would be like watching the evening news and the news anchors hid behind screens and remained anonymous. lol

Time and time again we see you relying on Zerohedge as your news source. It has become your site of one stop shopping. All you are SIG is a mindless Russia drone. You are one of those people who is too weak to formulate their own opinions. Even though they have access to a wealth of information accumulated over thousands of years. The rule of law SIG is what’s important and the civilized world is trying to get synchronized behind that idea. Your country of choice Russia, is falling woefully behind. You need to stop doing Putin’s bidding and get a grip on reality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge


____________________________________________

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Wow, you really DO have a man-crush on Putin!

Yanno, *I* certainly don't bring him up - at all. And yet, there you are, dragging him in to every single conversation that's about pretty much everything else. I'm sure if we were discussing how blue the sky is, you'd be bringing up ... Putin.

Do you think you could possibly NOT mention him for an entire thread, if the thread's not about Putin? Or are you too obsessed?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Ok some clarity is needed here. For all you who wish to criticize Clinton please feel free. I too have many, and I mean many reasons I am not happy with having to vote for her. Trump is out of the question. I would be remiss however, if I failed to remind all about the hypocrisy of SIG and 1kiki feigning disgust with Clinton, while defending everything Putin does. And let’s face the facts folks, check the threads, they defend everything Putin does without exception. It is literality impossible to be so dismayed by what Clinton does, yet not be even skeptical with what Putin does.

Raise your hand if you haven’t figured out why. I’ll give a hint. Think comrade trolls.


____________________________________________

---

---

Putin, Russia, is your hypocrisy meter. As I have said, It is literality impossible to be so dismayed by what Clinton does, yet not be even skeptical with what Putin does.

____________________________________________

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

But, in detail, the answer is: NONE. Yes, I have people work for me, but they have to have
(1) A valid Social Security number (Yes, I ask for the card, and then check it online)
(2) A valid driver's license.
(3) A working car, and car insurance
(4) A good knowledge of English.

---

So wrong about the country, right about the servants, check.

The main point being - if these employees from another country (I presume since you mention they need to be able to speak decent English) that work for you start waving their home country's flag, would you want to force them out of the US? How do THEY feel about Trump? Your quick "deport them!" reaction to citizens from foreign countries who may be US citizens - like those that work for you - seems extreme and overly emotional.

BTW - no one here thinks Hillary is a great choice - get over it. The more you try and suggest otherwise the more you appear completely disingenuous (sadly, that's almost all the time).

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Wow, you really DO have a man-crush on Putin!

Yanno, *I* certainly don't bring him up - at all. And yet, there you are, dragging him in to every single conversation that's about pretty much everything else. I'm sure if we were discussing how blue the sky is, you'd be bringing up ... Putin.

Do you think you could possibly NOT mention him for an entire thread, if the thread's not about Putin? Or are you too obsessed?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

BTW - no one here thinks Hillary is a great choice - get over it. The more you try and suggest otherwise the more you appear completely disingenuous (sadly, that's almost all the time).

---

Thanks T. Yeah, SIG can't keep her own thoughts straight let alone anyone else's.

==============================

---

That's because she deals in spreading lies and twisted truths. No way she can remember that shit from one moment to the next.


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
You ass. I haven't dealt with that article. Go suck your own cock.

---

Heh - the mask slips, the troll is revealed.

---

And man oh man is it ugly.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

You Know Those Missing Hillary Emails? Russia Might Leak 20,000 Of Them

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Funny - if you go to Hillary Clinton's site the first thing you get is a pop up that says something to the effect: "We can't afford a Trump in the White House" Interesting strategy - not "how good she is" but "how bad he is."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Q- What does GSTRING do for fun? A- He flosses his asshole with his GSTRING!

---

Wow - that's pretty low even for you.

So rather than have an adult conversation and take responsibility for, or own the things you made up, you choose to insult, threaten, and then runaway?

Bye yet again SIGNYM - stay classless as usual.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Oh, I can go much, much lower, You have no idea what I've thought of but never posted.

---

Great - more threats. Do impress us with how much lower you can go.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:
Yessir - That's how Russia rolls...

http://bit.ly/2aakH9m

How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

"Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things, thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign."

Of course this makes sense. Get ready for the scoffs and outrage.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
My god SIG. Is there anything about you that isn't doom and gloom? Is there anything about you that isn't hypocritical? voicing outrage about the behavior of Hillary Clinton while praising people like Putin and his Iranian allies.

Is there any part of you that isn't a warped and sick bitch? I am about finished with my BSW and I currently work in the mental health field. Trust me, you are one sick bitch.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"... and I currently work in the mental health field ..."

Janitor, perhaps? Because I'd sure hate to see you working with people with your (proven) racism and your (proven) hatred towards anyone who disagrees with your politics.

---

This is what I love about you 1kiki. You are clueless to my beliefs because most of what I post in the RWT is debunking what you and SIG post. As for me being a bigot, sorry but you and SIG have shown that it is you who care about others, only when it means you can stir up trouble in these forums. You blast a country for bombing one hospital and make excuses for another who bombs many.

Sorry asshole, all your posts in these threads are full of proof of that.

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

I always wondered why Hillary gave me a big case of the willies every time she tried to be charming. Now I know why:


HILLARY CLINTON, WARMONGER

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THUGGER:
The treaty, concluded in 1987, barred the United States and Russia from deploying missiles
with a range from 500 to 5,500 km,
and largely was credited with banishing
nuclear missiles from Europe

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/23/bolton-inf-treaty-russia
-putin-moscow-meeting

---

Quote:

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_sharing

Nuclear sharing is a concept in NATO's policy of nuclear deterrence, which involves member countries without nuclear weapons of their own in the planning for the use of nuclear weapons by NATO. In particular, it provides for the armed forces of those countries to be involved in 'delivering' nuclear weapons in the event of their use.

As part of nuclear sharing, the participating countries ... maintain technical equipment (e.g., nuclear-capable airplanes) required for the use of nuclear weapons, and store nuclear weapons on their territory. In case of war, the United States told NATO allies the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) would no longer be controlling.[1]

Weapons provided for nuclear sharing (2015)
Country Base Estimated Bombs
Belgium Kleine Brogel 10~20
Germany Büchel =20
Italy Aviano 50
Italy Ghedi 20~40
Netherlands Volkel 10~20
Turkey Incirlik 50~90
5 nations 6 bases 160~240

---

Quote:

---

https://summit.news/2019/11/19/clinton-foundation-files-16-8-million-l
oss/

Clinton Foundation Files $16.8 MILLION Loss

Newly released tax records show that the foundation reported a loss of almost $17 million in 2018, to add to the net loss of $16.1 million the previous year in 2017.

The numbers don’t lie.

Total revenue reported for 2018 was just $30.7 million, less than a tenth of what was being pulled in While Hillary was Secretary of State.

Only $24.2 million was posted in grants and contributions, which constitutes a record low for the “charity.” Expenses amounted to $47.5 million, hence a loss of $16.8 million.

In 2009, the Clinton Foundation hauled in $249 million, and in the four years that followed, another $392.2 million in revenue poured in. In her last three years in office, 2014-16, the foundation raised a whopping $344.4 million.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

I always wondered why Hillary gave me a big case of the willies every time she tried to be charming. Now I know why:

HILLARY CLINTON, WARMONGER

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI: Sunday, March 13, 2016 9:56 PM

My god SIG. Is there anything about you that isn't doom and gloom? Is there anything about you that isn't hypocritical? voicing outrage about the behavior of Hillary Clinton while praising people like Putin and his Iranian allies.

Is there any part of you that isn't a warped and sick bitch? I am about finished with my BSW and I currently work in the mental health field. Trust me, you are one sick bitch.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

I agree about her hawkishness.

I was looking at her speech more indirectly. It seems to me that she wants to continue provoking Russia, under the assumption that Russia won't respond directly militarily, especially not with nuclear weapons. She's going to presume on Putin having endless restraint, though he's already said he'll use nuclear weapons if threatened. She seems like she'll keep poking the Russian (nuclear) bear with no goal or stopping point.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

What DOES that make her, I wonder? A democrapublican? A republocrat?- KIKI

I think the word you're searching for is "centrist".- KPO

---

I think the word you're searching for is "plutocrat".

The USA is an oligarchy and there's no getting around that fact. It's the wealthy who determine policy, not the people. And Hillary has her nose up the butts of the wealthiest of the (international wealthy) like Goldman Sachs. She's so much in the pocket of international capital, she doesn't need the (national) capitalists, like the Koch brothers, who are mere dirt under her fingernails.

---

Quote:

---

Prosecutor On Special Counsel Jack Smith's Team Shut Down FBI Investigation Into Clinton Foundation In 2016

A top prosecutor on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team recommended that the FBI shut down an investigation into the Clinton Foundation in 2016, despite ample evidence of suspicious activity related to hundreds of thousands of dollars in foreign transactions, Fox News reported.

In his May 2023 report on the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, Special Counsel John Durham identified Ray Hulser, the former chief of the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section (PIN), as the official who “declined prosecution” of the Clinton Foundation. Hulser now serves on Smith’s team currently prosecuting former President Donald Trump for alleged crimes related to January 6.

According to Durham’s report, in late 2014, the FBI began investigating a “well-placed” confidential source’s claims that two foreign governments had attempted to make illegal donations to buy influence with Hillary ahead of her presidential campaign.

By early 2016, three different FBI field offices, in Washington, D.C., Little Rock, Arkansas, and New York, had opened investigations into the Clinton Foundation for “possible criminal activity,” but Hulser shut them down, claiming there was “insufficient predication” for opening the investigations. He reportedly declined to prosecute during a meeting on February 1, 2016.

An individual present for the meeting told Durham that the Justice Department’s reaction to the Clinton Foundation briefing was “hostile.”

According to Durham’s report, the investigation out of Washington was opened as a “preliminary investigation, because the case agent wanted to determine if he could develop additional information to corroborate allegations in a recently-published book, ‘Clinton Cash’ by Peter Schweizer, before seeking to convert the matter to a full investigation.”

Durham asked Hulser about his decision to shut down the Clinton Foundation probes as part of his investigation. Hulser told Durham that he thought the “FBI briefing was poorly presented and that there was insufficient predication for at least one of the investigations due to its reliance on allegations contained in a book.”

However, the New York and Little Rock investigations included predication “based on source reporting that identified foreign governments that had made, or offered to make, contributions to the Foundation in exchange for favorable or preferential treatment from Clinton,” according to the special counsel’s report.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
My god SIG. Is there anything about you that isn't doom and gloom? Is there anything about you that isn't hypocritical? voicing outrage about the behavior of Hillary Clinton while praising people like Putin and his Iranian allies.

Is there any part of you that isn't a warped and sick bitch? I am about finished with my BSW and I currently work in the mental health field. Trust me, you are one sick bitch.

---

Anyone working in the mental health field would never call anyone a "sick bitch". You're either a liar, or you've chosen the wrong profession!

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

---