Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Andy Mcnab and the war on terror
Friday, July 29, 2005 3:55 PM
CITIZEN
Quote: For the oil, thats it. The first attacks in the war weren't on the mainland - they were on oil rigs. Saddam wasn't a threat. You can moan about it from a moral point of view, but if you were paying £8 a gallon, there'd be riots in the streets. Iran's got a lot of gas, so it'll be interesting to see what happens next.
Quote: This is where you sieze a suspect for interrogation. Western goverments want to keep to their civil liberties laws, so you lift a suspect from the streets and fly them to a friendly country - often Pakistan or a north African country. Western goverments can then say, "We don't torture anyone." You just get someone in another country to do it for you.
Quote: Britain and America will want it to look like we've come home. But there's no exit plan. The US will be enclosed in their military cities, and we'll have our little bit down south. We'll say we've handed over to the Iraqi military, but we'll still have a huge military presence, because the troops who are no longer in Saudi will be stationed in Iraq instead.
Friday, July 29, 2005 4:04 PM
SERGEANTX
Friday, July 29, 2005 4:07 PM
Friday, July 29, 2005 4:08 PM
MOHRSTOUTBEARD
Friday, July 29, 2005 4:12 PM
INEVITABLEBETRAYAL
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Just read a few choice quotes from Andy McNab (ex-SAS, served in the 1st gulf war in the legendary Bravo Two Zero) : Why are we really in Iraq? Quote: For the oil, thats it. The first attacks in the war weren't on the mainland - they were on oil rigs.
Quote: For the oil, thats it. The first attacks in the war weren't on the mainland - they were on oil rigs.
Friday, July 29, 2005 4:15 PM
Quote:Originally posted by InevitableBetrayal: Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Just read a few choice quotes from Andy McNab (ex-SAS, served in the 1st gulf war in the legendary Bravo Two Zero) : Why are we really in Iraq? Quote: For the oil, thats it. The first attacks in the war weren't on the mainland - they were on oil rigs. I was involved on the "attacks" on the oil rigs. Our purpose wasn't to take them over so that America could have more oil. It was to prevent Hussein from causing mass ecological disaster as he did setting the Kuwaiti oilfields on fire during the Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait. We had figures in hand concerning how much oil would spill into the gulf if those things were destroyed, and so we acted to prevent that catastrophe from taking place. Don't take Andy McNab's word for it. He's acting on supposition without first hand knowledge. I was there. I was involved. It wasn't a hostile take over for oil that motivated us to grab those GOPLATS. It was to prevent ecological disaster. _______________________________________________ I wish I had a magical wish-granting plank.
Friday, July 29, 2005 6:05 PM
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Who said I hate America, exactly?
Friday, July 29, 2005 6:22 PM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Friday, July 29, 2005 6:26 PM
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Quote:Originally posted by InevitableBetrayal: Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Just read a few choice quotes from Andy McNab (ex-SAS, served in the 1st gulf war in the legendary Bravo Two Zero) : Why are we really in Iraq? Quote: For the oil, thats it. The first attacks in the war weren't on the mainland - they were on oil rigs. I was involved on the "attacks" on the oil rigs. Our purpose wasn't to take them over so that America could have more oil. It was to prevent Hussein from causing mass ecological disaster as he did setting the Kuwaiti oilfields on fire during the Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait. We had figures in hand concerning how much oil would spill into the gulf if those things were destroyed, and so we acted to prevent that catastrophe from taking place. Don't take Andy McNab's word for it. He's acting on supposition without first hand knowledge. I was there. I was involved. It wasn't a hostile take over for oil that motivated us to grab those GOPLATS. It was to prevent ecological disaster. _______________________________________________ I wish I had a magical wish-granting plank. I can accept that, its not without presedent, I suppose... But, come on, Oil is at least one of the motivations for the war.
Friday, July 29, 2005 6:27 PM
HKCAVALIER
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: We really don't hate Muslims, it's their religion.
Friday, July 29, 2005 7:24 PM
FINN MAC CUMHAL
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: But, come on, Oil is at least one of the motivations for the war.
Friday, July 29, 2005 8:13 PM
GINOBIFFARONI
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Just read a few choice quotes from Andy McNab (ex-SAS, served in the 1st gulf war in the legendary Bravo Two Zero) : Why are we really in Iraq? Quote: For the oil, thats it. The first attacks in the war weren't on the mainland - they were on oil rigs. Saddam wasn't a threat. You can moan about it from a moral point of view, but if you were paying £8 a gallon, there'd be riots in the streets. Iran's got a lot of gas, so it'll be interesting to see what happens next. Rendition: Quote: This is where you sieze a suspect for interrogation. Western goverments want to keep to their civil liberties laws, so you lift a suspect from the streets and fly them to a friendly country - often Pakistan or a north African country. Western goverments can then say, "We don't torture anyone." You just get someone in another country to do it for you. When will our troops come home? Quote: Britain and America will want it to look like we've come home. But there's no exit plan. The US will be enclosed in their military cities, and we'll have our little bit down south. We'll say we've handed over to the Iraqi military, but we'll still have a huge military presence, because the troops who are no longer in Saudi will be stationed in Iraq instead. A woman drove me to drink and I didn't even have the decency to thank her. --W.C. Fields
Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:05 AM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:48 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Saturday, July 30, 2005 5:00 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: We're still in Bosnia, aren't we? Clinton said we'd be out of there by Christmas ( never said what year, though) Some exit strategy we've got there too.
Saturday, July 30, 2005 5:30 AM
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: erm, if you gave my a reason as to why you were asking why I might be able to tell you...
Saturday, July 30, 2005 5:38 AM
Quote: Whats so criminal about not wanting a tyrannical dictator holding the Western world hostage with high oil prices ? Or him using the $$ from oil sales to build up his army (again)??
Quote: Why do I need to give you a reason? Is the answer you give going to be dependent on my I’m asking, and if so, why?
Saturday, July 30, 2005 5:51 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Whats so criminal about not wanting a tyrannical dictator holding the Western world hostage with high oil prices ? Or him using the $$ from oil sales to build up his army (again)?? We're still in Bosnia, aren't we? Clinton said we'd be out of there by Christmas ( never said what year, though) Some exit strategy we've got there too. " They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
Saturday, July 30, 2005 8:05 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Whats so criminal about not wanting a tyrannical dictator holding the Western world hostage with high oil prices?
Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:29 AM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:45 AM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 10:03 AM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 10:56 AM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:28 AM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:42 AM
Quote:Originally posted by HKCavalier: I really think a lot of Finn's points here are valid. The War for Oil argument has always seemed to me be too simple and too simply a slam against the Administration. It really doesn't belong in the discussion any more than the statement "The Bush Administration is a bunch of corrupt mothers!" The War for Oil argument really undermines any discussion. There is no evidence other than a kind of look-at-the-big-picture gestalt. Am I wrong about this?
Saturday, July 30, 2005 12:56 PM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:15 PM
Quote:Originally posted by GinoBiffaroni: Thats is an interesting arguement..... kinda leads to questions like if atomic weapons were available before the defeat of Germany, would they have been used... or is that sort of thing reserved to the yellow, black, or brown of this world.
Saturday, July 30, 2005 3:19 PM
Quote:original post by lynchaj: If cheap oil was all the US wanted we would have just white washed the UN weapons inspection program and lifted the sanctions at any time. Presto, cheap Iraqi oil floods the market...
Quote: "I did not think so at first. But the US is incredibly dependent on oil," news agency TT quoted Blix as saying at a security seminar in Stockholm. "They wanted to secure oil in case competition on the world market becomes too hard."
Quote: Iraq has the second largest proven reserves of oil in the world, behind only Saudi Arabia. 112 billion barrels lie below the country's desert sands, together with another probable 220 billion barrels of unproven reserves. What's more, the US Department of Energy says, "Iraq's true resource potential may be far greater, as the country is relatively unexplored due to years of war and sanctions." This, plus the fact that "Iraq's oil production costs are among the lowest in the world, makes it a highly attractive oil prospect," says the department's latest country analysis. No wonder many critics believe that the campaign to topple Saddam Hussein is really a battle for Iraq's oil.
Saturday, July 30, 2005 4:22 PM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 7:56 PM
Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:29 PM
SIGMANUNKI
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL