REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Trump shares call for media ‘accountability’ with ‘Charlie Kirk Act’ after shooting

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Sunday, September 14, 2025 21:43
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 275
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, September 14, 2025 9:14 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Trump shares viral video to rename Smith-Mundt Act to ‘Charlie Kirk Act’ following right-wing activist’s assassination

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/media-ce
nsorship-accountability-charlie-kirk-act-b2825988.html


This girl got her message out there to Trump and he reposted the video on Truth Social to let everyone know he saw it.

Quote:

Donald Trump has shared a video calling for the president to reinstate a Cold War-era media “accountability” law in response to the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, with a petition calling for its revival gathering more than 5,000 signatures within 13 hours.

Following the 31-year-old Kirk’s killing at Utah Valley University and the arrest of 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, TikTok user Ellie May called for the president to reintroduce the Smith-Mundt Act, a U.S. law once intended to prevent domestic dissemination of U.S.-backed foreign media, and to give it a new name: the “Charlie Kirk Act.”

May’s video went viral and was shared on the president’s Truth Social account.

In her video, May accused media outlets of “spreading propaganda” and conspiracy theories that spread rapidly across social media platforms.

AI-generated images and false claims misidentifying the suspect were among the content circulated, some of which gained additional reach via Grok, X’s AI chatbot. It reportedly acknowledged errors only after several false posts had already gone viral.

“I think the only way to bring forward decent change in this country is to start speaking up,” May told The Independent in a direct message on X.

“We had one Charlie Kirk before he passed since his death,” May added. “We have seen more people who have never put their faces in front of a camera start speaking truth to power. I think this is, not to play words on his organization, a turning point in our country.”

Changing the law would require an act of Congress.

In her TikTok video, where she largely reads from the Change.org petition she created, May, who told The Independent she only began engaging in elections in 2016, when she became eligible to vote, claims that media outlets frequently label individuals as “fascists,” “Nazis,” “white supremacists,” or “bigots” without evidence, fueling public hostility.

She argued that accountability should extend beyond traditional news outlets to include content creators who disseminate propaganda and half-truths online.

“Each violation should be subject to a fine amounting to at least 35 percent of the company's value,” May read from the online proposal she wrote. “Baseless accusations, such as labeling individuals as bigots, fascists, or racist, without verifiable proof, tarnish reputations and endanger lives. Such acts should not be tolerated and must invite strict accountability measures.”

Her petition, which has 5,000 signatures in less than a day since its launch, also includes the proposal of “stringent penalties for social media companies that censor information unfairly.”

“Each violation should be subject to a fine amounting to at least 35 percent of the company's value,” May wrote. “Baseless accusations, such as labeling individuals as bigots, fascists, or racist, without verifiable proof, tarnish reputations and endanger lives. Such acts should not be tolerated and must invite strict accountability measures.”

May told The Independent that the response to her petition has been “a lot more digestible” than she expected.

“Each time I check, it’s going up by about 100 signatures, so I feel like this could become a pivotal moment in American history,” she said. “If I were to ratio it percentage-wise, it’s about a 70-30, and the 70 percent are behind it.”

May called on Trump in her video to restore the Smith-Mundt Act, which she falsely claimed was abolished in 2013 by then-President Barack Obama and then-Vice President Joe Biden, and to rename it in Kirk’s honor.

Obama did not abolish the Smith-Mundt Act. Instead, his administration oversaw the passage of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which amended parts of the original law.

Nothing in that bill applies to what private media organizations in the can or cannot publish.

The original 1948 act created a ban on the domestic dissemination of informational materials produced by the U.S. government intended for foreign audiences, like those from the Voice of America.

The amendment, becoming effective on July 2, 2013, lifted the decades-old ban, so Americans can access content from the U.S. Agency for Global Media and the media organizations that it supports.

May also posted a follow-up video to X on Saturday addressing backlash she received for allegedly promoting media “censorship,” captioning the post, “Do not put words in my mouth that I didn’t say.”

“So here’s what we're not going to do: We're not going to conflate what I said with your feelings,” May said. “I'm not calling for censorship, I'm calling for media organizations to be held accountable for the ignorant s**t that they say.”

May criticized viral claims suggesting Robinson was a MAGA-aligned, ultra-conservative Republican, as well as proliferation of AI-doctored photos related to Robinson’s political views, including altered images of the shooter in MAGA apparel and allegedly fabricated screenshots showing donations to pro-Trump causes, which May insisted are entirely fake.

“That photo does not f***ing exist,” she said.

Erika Kirk, Charlie’s widow, vowed Friday to continue his legacy by advancing the right-wing movement he founded in an emotional tribute from Phoenix, Arizona.

As she addressed supporters, Erika, who is also the mother of their two young children, promised to grow Turning Point USA, the conservative youth organization her husband started, into “the biggest thing this nation has ever seen.”

Robinson is being held without bail at the Utah County Jail. He is expected to be formally charged with aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, and obstruction of justice.

Aggravated murder is a capital felony under Utah law, which means if convicted, Robinson could face the death penalty.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 14, 2025 9:49 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


saying the Emperor has no clothes is banned

want to talk about Palestine babies dying...that's banned...dont cheer Israeli bombings with their Zionist Warmongering...Jail! are you Hitler? did you mention Epstein or the Debts? or criticize Bush or Lindsey Graham? some new ‘accountability’ is coming for you!

Never let a crisis go to waste?

and those European, Roman, Greek, Spanish, German, Italian, French events leading to their civil wars, Ein Aphorismus ist ein selbständiger einzelner Gedanke...Un proverbe est une formule langagière...
The quote "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"

yeah there was the 'Patriot Act'

and before 911 they already had Laws for dealing with terroristic threats, plannings, crazy people and bombings

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 14, 2025 2:51 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Trump shares viral video to rename Smith-Mundt Act to ‘Charlie Kirk Act’ following right-wing activist’s assassination

Wondering where 6ixStringJack got his obsession about murdering every Democrat?

Trump Just Went on Fox and Issued an Unnerving Threat Against Liberals

https://newrepublic.com/article/200410/trump-issued-unnerving-threat-l
iberals


Imagine that President Donald Trump actively wanted to encourage radical right-wing groups and “lone wolf” individuals to wage open violent warfare on anyone they deem a leftist anywhere in America. If Trump wanted to send that precise message, he could hardly do much better than the words he actually did deliver on Fox and Friends on Friday morning.

“We have radicals on the right, as well—we have radicals on the left,” Fox’s Ainsley Earhardt said as Trump listened during a discussion about the recently assassinated Charlie Kirk. Earhardt continued: “How do we fix this country?”

“I’ll tell you something that’s going to get me in trouble, but I couldn’t care less,” Trump replied. “The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don’t want to see crime. They’re saying, ‘We don’t want these people coming in. We don’t want you burning our shopping centers. We don’t want you shooting our people in the middle of the street.’”

Trump concluded: “The radicals on the left are the problem.”

This exchange is being vastly overshadowed by the arrest of Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old unaffiliated voter in Utah, for allegedly assassinating Kirk. But whatever more we learn about Robinson, this Trump moment mustn’t skate by unnoticed. Though Trump has encouraged right-wing political violence for years—including inciting a violent insurrection and pardoning hundreds of supporters for it—he has also been known to rhetorically denounce political violence from both sides at key moments, or has gone through the motions of doing so.

But now Trump has broken with even that ritual, one enacted by presidents in both parties for decades. “I couldn’t care less” about radicals on the right, Trump explicitly said, declaring straight out that right-wing extremism is justified as a response to the alleged extremism of the left.

That is likely to be received as a clear message by radical right-wing forces across the country. Kirk’s assassination has triggered many on the right to call for full-scale violent civil conflict. “Charlie tried to have conversations with you on the left, and you killed him for it,” seethed influencer Matt Walsh, calling on the right to “fight back” in response. Libs of TikTok screamed: “THIS IS WAR.”

Notably, those calls to arms came well before we knew anything about Kirk’s alleged assassin. These declarations openly, unabashedly declare that the right has now been given the excuse it needs to wage open season on the left. On Fox, Trump has basically given this the green light.

“That statement is basically a permission slip,” said Jared Holt, who tracks extremist activity for the online research group Open Measures. Holt means this in two senses: Trump’s statement offers permission to broader mainstream audiences to write off the importance of radical right-wing violence, and is also aimed at right-wing extremist activity itself.

“It’s very likely that radical right groups that talk about Trump’s statement are going to view it as an indirect endorsement,” Holt added.

Kirk’s murder has ignited the perennial online war over which “side” is more guilty of political violence. Here’s a very partial list of prominent horrors: Aimed at the right we’ve seen the gristly shooting of Representative Steve Scalise, the two assassination attempts on Trump, and now the killing of Kirk. In the other direction, we’ve had numerous mass shootings motivated by “great replacement theory,” the vicious assault on Nancy Pelosi’s husband, the assassination of a Democratic state legislator in Minnesota, and of course the January 6 insurrection.

Kirk’s alleged assassin was apparently in the grip of a bundle of incoherent views rooted in extensive online meme brainrot. Perhaps he will turn out to be “more” left than right; perhaps not. But either way, to engage in these comparisons at times like these is to fight on the wrong field.

When certain far-right voices vow retribution in response to Kirk’s murder, they’re seizing on it as a bad-faith pretext to wage open warfare on liberals and leftists who are not guilty of any political violence at all. As Brian Beutler notes, only the right’s major institutional players do this.

Put another way: No amount of reasoning about who actually has waged political violence and who has not—or about who has actually been victimized and who has not—can make headway against that push. The entire point of it is to fake-justify the targeting of innocents.

Look at what the president said just after the assassination of Kirk:

For years those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country and must stop right now. My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges and law enforcement officials.

As Jonathan Chait notes, here Trump treats political violence as if it only exists on one side of the spectrum. I’d add something else: I’m unaware of any other recent president explicitly vowing to unleash the power of the American state on a vast, inchoate ideological group in quite this way.

Trump’s wording in this prewritten speech is deliberate: He says his administration will target everyone it can find who contributed to the assassination of Kirk. The clear message is that anyone who can be blamed for Kirk’s death even speciously and pretextually is now subject to retribution by the full force of the government and Trump’s security services. Note that this includes liberal-left “organizations” as well.

It shouldn’t escape notice that Stephen Miller recently called the entire Democratic Party a “domestic extremist organization,” or that Miller is a close ally of FBI Director Kash Patel. One imagines that Miller is whispering in Trump’s ear that Kirk’s assassination frees him to defy the courts with abandon and is conspiring with Patel to draw up plans for going after “domestic extremist” Democrats in what could look like a revival of the FBI domestic political spying of the 1960s.

If you think that sounds far-fetched, note that leading MAGA figures very much expect something like this, as these examples collected by Zack Beauchamp document:

We need whistleblowers right now more than ever: If the FBI gets enlisted in this threatened campaign of state retribution—which seems likely, given that Patel vowed exactly this before Trump won—we need to know what sort of planning for this is taking place on the inside. And now that Trump has declared right-wing extremist targeting of the left fully justified, we also need to know if the FBI is further turning a blind eye to far-right paramilitary mobilizations.

Obviously, presidents are supposed to try to calm tensions at such times, which is why they usually call for restraint on both sides. True, invoking a “norm” like this one seems preciously naïve when the authoritarian president is openly waging war against blue America on many fronts. But let’s not forget that there’s a reason presidents have typically denounced political violence on both sides: What presidents say on this topic matters.

“When any national political leader blames the other party for political violence, this only raises the temperature on both sides,” University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape, who researches the issue, tells me.

Pape says Trump’s statement on Fox represents something new. “There’s never been a president in our lifetimes who has excused political violence on his own side,” Pape notes, adding that Trump should instead “restrain extremist responses to the assassination of Kirk.”

Unfortunately, that’s not what Trump is doing at all. At a time when some of his most prominent supporters are calling for open season on liberals and the left, he’s functionally saying: Go for it. The MAGA-captured American state has your back. We’re behind you all the way.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, September 14, 2025 9:43 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Trump shares viral video to rename Smith-Mundt Act to ‘Charlie Kirk Act’ following right-wing activist’s assassination

Wondering where 6ixStringJack got his obsession about murdering every Democrat?



I've never once said or even insinuated that I wanted to murder any Democrat, let alone every Democrat.

This is you once again projecting YOUR own evil onto other people.

I will ruin your life though. And if you continue to address me, maybe I'll make you wish that you were dead, perhaps.


And I told you to tell Ted to shut his yap. You did not heed my warning.

You can thank him for you both being reported tonight.

Good luck. You'll need it.


P.S. Here is the link to your very long list of calls for assassinations against Politicians, Judges and Civilians you don't agree with:

http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=65116

--------------------------------------------------

The Democrats are the party of Murder.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:54 - 274 posts
FBI Director: "Scores" Of Search Warrants For "Shocking" Discord Chat Room, Kirk Shooter Wrote About Left-Political Motive
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:49 - 2 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:46 - 5941 posts
Kathy Hochel just backed the Communist
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:42 - 3 posts
FACTS
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:40 - 659 posts
A Sampler of Ted's "friends" at Fireflyfans.net
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:26 - 1 posts
No More Identity Politics
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:13 - 110 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:09 - 3303 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Mon, September 15, 2025 13:08 - 973 posts
Let The Hypocrisy Begin
Mon, September 15, 2025 12:58 - 208 posts
Expose Charlie's Murderers
Mon, September 15, 2025 12:34 - 5 posts
The "No Shit" Files: Wikipedia blacklists conservative sources in favor of left-wing bias
Mon, September 15, 2025 12:08 - 5 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL