REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Bush versus the CIA

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, August 26, 2005 09:21
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1280
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, July 23, 2005 4:29 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Ex-CIA official blasts Bush on leak of operative's name
www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/23/dems.radio/index.html

Quote:

(CNN) -- A former CIA intelligence official who once worked with Valerie Plame blasted President Bush and his administration for their response to the role of top White House aides in allegedly leaking Plame's identity as a CIA operative.

... Johnson, a registered Republican who voted for Bush in 2000, said he and Plame have been friends since they began their training at the CIA in 1985... In Saturday's radio address, Johnson said he was "stunned" by government officials' "ignorance about a matter so basic to the national security structure of the nation."

He strongly responded to some Republican allegations that minimized Plame's role in the CIA. "We must put to bed the lie that she was not undercover," he said.

"Instead of a president concerned first and foremost with protecting this country and the intelligence officers who serve it, we are confronted with a president who is willing to sit by while political operatives savage the reputations of good Americans like Valerie and Joe Wilson."



He also said that not punishing Rove sends the message to operatives and their contacts abroad that their work and identities will not be protected by the White House.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:38 AM

CHRISISALL


But according to Hero, isn't that whole thing like, a non-event? I mean, nobody died, or nuthin'...



If I was undercover in another country, I'd be damn nervous about now Chrisisall
PLUS: What's his dad think of this?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:40 AM

SPINLAND


The CIA needs to "take out" Rove. Non-violently, of course.

----
I can see you.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:15 PM

HKCAVALIER


Someplace nice, with candles?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:18 PM

CHRISISALL


Everything is a joke to you, right? lol

And you're not funny, lol, at all!

lol

Can't stop the funny Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:32 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
But according to Hero, isn't that whole thing like, a non-event? I mean, nobody died, or nuthin'...



I don't know about it being a non-event, but Plame apparantly outed herself years before it was published. She told her husband and thats illegal.

Further, she was a former covert operative and the law only applies to current and recent covert operatives and her service was well outside the legal limit.

It was common knowledge who she was, who she was married to (it was printed in the Who's Who magazine), and people who knew her knew where she worked.

So if anybody should be punished it should be her and Bob Novak.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:23 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


1) You are allowed to tell a few people on a need to know basis - usually a spouse

2) She was an active, not former operative, and made many recent job-related overseas trips

3) it was common knowledge she was Wilson's wife, it was NOT common knowledge she was an operative; on the flip side even her equally undercover co-workers did not know her civilian identity; and while the location of her office may have been able to be discerned, her job in that office was not

4) Novak is a scumbag


Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:07 PM

PERFESSERGEE


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
But according to Hero, isn't that whole thing like, a non-event? I mean, nobody died, or nuthin'...



I don't know about it being a non-event, but Plame apparantly outed herself years before it was published. She told her husband and thats illegal.

Further, she was a former covert operative and the law only applies to current and recent covert operatives and her service was well outside the legal limit.

It was common knowledge who she was, who she was married to (it was printed in the Who's Who magazine), and people who knew her knew where she worked.

So if anybody should be punished it should be her and Bob Novak.

H



OK, I'm in complete agreement that Bob Novak should be in jail. Hypocrite scumbags deserve their own Special Hell. But, when apologists for those who are in power are involved, I'm not gonna hold my breath for even an instant (there's this little trivial issue of "who is going to prosecute"? Uh, those in power? Yeah, right).

But now I'm going to have to shout, Hero: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU THAT YOU THINK THAT THE VICTIM SHOULD BE PUNISHED? Is this how the prosecuting attorneys work in your district? If this is how you view the victim, then damn I'm glad that none of my family or friends live there.

And I've already self-censored. You should have seen my first response.


perfessergee

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 25, 2005 8:13 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by perfessergee:
But now I'm going to have to shout, Hero: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU THAT YOU THINK THAT THE VICTIM SHOULD BE PUNISHED? Is this how the prosecuting attorneys work in your district? If this is how you view the victim, then damn I'm glad that none of my family or friends live there.

And I've already self-censored. You should have seen my first response.


perfessergee



We've yet to hear the real story on Hero. It's been suggested he's a mutant cyborg, bent on the destruction of all humanity. Or just an asshole. The truth may be even more frightening than our worst nightmares.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 12:00 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Still not convinced it was Bush or Rove. Why? Because it doesn't get them anything, that's why. Plame's name was already out there, she wasn't on any list of protected names, and it hasn't benefited the W.H. in any way what so ever. If anything, it's been blown way out of proportion.

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 3:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Some people have their heads so far up that it would require a major transplant to correct. Even with the best pre-surgical preparation the patient might die from the shock of sudden brain activity. Hospital committees have already turned down the procedure, but in I am kindly volunteeering my surgical services for humanitarian purposes. The fact that I have no formal training just indicates how deeply I feel that people should not be forced to live with such horrible defects. But I promise to take out a really really well-funded umbrella liability policy just in case.


Sorry folks. It was either that or spew all over the inet.
-----------------------

When I originally posted this, I didn't have time to follow up with more info. I realized how deeply this touched CIA when I heard one anonymous officer on-air. He was voice-shakingly angry and upset and he knew EXACTLY who was responsible. "Let's just say that it's someone in the Old Executive Building". I didn't expect to hear that from someone who's spent a whole career cooly thinking the unthinkable. And I REALLY didn't expect to hear it on-air from someone who's spent a whole career staying in the shadows. I'd known for a while that things weren't going well between the CIA and the WH, but I didn't realize the emotional impact this had in the agency. But because of that one interview, I wondered if at least SOME people in the CIA would want do what they normally do with unfriendly governments....

To add evidence on this very serious turf struggle: When Bush was fixing Iraq intelligence around the policy, he made a POINT of bypassing the CIA by forming the Office of Special Plans. This group was specifically designed to avoid normal CIA intelligence- vetting procedure which would likely have eliminated many of Bush's rationalizations for going to war. The CIA had already discredited Chalabi, and most of the so-called intelligence on Iraq came from that group. To then get publically blamed for "bad intelligence" must have steamed many CIA officers.

Meanwhile, back in Iraq... Chalabi- who had been appointed to the Iraq Governing Council (IGC) by the White House was summarily raided by USA officials and accused of spying for Iran. www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120535,00.html Most importantly "White House officials said President Bush did not order the action.". The raid resulted in replacing neo-con friendly IGC with CIA-friendly Allawi. Sounds ike a "soft coup".

Tenet resigned his position as director of the CIA. Altho appointed by Clinton, Tenet carried a lot of water for the Bush admin in the buildup to the Iraq war, and w/o knowing the full story of exactly why he resigned I believe it was to protect him from fallout. (He was the one in the background of Bush's speeches looking like a black-eyed dyspeptic.) He was subsequently replaced by Porter Goss, whose abrasive and unprofessional insistance that the CIA stay "on message" with the WH caused several resignations of high-ranking, effective, experienced officers from the CIA.

And finally, the head of the CIA is no longer the chief intelligence person in the USA. Up until the creation of the "Director of National Intelligence" www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/02/17/intelligence.chief/
the CIA Director has done double-duty as both CIA head AND as head of all intelligence agencies including the DIA, FBI, Secret Service, and NSA. They CIA Director gave the President the daily intelligence briefing. THAT function in now performed by Honduran death-squad promoter Negroponte, who has been loyal to the Bush family through decades.

The funny thing is, Bush hasn't got the memo yet. He refers to Negroponte as "that CIA guy".
---------------------------

You all may be asking "Where this thread is going?" Well... nowhere, really. I'm not a great fan of the CIA which certainly has it's share of dirty tricks in it history. Just adding to the pile with the hope that it may help someone else clarify what's going on. When that happens, I hope they'll post back.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 6:11 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So, speaking of the devil....

Quote:

CIA review urges disciplinary proceedings for top officials

Friday, August 26, 2005; Posted: 9:56 a.m. EDT (13:56 GMT)


CIA Director Porter Goss must decide whether to heed the recommendation of his top watchdog to hold disciplinary reviews for current and former officials who were involved in faulty intelligence efforts before the September 11 attacks. The proceedings, formally called an accountability board, were recommended by the CIA inspector general, John Helgerson... Among those singled out for criticism are former CIA Director George Tenet former clandestine service chief Jim Pavitt and former counterterrorism center head Cofer Black.


www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/08/26/cia.report.ap/index.html

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 6:38 AM

SEVENPERCENT


On an amusing (at least to myself) and almost unrelated sidenote to this thread, I have a great picture I took of a sign that sits on a highway leading into Washington D.C. It's for the George Bush Center for Intelligence, and while it is in relation to the prior GB and the CIA, in regards to this admin it struck me as exceptionally hi-larious. I laughed every day I passed it, and finally had to stop and take a picture.

Okay, end threadjack, carry on.

------------------------------------------
He looked bigger when I couldn't see him.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 6:59 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by perfessergee:
OK, I'm in complete agreement that Bob Novak should be in jail. Hypocrite scumbags deserve their own Special Hell. But, when apologists for those who are in power are involved, I'm not gonna hold my breath for even an instant (there's this little trivial issue of "who is going to prosecute"? Uh, those in power? Yeah, right).


Excellent point. Watching from a professional standpoint, however, it seems the Prosecutor is doing a pretty good job. If these reporters would stop protecting their sources then we'd know. Unlike most prosecutors I believe in Reporter-Source confidentiality. But I think the protection should be limited and must NEVER apply to cases of national security which this is.

My view is that while Rove was not the primary source, he likely did serve the function of secondary source, ie the person you call to comment on the accuracy of the primary source. Otherwise, why is this lady in jail protecting someone who gave permission to the reporters to divulge his name and who everyone already "knows" is the source? The answer is that, in fact, he is NOT her source. An answer confirmed by Novak who revealed that his source was not a person, but rather a number of people and publications including Ambassador Wilson and his wife. Her continued detention suggests a singular source for her, not Novak's general source and one who is NOT Carl Rove. I suggest someone at the CIA or DNC who was looking to discredit Rove and the White House, but I have no proof.
Quote:


But now I'm going to have to shout, Hero: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU THAT YOU THINK THAT THE VICTIM SHOULD BE PUNISHED?


No need to shout, its a legitimate question.

If she broke the law by breaking her own cover, then she is both the victim and the criminal actor. Thus, she should be punished accordingly. In this case her punishment was to be removed from Covert status and assigned a "desk" position at Langley. Given the circumstances I find that sufficient.

Has she been further victimized by the articles mentioning her? Perhaps. But ultimately the responsibility lies with her bad choices. As distastful as it is, the reporters and whoever may have supplied them with the information, most likely did not break the law and thus it is unlikely they will be punished except in the court of public opinion. Novak has lost his job and his cool, and the other reporters have lost credibility and one is sitting in jail. It is unlikely to go much further then that. Unless Carl Rove specifically took an action that causes him to lose the trust of the President, then its unlikely any punishment will or should come to him.
Quote:

Is this how the prosecuting attorneys work in your district?


Why yes, yes it is. (Evil laugh) It often works out that the victim must face some form of punishment. For example, a man hits his live-in girlfriend who calls the police and has him arrested. On the day of trial she tearfully admits to lying in order to get her boyfriend out of jail because she loves him SO MUCH. We charge her with lying to police because she either lied the night they came (unlikely given her busted lip) or she is lying the day of trial. Either way her lies will result in a jail sentence and a record.
Quote:


If this is how you view the victim, then damn I'm glad that none of my family or friends live there.


I am glad you don't live here as well. I'm sure you and your family are much happier in Fantasyland.

I've been a prosecutor long enough to know that victims are not always innocent. I feel bad for them, I treat them as gently and with as much respect as possible, by my responsibilty is to the ONLY innocent victim that is ever present in the Courtroom and that is the State. The State plays no role in driving drunk, beating wives, robbing mini-marts, or any other offense you can think of. Yet the State is harmed in some small way by every crime be it speeding to murder.

That's reality, if you want to see it yourself check out Cops, Court TV, or your local court's morning arraignments.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 9:15 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


This article seems to be pretty insightful. It acknowledges the longstanding WH/ DOD animosity towards the CIA and traces some of the reasons. (There are at least two issues here: 9-11 and Iraq... and no matter how much some people might like to link them, there is no link at all. The CIA bungled one and nailed the other.)
www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-na-leak25aug25,1,2643475.story
One of the things that caught my eye was an indication of the source of WHERE the info came from about Plame's real identity. Rove said he heard it from reporters. But it originally came from....
Quote:

After a June 12 Washington Post story made reference to the Niger uranium inquiry, Armitage asked intelligence officers in the State Department for more information. He was forwarded a copy of a memo classified "Secret" that included a description of Wilson's trip for the CIA, his findings, a brief description of the origin of the trip and a reference to "Wilson's wife."

The memo was kept in a safe at the State Department along with notes from an analyst who attended the CIA meeting at which Wilson was suggested for the Niger assignment....
The next day, July 7, this memo and the notes were removed from the safe and forwarded to Powell via a secure fax line to Air Force One. ... Powell told prosecutors that he circulated the memo among those traveling with him in the front section of Air Force One.

In terms of its impact, the article says
Quote:

Plame suppressed her anger by compiling a list of the things she had to do to protect information and two decades' worth of contacts overseas. An entire career, she told her husband, had gone down the tubes.
According to other articles, some CIA officers say that at least one star (dedicted to the death of each CIA officer) was due to Plame's outing.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 26, 2005 9:21 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I've been a prosecutor long enough to know that victims are not always innocent.
I've lived long enough to know that NOBODY is always innocent. But nonetheless Valerie did not "out" herself and she broke no laws in this matter.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russian losses in Ukraine
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:32 - 1163 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:10 - 45 posts
Salon: How to gather with grace after that election
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:04 - 1 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:59 - 215 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:58 - 1540 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:46 - 650 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:41 - 4847 posts
Dubai goes bankrupt, kosher Rothschilds win the spoils
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:31 - 5 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:29 - 7515 posts
Jean-Luc Brunel, fashion mogul Peter Nygard linked to Epstein
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:27 - 14 posts
All things Space
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:17 - 270 posts
White Woman Gets Murdered, Race Baiters Most Affected
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:40 - 20 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL