REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

There is a God, or There is no god the next generation

POSTED BY: CITIZEN
UPDATED: Thursday, August 24, 2006 16:57
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 10122
PAGE 2 of 3

Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:39 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
if the #1 commandment according to Jesus(God manifest) was "love your neighbor as yourself. for love does no harm", how can you truly claim their actions to be Christian? is not the saying "actions speak louder than words?"


Just a nitpick Second, not first. Give a quick re-read to Matthew. This is one of the stories that I thought was pretty cool.

Okay, back to lurking on this thread. My childhood fundie took over for a second.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:55 PM

ANTIMASON


Citizen-- it appears as though you can trace Christianity closer to its source then any other religion; by that i mean the number and accuracy of translations, dating closer to the time the events took place, and when they were recorded and began circulating.

Most the NT was written within Jesus' lifetime with little dispute, but even liberal scholars hold to within a century. relatively speaking, this is closer than any of the other beleifs i know of. Jesus picked up from the Jews, so was a fullfillment of their scriptures and recordings; and i would argue that the Qurans message is not consistant with the Bibles in that it denies Jesus' deity. since it was written centuries afterwards, they have no proof do deny the ressurection, so the contradictions cant be justified. and we have third party corroboration:

"Further support for the Bible comes from the fact that events of the New Testament are supported by writings outside the Bible. Corroboration is available from at least 17 non-Christian sources from antiquity. (Examples: Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the Younger, Epictetus, Lucian, Aristides, Josephus, etc.)" http://faithfacts.gospelcom.net/quest_bible_true.html

Buddha was just a man, and his message was indoctrined over a few centuries after his death, and this knowledge is based on later sources apparently; if im not mistaken. im not even denying his message, because there are universal truths..but he was only a man. Jesus' calim was God manifest! atleast with the NT, we have thousands of copies of manuscripts, in different languages, which go all the way back to within a century of Jesus' lifetime, including unbiased corroboration.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 12:59 PM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

Originally posted by SoupCatcher:
Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
if the #1 commandment according to Jesus(God manifest) was "love your neighbor as yourself. for love does no harm", how can you truly claim their actions to be Christian? is not the saying "actions speak louder than words?"


Just a nitpick Second, not first. Give a quick re-read to Matthew. This is one of the stories that I thought was pretty cool.

Okay, back to lurking on this thread. My childhood fundie took over for a second.



ill agree, Jesus says "the greatest commandment is love God above all others, and love your neighbor as yourself" but my arguement would be that they are the same thing, if loving God infinitly leads to all encompassing love

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 1:49 PM

CITIZEN


Antimason:
Actually I thought that the NT was mostly written after Jesus' death. The point I was trying to make is that all religions are backed up by eye witness accounts, we either believe they are all true, or that they all have the same weight, or we demand more than just eye witness accounts.

Whatever the truth is either way it is unreasonable to assume that eye witness accounts dictated by words on paper across millennia can hold the same weight on a scientific standard as theories like the Big Bang or evolution. Even the Catholic Church agrees, they've adopted the Big Bang as Gods method of creation.

Yes there's third party corroboration to the Bible, this is hardly surprising since the bible is at least partially an historic document, but it hardly means ergo everything in the Bible is correct.

Point is we can’t just play favourites with the eye witness accounts here.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 1:52 PM

DREAMTROVE


HK

Non-human intelligence is not paranormal. In fact it's amazingly normal. Humans are not the most intelligent animal on the earth, and on occassion they become very run of the mill. On the beach where I vacation there's a beautiful sculpture of an egret, oit of an oyster bed, which was at least allegedly made by the egrets who live there, and I see no reason to doubt it. There are countless examples in nature or representitive art, communication etc. If all ants talk to other ants, eventually what ants do on one side of the world will resemble those the other side.

I don't buy into this eeire supernatural influence, I just think we're not alone, on this earth, there's animals and bugs and stuff here. You add their brain masses together and it way outweighs ours.

Here's a sobering tidbit. Humans are getting dumberm and have been for the last 40,000 years, at their last smart peak. It was about the same height as their previous smart peak, closer to a million years ago. Dogs have been on the brain decline a little longer, 100-150,000 years. At the moment when dogs and humans created their relationship, humans were near a low, and dogs were at a high, and brain-bodyweight indicates that at the time, about 100,000 years ago, dogs were smarter than people. Kinda makes one think, I'm not sure what, but I found it interesting.

Of course, in sci-fi land, one can consider a future in which humans have descended to their nadir, which is about cat-level of intelligence, and some other species is ruling the earth, say. meerkats. The top meerkat scholars will review the remains of our civilization and argue that it is not possible that the cat-brained humans built this world, as the looney professor mongoose suggests, but that instead, manhatten was built by an early evolution of meerkat, who was larger, and somewhat human-looking.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 2:48 PM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
I thought that's what I did when I said "it almost seems like"?

What, are you saying I was being defensive? Okay, so perhaps I was being a little defensive. Somehow you and I got off on a wrong foot and I was by this point in our discussion anticipating that you would misunderstand. Okay, so, no "perhaps"--I was being defensive.
Quote:

I see your sentiment, but not everyone can be a monk, and surely an individual like a monk or a priest who devotes their life to the understanding of these matters will have something to teach those of us who don't have the time or even the inclination to devote that sort of time to those pursuits? Would they not be able to help us, could they not have gained some insight that we may not be able to gain simply because they devote their entire life to these issues where as we do not?
I think I'm making a plea for a healthy self respect. Yes, go get a teacher, go talk to a specialist in those areas you are inexpert, but always stay true to your intuition and check in with yourself regularly to see if this teacher you've found is still the right one.

You know, people throughout the world will often put a chest or table in the entry way to their homes. They'll hang a mirror above it and put a vase of cut flowers on it to welcome visitors. Now they don't know that they've created an altar such as people made 1500 years ago throughout Europe to honor the Goddess, but it seems right to them. Having studied human spiritual practice from a bazillion angles I've come to understand that all sorts of ostensibly nonspiritual people have an excellent intuitive grasp of the spiritual. In some ways, all you need to be a spiritual person is to be open-minded, physically healthy (or healing) and know how to have fun. If everyone had these three areas covered the world would be in much better shape.
Quote:

Well the three Abrahamic religions trace their routes back to the cult of a Canaanite war god, so it's hardly surprising to me that they all share a certain darkness. But they aren't the only religions in the world, Buddhism is a religion for instance, I'm not sure we can condemn religion on the example of the Abrahamic.
Well then we get into semantics, 'cause I wouldn't call Buddhism a religion like the Abrahamic threesome. If it is a religion, it's a lot closer to the various aboriginal spiritualities on the planet. People who don't know anything about such spiritualities make all kinds of bizarre assumptions about them if you call them "religions." I've seen it time and time again, so I don't call Native American Shamanism or Buddhism or Witchcraft religions. In my experience, these are closer to what I would call disciplines or practices, perhaps metaphysics or plain aboriginal sciences.

Would you prefer me to say I don't find dogmatic and exclusionary religions healthy in the least?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 5:30 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


I don't have anything to add. I just want to say it was great reading such an interesting discussion.

Thank you.

Rue



Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 6:15 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Actually, I do have comments about the whole teaching /learning thing. As was convincingly outlined to me, no one ever really 'teaches' another. The pupil has to recreate the words into a meaningful thought. The words are the experience, the lesson - knowledge - is generated internally. Knowledge just can't be drummed into you. (Well, it can, but it takes a lot of time, repetition, and control over the person's total experience.)
So I agree with the concept that you already have to be looking for knowledge. Then anyone who says that which you find valuable will be your teacher.



Nearly everything I know I learned by the grace of others.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 13, 2006 8:26 PM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:
HK

Non-human intelligence is not paranormal. In fact it's amazingly normal. Humans are not the most intelligent animal on the earth, and on occassion they become very run of the mill.

Dreamtrove, whatcha sayin' that I don't already know? The trouble is, folks like you and me don't get to say what's "paranormal" and what's "normal." A lot of what you and I take for granted the world at large thinks is plain crazy. I hate to be the one to tell ya, but you and I are paranormal.

Have you seen any of these crop circles, the ones from the last few years?
Pretty breath-taking.


HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 12:21 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Dreamtrove:
Non-human intelligence is not paranormal.

No it's quite normal.
Quote:

Humans are not the most intelligent animal on the earth, and on occassion they become very run of the mill.
Okay this is where we part company. What species, pray tell, is? There must be many, many species about that are more intelligent than Humans if Humans are merely run of the mill. It also leads to a rather interesting question of how our weakling little race survived, given that we are weaker and less physically imposing than creatures somewhat smaller than us and our only real advantage is our intelligence. If we're merely run of the mill mentally and our physical attributes are decidedly below par then obviously the Human race must have been made extinct long ago...
Quote:

On the beach where I vacation there's a beautiful sculpture of an egret, oit of an oyster bed, which was at least allegedly made by the egrets who live there, and I see no reason to doubt it.
Uhuh and Fionn mac Cumhail really did build the giants causeway.
Quote:

There are countless examples in nature or representitive art, communication etc.
Well you're going to have to run the representative art by me one more time, but communication is no great feat. In fact it's required for social creatures, and all animals do it to some degree or another irregardless of intelligence. Snakes aren't the brightest of animals but you can sure tell when they are upset because they communicate that through body posture and other threat warnings. But a Monkey pointing at some food is hardly the same thing as the complete works of Shakespeare.
Quote:

If all ants talk to other ants, eventually what ants do on one side of the world will resemble those the other side.
Instinct DT, they're all Ants and they all have the same instincts which dictates how they act. You'd have something if the same species of Ant in different geographical locations but similar environments behaved in radically different ways, because this would be indicative of non-instinctual culture.

I’ll say it right here, Ants communicate, they say “Friend” or they say “Foe” they say “Food follow” and “Get food” what they don’t do is pass on complex thoughts and concepts through artificial language.
Quote:

You add their brain masses together and it way outweighs ours.
Erm if you add all the manure in the world together then it'll outweigh our collective brain masses, all that proves is that there's an awful lot of bullshit in the world.
Quote:

Dogs have been on the brain decline a little longer, 100-150,000 years. At the moment when dogs and humans created their relationship, humans were near a low, and dogs were at a high, and brain-bodyweight indicates that at the time, about 100,000 years ago, dogs were smarter than people.
Yeah okay, Dogs domesticated people.

You'd really need to pull something out a little more convincing than your say so before I believe that the real power behind the throne walks on four legs and eats its own crap. George Bush not withstanding.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 12:32 AM

DESKTOPHIPPIE


Quote:

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the beach where I vacation there's a beautiful sculpture of an egret, oit of an oyster bed, which was at least allegedly made by the egrets who live there, and I see no reason to doubt it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Uhuh and Fionn mac Cumhail really did build the giants causeway.



Wait... Fionn mac Cumhail didn't build the giant's causeway???




More animations available at http://desktophippie.googlepages.com

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 10:33 AM

ANTIMASON


if there were a God which created the universe, what would you expect such an entity or force to look like, or disclose itself to you as? would you expect frequent visitations, or feel entitled to a set of your own miraculous abilities?

the Bible records many events, divine and otherwise, which happened thousands of years ago... what other evidence would we have of such things, outside of written, corroborated accounts? im sure you know through all your technical adeptness that there were no video cameras or science laboratories back then, right?

archeology continues to prove the Bible historically accurate, as far as towns, battles, rulers etc. just as history confirms the accuracy of such events

over a quarter of the Bible is prophecy. can you predict what is going to happen a week from now? in the past the Jews would stone to death a prophet whos prophecies were not fullfilled. yet there is an incredible amount of predictions, which came true, typically hundreds, to even a thousand years in advance. this includes the propecy fullfilled by Jesus, the destruction of the temple in 70ad, and even Israels rebirth as a sovereign nation in 1948.

even Nostrudamus, in all his infamy, has not been proven to be this accurate. so what more should we expect from these people?

prophecy was a gift, so that we may know that the prophets recieved divine messages from the Father of creation. this was so that we may know that God is real, and that he has a plan to spare his people from times of wrath; just as Noah with the ark, just as in Sodom and Gommorah

you can continue in your disbelief, because God, in his wisdom, hid his secrets from those who of their arrogance, sought to follow only their own desires. those people will be in great distress and turmoil as they wonder what is coming over the world, because this is to be the most difficult, trying time in history

i just pray you will have the spiritual knowledge and discernment to understand the times you are entering into; because there are forces currently at work, who are preparing the reign of antiCHrist, and to disbelieve in God, is to deny Satan and his influences. understand that in this period, known as the tribulation, even many of the elect will be decieved, and those who receive the Mark will partake in the wrath of God, his judgement and condemnation for those who persistantly refused to acknowledge his love, his wisdom and his word.

i cant prove God scientifically exists, by your standards, which is that i need a theory that i can run through a computer model. but science cant save you from what is about to befall humanity and the world, and that is a tradeoff i am more than willing to make

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 11:07 AM

HKCAVALIER


Hey, Antimason,

History also teaches us that millennarianism has cropped up at least every hundred years and once for every major war since Jesus walked. So history shows that for the past 2 thousand years folks have talked exactly the way you talk and they were all--every last one of them--wrong.

Every one of them thought that the social uphevals of their day constituted the entrance into the tribulation, and they were quite mistaken. What makes your millennarianism better than theirs? Surely they knew their Bible, surely they were good Christians, what made them so wrong and you so right?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 2:00 PM

NANITE1018


Thanks for agreeing Reaverman.

This is just me trying to get back in the discussion, getting updated. lol, school just started today, so i won't be able to post as often anymore.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 3:20 PM

ANTIMASON


HK--
the tribulation, and the reign of the beast identify the last 7 years of the age. since the Jews are Gods people, the antiChrists goal is to decieve them into worshipping him as their messiah. during this period, the Jews will once again resume sacrifices on the temple mount, and 3 1/2 years into the treaty with Israel, the deal is broken, the sacrifices stop, and an "abomination" is set up on the temple; whatever the sequence to these events, i think this event may alert the world to the reality of the antiChrist, but will be to late at this point.

well, in order for this to happen, the Jews had to reclaim the land, and establish Israeli sovereignty once again; and after that, they had to rebuild the temple. these events were to directly proceed the final generation.

name a time that the Jews had a nation before 1948?

and now the Jews have the temples designs retrofitted and ready to be put in place

if America is indeed mystery Babylon, than it will be us who pushes for this global government that is to become the beast.

Israel is, by proxy, our lil superpower...maybe its in anticipation for Americas future messiah?

with this "war on terror", and the progression of the national security apparatus, ID scanners etc, America for the first time is officially threatened with a permanant loss of liberty.

name a time in America, let alone the history of the world, when man possessed the technology to track global trade on an individual basis, to the extent that no one can buy or sell without recieving a mark, or identification?

without getting into every detail, i repeat- no time, before 1948, was the right time, because the circumstances werent right!

but now we have prophecies from Jeremiah, Daniel and Ezekial with the potential to be fullfilled, most of which proceed or define the end of the age. one notable prophecy is in Daniel, which deals specifically with Persia, or modern day Iran, and Israel, aswell as the antiChrist and his rise to power during the tribulation

im not saying i know the exact day, but Jesus said that when the time drew near, we would see the signs and know that our redemption draws close

the bible also says:
"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."

well, if we have known evidence about the elite, manipulating world markets, plotting and scheming for control, along with proven occult secret societies whos members make up a significant portion of this group; including current "Christian" politicians and there agressive world views, then i think we should draw some parallels already

the key is all this is to realize that there really is a "nwo" agenda




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 7:07 PM

HKCAVALIER


Antimason,

I know the whole millennial gig, believe me. I know about Jerusalem and the 7 years of tribulation. I know what millenarians say today. My question was how could all these other folks for the past 2 thousand years be so dead wrong? They read the same Bible you do, so how did they miss all this stuff you list? Every hundred years for 2 thousand years, there have been enough apparent fulfillments of prophecy to convince many Christians that Antichrist was upon them.

Antimason, I have a serious question for you: do you want us to be afraid? Do you think Christ wants us to be afraid?

And I'm curious, have you investigated the socalled "Third Secret of Fatima" at all?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 7:11 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Hey, Antimason,

History also teaches us that millennarianism has cropped up at least every hundred years and once for every major war since Jesus walked. So history shows that for the past 2 thousand years folks have talked exactly the way you talk and they were all--every last one of them--wrong.

Every one of them thought that the social uphevals of their day constituted the entrance into the tribulation, and they were quite mistaken. What makes your millennarianism better than theirs? Surely they knew their Bible, surely they were good Christians, what made them so wrong and you so right?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.



So well stated HK, there really is nothing more to talk about..I patiently wait for Anti's response.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 14, 2006 9:34 PM

SOUPCATCHER


Okay. This tangent is relevant to the thread under only the thinnest of pretexts but I figured it was better to do it here than starting another thread because, hey, how many religion related threads does RWED need? And since we have premillenial dispensationalism on display in this thread (thanks to antimason), and the article I'm about to hype mentions premillenial dispensationalism ... well, that's good enough for me .

I've long held a sneaking suspicion that some attitudes in our country in regards to wealth and poverty have a distinctly Calvinistic streak to them. Attitudes such as poor people are to blame for their own poverty or any attempt to tax rich people is wrong (gross oversimplifications of the positions to make the point). There's something in those attitudes that reminded me of the concept of the Elect. Even if the people holding those views were not Presbyterian or religious at all.

So it was edifying to read the following article* that traces the historical intertwining of Calvinist thought with American belief throughout the history of the country. Just a few snippets from the intro to the article:
Quote:

excerpted from http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/2/6/15390/88821
Today, many ideas, concepts, and frames of reference in modern American society are legacies of the history of Protestantism as it divided and morphed through Calvinism, revivalist evangelicalism, and fundamentalism.

Even people who see themselves as secular and not religious often unconsciously adopt many of these historic cultural legacies while thinking of their ideas as simply "common sense."

What is "common sense" for one group, however, is foolish belief for another. According to author George Lakoff, a linguist who studies the linkage between rhetoric and ideas, there is a tremendous gulf between what conservatives and liberals think of as common sense, especially when it comes to issues of moral values.

In his book Moral Politics, which has gained attention in both media and public debates, Lakoff argues that conservatives base their moral views of social policy on a "Strict Father" model, while liberals base their views on a "Nurturant Parent" model.

According to Axel R. Schaefer, there are three main ideological tendencies in U.S. social reform:

• Liberal/Progressive: based on changing systems and institutions to change individual behavior on a collective basis over time.

• Calvinist/Free Market: based on changing individual social behavior through punishment.

• Evangelical/Revivalist: based on born again conversion to change individual behavior, but still linked to some Calvinist ideas of punishment.
...


If that sounds like your cup of tea, have at it. It's a long read but I recommend it. Whether we like it or not, and whether the founders would have approved or not, the beliefs of various Protestant denominations have had an impact on this country. Today, the impact is profound and we have a group of ideological extremists as the core base of support for the Republicans in power. Understanding the development of the views that the fundamentalist right hold is important, in my view, if we are ever to effectively counter the threat they pose to the separation of church and state.

I found a link to this article in reading through comments on an ongoing series by a guest poster over at one of my favorite blogs, Orcinus. The series is on authoritarianism and fundamentalism and is something else I highly recommend (part 1: http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/08/cracks-in-wall-part-i-defining.ht
ml
part 2: http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/08/cracks-in-wall-part-ii-listening-
to.html
). Here's a snippet that I found especially relevant to the thread, "Watch What You Wish For:"
Quote:

excerpted from http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/08/cracks-in-wall-part-ii-listening-
to.html

... We know, for example, that fear can transform the behavior of otherwise rational and not particularly authoritarian people. Fear creates physiological changes that impair the brain's ability to reason, and drives people to fall in behind whatever leader presents himself without asking too many questions. Like all herd animals, we are biologically driven to close ranks tightly behind the alpha in times of trouble. Resisting that impulse sometimes means fighting our own evolutionary imperatives. And, as we are now too well aware, unscrupulous leaders will not hesitate to create, manipulate, and perpetuate fear in order to activate that instinct and keep their followers at heel.

Thus, some people who've never been natural followers sometimes get caught up in authoritarian religion and politics in the wake of deep personal losses: unemployment, divorce, a death in the family, arrest, and so on. Entire populations (or, at least, a good fraction of the whole) can take the same path when faced with large collective losses. Kevin Phillips, in American Theocracy,, points out that the South's authoritarian streak (which always ran deep) grew rigid and hard after their loss in the Civil War. Karen Armstrong, in The Battle for God, points out that fundamentalist movements commonly begin in communities that perceive themselves under economic, political, or geographic siege. The way America came together under FDR after Pearl Harbor is the stuff of national legend. And the Bush Administration has exploited this tendency shamelessly in the wake of 9/11.

Cut loose from our moorings, in over our heads, we all look for something solid to hold onto. No matter how strong we are, we've all got areas where we are brittle and vulnerable. It's hard for any of us to say for sure that we'd walk away from an authoritarian leader who promised us precisely the right kind of salvation in precisely the wrong moment. This is something to bear in mind whenever we deal with authoritarian followers: they have simply responded to an impulse that exists -- at least to some degree -- in all of us.
...



* This article is actually culled from a longer piece on the topic of punishment for crime as opposed to rehabilitation for crime and the religious overtones of the punishment for crime position that can be found here: http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v18n3/berlet_calvinism.html
The longer piece, not surprisingly, hangs together better.

* edited to add a second snippet

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 5:02 AM

DREAMTROVE


When I look at this



I see mexicans with too much time on their hands.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:27 AM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Quote:

HK--
the tribulation, and the reign of the beast identify the last 7 years of the age. since the Jews are Gods people, the antiChrists goal is to decieve them into worshipping him as their messiah. during this period, the Jews will once again resume sacrifices on the temple mount, and 3 1/2 years into the treaty with Israel, the deal is broken, the sacrifices stop, and an "abomination" is set up on the temple; whatever the sequence to these events, i think this event may alert the world to the reality of the antiChrist, but will be to late at this point.

well, in order for this to happen, the Jews had to reclaim the land, and establish Israeli sovereignty once again; and after that, they had to rebuild the temple. these events were to directly proceed the final generation.

name a time that the Jews had a nation before 1948?

and now the Jews have the temples designs retrofitted and ready to be put in place

if America is indeed mystery Babylon, than it will be us who pushes for this global government that is to become the beast.

Israel is, by proxy, our lil superpower...maybe its in anticipation for Americas future messiah?

with this "war on terror", and the progression of the national security apparatus, ID scanners etc, America for the first time is officially threatened with a permanant loss of liberty.

name a time in America, let alone the history of the world, when man possessed the technology to track global trade on an individual basis, to the extent that no one can buy or sell without recieving a mark, or identification?

without getting into every detail, i repeat- no time, before 1948, was the right time, because the circumstances werent right!

but now we have prophecies from Jeremiah, Daniel and Ezekial with the potential to be fullfilled, most of which proceed or define the end of the age. one notable prophecy is in Daniel, which deals specifically with Persia, or modern day Iran, and Israel, aswell as the antiChrist and his rise to power during the tribulation

im not saying i know the exact day, but Jesus said that when the time drew near, we would see the signs and know that our redemption draws close

the bible also says:
"For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms."

well, if we have known evidence about the elite, manipulating world markets, plotting and scheming for control, along with proven occult secret societies whos members make up a significant portion of this group; including current "Christian" politicians and there agressive world views, then i think we should draw some parallels already

the key is all this is to realize that there really is a "nwo" agenda



You'll pardon me while I do this...



---

Go to http://richlabonte.net/tvvote/ and vote Firefly!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:53 AM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:
When I look at this



I see mexicans with too much time on their hands.

Ah, you crazy and very ill-informed. Thing's big as a football field and mathematically accurate down to inches. And these things happen in a matter of minutes and no one--no one--has ever caught your mexicans in the act. A couple guys with boards hoaxing could not pull this off.

Also, DT, you need to understand that the plants that have been bent have not been broken but continue to grow. Try that with a board tied to your leg.

Mexicans. You see, Antimason, people are devoted to their belief systems first. Any rational justification is just an afterthought to make their cherished beliefs sound good.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:58 AM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Originally posted by PaganPaul:

Quote:

The basic gist of my explanation is that there are two separate and contradictory creation stories in the book of Genesis.

The first creation story documents how all the Gods and Goddesses gathered together and performed the Great Creation, the 7 day create-a-thon, which culminated in Them creating men and women together as equals, and giving them “dominion over the birds of the air, the fish of the sea, the beasts of the earth,” etc. This is the famous “Let US create man in OUR image, in OUR likeness,” quote. It’s the only time the bible uses the plural in reference to god, so don’t try to explain it as the royal “we” since it’s not used anywhere else.

Now skip ahead a bit, and we get to the second creation, in which a single god goes off by himself in secret and creates a man and a woman (no where does it say Adam and Eve were the first ones). These poor, less than perfect beings were never given dominion over anything, and were created with the sole purpose of worshiping this single vain god.

This also explains why when Cain slays his brother Able, there is an entire city for him to run off to. This city is populated by the children of the first creation, who took pity on this poor lost soul and welcomed him into their community, where he proceeded to spread his own “original sin” throughout the population via his descendants.

Since the descendants of the second creation have no dominion over the earth, when we children of the original population demonstrate our God and Goddess given abilities we are labeled as witches and burned at the stake by the jealous children of the second.

The Pagans are the original population, and the Christians (descendants of Adam and Eve) came later with lesser abilities. This is all according to their own bible.

There’s a lot more to it, and many more examples of the True Gods being above the petty single god (the one who lied to Adam and Eve in the garden - the snake actually told the truth!), but that’s the basic gist of the explanation.

We are the true people. We are the way. So says their own bible.



I think that's the coolest thing I've ever heard.

---

Go to http://richlabonte.net/tvvote/ and vote Firefly!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:06 AM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Antimason,

I know the whole millennial gig, believe me. I know about Jerusalem and the 7 years of tribulation. I know what millenarians say today. My question was how could all these other folks for the past 2 thousand years be so dead wrong? They read the same Bible you do, so how did they miss all this stuff you list? Every hundred years for 2 thousand years, there have been enough apparent fulfillments of prophecy to convince many Christians that Antichrist was upon them.



well..im not quite sure how to answer that, because i wasnt with them, and im not sure what they were basing their beliefs off of.

are you arguing that we're no different now, with 6 billion people on earth, then when the earth only possessed a few hundred million people?

America didnt become the world superpower until the 50's, around the same time Israel regained its sovereignty. if America is Mystery Babylon, then these two phases of prophecy had yet to be fullfilled.

i will state again, the Jews had to return to their homeland before the final generation of the end. a great portion of Revelation takes place in Israel; if the jews have been scattered since Rome 2000 years ago, and even longer before that, then its obvious the prophecies hadnt fully reached maturity yet.

heres another thing that both you HK, and Kanemen deny, and that is the presence of the occult and their NWO agenda. you may think its all just theatrics, but i think its an accurate gauge to track antiChrist prophecy and the system of the beast. if you arent considering the occult, you arent listening to Jesus when he warns you of false christs and the synonogue of Satan.

Quote:

antimason, I have a serious question for you: do you want us to be afraid? Do you think Christ wants us to be afraid?

And I'm curious, have you investigated the socalled "Third Secret of Fatima" at all?.



does Jesus want us to be ignorant? im not afraid..i know the stakes, and im willing to fight for the word, and the truth of prophecy. im always baffled...just what do people think the tribulation is exactly? it is the persecution of believers at the hand of the world, which is of Satan.

maybe i should ask why youre afraid? is it because this pre-tribulation rapture is proving to be wishful thinking? is it because you support Bush, therefore you are you supporting the agenda of Mystery Babylon? brother id rather you know the truth, and change your ways and distance yourself from the Christians who think America is Gods chosen people, and will float away in the clouds safe and sound before all the rough stuff happens on earth; cause thats a lie! America will recieve the worst persecution and judgement, because we are the wealthiest, christian nation ever to exist; and have allowed ourselves to be decieved by the beast! its in revelation

as for the thrid secret of fatima, i recall the story vaguely from awhile back...i did a little reading on it just now, but im not sure what the question is? tell me your opinion, and ill respond when i know what you want to know for sure. what i do know is that Satan and his fallen angels will return in the end to help decieve mankind, and usher in this global religion based on Lucifer

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:09 PM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
well..im not quite sure how to answer that, because i wasnt with them, and im not sure what they were basing their beliefs off of.

C'mon, AM, they were basing their beliefs off of the same thing you are, the Holy Bible, specifically, the Book of Revelation.
Quote:

are you arguing that we're no different now, with 6 billion people on earth, then when the earth only possessed a few hundred million people?
Why is it when people don't understand another person's argument, they imagine the other person's argument to be some wacky untennable nonsense? I'm arguing that the Bible, the Book of Revelation specifically, is open to enormous and ongoing misinterpretation by every generation of Christian since it was written! You say you have the final word, that Israel's physical return to the global scene is crucial to the fulfillment of prophecy and yet thousands of learned, virtuous Christians before you obviously didn't think so.
Quote:

heres another thing that both you HK, and Kanemen deny, and that is the presence of the occult and their NWO agenda.
Who you talking to, AM? I never denied the presence of the occult nor the NWO agenda. I got no problem with your contention that Skull & Bones is an offshoot of the Thule-gesellschaft.

I am abundantly aware of the forces of evil that have been trying to enslave the world. I just don't see them succeeding or the world coming to an end within the next 7 years. The human race has just begun to figure things out, no way is God gonna pull the plug on the experiment now.
Quote:

maybe i should ask why youre afraid? is it because this pre-tribulation rapture is proving to be wishful thinking? is it because you support Bush, therefore you are you supporting the agenda of Mystery Babylon?
Is there some other HKCavalier on here that you have me mixed up with? I'm not afraid of the End of the World. I'm not even afraid of 'Slammo-fascists. I'm not even afraid that Bush is gonna suspend the constitution and turn our country into a fascist dictatorship (Well, actually, that last one I do get frightened about sometimes, but everyone has bad days). I just want all this crazy nonsense to come to an end, sooner rather than later.

The forces of darkness, such as they are, have always envied the happy, the healthy and the well beloved; they've always tried to overpower us with force and fear and lies. And in the long run, they have always failed. People like you have been just as sure as you are right now that the world would come to an end, and it hasn't yet. I'm optimistic.

Evil is a kind of numbness that deprives people of their capacity for love and peace. It's a spiritual sickness. Some populations perish from this sickness, but it has never taken such hold over the entire world as to threaten the human race as a whole.

Just look at the United States. How many of us are actively engaged in the so-called War on Terror? Of that tiny percentage, how many people are actually determining policy, forging your New World Order? The vast, vast majority of human beings living within the borders of these United States are beyond their grasp.
Quote:

brother id rather you know the truth, and change your ways and distance yourself from the Christians who think America is Gods chosen people, and will float away in the clouds safe and sound before all the rough stuff happens on earth; cause thats a lie!
You'll be happy to know, I've got nothing to do with those Christians.

To the extent I have an opinion on the matter, I believe the Church has been corrupted by Lucifer since the 1st Century. I understand that evil in human beings is a disease of the individual will, expressed as the desire to overcome the will of other beings--enslavement, mind-control, state power, etc.

As I understand it, the introduction of proselytism into Christian doctine was the Devil's work; Lucifer got in on the ground floor even before all the Gospels were finished, creating the Church as a mechanism of mind-control and spiritual servitude.

I think you're alright, Antimason, I think your intuition is aware of a real problem in the world, but that you've blunted your discernment with all this Bible thumping. I don't think it's your fault--this type of thing is just what Christianity does to people if they get too far into it. To my mind, Christianity is best kept casual, Jesus-centered (Mary centered?) and intuitive.
Quote:

as for the thrid secret of fatima, i recall the story vaguely from awhile back...i did a little reading on it just now, but im not sure what the question is? tell me your opinion, and ill respond when i know what you want to know for sure. what i do know is that Satan and his fallen angels will return in the end to help decieve mankind, and usher in this global religion based on Lucifer
Well, the third secret revealed that the Vatican was run by Satanists and that the Earthly Church would fall. I think a lot of Christians, like yourself, intuitively know this; as a devout Christian, it's prolly hard to see a difference between an end of the Christian World and an end of the World entirely.

Anyways, see, Antimason? I'm just as out there as you are. And, for the record, I realize that I may be wrong about all of this.

We'll see.


HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:58 PM

ANTIMASON


i agree with a lot of what you say.. and i realize that my language is strong, and comes off abrasively a lot of the time; i apologize for that, and i suspect it does work against me.

before i became a believer, i stumbled upon the 9/11 conspiracy, and all the other lies that are perpetrated by the media and government. then i got into the elite, secret societies, the occult, the whole NWO agenda... and through all my research, eventually leading to the Bible, i gained my faith, and am now a hardcore believer. i feel as though this is physical proof of the conspiracy at work to establish the antichrists reign

about recent end times beliefs..i just feel that now the pieces of the puzzle fit better than they did. my recent revelation though is that America fits all the signs of prophetic Mystery Babylon. if this is so, that places us closer to the tribulation than any other possible culture or time period.

id like for you to check out this link, and tell me what you think. i encourage you to read through it http://www.the-tribulation-network.com/denemcgriff/in_search_of_babylo
n_ch6.htm

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 16, 2006 1:58 PM

NANITE1018


Help me Antimason:

Who is this Antichrist? What's he gonna do (supposedly, since i am an atheist and don't think there is any such thing)? What are these signs you talk about? Sorry, but i don't really now much about Revelation stuff and all of the prophecies, except that he's supposed to be in power 7 years and rule the world. Other than that, i got nuthin'.

Sorry if you answered those earlier i just don't feel like reading the other posts, sorry.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 16, 2006 2:49 PM

DREAMTROVE


Quote:

Ah, you crazy and very ill-informed. Thing's big as a football field and mathematically accurate down to inches. And these things happen in a matter of minutes and no one--no one--has ever caught your mexicans in the act. A couple guys with boards hoaxing could not pull this off.



what a load of bull


Quote:

Also, DT, you need to understand that the plants that have been bent have not been broken but continue to grow. Try that with a board tied to your leg.


Huh? I'm a farmer remember.

Quote:

Mexicans. You see, Antimason, people are devoted to their belief systems first. Any rational justification is just an afterthought to make their cherished beliefs sound good.


I knew the PC police would give me a hard time. Mexicans. Farm. they do, I've seen 'em do it. is it a sterotype, sure. Do I have anything against Mexicans? absolutely not. Viva Mexico, etc. I don't know what you're problem with Mexicans is that you don't think they're capable of this :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:24 AM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

Originally posted by nanite1018:
Help me Antimason:

Who is this Antichrist? What's he gonna do (supposedly, since i am an atheist and don't think there is any such thing)? What are these signs you talk about? Sorry, but i don't really now much about Revelation stuff and all of the prophecies, except that he's supposed to be in power 7 years and rule the world. Other than that, i got nuthin'.

Sorry if you answered those earlier i just don't feel like reading the other posts, sorry.



the antiChrist is Lucifer manifest, just as Christ was God manifest. the system of the Beast, and Mystery Babylon, are the epitomy of Satans rule on earth, or the complete antithesis of Gods will.

that is the main point to grasp. im giving you this link because it explains better then i, what Satans goal was from the beginning of Mans creation.. just know that is the antiChrists goal aswell

http://www.mt.net/~watcher/judgment.html

the bible says "just as it was in the times of Noah; so too shall it be at the coming of the Son of Man(Jesus)". whats important is that in Noahs time, Satan, and the fallen angels had almost complete influence over the earth. this link better describes the scenario of the tribulation

http://www.the-tribulation-network.com/denemcgriff/in_search_of_babylo
n_intro.htm


i apologize if this seems like a cop-out, but i dont have my Bible in front of me to dig out all the verses regarding the antiChrist(and his various names)and the prophecies regarding the end times. its not a whole lot of reading, but its well worth it for the insights; and the thing is, no one knows for sure the prophecy..some have pieces to add that others dont, but the most important part is acknowledging the occult, and their NWO agenda..without which, the convential beliefs are misdirected and insufficient


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:11 AM

NANITE1018


Ok, well that bit about man becoming gods: what's wrong with that? Why can't man be as great as God? God restrained human potential in the Tower of Babylon story. why? Because he was frightened by the power of mankind. So he splintered us. So in a Biblical sense, God didn't want to be faced with a united mankind because mankind would be so powerful.

Now i don't believe in all of that gose.

But it symbolises my feeling, to me humanity, science, technology, and reason matter. Humanity has the potential to become incredibly powerful, live forever, and never go extinct. That is essentially godhood. And mankind has a responsibility to spread life across the cosmos.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:09 PM

DUKKATI


Man becoming gods ...HA! [note the little g]

If man kind were ever able to become gods then we would have a whole lots of gods fighting over who was the best god and sooner or later one god would figure out how to make all the other gods disappear.....but if every one was a god then every one would already know every thing so we would know how to do anything...whow! boogles the mind dont it?

Theres goes that "leap of logic" of mine again....

===========================================

I've been through the system.
It dont work.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:14 PM

DUKKATI


Thank you. I can chew on this for awhile.


/////////////////////////////

I've been through the system.
It dont work.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:36 PM

YINYANG

You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.


Quote:

Man becoming gods ...HA! [note the little g]

If man kind were ever able to become gods then we would have a whole lots of gods fighting over who was the best god and sooner or later one god would figure out how to make all the other gods disappear.....but if every one was a god then every one would already know every thing so we would know how to do anything...whow! boogles the mind dont it?

Theres goes that "leap of logic" of mine again....



The self-correcting DukKati. I like it.

---

Go to http://richlabonte.net/tvvote/ and vote Firefly!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:40 PM

DREAMTROVE


Nanite,

The antichrist is a chick named Hannah.

Andrew: (singing) We will be GODS!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 18, 2006 5:30 PM

HKCAVALIER


Heya Dream,

I know this thread is "sooooo last week" but I couldn't leave this misunderstanding between us hanging. The main thing I didn't appreciate about your "mexicans" comment was not that it offended my P.C. sensibilities, but was how completely dismissive you were of my position.

It's as if I'd come back from Cairo and was talking about how amazing the Pyramids were and you told me, "Not really, my little brother and I used to build 'em in the backyard when we were kids." I might shake my head in dismay and repeat the words "little brother" not because you used the prejudicial modifier "little" but because of how trivial you made my experiences out to be.

You know, I was very disappointed that you would dismiss me like that on what I assume is little or no evidence whatever. I found it profoundly ironic that you, who are willing to see beyond the "official story" of 9/11 to some pretty hard to imagine criminal conspiracies, would simply trash my comments and supply the most dismissive "official story" as if you were the AURaptor of metaphysics.

But I know you aren't responsible for our entire culture's dismissal of these things which interest me and I shouldn't take it out on you. Sorry.

P.S.: If you should ever have the chance to check out any crop circles, I encourage you to see one up close and personal, from up close they really are hard to dismiss.

Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:
Quote:

Ah, you crazy and very ill-informed. Thing's big as a football field and mathematically accurate down to inches. And these things happen in a matter of minutes and no one--no one--has ever caught your mexicans in the act. A couple guys with boards hoaxing could not pull this off.



what a load of bull


Quote:

Also, DT, you need to understand that the plants that have been bent have not been broken but continue to grow. Try that with a board tied to your leg.


Huh? I'm a farmer remember.

Quote:

Mexicans. You see, Antimason, people are devoted to their belief systems first. Any rational justification is just an afterthought to make their cherished beliefs sound good.


I knew the PC police would give me a hard time. Mexicans. Farm. they do, I've seen 'em do it. is it a sterotype, sure. Do I have anything against Mexicans? absolutely not. Viva Mexico, etc. I don't know what you're problem with Mexicans is that you don't think they're capable of this :)



HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 18, 2006 5:47 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Oh HK,

I was curious. You were interested in what atheists find comfort in*. Did you feel you got an understandable answer?

* Yes, I know, this is a dangling participle. But I see it everywhere - in national newspapers and magazines etc. So I guess I'm so old standard English has changed since I learned it in school.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, August 18, 2006 7:02 PM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Oh HK,

I was curious. You were interested in what atheists find comfort in*. Did you feel you got an understandable answer?

* Yes, I know, this is a dangling participle. But I see it everywhere - in national newspapers and magazines etc. So I guess I'm so old standard English has changed since I learned it in school.

Hey Rue, the threads are flyin' fast and furious on the RWED these days, it's hard to keep up! As far as I know, I got no answer at all...now, I can't even find the post (thread?) where I posed the question. Help?

(Edit: found the thread: http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=23117 )

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 20, 2006 6:52 PM

REAVERMAN


Quote:

no fossil evidence has been recovered.


Not true. I dont have a specific link, but I bet you could find tons of stuff about archaeological evidence for evolution on the discovery channel web page.

Quote:

are you saying you cant prove a murder case by using eye witness accounts?


Uh.. yeah, pretty much. Eyewitness testimony helps in a murder case, but is a helluva long way from proof.

Quote:

so what exactly is the Bible, and the numerous third person accounts of a historical Jesus, and the miracles he performed?


His followers making him sound good.

Quote:

it is not hard to prove that Jesus existed, and died on the cross


Its already been proven that Jesus existed. The question is his divinity.

Quote:

..or that hundreds of people witnessed his ressurection,


How is that easy to prove? Even if it happened, those witnesses have been dead for 2000 years, so how do we get proof of that?

Quote:

to the extent that they were murdered and pursued ruthlessly by the Romans for their beliefs.


They were ruthlessly persecuted for breaking Roman law. Every citizen of the empire had to pay lip service to the emperor once in a while. It was the law. I'm sure a god would know where your heart truly lay, so they were persecuted for their own thick-headedness.

PS: The new testament wasn't written down until 80-100 years after Jesus' death. There are no "eyewitness accounts".



You're welcome on my boat. God ain't.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 20, 2006 9:18 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
if there were a God which created the universe, what would you expect such an entity or force to look like?...



David Blaine?

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, August 20, 2006 9:34 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Ah, you crazy and very ill-informed. Thing's big as a football field and mathematically accurate down to inches. And these things happen in a matter of minutes and no one--no one--has ever caught your mexicans in the act. A couple guys with boards hoaxing could not pull this off.

Also, DT, you need to understand that the plants that have been bent have not been broken but continue to grow. Try that with a board tied to your leg.



HK, by my estimation you're one of the smartest people on RWE. That's why it kinda shocks me when you post stuff like this. The crop-circle thing is one of the flimsier of the 'paranormal' phenomena. Forgive me for saying so, but sometimes it seems like your bullshit sensor is completely broken, at least when it comes to this kind of stuff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_circles

http://www.circlemakers.org/

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 2:17 AM

DREAMTROVE


HK

Quote:

I know this thread is "sooooo last week"


Huh, you're the same age as me.
Or maybe you just followed just to the buffy movie.
Or was it heathers?

Quote:

but I couldn't leave this misunderstanding between us hanging. The main thing I didn't appreciate about your "mexicans" comment was not that it offended my P.C. sensibilities, but was how completely dismissive you were of my position.


Was I?

"You have no idea how easy a matter it is to offend a man who is on the look-out for offenses." - Frederick Douglas

Seriously, getting offended is not a work of art, or anything greatly remarkable like the pyramids.

Quote:

It's as if I'd come back from Cairo and was talking about how amazing the Pyramids were and you told me, "Not really, my little brother and I used to build 'em in the backyard when we were kids."


Oh, it's possible you were refering to crop circles. They're nothing new either. Talented mexicans.

Quote:

I might shake my head in dismay and repeat the words "little brother" not because you used the prejudicial modifier "little" but because of how trivial you made my experiences out to be.


Nah we're clearly the same age because you used a variant of "that's sooo five minutes ago."

Quote:

You know, I was very disappointed that you would dismiss me like that on what I assume is little or no evidence whatever.


Crop circles are in fact mexicans with too much time on their hands, I read an article about someone catching them in the act. I just didn't want to go into it.
There is no extra-terrestrial presence on the Earth. Humans are not important, heck, we're not even a species, we're just a breed of ape. An animal who builds things, big whoop as far as the universe is concerned.
And space is big, real big, you may think it's a long walk down to the chemists, but that's peanuts compared to space.

Quote:

I found it profoundly ironic that you, who are willing to see beyond the "official story" of 9/11 to some pretty hard to imagine criminal conspiracies,


It's patently obvious. The official story makes no sense, it's full of magic and superstition.

Quote:

would simply trash my comments and supply the most dismissive "official story" as if you were the AURaptor of metaphysics.


Lol. I think it's absurd. If it helps any I think the christian's fantasies about christ's ascention are equally absurd.
But it's easy to make crop circles, any talented group of mexicans with too much time on their hands can do it.

Quote:

But I know you aren't responsible for our entire culture's dismissal of these things which interest me and I shouldn't take it out on you. Sorry.


They're nifty, and if someone said "hey, look at what these guys did" we'd say "cool" but as evidence of extra-terrestrial presence, it's boulderdash, it's like those fake relics in tombs with the space ships.
If I thought there were aliens visiting earth, I'd believe it, but it's just not so. Think how advanced humans are compared to other apes. Then think about all the trillion species of life. We, alone, have space ships, and it's in doubt if we ever made it to the moon. Think how many billions of years of animals without space ships. Now think of how many planets you have to go out until you find one which will be as abundant of life as the Earth, then how many of those before you have to go before you find space ships that have actually gone somewhere. Space travel is really rare. It might be thousand of light years. Now Imagine you're a galatic empire with space ships. Where are you going to go? To all of the planets that surround you looking for intelligent life? Sure. How long would it take until you're search expanded as far as Earth. Forever. If you want to meet space aliens, you have to go to them. They ain't coming here.

Quote:

P.S.: If you should ever have the chance to check out any crop circles, I encourage you to see one up close and personal, from up close they really are hard to dismiss.


I checked them out years ago. This is not aliens, it is mexicans with too much time on their hands, who I suppose, technically, are aliens. But they're not space aliens.

Seriously I think this is fantasy. People want there to be aliens, so they make up stories, it's no different from ghosts or angels or faeries.

the nearest intelligent lifeforms alien to our own ar right here on Earth, where they were born. There are countless species of life including a handful more intelligent than humans. Study those instead, it's more fruitful and a lot more interesting. If you want to find lifeforms on other planets, study space travel, build a ship, but I'm giving you the heads up right now that results will be rare and when they do exist, they are going to be simple. Still fascinating topic to study.

BTW, the most intelligent creature on the earth is the octopus. Second is the squid. Dolphins and whales are on the same level as humans. Elephants are pretty smart.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 2:35 AM

DREAMTROVE


Antimason,

I hate to be the one to break this to you but Reaverman is right.

It's not that we're programmed to believe in evolution, it's that we are dealing with about 400,000 times the amount of evidence as your sources are. You are the guy in the cave on this issue, staring at the shadows moving on the wall and coming up with theories about world. We're the guys outside who can see the world pretty much as it is.

It's like trying to argue with someone who believes that "Satisfaction" was first recorded by Britney Spears. You just don't know where to begin.

It's even worse than it seems. Not only is creationist intelligent design flat out wrong, it's missing the whole point of how logic works. Evolution is far greater than a basic principle of biology, it is one of the ruling laws of the universe, up with relativity and chaos theory. Without evolution, it is impossible to explain the existance of matter, or for that matter energy. Science fiction like firefly could certainly not exist without it.

Here's my advice to you:

'Vex not thy spirit at the course of things; They heed not thy vexation. How ludicrous and outlandish is astonishment at anything that may happen in life.' - Marcus Aurelius

ie. "don't blame the world for not fitting your theory, change your theory to fit the world."

Evolution is a wonderful topic full of fascinating discoveries. (of God's work, if you will)

I'm not even going to argue the point. If you care about the truth, heed the loudly ringing alarm and wake up on this one - it's not a leftist secular plot or a threat to your faith. It's just the way things are.


Sgt. X,

I concur.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 3:55 AM

CANTTAKESKY


HK,

I am intrigued by your position on the crop circle business. My current position is that many of them have been proven to be manmade, so it isn't a stretch to imagine that they are ALL manmade--just haven't caught the perps yet. As far as "unexplainable" features like having it made in minutes and without breaking the stalks, I think those questions do not necessarily exclude manmade explanations. Edward Leedskalin moved an entire castle made out of tons of coral rock in a single night, on a pickup truck. There are people out there who know these secrets--it is conceivable that someone with such knowledge made some of these more advanced circles.

However, that doesn't mean I can't be wrong. Do you have any favorite websites that provide support for paranormal explanations. I'd like to read up and see what the other side says. Thanks.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 8:02 AM

ANTIMASON


im not denying there is a role that evolution plays in the universe..i simply do not believe it is the only force at work. science may theorize the laws of the universe, but what mechanism establishes those laws to begin with? i dont believe it all just happens randomly..i believe an omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient entity (God) did it

the fact is, no one here knows what lies beyond death..but almost all of our ancestors believed in an afterlife, so who can dismiss the concept outright? would that not seem to explain apparitions and other paranormal activities?

i believe just as the Bible claims, that Man is in a mortal, physical dimension, our fallen nature.. that it is only a stepping stone to eternity; i believe our soul carries on after our earthly physical body dies. when Jesus returns, at the end of the age, our redemption will transform our mortal bodies to immortal, to return us to our pre-fall state, and to finally transition to a higher phase of consciousness.

im not sure anyone can disprove that it is atleast a possibility, so why deny everything that supports such a theory, such as Jesus' resurrection? if Jesus' stories were inaccurate, there would have been a whole region with conflicting stories, and people close enough to the events to dispute the claims; but instead people died for their witness and testimony.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 10:20 AM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
im not sure anyone can disprove that it is atleast a possibility, so why deny everything that supports such a theory, such as Jesus' resurrection?

I'll not get into why the "you can't prove it isn't true" argument is so flawed. It's very popular regardless. But tell me, by this logic why deny anything? Shouldn't you give equal consideration of every single story someone claims is true?


SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 10:35 AM

ANTIMASON


the problem is that you are dismissing everything we know about Jesus' as a historical person. no one here has any problem excepting biographical history about anyone else from that period, such as the Roman rulers and Greek philosophers, with far less scrutiny; but Jesus accounts are written-off immediately. what seperated Jesus from any other crazy person in the world, if he wasnt actually doing something? i think its denegrating to say that all the people who witnesses his miracles, and his ressurection, are considered what..lyers? hillucinating? even extra-biblical, non-biased accounts confirm the events which took place.

basically what your saying is that the Bible is just a book; and i think that is an insult to people who are theologians and scholars, that have spent their lives investigating the merits and evidence for our belief, for someone to just dismiss everything, as if they themselves are all knowing. i atleast acknowledge the role evolution plays


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 11:27 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
basically what your saying is that the Bible is just a book; and i think that is an insult to people who are theologians and scholars, that have spent their lives investigating the merits and evidence for our belief, for someone to just dismiss everything, as if they themselves are all knowing. i atleast acknowledge the role evolution plays

Like the insult against those of other beliefs that don't recognise Jesus as the son of god you mean.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 3:38 PM

ANTIMASON


look im tired of beating a dead horse about this Jesus' issue...but heres the thing Citizen-christians have no religion if Jesus' wasnt ressurected from the dead; our faith is based off the concept that life on earth is our souls existence in the mortal, 3rd, physical dimension. Jesus' ressurection was his way of showing his followers that death is not the end. to deny Jesus' deity is to deny the foundation of christianity

think about this, if Jesus' never once performed a healing, a miracle, never defied nature or created something from nothing..he wouldnt have created a following at all. but his word had truth, and his his actions were perceived as divine, and people sacrificed their lives for the testimony of what they saw. would anyone here die for Jesus, given what they know? what seperates us from them is that they saw Jesus'divinity with their own eyes

Jesus' death was well known when it happened, being documented by numerous sources, so why wasnt Jesus' seen 3 days later, badly beaten and barely alive, if that is what happened? if this had been the case, no one would have believed his claims that he was God manifest! but he was seen fully restored, witnessed by a many people, including Paul, who persecuted him until he saw Jesus' restored anew

isnt this is a problem for the skeptics? they cant deny his existence, death or his body being placed under guard, since they are all events recorded extra-biblicly; so what is the explanation for his being witnessed by so many, including his followers, fully healed, just days later? he created such a following that the Romans tryed to exterminate all christian presence...why did these people die for something non-existant? why did the Romans retaliate so excessively for something that was a made up story? if it was all a myth, surely someone would have spoke up before they were persecuted relentlessly

ive heard the alternative explanations, and they have just as many holes as the official 9/11 story; all i ask is that you consider the possibility..you dont have to make up your mind, just dont write off the possibility


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 21, 2006 9:07 PM

HKCAVALIER


Hey Sergeant, Hey CantTakeSky,

My mentioning crop circles took even me by surprise actually. I'm not "into" crop circles by any means, most of the time I take them pretty much for granted (yeah). But the conversation about god and belief and awarenesses beside the human all met in my experience of and research into crop circles. Also, about a week ago a friend shared some footage of some of them with me so the phenom was fresh in my mind.

As soon as I posted my first post about them (way up there in the thread somewhere), it hit me what kinda a flack I might be in for, so I checked out what wikipedia had to say on the subject. I was really surprised and disappointed to find what amounted to a full page ad for www.circlemakers.org (not the first time wikipedia's knowledge on something I've actually studied was kinda lacking).

The whole circlemakers thing is really part of a much bigger problem with human cognition that I'm seeing more and more of these days, a particularly American relationship to "the possible." Let me explain.

Many American lovers of capitalism point to the "self-made" million- and billionaires to prove the system's validity. The presupposition goes that if one human can do it under capitalism, all humans can do it under capitalism.

But this is not a logical or even realistic conclusion. Who knows what factors went into making Bill Gates rich? Personality, upbringing, socio-political factors of his times, unaccountable luck, unrepeatable personal genius, all of these largely unknowable factors contributed to the unique circumstances of his rise to wealth and power. But it's no fun to be told that the most important events of your life are often entirely out of your control, so we ignore all that and say, "Well...it's possible!"

Or take the old American fantasy, "Anyone can become President." It's simply not true.

So we want something to be true. We find an example, however freakish. And from that we abstract a hopeful truism. "Boy rises from nothing to become President of General Motors." So what? What does that mean for any particular individual? Nothing. It's just part of our American mythology.

Or the threat of terrorism. A particular terrorist plot had utterly unprecedented success in 2001. Therefore, it could happen again any minute of any day from now on. Nonsense. A ton of unrepeatable circumstances, blunders and far-reaching mischance contributed to the tragedy. But it's possible. It's also possible that no single terrorist attack will ever achieve that level of destruction again.

So circlemakers construct a fake crop circle. Well, there it is! Somebody made a crop circle, therefore, all 10,000+ crop circles made over the past 30 years could be faked.
Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
My current position is that many of them have been proven to be manmade, so it isn't a stretch to imagine that they are ALL manmade--just haven't caught the perps yet.

Hey CTS, don't mean to pick on you, but this quote serves my point. It's all too easy for people to go from "plausible" to "probable" without even noticing. All too often the next step is "case closed." "Plausible," what seems reasonable, is nothing but prejudice. Any time we start with "plausible" we remove a thousand possibilities.

When there's something we'd like to believe, all we really need to establish is its plausibility. Just look at the WTC attack. Is it plausible that the towers fell as a result of the airplanes alone? Well, yes. Okay, fine, well, glad that's settled.
Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
As far as "unexplainable" features like having it made in minutes and without breaking the stalks, I think those questions do not necessarily exclude manmade explanations. Edward Leedskalin moved an entire castle made out of tons of coral rock in a single night, on a pickup truck. There are people out there who know these secrets--it is conceivable that someone with such knowledge made some of these more advanced circles.

Somebody did something equally improbable, therefore...nothing. But okay, just show me one guy who creates a crop circle in complete darkness in under an hour and I'll eat a few sombreros (the really big kind).

The logical conclusion drawn from your example is that the over 10,000 crop circles were all perpetrated by 1000 David Copperfields in a world-wide, cross-generational conspiracy. My study of conspiracies has shown that every last one of them revolves around money and power. Where is the money and where is the power in being an anonymous genius crop circle creator?
Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
However, that doesn't mean I can't be wrong. Do you have any favorite websites that provide support for paranormal explanations. I'd like to read up and see what the other side says. Thanks.

I appreciate you saying that--I know the feeling!

Unfortunately, I don't have any "favorite" websites (most web discussions of the paranormal are dominated by the worst kinds of trolls and insufferable James Randi types).

Here's a link to a page on the absurd 1998 "documentary" Unmasked: the Secret of Deception which John "circlemakers" Lundberg participated in: http://www.cropcirclesecrets.org/crophoax_debrief.html Can't vouch for the site as a whole, but this critique squares with my memories of the broadcast. Don't endorse every conclusion the guy makes, but it doesn't speak well for Mr. Lundberg's credibility in my view.

And finally, Dreamtrove. I'm sorry, but I don't think you and I can discuss this subject--you make so many assumptions about me it makes my head spin. I never dissed you for being politically incorrect, it never once occured to me to imagine how old you are, I don't want to believe in aliens, I don't think aliens created the crop circles--please, let's just drop it.

I hope that we can continue to have fruitful interactions on other topics. Your posts earlier this year on Hilary Clinton help put the final nail in the coffin of any hopes I had for her nomination and for that clarity I am eternally grateful.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:45 AM

CITIZEN


I understand without Jesus' divinity there is no Christianity; I really get it, despite not being Christian. Why do you find it so hard to understand that too people who are not Christian the bible IS just a book.

If you want to take that as an insult, go ahead because by the same logic your belief in Jesus is an insult to every non Christian religion and every scholar and theologian that studies them.

And what's this nonsense about it being impossible for Jesus to create a following without miracles? If that's the case how do you explain followers of all the other religions?

I'm not dismissing anything, I'm merely pointing out that to any non-Christian the Bible IS just a book, and that is not an insult.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 22, 2006 6:15 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
It's all too easy for people to go from "plausible" to "probable" without even noticing. All too often the next step is "case closed." "Plausible," what seems reasonable, is nothing but prejudice.

This is a good point. However, with crop circles, the mystery is so extensive (in my view) that all explanations I have heard seem to involve more or less the same amount of improbability. Then one ranks those explanations according to one's own values and biases, and end up with the preferred explanation.

Quote:

Any time we start with "plausible" we remove a thousand possibilities.
I don't think so. I mean, we have to narrow the infinite possibilities down sometime. Left with the remaining plausible alternatives, one doesn't necessarily become close-minded and dogmatic all of a sudden. It just means these are deemed to be more probable than others. It's a continuum, with more probable on one end, and less probable on the other. Somewhere on that continuum, we draw an arbitrary line and say everything on this side is plausible. The ranking on this continuum is heavily influenced by personal preferences and experiences.

I think what you are talking about is narrow mindedness and dogmatism. Some people are simply dogmatic. They draw the plausible line to allow for only one explanation, and that is the only answer they will entertain. There are people who are not aware of their own value system, biases, and assumptions behind their reasoning. They don't understand how if one of those premises is flawed, their whole reasoning is flawed. They don't understand how they could ever be wrong. (But I'm not one of THOSE people. )

Now let's talk about crop circles to illustrate. Here is my reasoning.

Crop circles are made by either someone (intelligent life form) or "nature." Nature has a history of being sorta random, which is inconsistent with the intricate designs of the circles. It doesn't fit her MO, so I put nature to the other side of the plausible line. (This reflects a personal bias and assumption I have that intricacy and order reflects intelligence and consciousness. It also assumes that nature is not intelligent and conscious. If my assumption is wrong, then obviously my evaluation would be wrong).

So in my view, someone made the formations. That someone could be from earth or not from earth. Of all the intelligent beings on earth, I've ruled out dolphins and other animals (again inconsistent with MO). That leaves me with homo sapiens or ET life forms. Both of these are on the only explanations left on my plausible side. Now, we have a lot of educated speculation and testimony about ET, but nothing empirical and replicable. So my personal scientific preferences put homo sapiens as a more probable explanation than ET.

Homo sapiens has made designs like this before, just in other media--so this is not inconsistent with man's MO. The mystery for me is not so much in WHO, but in HOW this was accomplished. There have been other "HOW" mysteries where construction has been assumed to be manmade--the pyramids, Leedskalin's coral castle, Incan Machu Picchu, etc. So I throw crop circles in as another one.

In my continuum, all the other possibilities still exist. I just prefer to focus on solving the one on my "most probable" end. It may be that new information will turn up and I will revisit other "less probable" explanations. My ranking doesn't mean I am right and others are wrong--it is just the one that makes the most sense to me.

To answer HOW, I form a new continuum. Could be footprints of someone who is doing hyperdimensional travel, could be some eccentric who has discovered the secrets of antigravity, could be pranksters with boards, could be government secret weapons, could be a group of bored psychics who can bend corn as well as spoons. I don't know. But this is where I am concentrating my efforts--on the manmade explanation. As I get more info, I will again sort the plausible from the implausible and then rank the remaining on probability.

Now we can argue about my values and assumptions all you want. But I think the logic itself is pretty sound.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL