REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Mandatory vaccinations vs. right to choose

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Wednesday, December 6, 2006 21:56
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 13901
PAGE 2 of 5

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:27 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


REAL LIFE EXAMPLE

Whooping cough hits Chicago suburb

CHICAGO, Illinois (Reuters) -- For the past two weeks, high school nurse Colleen Kahler (health services coordinator at New Trier High School in Winnetka, Illinois, a tony suburb of Chicago) has been on high alert. Her office, which typically treats routine ailments such as sore throats, stomach aches and pulled muscles, has been transformed into a screening center for an unlikely disease with a name that recalls a bygone era -- whooping cough.

Health experts said the New Trier outbreak underscores how whooping cough, a highly contagious respiratory infection, remains a public health threat in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were more than 25,600 reported cases in 2005; the true number may top 1 million annually. It killed 13 children, mostly infants, in 2003. Before immunizations became widespread, an average of 147,000 people in the United States developed whooping cough every year and 9,000 died....

An upswing of reported cases in the past decade is a source of debate among health professionals, who attribute it both to waning immunity in teenagers and adults and improved detection. Neither the vaccine, nor infection with the bacteria itself, offer lifelong protection. Beginning at two months of age, babies get vaccinated against whooping cough, also known as pertussis, as part of an early childhood immunization series that includes diphtheria and tetanus. Until last year, with the approval of a new type of vaccine for people aged 11 to 64, adolescents got only a booster shot for diphtheria and tetanus because the vaccine used in recent years was not approved for people over the age of 7 because of concern about possible side effects.

New Trier had 26 confirmed cases of pertussis by November 16, or one-third of all those reported in suburban Cook County. The school's first case was detected in late August when students returned from summer break. There have also been reports of sporadic cases at other high schools in the area. Since early November, New Trier has been operating under directives from local health authorities to treat the situation as an outbreak. Rarely life-threatening in teens or adults, small children are at risk for broken ribs, pneumonia, and sometimes death. They typically get the disease from adults, making containment of an outbreak on the scale of New Trier's critical.

CDC now recommends that adolescents and adults get the new tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis booster instead of the older vaccine that included only tetanus and diphtheria. At New Trier, most of the cases were among older students who had not received the new shot.... But despite the school's best efforts, the outbreak has not been easy on the local community. Many pediatricians were not ready for the onslaught of requests for pertussis vaccine, and parents have had difficulty seeking alternative sources.

------------------------------

I think this is a perfect example of what you've been discussing.

The disease
Pertussis is a dangerous disease. It used to cause sweeping epidemics that sent parents to steam their children who were being wracked by paroxysms so severe they didn't have time to inhale for 10-15 coughs. That often caused vomitting, aspiration, and pneumonia. The "whoop" (on inhalation) is from a swollen larynx, which at times becomes SO swollen that child dies of asphyxia. In addition, you get all of the fun neurological side effects that you'd get from the vaccine itself- convulsions, and sometimes brain damage- except at a much higher rate than from vaccination. It is rarely fatal in older children and adults because their airways are just so much larger that swelling rarely closes it off entirely. (Like asthma is young children versus asthma in adults.) It is very contagious and begins rather innocuously with a 2-week dry cough, so it has a chance to spread before the first "whoop" is ever heard.

The vaccine
The old vaccine is estimated to cause very rare (0-10 in a million) but serious lifelong deficits from vaccine encephalopathy. Some doctors in the CDC "doubt" that this occurs, but I personally know of one child's hx who actually had a court rule that his condition was caused by the pertussis vaccine. (BTW- It has nothing to do with mercury.) In THIS child's case, he reacted badly to the first vaccine (seizures) but the doctor passed it off, and child got the second shot (reacted even worse) and the third (which led to encephalopathy). This makes me distrust what the CDC says about safety. The newer vaccine is safER (by about a factor of 10) but not "completely" safe: it still produces site swelling, febrile seizures, or high temperature in 10-50/million (with no lasting consequence) but has not been in use long enough to determine if the risk for encephalopathy is reduced or eliminated.. according to the CDC.

www.cdc.gov/MMWR/preview/mmwrhtml/00048610.htm#00002340.htm

Policy and alternatives
So, what to do? The vaccination risk is clearly lower than the disease risk, which killed an average of 9000 people each year (mostly infants and young children) and left a large number brain-damaged. That's no comfort if YOUR child happens to be the one with the serious, lasting vaccination consequences.

You COULD wait until an outbreak to get vaccinated but (a) local physicians will not have enough supply on-hand and (b) it takes time (weeks) to develop immunity, which is too long if you're in a race against an epidemic.You COULD re-immunize older children with the acellualr version. But there is one other wrinkle... in doing research for my post, I found an article that on an admittedly SMALL study (6 people) the acellular pertussis vaccine, while reducing the SYMPTOMS of the disease, may not prevent bacterial colonization of a body. This implies that re-immunizing teenagers and adults may simply make the disease less evident- but still fully infectious.
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=97836

If I had to promote some sort of policy, it would be to vaccinate all infants with the acellular vaccine. I would make sure that ANY child who seized as a result of the first vaccine simply NOT get the remainder of the shots. The only followup that makes sense in teens and adults would be the whole-cell pertussis vaccine (since that appears to be the only vaccine that reduces infectiousness) excluding those who reacted badly to the acellular vaccine.

In addition, there should be a nurse's office rapid-test for whooping cough- a plastic strip that you put in your mouth to see if a dot turns color. Also, better treatment for infants and children who DO get whooping cough- would require better screening and public health.
---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:30 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:
I don't mean to sound agitated, but there is science out there on this and it bothers me that you're ignoring it.

There is BAD science on this. I have read dozens of original published research. That is hardly ignoring it. I happen to disagree with their conclusions. And I can back it up. Do I have the right to disagree and follow my own conclusions? Or should I be forced to fall in line with the conclusions of the majority? That is the question.
Quote:

You don't want to go toe-to-toe with a biomedical engineer on this. ;)
Bring it on. Give me a study that you believe is conclusive proof of effectiveness and I'll tell you what is wrong with that conclusion.
Quote:

Either way, we can rewrite the equation to consider how effective the vaccine is and objecting to the vaccine is *still* a self-interested decision in cases where it has more than zero effectiveness.
I have absolutely no problem being called "self-interested." My first duty is to my children: to protect them according to the best evidence available. Society comes next. And if there is a conflict between societal interests and those of my kids, guess who wins? I will NOT sacrifice my children to the public good. Self-interested is just fine if you want to call it that.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
People don't start wars, governments do.
--Ronald Reagan

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:44 AM

EVILDINOSAUR


I'd say it's a fair requirement to have to be vaccinated in order to enter public school, unless there's a medical reason for not being able to. If parents don't want to get the child vaccinated then the child can't go to a public school, I think that's fair.

"Haha, mine is an evil laugh."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:47 AM

FREERADICAL42


You should look up "Measles transmission and vaccine effectiveness during a large outbreak on a densely populated island: implications for vaccination policy."

It indicates that the MMR vaccination is only 60% effective in the long term, but there's also the result that the epidemic was only stopped when most of the population was re-vaccinated.

"See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:55 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


CTS- Altho vaccines have potential horrific side effects, the full-blown disease is worse. Although I personally know of one vaccine brain-damaged kid, I also know one kid who was born deaf (rubella), another who was brain-dmaged (measles), another (mine) who went neurologically downhill after chickenpox, and two adults who almost died of chicken pox.

I just happened to find this today:

Shadowed by peril as we are, you would think we'd get pretty good at distinguishing the risks likeliest to do us in from the ones that are statistical long shots. But you would be wrong. We agonize over avian flu, which to date has killed precisely no one in the United States, but have to be cajoled into getting vaccinated for the common flu, which contributes to the deaths of 36,000 Americans each year.

We wring our hands over the mad cow pathogen that might be (but almost certainly isn't) in our hamburger and worry far less about the cholesterol that contributes to the heart disease that kills 700,000 of us annually. We pride ourselves on being the only species that understands the concept of risk, yet we have a confounding habit of worrying about mere possibilities while ignoring probabilities, building barricades against perceived dangers while leaving ourselves exposed to real ones.

www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/26/cover.story.tm/index.html





---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:31 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by EvilDinosaur:
I'd say it's a fair requirement to have to be vaccinated in order to enter public school, unless there's a medical reason for not being able to. If parents don't want to get the child vaccinated then the child can't go to a public school, I think that's fair.

That's only fair if there were no compulsory school laws.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.
--H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:34 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
CTS- Altho vaccines have potential horrific side effects, the full-blown disease is worse.

And you have every right to that opinion.

Back to the question of this thread, should I be allowed to disagree and act on my own opinion?

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
"When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies."
--U.S. Representative Ron Paul

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:44 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


CTS- My "opinion" is based on personal experience, which I cite because you don't "trust" official reports, the news media, or... apparently ... anyone else's personal experience.

Should you be allowed to shoot at someone? Obviously, your right to "disagree" with the majority has limits. The answer is- NO- you do NOT have an unconditional limit to do whatever the heck you want.

If you were a "typhoid Mary" - the quintessential asymptomatic carrier of an infectious serious disease (eg TB) - should you be allowed to work in a cafeteria? If you had AIDS, should you be allowed to have unprotected sex with partners who were not aware of your HIV status?

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:46 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:
You should look up "Measles transmission and vaccine effectiveness during a large outbreak on a densely populated island: implications for vaccination policy."

The abstract is useless for evaluating methodology. For example, it says, "MMR vaccine effectiveness was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-98%) for 1 dose and 95% (95% CI, 82%-98%) for 2 doses." Where did they get that number? That makes all the difference, doesn't it?

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ucp/WebIntegrationServlet?call=Conten
tWeblet&url=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal/issues/v42n3/37212/37212.html?erFrom=1700901065199949638Guest¤t_page=content


Since I don't want to pay $15 for the full text of this article, I will have to go to the library and get it. I'll get back to you on this when I've read it.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
A conclusion is the place where you get tired of thinking.
-- Arthur Bloch

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:55 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Should you be allowed to shoot at someone? ...The answer is- NO- you do NOT have an unconditional limit to do whatever the heck you want.

Let me rephrase my question.

If my opinion is that the horrific side effects are more probable and worse FOR MY CHILDREN than the full blown disease, do I have a right to disagree with you and act on my own opinion? Or should your opinion that disease is worse than side effects trump mine in the care of MY CHILDREN?

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.
--Bertrand Russell

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:17 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


IF your children get the disease the effects WILL be worse than from vaccination. If you're worried about what cell fragments or killed or attentuated viruses "might" do, just imagine what the full complement of rapidly reproducing cells, toxins, polysaccharides, agglutins, RNA/DNA etc will cause! What you're gambling on in the risk from UNIVERSAL vaccination (100% X 10/1,000,000) versus the risk from catching the disease (??% X 100/1,000,000.... or figures to that effect). The civic duty of preventing YOUR children from becoming carriers nevers enters into your equation, nor does the effect of carrying your argument to the entire population, which increases the chances that YOUR child will catch the disease due to loss of "herd immunity".

Given that you say that your son has a severe immune dysfunction, I would imagine that (a) would be proveable with Ig tests abd (b) should provide ample reason to defer vaccination. My daughter- given her neuro hx- was deferred from pertussis vaccine. There are individual reasons to defer vaccine that have nothing to do with generic fear of vaccination.

But what if people want to skip vaccination for other than specific reasons? The "majority" ALSO has a right to self-protection, and has to look at the concept that unvaccinated children MAY become carriers for previously contained diseases. Given that, an unvaccinated child should be treated as a pontential vector (until/unless rapid tests become available) especially in times of outbreak and should be FULLY QUARANTINED: no school no shopping trips to the supermarket, no play dates, or trips to the park. And if mom dad, and other caregivers don't have immunity, they should ALSO be fully quarantined.




---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:41 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Only fools, suckers and dead people get "stabbed" by "needles" full of deadly diseases and unknown ingredients, including "flu shots" that include "live immortal human fetus cells" (aka cancer), and mercury (Thimerisol).

Quote:


FREE VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Vaccinations - The Hidden Truth from Oz

15 speakers, including 5 medical doctors, plus researchers, parents and a registered dog breeder reveal the true, well documented answers to: Was it vaccines that saved us? Do vaccines prevent or cause diseases? Can statistics be misleading? What poisons do vaccinations contain? What damage are vaccines causing? Are childhood diseases really "deadly"? Why does vaccination continue? What are our rights? Can damage be evaluated and countered? What is the true key to immunity? Presents orthodox medical research. Fully informs in just 90 mins. Nothing is safe from the vaccine invasion, not even our genes. They shot first, we asked questions later. Now we know...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8610554679207090010&q=vaccines



Uncle Scam "lost" MILLIONS of "vaccination records" of EVERY soldier in the Gulf Wars. Now over 200,000 US Gulf War soldiers are DEAD. "Vaccines" are ONLY used to SPREAD disease for purposes of genocide. Health can only be maintained by sanitation: washing hands, washing clothing, washing bedding, cooking food, refrigerating food. Only 10% of doctors wash their hands...

HIV AIDS is a US Govt bioweapon discussed in Congressional Record in July 1969 (during Vietnam Wars while Apollo astronots "walked on the moon"). HIV AIDS was first spread by bogus "Hepatitis vaccine" given to "promiscuous sodimites" recruited in NY City and San Francisco. Polio "vaccines" are proven to include live polio virus that spreads polio.

Quote:


FREE VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Origin of Aids

US Govt contracts and patents for the HIV AIDS virus bioweapon, proven by US Congressional Record, US Patent Office, Centers for Disease Creation and Dr Len Horowitz at HealingCelebrations.com.
www.mind-deprogramming.com
www.checktheevidence.com/video/



Smallpox "vaccinations" were "the latest technology" over 200 years ago, during the US Revolutionary War. "Cowpox pus scrapings" were "the latest technology" 2,000 years ago during the fall of the Roman Empire.

Lyme Disease started in Lyme Connecticut, across the river from Lab 257 on "Plum Island Animal Disease Center" (PIADC), a Biolevel 5 bioweapons lab in Fort Terry, site of the "first engagement between the Continental Army and the Redcoats during the Revolutionary War". The island is now under the control of the Department of Homeland Security. US Department of Homeland Security is directed by Jewish Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, born in Communist Czechslovakia, son of Mossad terrorists, who opened the US borders to 40-million terrorists with incurable terminal diseases, like mycoplasma TB and mycoplasma leprosy (AIDS and Gulf War Syndrome are mycoplasmas). Silence of the Lambs (1989) mentions "Plum Island" as a possible relocation site for Hannibal Lecter. He derisively refers to it as "Anthrax Island".
www.dhs.gov/xres/labs/editorial_0901.shtm
www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=19-40-00-00
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_Island_%28New_York%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_Island_Animal_Disease_Center
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/331695.shtml
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10039154/
http://goddess-of-fire.tripod.com/index-1.html

Quote:


"There is no more terrifying example of hubris (self-destructive arrogance) than the Plum Island Animal Disease Research Center. Located just two miles off the tip of Long Island and six miles from the Connecticut coastline, Plum Island is home to a Bio-Safety Level 4 (BSL-4) research facility. The only comparable government facilities in the country are the United States Army laboratory at Fort Detrick, MD, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Plum Island is specifically engaged in the study of zoonotic diseases. Zoonotic diseases are diseases that can be transmitted from animals to humans, like West Nile, like Lyme disease. Like Ebola."
-Dr Patricia Doyle, PhD
www.rense.com/general67/plum2.htm



In USA, medical doctors are the leading cause of death, murdering 2.5-million US citizens every year, including adults, children and unborn babies. Over 45-million aborticides in USA since US Supreme Court relegalized genocide with Roe v Wade in 1973.

I will never accept another "vaccination", and I will defend myself with lawful use of deadly force and justifiable homicide against any person who attempts to forcably "vaccinate" me. I don't need to sign no stinkin "exemption contract". Try forcing "your" doctor to sign a contract accepting full financial and criminal responsibility when you have an "adverse reaction", such as death...

www.aidsbiowar.com
www.tetrahedron.org
www.whale.to/m/scott7.html

Quote:


"We believe that within a period of five to ten years, it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. Within the next five to ten years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could be different in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organism. Most importantly, it might be damaging to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. A research program to explore feasibility could be completed in approximately five years at a cost of $10 million. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken, lest it lead to yet another method of mass killing of large populations."
—Dr. Donald MacArthur, RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION, Department of the Army, Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency, Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering, SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS HOUSE BILL 15090, UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY, U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Ninety-First Congress, first session, July 1, 1969, testimony on June 9, 1969 (FULL TEXT HTML -- JPG Image Scan of HB 15090)
www.umoja-research.com/aids_murder_docs.htm
http://community-2.webtv.net/LikingLArry/IsTheAIDSVirusMan/

"PATHOGENIC MYCOPLASMA - The invention relates to a novel pathogenic mycoplasma isolated from patients with Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or patients dying from diseases and symptoms resembling AIDS diseases. The invention further relates to a variety of vaccinations against mycoplasma infection in humans and/or animals."
—United States Patent, US Patent Office, Patent Number 5,242,820, Inventor Stryh-Cheng Lo and American Registry of Pathology in Washington DC, Filed June 6, 1991, continuation date June 18, 1986
www.gulfwarvets.com/mycoplas.htm

"The true history of the origin of AIDS can be traced throughout the 20th Century and back to 1878. Two years later, in 1889, we were able to identify 'mycoplasmas', a transmissible agent, that is now found at the heart of human diseases, including (AIDS) HIV. In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and suddenly there was an explosion of polio. In 1898, we knew we could use mycoplasma to cause epidemics, because we were able to do so in cattle, and we saw it in tobacco plants. In 1899, the U.S. Congress began investigating 'leprosy [mycoplasma] in the United States'. In 1902, We organized a 'Station for Experimental Evolution' and we were able to identify diseases of an ethnic nature. In 1904, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in horses. On April 29 of that year the United States passed a 'FEDERAL QUARANTINE ACT'. In 1910, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in fowl/birds. In 1917, we formed the 'Federation of the American Society for Experimental Biology' (FASEB). In 1918, the influenza virus killed millions of unsuspecting. It was a flu virus modified with a bird mycoplasma for which human primates had no 'acquired immunity'. In 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the 'necessity for "organized' plagues" against the Black population. In 1931, we secretly tested African Americans and we tested AIDS in sheep. In 1935, we learned we could crystallize the tobacco mycoplasma, and it would remain infectious. In 1943, we officially began our bio-warfare program. Shortly thereafter, we were finding our way to New Guinea to study mycoplasma in humans. In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign [NAZI and Japanese] scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide. In 1949, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson isolates the VISNA virus. Visna is man made and shares some 'unique DNA' with HIV. In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus. Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program. In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of 'Special Operation-X.' (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962. By 1960, Nikita Kruschev had been let in on the biological weapon. His 1960 statement will long reflect the arrogance of the secret blend of communism and democracy. The two countries would go to a November 1972 agreement to cull the Black Population. Progress Report # 8 at 104 - 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo [awarded the Nobel Prize for 'discovering' the 'HIV/AIDS virus' in 1984] can not explain why he excluded his role as a 'project officer' for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo's early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The 'research logic' is irrefutable evidence of a federal "Manhattan-style project" to develop a 'contagious' cancer that 'selectively' kills. Dr. Gallo's 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement. Progress Report #8 at 273 - 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild. Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would 'suddenly emerge' from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made. In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy. In 1973, we find that world scientist, Garth Nicolson reports on his project, 'Role of the Cell Surface in Escape From Immunological Surveillance.' His report is accompanied by seven published papers. Dr. Nicolson worked in conjunction with the Special Virus program from 1972 until 1978. Dr. Nicolson is considered by some to be Dr. Gallo's "West Coast" counterpart. It is strongly held that because of Dr. Nicolson, Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Luc Montagnier would secretly meet in Southern California to coordinate what they would and would not say about the special virus development program. In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania.  The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa's population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you. In 1975, President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200. In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the 'experimental' hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won't get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you. Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On September 28, 1998 I filed suit against the United States for the 'creation', 'production' and 'proliferation' of AIDS. On November 7, 2000, the appeals court agreed with the lower court and held AIDS bioengineering as 'frivolous' [appealed to US Supreme Court]. The world continues to wait for the court to rule on the resubmitted issues. The court can not continue to simply brush aside our experts and the government's flowchart. I have been asked to give my perspective with regard to the federal program MK-NAOMI . MK-NAOMI is the code for the development of AIDS. The 'MK' portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The 'NAOMI' portion stands for 'Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.' Our society is structured to hide crimes committed by the state, while punishing citizens for minor indiscretions. Their strategy focuses on the general confusion they can create via manipulation of the media. They are very good at what they do. We must become more focused in our continued presentation of the flowchart. The flowchart is the absolute missing link in proving the existence of a coordinated research program to develop a cancer virus that depletes the immune system. New diseases do not create old illnesses. We have found the origin of AIDS, it is us."
—Boyd E. Graves, J.D., attorney-at-law, graduate US Naval Academy at Annapolis, The History of the Development of AIDS, Chapter Excerpt from "State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS"
www.boydgraves.com/timeline/

"This is a huge scandal that absolutely dwarfs Watergate. The type of mycoplasma we identified was highly unusual and it almost certainly couldn't occur naturally. It has one gene from the HIV-1 virus—but only one gene. This meant that it almost certainly was an artificially modified microbe—altered purposely by scientists! When we looked at the history of mycoplasma research we found that the military had funded mycoplasma 'vaccine testing' in a Texas prison well before the Gulf War. Ths testing had been done by a biotech firm in Houston. When we checked with the prison we learned that many of the prioners involved—plus prison guards and family members—were currently ill with the same symptoms as Gulf War syndrome. Further, we were able to study samples of these prisoners' blood and found they were infected with the same unique mycoplasma that was infecting Gulf War veterans!"
—Dr. Garth Nicolson ( Institute for Molecular Medicine), National Enquirer, "Gulf War G.I.s Poisoned by American Germ Weapons - Scientist Blows Lid Off Huge Govt. Cover-up," April 2, 1996
www.immed.org/illness/clinical_testing.html

"A generation ago, people trusted their doctors blindly and implicitly. The personal bonds people used to form with their doctors have largely been replaced with the cold hard contemporary reality that medicine has become a $multi-billion per year business with little room for compassion. The healthcare market place is not kind and people have lost trust. Iatrogeny plays a large and ugly role in this. A recent study published in The Journal of The American Medical Association (2000:284:94) by Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, showed that in the U.S. there are 225,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes, placing iatrogeny as the third leading cause of death in the U.S., second only to heart disease and cancer. The scary part is that this does not include disabilities and disorders; just deaths in hospitalized patients. In any event, when one ponders that more than four times as many people die in one year from doctors' mistakes than died in the entire Vietnam War, one is aghast at why this information isn't making headlines or why huge think tanks funded by medicopolitical interests haven't formed. We have the American Heart Association to address heart disease, Richard Nixon's "War on Cancer," and even groups like "Mothers Against Drunk Driving." Organizations have been formed to address almost every sort of issue, save iatrogeny. Many believe that Barbara Starfield's study cited earlier is just the tip of the iceberg. After all, the study only looked at hospitalized patients. What of the in home and outpatient errors? There are more people to consider in these groups, and certainly more iatrogeny. Could it be that iatrogeny is the leading cause of death in the U.S.? In the World? At any rate, the iatrogenic holocaust makes World War II deaths pale in comparison. Murder Or Mistake? The fine line between murder or mistake is a hot potato. If you saw your neighbors being killed one by one or en masse, yet did nothing about it, or took up for the killers, you could be guilty of "accessory to murder" or "accessory to murder after the fact." One could even make the argument for a global elitist plan at population control allowing iatrogeny to gain such momentum. Regardless of etiology, Iatrogeny is real. It is rampant and far from being under control. This author believes that 225,000 deaths every year may be an example of when mistakes cross over to the darkness of negligence. If so, then we are witnessing the greatest holocaust to befall mankind ever. I leave you with my own definition of a freshly coined word:
Quote:


Iatrogenocide - [Gk, iatros, physician, genein, to produce, cide, killing] The extermination of a population in a systematic fashion through medical error.


—Dr. John Doe, Journal of Degenerative Disease, February/March 2002: 3(3rd); pages 37-38; Idaho Observer, reposted by CampaignForTruth.com, "Quarter-Million Doctor-Induced Deaths Annually: Iatrogenocide?" March 2002
www.campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/130902/idahoobserverdeathbydocs.htm

"The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US. (By contrast, the number of deaths attributable to heart disease in 2001 was 699,697, while the number of deaths attributable to cancer was 553,251.5) Using Leape's 1997 medical and drug error rate of 3 million multiplied by the 14% fatality rate he used in 1994 produces an annual death rate of 420,000 for drug errors and medical errors combined. Using this number instead of Lazorou's 106,000 drug errors and the Institute of Medicine 's (IOM) estimated 98,000 annual medical errors would add another 216,000 deaths, for a total of 999,936 deaths annually. Our estimated 10-year total of 7.8 million iatrogenic* deaths is more than all the casualties from all the wars fought by the US throughout its entire history. An estimated 164 million people—more than half of the total US population—receive unneeded medical treatment over the course of a decade. What's iatrogenesis? From the Greek roots iatros = doctor & genesis = caused: DRUG IATROGENESIS -- Prescription drugs constitute the major treatment modality of scientific medicine. With the discovery of the 'germ theory,' medical scientists convinced the public that infectious organisms were the cause of illness. Finding the 'cure' for these infections proved much harder than anyone imagined. From the beginning, chemical drugs promised much more than they delivered. But far beyond not working, the drugs also caused incalculable side effects. The drugs themselves, even when properly prescribed, have side effects that can be fatal, as Lazarou's study showed. But human error can make the situation even worse. As few as 5% and no more than 20% of iatrogenic acts are ever reported. This implies that if medical errors were completely and accurately reported, we would have an annual iatrogenic death toll much higher than 783,936. In 1994, Leape said his figure of 180,000 medical mistakes resulting in death annually was equivalent to three jumbo-jet crashes every two days. Our considerably higher figure is equivalent to six jumbo jets are falling out of the sky each day."
—Gary Null, PhD; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; Dorothy Smith, PhD, Life Extension Magazine, "Death by Medicine", March 2004 (plus 1.5-Million annual aborticides in USA)
www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm

"Eugenics is the science of improving hereditary qualities by socially controlling human reproduction. In 1927, the eugenics movement reached the height of its popularity when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, held that it was constitutional to involuntarily sterilize the developmentally disabled, the insane, or the uncontrollably epileptic. Oliver Wendell Holmes, supported by Louis Brandeis and six other justices, wrote the opinion."
—Planned Parenthood ® Federation of America, "Margaret Sanger - Sanger and Eugenics"
www.plannedparenthood.org/about/thisispp/sanger.html

"It seems to me from my experience . . . in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table. . . . They do not do this with the white people, and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results. . . . His work, in my opinion, should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us. The minister's work is also important, and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation, as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs."
—Margaret Sanger (1883-1966), founder of Planned Parenthood and editor of The Birth Control Review from 1917 to 1938, letter to Clarence J. Gamble, M.D., Planned Parenthood ® Federation of America, "Margaret Sanger - Sanger and Eugenics", 1939
www.plannedparenthood.org/about/thisispp/sanger.html

"During the Nazi era, so-called "euthanasia programs" were established for handicapped and mentally ill children and adults. Organized killings of an estimated 70,000 German citizens took place at killing centers and in psychiatric institutions. Nurses were active participants and killed over 10,000 people in these involuntary "euthanasia programs". After the war was over, most of the nurses were never punished for these crimes against humanity although some nurses were tried along with the physicians they assisted. One such trial was of 14 nurses and was held in Munich in 1965. Although some of these nurses reported that they struggled with a guilty conscience, others did not see anything wrong with their actions and believed that they were releasing these patients from their suffering. "The idea of ending 'lives not worth living' did not begin with the Nazis, but had been discussed in the legal and medical literatures since the end of the First World War", with supportive articles appearing in both European and American literature. It became compulsory to register all "malformed" newborn children with the Reich Committee. The Reich Committee for Research on Hereditary Diseases and Constitutional Susceptibility to Severe Diseases "was an organization for the killing of children who were born mentally deficient or bodily deformed. When the Public Health Offices were notified of a decision they were to arrange for the child's admission to one of approximately thirty inpatient pediatric clinics. At the specialized centers, children who were designated by the Reich Committee for euthanasia were killed shortly after arrival by medication or were starved to death. In the pediatric unit of Haar, for example, 332 children died of deliberate starvation or by an overdose of Luminal [Phenobarbital]. This drug was mixed into the children's food every morning and night until they became unconscious and developed pneumonia. Some were also given injections of morphine and scopolamine. The nursing staff of the pediatric unit of Haar was led by a senior nurse, Emma D., and two younger colleagues, Emma L. and Maria S. They were forced to swear an oath of loyalty, pledging eternal silence regarding what went on in the clinic, under pain of death. Like many nurses who worked in these clinics, they received a 25RM-per-month (approximately $80 US) supplementary payment, know pejoratively as 'Schmutzgeld' (dirty money). The doctors sometimes received a 250RM (approximately $800 US) Christmas bonus. In some clinics (notoriously the Kalmenhof at Idstein), the tensions of the job were soothed by a visit to the wine cellars to mark every fiftieth killing with copious amounts of wine and cider. In 1939, Hitler issued an order to expand the euthanasia program to "the worthless lives of seriously ill mental patients" which would "result in certain savings in terms of hospitals, doctors and nursing staff". The organization went by the name "Aktion T-4". Six killing centers were set up in existing psychiatric hospitals. In 1941, Hadamar "celebrated the cremation of its ten-thousandth patient in a special ceremony, where everyone in attendance - secretaries, nurses, and psychiatrists - received a bottle of beer for the occasion". Although the children were killed with injections or starvation, these methods were not efficient for the large number of adults at the killing centers. In these locations, gas was used. Patients were transported by bus from local and regional hospitals to the killing centers. "At the killing center, the arriving patients were met by the staff and led to the reception room by a male or female nurse, who might have accompanied them on their trip". Patients were examined individually by a physician, photographed, and measured. They were then taken to gas chambers which were disguised as shower rooms. "The patients were already prepared for the showers because, while they were undressing, the nurses had told them that they would be bathed" (Friedlander, 1995, p. 95). "Most patients accepted the nurses' explanation that they were going to the showers..." By 1941, more than 70,000 patients from German mental hospitals had been killed. Later the killing centers were used for the killing of selected (healthy normal) concentration camp prisoners in the "Special Treatment 14f13" euthanasia program. During the "wild" euthanasia phase, handicapped patients that were to be killed at the killing centers arrived by transport, often in the middle of the night. The staff selected for killing patients who were unable to work as well as "patients who caused extra work for the nurses, those who were deaf-mute, ill, obstructive, or undisciplined, and anyone else who was simply annoying". Those selected to be killed were "taken to so-called killing rooms where physicians and nurses killed them using orally-administered drug overdoses or lethal injections." Families were notified of the deaths of these relatives and could receive an urn of ashes purported to be those of their loved one. In reality, the urns contained combined ashes of many people from the crematorium. When the round was finished, the patients selected by Dr. Mootz had to be taken to the extra room. Generally the nurse on duty had to undress the patients and take them to the extra room. Depending on the circumstances, there were different methods. If the patient was very confused or ill to such an extent that she didn't think about it, after having her undress, I just took her to the extra room. If the patients were in their right minds and could see through everything, we told them that their health condition had improved in a manner that they only would have to take a cure in order to get discharged. The patients believed us in most cases and undressed themselves voluntarily, so we didn't have any difficulties with them. We really wanted to make the last way as easy as possible for the selected patients. In this connection I remember that one patient was a strict Catholic and the last day she asked for a priest to get the last sacraments. I remember very clearly and can say with absolute certainty that the priest was informed before the killing and that the patient, who at least that day was completely in her right mind, got the last sacraments from the priest. I can't remember that I ever appointed a younger nurse to help me. Young nurses deliberately weren't appointed to participate in the killings because we feared they couldn't be able to keep their mouths shut.""
-Professor Susan Benedict, College of Nursing,
Medical University of South Carolina, Research on Medical Ethics and the Holocaust, Research Institute of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Western Journal of Nursing Research, "Nurses' Participation in the Nazi Euthanasia Programs," April 1999
www.baycrest.org/Winter%202002/article4.htm

"Harold Shipman, the [Jewish] British family doctor who murdered more than 200 of his patients to become one of the worst serial killers of all time, hanged himself in his prison cell on the eve of his 58th birthday, prison officials said. A prison source, speaking on condition of anonymity said Shipman 'used a bed sheet as a ligature from the bars on his windows' in his single occupant cell to take his life. Shipman was sentenced to life imprisonment in January 2000 for the murder of 15 female patients between 1975 and 1998, and faced no prospect of parole. Two years later an inquiry concluded that he was responsible for the deaths by lethal injection of at least another 200 mostly female and elderly patients at his greater Manchester area practice. Most of Shipman's victims died suddenly without having experienced any life-threatening symptoms. Home Secretary David Blunkett ruled in June 2002 that Shipman should never be released from jail—joining a select few prisoners in Britain who have been told they would remain in prison until their dying day. In her report in July 2002, Judge Janet Smith, who chaired the inquiry into the physician who came to be known as 'Dr Death,' said Shipman may have been addicted to killing. They were, by and large, elderly women who died after being given a lethal injection, usually of morphine, while Shipman visited them in their homes. The Smith inquiry had looked into a total of 887 deaths, and it concluded that he had killed 200 people, in addition to the 15 for whom he had been convicted. It added that there was a 'real suspicion' that Shipman may have been responsible for an additional 45 deaths. 'He betrayed (patients') trust in a way and to an extent that I believe is unparalleled in history,' Smith said."
—Reuters, "Britain's worst serial killer 'Dr Death' dies in prison," January 13, 2004
www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1024925.htm



When your kid dies from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome after a shot from the doctor, and you get convicted of homicide for Shaken Baby Syndrome to keep the doctor out of jail, just remember I told you so. OR JUST SAY NO!!!

Quote:


Abbie Bernstein: "Do you believe a government can be shamed into or out of what it's doing by the actions of individuals?"

Joss Whedon: "The idea was to say that people can make a difference, they can show the wrongs that are being done. They can speak out against them and make people aware of them. They can even create giant scandals. Sometimes they can topple governments. The point is that the truth is always more important than the power structure, and whether you make a dent or not, the fact that you succeeded in trying is a victory."

-Serenity - The Official Visual Companion



FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:48 AM

FREERADICAL42


Well, now that PN has weighed in on the anti-inoculation side, I think it doesn't stand a chance of being credible.

A shame.

"See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:59 AM

OLDENGLANDDRY


I'm sure that PN feels a prick most of the time but that's another story.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:03 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:
Well, now that PN has weighed in on the anti-inoculation side, I think it doesn't stand a chance of being credible.

A shame.



Do you think your total lack of facts qualifies you to discuss anything or convince anyone? Are you a govt disinfo agent, sucking your unfair share of Bush Jr's illegal $2-billion propaganda budget?

"You can't stop the signal! Damn Gangsta Govt killed me with a sword!"
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:09 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
I'm sure that PN feels a prick most of the time but that's another story.



Wow, another total lack of facts attempting to influence the gullible.

Quote:


Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation

Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist


by H. Michael Sweeney
www.MKZine.com
Spring/Summer 2003

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

www.whale.to/m/disin.html
www.911review.org/Wiki/RulesOfDisinformation.shtml
www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html

Examples & response:
www.proparanoid.net/truth.htm




"A monarch's neck should always have a noose around it - it keeps him upright."
—Robert A. Heinlein

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:27 AM

FREERADICAL42


Quote:

Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
I'm sure that PN feels a prick most of the time but that's another story.



Don't feed the troll.

"See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:43 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:
Quote:

Originally posted by oldenglanddry:
I'm sure that PN feels a prick most of the time but that's another story.



Don't feed the troll.



Aha - another brain-dead moron without a life types irrelevant words on a keyboard, without bothering his little "brain" with pesky facts.

Watch this video if you want to raise your IQ:

Quote:


FREE VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Vaccinations - The Hidden Truth from Oz

15 speakers, including 5 medical doctors, plus researchers, parents and a registered dog breeder reveal the true, well documented answers to: Was it vaccines that saved us? Do vaccines prevent or cause diseases? Can statistics be misleading? What poisons do vaccinations contain? What damage are vaccines causing? Are childhood diseases really "deadly"? Why does vaccination continue? What are our rights? Can damage be evaluated and countered? What is the true key to immunity? Presents orthodox medical research. Fully informs in just 90 mins. Nothing is safe from the vaccine invasion, not even our genes. They shot first, we asked questions later. Now we know...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8610554679207090010&q=vaccines



Yes, your Gangsta Govt loves you. That's why they perform ritual "simulated" human sacrifice at Bohemian Grove...
Quote:



Bush Gang and Bill Clinton-Blythe Rockefeller worshipping Molech/Lucifer/Satan at Bohemian Grove in Monte Rio, California on Summer Solstice. Photo copyright Bohemian Club annual yearbook
http://www.lonelantern.org/bohemian_grove.html

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove
Original full-length version - Infiltration of Jewish Bohemian Grove presidential compound and homosexual nudist colony that performs "mock" human sacrifice to 50-foot-tall idol of Molech - Where Bush Gang and Bill Clinton-Blythe III (Rockefeller) vacation every year to worship Satan and run nekked in the woods with 3,000 homosexual world dictators - Undercover video by Infowars.com
http://www.archive.org/details/DSIBG
http://www.infowars.com/bg1.html

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove and The Order of Death
Two documentaries in one - An employee of Bohemian Grove presidential compound used undercover video to capture the 50-foot-tall idol of Molech and "mock" human sacrifice up close and in broad daylight - Undercover video by Infowars.com
http://www.lastingnetworks.com/alex/

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Boners at Bohemian Grove
Music video by Counter Coup and John Lee
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/6737.php

VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Snuff kiddie porn at Bohemian Grove
Alex Jones of Infowars.com interviews Senator John DeCamp author of The Franklin Coverup, music by Counter Coup and Bohemian Club
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/6737.php

Moloch.
an ancient Phoenician and Ammonite god, to whom children were sacrificed by burning.
-Webster's New World Dictionary

"And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones. And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not: Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people."
-Leviticus 20:1-5, Christian Bible KJV

"And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon."
-1 Kings 11:6-7, Christian Bible KJV

"Because of all the evil of the children of Israel and of the children of Judah, which they have done to provoke me to anger, they, their kings, their princes, their priests, and their prophets, and the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And they have turned unto me the back, and not the face: though I taught them, rising up early and teaching them, yet they have not hearkened to receive instruction. But they set their abominations in the house, which is called by my name, to defile it. And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin."
-Jeremiah 32:32-35, Christian Bible KJV

"And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
-Leviticus 18:21-22, Christian Bible KJV

And the king sent, and they gathered unto him all the elders of Judah and of Jerusalem. And the king commanded Hilkiah the high priest, and the priests of the second order, and the keepers of the door, to bring forth out of the temple of the LORD all the vessels that were made for Baal, and for the grove, and for all the host of heaven: and he burned them without Jerusalem in the fields of Kidron, and carried the ashes of them unto Bethel. And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove. And he defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech. And he slew all the priests of the high places that were there upon the altars, and burned men's bones upon them, and returned to Jerusalem. Jehoahaz was twenty and three years old when he began to reign; and he reigned three months in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Hamutal, the daughter of Jeremiah of Libnah. And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD. And Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold to Pharaoh; but he taxed the land to give the money according to the commandment of Pharaoh: he exacted the silver and the gold of the people of the land, of every one according to his taxation, to give it unto Pharaohnechoh. Jehoiakim was twenty and five years old when he began to reign; And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his fathers had done."
-2 Kings 23:1-37

"But it's not just the ratty part of town. The upper class in San Francisco is that way. The Bohemian Grove, which I attend from time to time - it is the most faggy goddamn thing that you would ever imagine with that San Francisco crowd."
-President Richard "Dick" Nixon, White House audiotape, Nixon Presidential Library, 1971
http://www.prisonplanet.com/032604nixontape.html (audio download)

More photos and news from Bohemian Grove:
http://www.nwowatcher.com/smf/index.php?topic=152
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove


Bush Gang and Bill Clinton-Blythe Rockefeller performing "mock" human sacrifice to 50-foot tall idol of Molech/Lucifer/Satan at Bohemian Grove. That's a "live" human body burning as it screams in agony over the loudspeakers. Photo copyright Bohemian Club annual yearbook
http://www.43places.com/places/view/379646

"In the event that I am reincarnated I would like to return as a deadly virus in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
—His Royal Highness Prince Philip, husband Queen Elizabeth of Britain (aka Queen of Babylon at Bohemian Grove), father-in-law of Princess Diana, from autobiography, Down to Earth: Speeches and Writings of His Royal Highness Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, on the Relationship of Man With His Environment, in chapter titled, "His Royal Virus"
www.amazon.com

GEORGE W. BUSH reigns at the White House -- because he has more royal blood than Al Gore. And because of his noble heritage, Burke's Peerage, the bible of British aristocracy, correctly predicted Bush's victory before Election Day. "Governor Bush is related to more imperial royal and noble houses than any previous President," said Burke's Peerage publishing director Harold Brooks-Baker. FAST FACT! "He's closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne, including a close kinship with all members of the British House of Windsor, making him a distant cousin of the Queen and Prince Charles."
—National Enquirer (CIA owned and operated by OSS/CIA agent Alexander Pope - #1 propaganda value at every checkout line in USA), "BUSH'S WIN: IT'S ALL IN HIS ROYAL BLOOD!", December 28, 2000



"You can't stop the signal! But stupid sheeple can ignore it at their peril."
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:52 AM

FREERADICAL42


Quote:

Originally posted by canttakesky:
Quote:

Originally posted by freeradical42:
You should look up "Measles transmission and vaccine effectiveness during a large outbreak on a densely populated island: implications for vaccination policy."

The abstract is useless for evaluating methodology. For example, it says, "MMR vaccine effectiveness was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-98%) for 1 dose and 95% (95% CI, 82%-98%) for 2 doses." Where did they get that number? That makes all the difference, doesn't it?

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ucp/WebIntegrationServlet?call=Conten
tWeblet&url=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal/issues/v42n3/37212/37212.html?erFrom=1700901065199949638Guest¤t_page=content


Since I don't want to pay $15 for the full text of this article, I will have to go to the library and get it. I'll get back to you on this when I've read it.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
A conclusion is the place where you get tired of thinking.
-- Arthur Bloch



In other news, I'm glad you're willing to actually go out and read the available data on this. My referencing that paper was based on a quick search of PubMed, so there may be many more resources on this topic to help you form your opinion.

"See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 10:58 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I read PN's stuff because within the tons of garbage there IS some truth. Perhaps PN is young enough not to remember the panic that polio caused, or the scourge of smallpox. ALL diseases are caused by the conspiracy, doncha know!

---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 11:00 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
IF your children get the disease the effects WILL be worse than from vaccination.


A few years ago, my husband came home one day with a cough. Next day, I and our 2 yr old daughter were coughing too. The cough in my husband and me were mild, and went away after a few days. My daughter's cough quickly turned into a series of spasms punctuated by a gag reflex. We had all contracted pertussis. Had it not been for my daughter's symptoms, we would have been none the wiser. My 2 yr old was completely fine in between coughs, though the coughs themselves were very uncomfortable. She had it for a few weeks. I kept her home for 3 months, though my husband went to work, and I went grocery shopping. The biggest suffering caused by pertussis was lack of a social life for 3 months.

So again, I respectfully disagree with you that the disease WILL be worse than the vaccination. I have talked to quite a few others whose children have had pertussis, and while it was not fun or comfortable, it was not dangerous at all. Many educated parents and professionals believe the only true danger pertussis poses is to very young infants, whose respiratory systems may succumb to the spasms. If there is a way to protect them without risking my children, I would gladly do so. But I am not going to pretend their lives are worth more than my children's lives. And that's assuming the pertussis vaccine prevents transmission, which is questionable given the increasing number of subclinical pertussis that is occurring.

Just because I don't care about society as much as I love my children does not mean I don't care about society at all. I prefer to find solutions for society that don't risk the health of my children, or anyone else's children. There has got to be a better way, but we're not looking for it because we are too busy defending the current way. If I could influence policy, I would put a LOT more effort doing much better vaccine research, instead of the infomercial and whitewashing crap the pharm corporations put out.

I offered the example of the mother with 2 autistic children (whose symptoms started shortly after vaccination) who doesn't want her third vaccinated. She would rather risk measles, mumps, and rubella (which come and go) than another case of autism (which is permanently disabling). From what I am hearing on this board, most folks here concur with authorities in denying her that choice.

I guess you've answered my question.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river.
--Nikita Khrushchev (1894 - 1971)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 11:18 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


If gangsters in govt cared anything about public health and disease prevention, they would close the gorram borders! They would not invite 200-million more illegal aliens to USA in the next 20 years, all without any attempt at medical screening. Millions of these diseased illegal aliens will be serving your food, and sitting next to your kids in govt skools... Doh!

BOHEMIAN GROVE BOHEMIAN GROVE BOHEMIAN GROVE BOHEMIAN GROVE!!!! Funny how folks get instant amnesia at the horror that our world dictators romp nekked peeing on the California redwoods. Funny how no skools teach that fact of history for the past 125 years. Funny how the Media Mafia keeps that Top Secret...


"You can't stop the signal! Unless you kill me with illegal alien diseases."
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 11:30 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

A few years ago, my husband came home one day with a cough. Next day, I and our 2 yr old daughter were coughing too. The cough in my husband and me were mild, and went away after a few days. My daughter's cough quickly turned into a series of spasms punctuated by a gag reflex. We had all contracted pertussis. Had it not been for my daughter's symptoms, we would have been none the wiser. My 2 yr old was completely fine in between coughs, though the coughs themselves were very uncomfortable. She had it for a few weeks. I kept her home for 3 months, though my husband went to work, and I went grocery shopping. The biggest suffering caused by pertussis was lack of a social life for 3 months.- CTS
I don't know how long the infectious period is for pertussis. I wonder if your husband should have gone to work. He COULD have spread it to someone with a baby at home.... that's how this stuff happens. SignyM
Quote:

So again, I respectfully disagree with you that the disease WILL be worse than the vaccination. I have talked to quite a few others whose children have had pertussis, and while it was not fun or comfortable, it was not dangerous at all. Many educated parents and professionals believe the only true danger pertussis poses is to very young infants, whose respiratory systems may succumb to the spasms. CTS
CTS: What you're doing is comparing the BEST case pertussis infection with the WORST case vaccination effect. That's not a fair, reasonable, or intellectually honest comparison. Yes, in most cases pertussis is a self-limiting disease. But in most people, the vaccination itself has even fewer side effects than the disease. Looking at the "worst" end of the spectrum, pertussis can be fatal; with modern medicine the fatality rate is about 0.5% (500/ 1,000,000) and the encephalopathy rate is about 0.3% (300/ 1,000,000). www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1184075
In comparison, I can't find ANY reference to a fatal vaccination reaction, and an estimated encephalopathy rate as high as 0.00001% (10/ 1,000,000). If you can find some data along these lines... not supposition and hypothesis but actual studies.... please link them.- SignyM
Quote:

Just because I don't care about society as much as I love my children does not mean I don't care about society at all. I prefer to find solutions for society that don't risk the health of my children, or anyone else's children.-CTS
For your children, because of specific contraindications, the risks may outweigh the benefits. But one of the things you're missing is that sometimes doing NOTHING is riskier than doing "something". I've run into this before: people on my neuro bbx who are so mesermized by the risk of medication that even tho their child is seizing 3Xday and gorked out from seizures all the time they're frozen by their own fears. -SignyM
Quote:

I offered the example of the mother with 2 autistic children (whose symptoms started shortly after vaccination) who doesn't want her third vaccinated. She would rather risk measles, mumps, and rubella (which come and go) than another case of autism (which is permanently disabling). From what I am hearing on this board, most folks here concur with authorities in denying her that choice.-CTS
AFA the women whose children were dx with autism after vaccination... I know of two people who claim that, one of which is fully documented. I have no doubt that there is some connection between the immune system and autism (The "risk" gene for autism- the MET gene- controls the gut brain, and the immune system.) Having autistic children in the family should IMHO preclude vaccination. Having said that, unvaccinated children SHOULD be treated as potential carriers in times of outbreak and quarantined.- SignyM
Quote:

If there is a way to protect them without risking my children, I would gladly do so. But I am not going to pretend their lives are worth more than my children's lives. And that's assuming the pertussis vaccine prevents transmission, which is questionable given the increasing number of subclinical pertussis that is occurring.-CTS
SUBCLINICAL? That means infections with no symptoms. If there are no symptoms, how is pertussis being diagnosed? Links please? _signyM


---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 11:48 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Hi CTS,

I'm just going down the posts. This is from you:
"I wasn't aware that professional journals where scientists publish their research findings were part of the government."

Independent research is funded by the government. Without government funding the only research would be privately funded and thus liable to bias. However, there is another issue with government-funded research, and that is it takes place after a medicine is released to the public (if at all).

My question is really about the schizophrenia most USers have toward government regulation. It's viewed as a infringment on business 'freedom' (which people mistakenly equate with their own personal freedoms). And so the FDA is hampered and hamstrung by policy from doing a credible job.

To focus my question more - how would you feel about an empowered FDA that really could do independent research in the interests of protecting citizens?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 12:09 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!



Dr Julie Gerberding runs Jewish Centers for Disease Creation Level 5 Bioweapons Lab
www.vaccinetruth.org

Quote:


Mad Scientists Resurrect Killer Flu

By Gina Kolata
The New York Times
OCTOBER 6, 2005

Two teams of federal and university scientists announced Wednesday that they have resurrected the 1918 influenza virus, the cause of one of history's most deadly epidemics, and have found that, unlike the viruses that caused more recent flu pandemics of 1957 and 1968, it was actually a bird flu that jumped directly to humans.

The work, being published in the journals Nature and Science, involved getting the complete genetic sequence of the 1918 virus, using techniques of molecular biology to synthesize it, and then using it to infect mice and human lung cells in a specially equipped secure lab at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

In a joint statement, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Julie Gerberding, director of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said: "The new studies could have an immediate impact by helping scientist focus on detecting changes in the evolving H5N1 virus that might make widespread transmission among humans more likely."

www.iht.com/articles/2005/10/05/news/flu.php


1918 Influenza Pandemic Caused by Highly Conserved Viruses with Two Receptor-Binding Variants

*Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rockville, Maryland, USA; †National Institute for Medical Research, London, United Kingdom; ‡Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom; and §Retroscreen Virology, Ltd., London, United Kingdom
www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol9no10/02-0789.htm

"The art of warfare will be vastly different than it is today. 'Combat' likely will take place in new dimensions. Advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
—Rabbi Dov Zakheim, Dick Cheney, "Jeb" Bush, Sir Donald "I Sold WMD Bioweapons To Saddam Hussein" Rumsfeld Knight of the British Empire, Jewish Project for a New American Century Corporation (PNAC), Rebuilding America's Defenses, 1999
www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf




TRUST ME - I'M A JEW?

"All vows, obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called onam, onas, or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next, we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths. And it shall be forgiven all the congregation of the children of Israel."
-Jewish Kol Nidre prayer on Yom Kippur aka Day of Atonement
www.JewishEncyclopedia.com


Quote:


Centers for Disease Control Director Julie Gerberding has plan to 'save' us from 'bird flu'

by Dominus Noster

http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/nucleus/media/rsscache/20060522-juli
egerberdingwitch.JPG

Dr. Julie Gerberding pictured above.
Dr. Gerberding says, "Trust me"

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Centers for Disease Control Director Julie Gerberding has helped create a plan to save the world from the "bird flu." With a smile on her face, she talked about the possibility that the government may need to declare martial law, and people like herself would get more power and funding if the "bird flu" ever struck.

"How awesome that would be if there was an actual bird flu threat, since I would get so much more money and power, and I would feel important," said Dr. Julie Gerberding. "Right now, the idea is to scare everybody into trusting the government and big pharma as their saviors. Every time I open my mouth about the bird flu, my pharma stocks surge."

When one reporter asked Dr. Gerberding how she can make such statements about how scary the bird flu is, since no bird flu test even exists, Gerberding had security promptly remove the reporter. Dr. Gerberding then spoke about the need to ensure that everybody gets a nice bird flu vaccine needle with their name written all over it, which the government would provide since the government loves everybody so much and cares about whether or not we all live.

Even though the government routinely uses vaccines on its own military that have caused a plurality of health problems in hundreds of thousands of service members, and then does nothing to address their problems after the fact, Dr. Julie Gerberding insisted that we can "trust" the government on this one.

"I am Dr. Julie Gerberding. I know what I am talking about. I work for the government. You can trust me and the government on this issue. We know what is best," said Gerberding.

www.unconfirmedsources.com/?itemid=1720





"There is no news. There's the truth of the signal. What I see. And, there's the puppet theater... the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public. You can't stop the signal."
-Mr Universe, Pirate TV

somnambulism.
Syn. sleepwalking, wandering, noctambulism, noctambulation;
-Websters New World Dictionary

FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 12:09 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Still going down the thread,

CTS,

Polio vaccines ARE effective and have eradicated polio in countries with mass vaccination. Even given your statistics, the FACT is that there has been no outbreaks of paralytic polio in the US since mass vaccination. What you have indicated to me is that you're willing to write off the numbers of people who were permanently paralyzed before the vaccine. "1977 - The National Health Interview Survey reports that there are 254,000 persons living in the United States who had been paralyzed by polio. Some estimates place the number at more than 600, 000." http://www.cloudnet.com/~edrbsass/poliotimeline.htm

I'm all for debate, but, really now. Do you not consider this a significant benefit? Or did this major fact escape your statistical 'analysis'?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 12:20 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Still going down the thread,

CTS,

Polio vaccines ARE effective and have eradicated polio in countries with mass vaccination. Even given your statistics, the FACT is that there has been no outbreaks of paralytic polio in the US since mass vaccination. What you have indicated to me is that you're willing to write off the numbers of people who were permanently paralyzed before the vaccine. "1977 - The National Health Interview Survey reports that there are 254,000 persons living in the United States who had been paralyzed by polio. Some estimates place the number at more than 600, 000." http://www.cloudnet.com/~edrbsass/poliotimeline.htm

I'm all for debate, but, really now. Do you not consider this a significant benefit? Or did this major fact escape your statistical 'analysis'?



Polio was "cured" by redefining "polio" to censor all the new cases of polio caused by the "vaccines" with live polio. Same with all other diseases "cured" by "vaccines":

Quote:


FREE VIDEO DOWNLOAD: Vaccinations - The Hidden Truth from Oz

15 speakers, including 5 medical doctors, plus researchers, parents and a registered dog breeder reveal the true, well documented answers to: Was it vaccines that saved us? Do vaccines prevent or cause diseases? Can statistics be misleading? What poisons do vaccinations contain? What damage are vaccines causing? Are childhood diseases really "deadly"? Why does vaccination continue? What are our rights? Can damage be evaluated and countered? What is the true key to immunity? Presents orthodox medical research. Fully informs in just 90 mins. Nothing is safe from the vaccine invasion, not even our genes. They shot first, we asked questions later. Now we know...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8610554679207090010&q=vaccines



Select to view spoiler:


Fed woman: It's the Pax. The G-Paxilon Hydroclorate that we added to the air processors. It was supposed to calm the population, weed out aggression. Well, it works. The people here stopped fighting. And then they stopped everything else. They stopped going to work... they stopped breeding, talking, eating. There's 30-million people here, and they all just let themselves die.
(smashing down door)
(whine, wimper)
I have to be quick. About a tenth of a percent of... the population had the opposite reaction to the Pax. Their aggressor response increased beyond madness. They have become...
(smashing down door)
Well, they've killed most of us. And not just killed... they've done things.
Wash: Reavers. They made them.
Fed woman: I won't live to report this, but people have to know. We meant it for the best... to make people safer.
(Reavers growling)
God!
(Fed woman screaming)
(Reaver munching)
Reaver 1: Bill, does this taste like chicken to you?
Reaver 2: Ted, I think it takes like sheeple.
Reaver 3: Does this scalp make my butt look fat?



FIREFLY SERENITY PILOT MUSIC VIDEO V2
Tangerine Dream - Thief Soundtrack: Confrontation
http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/8912.php
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=8cd2bd0379340120e7a6ed00f2a53ee5
.1044556

www.myspace.com/piratenewsctv
www.piratenews.org


Does that seem right to you?
www.scifi.com/onair/

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 1:06 PM

KANEMAN


"The dilemma is, do they have the right to question authority and have those doubts?"


See my original post.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 1:13 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Frem,

Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Why is it that I suddenly feel trapped between a Klan lynch mob and a Panthers meeting ?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

I'm actually QUITE interested in facts and so I would appreciate your specific input. I agree with you completely on some things. I DON'T trust the FDA as currently formed. I linked several New England Journal of Medicine articles which were quite explicit in what's wrong with the approval process and criteria. It's unconscionable. But I believe the answer is to demand more from a govenment that claims to represent us.
Quote:

So, where's the independant, peer reviewed, proper scientific method study ?
As to studies of MMR and autism, they do exist. Looking under google scholar I came across this: http://jama.highwire.org/cgi/content/abstract/285/9/1183
Essentially no correlation was observed between the secular trend of early childhood MMR immunization rates in California and the secular trend in numbers of children with autism enrolled in California's regional service center system. For the 1980-1994 birth cohorts, a marked, sustained increase in autism case numbers was noted, from 44 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1980 cohort to 208 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1994 cohort (a 373% relative increase), but changes in early childhood MMR immunization coverage over the same time period were much smaller and of shorter duration. Immunization coverage by the age of 24 months increased from 72% to 82%, a relative increase of only 14%, over the same time period.

However, there are OTHER large studies involving hundreds of thousands of children not limited to the US, or even the western world. Similar studies have been done for thimerosal (for example, a Danish study of 467,450 children finding no link with autism http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/290/13/1763?AddInterest=
1053
)
Quote:

There also exists some evidence, referenced through the State of California DDS, of a rather sharp drop in Autism cases *after* Thimerosal was removed from common vaccines - no scientific study exists, but the numbers are there.
http://www.dds.ca.gov/autism/autism_main.cfm

I did look through the site and didn't find the numbers you were referring to. What I found was that autism has skyrocketed without any letup. So if you could post a link to the specific data intended, I would appreciate it.
Quote:

And that ever so "safe" flu vaccine, which everyone assured you was so safe.. ain't.
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/129/117515.htm

In the interests of accuracy, I did want to point out that the product in question is NOT a vaccine, it's a medicine.

The other thing I wanted to point out is that mass vaccination is an effort in epidemiology, a branch of medicine you may not be familiar with. And that you seem to be demanding absolute guarantees, which don't exist anywhere in this life.

But in any case, I share your disdain for 'government in service of business'. If government really regulated the medical industry, it would have demanded the removal of thimerosal just on suspicion. It would be looking after the safety of medicines and vaccines before being released to the public, not after. It would be conducting major studies on who benefits from and who is hurt by mass vaccination.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 1:29 PM

CITIZEN


CTS:
I understand you're probably ignoring me, but if you are not what are your opinions on what I have said?



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 1:46 PM

KANEMAN


"Or should your opinion that disease is worse than side effects trump mine in the care of MY CHILDREN"


No one is making your children take a flu vac. We try to get as many children inoculated to SERIOUS diseases as possible, and it has worked over the last century. Really worked. The proof is in the poxxing.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 1:49 PM

KANEMAN


CITIZEN

CTS:
I understand you're probably ignoring me


Citz what have you done now? Bad Citizen...Bad.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 4:17 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Cit, do you even READ the posts before digging further into your entrenchment ?
Quote:

Here's a hint, I don't have an axe to grind, nor am I guessing, when I make blunt statements, I just expect people to actually do their own investigation and make their own judgement calls - if you come to a different conclusion, that's you.

I didn't say word one about your judgement, I stated that your own thrust, and prettymuch the entirely of your post, was flaming mine, and/or my RIGHT to have my own judgement, something I find repellent and insulting.

If I come to a conclusion different than yours, based on an incomplete set of facts, that is my option, and my right, and any attempt to take that from me will result in me not liking it very much, how simple a thing is this to NOT get across ?
Quote:

Sure no mandatory vaccinations, but if YOUR choice leads to YOU getting that disease your health service or medical insurer is under no obligation to pay for your treatment. If a vaccination is provided I see no reason why other people should foot the bill for your decision. Maybe you can provide me with a reason why they should?

Fine, show me your rabies vacc cert then, and THEN we'll talk, if you wanna be ridiculous about it, no one said that folks shouldn't take responsibility for their decisions, but then the converse must also be true - if the state makes vaccination mandatory they must then also pay for those injured by vaccination or resultant side effects - quid pro quo.

But you came down with a nasty, one-sided, entrenched fullisade against the whole concept, in spite of established, and in my opinion, significant, evidence.
Quote:

I think there should be research into it, but anyone saying there is SOME evidence is merely following a post hoc analysis.

As I suspected, you dismiss two very good studies out of hand because they did not fit your narrow little worldview.
Quote:

I thought parents should have the right to choose to have single vaccinations rather than MMR if they wished, but that since MMR was offered by the NHS they should pay for the single injections themselves. If they make the choice, they pay for it.

Fine by me, that's the whole point you seem to be missing - the idea of informed consent, if you were to offer me the choice between a vacc without Thimerosal and one with it, hell yes - but when you get to mandating such things, you remove even THAT choice because of financial collusion with a mandatory scheme, if the Thimerosal crap is cheaper for big pharma, that's what they'll use, and safety be damned.
Quote:

You turn up and immediately question my decency because you've decided what you want my position to be and you've decided that I don't know what I'm talking about and you think you have a right to talk about “wasting your time on this imminent flamefest”? You're playing more than your part in creating it.

I question your decency because you think you've got some right to make other peoples choices for them, and then on top of it have the arrogance to flame someone who disputes that idea - folks have a right to disagree with you, I just don't see much of the point of trying to when it's pointedly obvious that you intend to ignore any evidence that contradicts what you wish to believe.

And no, as far as vaccination goes, I do NOT have an axe to grind, I drive a cab for cryin out loud, which means I have a pretty damned significant exposure to just about every pathogen known to man - for my own safety as well as that of my passengers I want maximum protection, but I want a SAFE, EFFECTIVE solution as such as possible, and minimum risk from that protection, something only informed consent and personal choice can offer... my axe to grind is on having that choice, because removing it would place decisions best left to the individual, in the hands of untrustworthy entities such as big pharma, the FDA, and the government.
Quote:

Though of course if I do, for once, bother to think for myself and come to a different conclusion its because I have no Human decency, right?

By all means, think for yourself - but in the name of decency do NOT try to force your own, personal conclusions onto others, or they might well become annoyed with you - what part of this concept is not sinking in here ?
Quote:

So what, you're questioning the link between obesity, heart disease and so on and Junk food?

Actually yes, but save that for another thread cause there's a whole level of detail to that which'd take up too much room here, I just don't see protein, red meat, and naturally occuring sugars to be as dangerous as additives, etc yadda yadda... some other time for this topic.
Quote:

YOUR life, YOUR decisions, so YOU take the responsibility for them.

Damn right, my point exactly, and I don't attempt to force them on anyone else, an example folks could learn from.

As for nasty, good! - by all means fire back, then think about what made you angry and why, and how... dry logic only goes so far, and we ARE human, not machines, sometimes a little bit of aggression results in a better debate, your post was insulting, patronizing, and all denials aside, you meant it to be.
I never deny my lack of civility, and yes I meant to insult and annoy you.
Quid Pro Quo.

And no, I wasn't laying into you CTS, your position is quite similar to mine, informed personal choice and responsibility above all, instead of tossing the decision into the hands of folk proven to be untrustworthy.

I find that most of the pro-vac screaming involves a whole lot of straw-man "what if" arguments that some of the very folk using have shot down in other threads.
(Example: So, since Saddam *might* have had WMD, it was good idea to invade)
You can't use one brand of logic on one topic, and another in a second topic, and then have credibility or consistency in that logic, something Antimason's been grilled on repeatedly, and some folks have replicated that hypocrisy here themselves.

Rue
Quote:

I'm actually QUITE interested in facts and so I would appreciate your specific input. I agree with you completely on some things. I DON'T trust the FDA as currently formed. I linked several New England Journal of Medicine articles which were quite explicit in what's wrong with the approval process and criteria. It's unconscionable. But I believe the answer is to demand more from a govenment that claims to represent us.

That is a big part of my argument, folks are demanding that I take on faith the word of folks who've been proven untrustworthy, with my health and life in the balance - folks who have significant credibility issues, who have a history of collusion with big pharma (research the approval of aspartame, for example) and a general reputation for incompetence.

And this
Quote:

(a 373% relative increase)

And we're supposed to take that as statsicially insignificant, gotta be other factors, yeah, can't POSSIBLY have anything to do with... yadda fekkin yadda.
Uh huh, Sure... right.

This one now.
Quote:

I did look through the site and didn't find the numbers you were referring to. What I found was that autism has skyrocketed without any letup. So if you could post a link to the specific data intended, I would appreciate it.

I think you'll have to dig through some of the documents themselves, for the 03/04 period, there is a small but significant decline in autism cases in general population that *seems* (no scientific study, yet, research would be helpful) to coincide with the removal of Thimerosal from childhood MMR vaccines in the region, but be advised also the the numbers do shift some because the sample size extends due to population increase as well.
The irony is that this particular trend was spotted by Jack Kirby, who's about as pro-vac as one can get, to the point of compromising his own medical ethics.

Quote:

The other thing I wanted to point out is that mass vaccination is an effort in epidemiology, a branch of medicine you may not be familiar with. And that you seem to be demanding absolute guarantees, which don't exist anywhere in this life.

epide-wubba-who ?
I'll need that in captain dummy talk, if you would.
(which means no, and the whole herd immunity concept goes right over my head too, *I* am not responsible for society, nor is it, nor should it, be responsible for me.)

I am not lookin for absolute guarantees, just lookin for maximum safety and protection, something I do NOT feel will happen in light of the actions of all the principals involved if such things are mandatory.

The Salon article is particularly revealing - that INSTEAD of acting immediately to remove Thimerosal and create a safer vaccine, FIRST they covered it up, lied, falsified research, and tried to alter the lawmaking process (and in a fashion that qualifies as a RICO offense) to protect themselves, and their profits, and be damned to the citizenry.

And folks want me to TRUST these folk ? puh-lease!

The idea that folks questioning the process, and most especially questioning the safety of the product, the accuracy of the claims, etc - are totally against vaccination of any kind, under any circumstances, is a strawman fallacy which certain folk then argued against instead of the REAL issue of informed consent.

I fail to see what's so all-fired wrong about taking control of your own life and health decisions - and from previous posts which I am sure you are well aware of, I have damned good reason not to trust "The Medical Establishment", and if I had, I wouldn't be sitting here bitchin.

We need
#1 - Proper research by neutral parties with no agenda or collusion, using proper scientific method.
#2 - Informed consent, and the right to make our own health decisions based on the evidence available to us and our interpretation of it.
#3 - Less collusion between the FDA and Big Pharma, preferably none, followed by actual investigations into the matter, and if necessary, criminal charges.

I fail to see where the desire for any of those things is such a horrible danger to society, only the worldview of people so entrenched in their beliefs that the rickety towers of their faith in the medical establisment would quiver if the presumptions and assumptions holding them up were removed.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 5:11 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Hi FremD,

At the same time there was a a 373% relative increase in autism, there was a 14% relative increase in MMR vaccination. That was the point of the article - the two weren't ratioed in a way that would indicate cause and effect.

To me the whole thing about mass-health (epidemiology, more or less) is that it gives YOU better odds of good health.

Take the example of polio. Mass vaccination creates a 'polio free' environment where epidemic transmission of polio can't occur. Because of that, whether or not YOUR body produced 'neutralizing' polio antibodies (antibodies that would block polio) you are free of the chance of being paralyzed.

That's the benefit of mass vaccination - an new environment is created that increases everyone's chance at good health, including yours. It's not like you're 'sacrificing' for the good of others - you're reducing your own personal risk by reducing common risk.

(To reprise the debate about polio: Both CTS and PN say that mass vaccination was either minimally effective or downright harmful. CTS said that "polio is mostly a benign disease" and that the impressive reduction of polio cases was b/c polio was redefined. PN says the vaccine 'causes' epidemic polio.

The overwhelming fact is that in 1977 between 254,000 and 600,000 people in the US were permanently paralyzed or had died from epidemic polio. Since the advent of polio vaccines and mass vaccination, there has been NO epidemic polio and no mass numbers of dead or paralyzed people as a result.

In this case, mass vaccination - even with some small individual risk - reduced your chances of death or paralysis from 1/10 to as close to nil as you can get.)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 5:14 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Without government funding the only research would be privately funded and thus liable to bias.

I suppose I have a different view of government funded medical research, which I consider to be just as biased as privately funded medical research. I have read a lot of govt funded crap on CFS, for example, which were as biased and incompetent as they come.

Quote:

To focus my question more - how would you feel about an empowered FDA that really could do independent research in the interests of protecting citizens?
Ideally, I would prefer a solution that isn't dependent on tax-payers. Since that isn't going to happen, I could settle for an empowered FDA *if* it can demonstrate a consistent level of impartiality and integrity. However, that ain't gonna happen either, so I might as well stick up for my ideal unlikely solution: research voluntarily funded by patients/consumers (maybe via non-profits), who have a genuine vested interest in real solutions. Some of that is being done already. CFS and autism patient non-profits, for example, are hiring researchers privately to investigate questions the medical establishment (including govt funded researchers) won't touch.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
There is scarcely anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse, and sell a little more cheaply. The person who buys on price alone is this man's lawful prey.
--John Ruskin (1819 - 1900), (attributed)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 5:29 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
CTS:
I understand you're probably ignoring me, but if you are not what are your opinions on what I have said?

Citizen and everyone,

I see a lot of comments that I disagree with, of course. The way I see it, I have two choices. I can argue against every comment and answer every question, or I can state and defend my position and let it go at that. Either way, I am convinced that none of you will change your minds because of anything I've said. So, instead of getting mired in a war over minutiae, I have chosen the second option. It seems more efficient. If all the posts I have already written does not make my position clear, then I don't know what will. If I try my best and am still misunderstood, I am just going to have to live with it.

If you have a pointed question that hasn't been covered, I will gladly answer. But I don't see a point in back-and-forth bickering, do you?

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
--Will Rogers

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 5:33 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


PN,

I have no idea where to start.

Polio vaccines did eradicate polio. How do I know this? B/c there are no longer hundreds of thousands of people in the US with paralysis or who have died from it.

About AIDS - I don't know why you think it's bacterial rather than viral. I'd have to put that in the 'wholly-unfounded' category.

When it comes to Lyme disease, I did a little looking. There are MANY species of borellia. Below is a list (somewhat scrambled but the link is there.) As a genus, it certainly has a fair share of pathogens, most more virulent than the Lyme species. And as a bio-weapon, it would only be effective in the long, long, long haul, if at all. It's not a disease that transmits from person to person, or that causes debilitating illness in many people, or in a short enough time to cripple a country. So while I don't necessarily believe whatever the government tells me, Lyme disease as a bio-weapon is wildly illogical.

http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/reprint/50/4/381.pdf
B. hermsii New World tick-borne 100 0. hermsi Western United States and Canada
relapsing fever
B. turicatae New World tick-borne 86 0. turicata Southwestern United States and
relapsing fever northern Mexico
B. parkeri New World tick-borne 77 0. parkeri Western United States and Baja
relapsing fever California
B. mazzottii New World tick-borne ND 0. talaje Mexico and Central America
relapsing fever
B. venezuelensis New World tick-borne ND 0. rudis Central America and northern South
relapsing fever America
B. duttonii Old World tick-borne 17 0. moubata Sub-Saharan Africa
relapsing fever
B. crocidurae Old World tick-borne 32-35 0. erraticus North Africa, East Africa, Near East,
relapsing fever Middle East, and southeast Europe
B. persica Old World tick-borne ND 0. tholozani Middle East, Greece, and Central Asia
relapsing fever
B. hispanica Old World tick-borne ND 0. marocanus Iberian peninsula and western North
relapsing fever Africa
B. latyschewii Old World tick-borne ND 0. tartakowskyi Iran, Afghanistan, south-central USSR,
relapsing fever Iraq, and southwestern USSR
B. caucasia Old World tick-borne ND 0. asperus Iraq and southwestern USSR
relapsing fever
B. recurrentis Louse-borne relapsing ND Pediculus humanus Worldwide
fever
B. anserina Avian borreliosis 53-63 Argas persicus and Worldwide
other Argas spp.
B. theileri Bovine borreliosis ND Boophilus microplus South Africa, Nigeria, Australia, Brazil,
Boophilus annulatus and Mexico
Boophilus decoloratus
Rhipicephalus evertsi
B. burgdorferi Lyme disease 30-44 1. dammini Eastern United States
I. ricinus Europe, western USSR, and Scandinavia
I. pacificus Western United States
B. coriaceae Epizootic bovine 44-50 0. coriaceus California



Plum Island is a well-know facility. Unfortunately once it got it's funding tied in with the DHS a lot of information went 'dark'. So if it does nothing else, it breeds suspicion.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 5:48 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


CTS,

We certainly agree that the government could do FAR better. But I do think you could give more credence to overseas research, as they are not beholden to the same pro-business political ideology as in the US.

What you think of as the boon of privately sponsored research does inevitably lead to situations you may not like. If you think getting research done on common issues is difficult now with government funding, getting it done on rare conditions with private money alone would be impossible. If 2, or 10, or even 100 people have a rare condition, there just wouldn't be enough collective interest and therefore enough money to fund the research.

"If all the posts I have already written does not make my position clear, then I don't know what will. If I try my best and am still misunderstood, I am just going to have to live with it."

I think many people here do understand what you are saying, they just disagree. You dismiss US university research papers, foreign research, in some cases even basic science, news accounts, large-scale population surveys, and even other people's personal accounts of their own experiences. Having dismissed an entire world of information, I think you'll find very few people willing to credit your positions.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 6:03 PM

BABYWITHTHEPOWER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
At the same time there was a a 373% relative increase in autism, there was a 14% relative increase in MMR vaccination. That was the point of the article - the two weren't ratioed in a way that would indicate cause and effect.



Okay, Rue, I have a question about these figures. And this isn't a personal attack, I am truely curious. In the words of my accounting professor; "Figures never lie, but liars can figure." I've always been skeptical of data that uses percentages as a comparrison because they rarely show the source data, and when they do, picking up a calculator you can tell that the percentages are misleading.

A 373% increase versus a 14% increase doesn't seem to correlate, that I will give you, but what exactly are those percentages of, what are the counts of the source data? And what is the significance of the word 'relative'?

If those percentages are simply relating to the numbers of people that developed autism and the number of MMR vacines doled out, the percentages may be different by a vast ammount, but the numbers might correlate. Lets say(and for the sake of argument we'll assume that all cases of autism mentioned in this percentage were people who had recieved the MMR) last year, 100 people developed autism and 1 million got the shot. That means this year 437 people developed autism and 1.14 million people got the shot. That's 337 additional cases out of the additional 140,000 people getting the shot.

Now, let's check these numbers here.

Last year - 100/1,000,000 or .0001%
This year's additional - 337/140,000 or .0024%
This year's total - 437/1,140,000 or .0004%

So there was a huge spike in the percentage of cases of autism, but only a small increase in the percentage of the shot. But when you look at the reletive data (again my numbers are example only, I don't have actual data) there is a correlation. It's not a clear cut correlation, possibly it's all coincidence, but the numbers are high enough to warrent concern.

Now you might be thinking "Where the hell did he get these numbers? I didn't mean any of that." And that goes back to my statement 'figures never lie, but liars can figure.' There's no disputing the math, type it into a calculator and it's right, but the context and source data are what's important. Give me all the percentages you want, but someone, somewhere, has only factored in the information that supports their argument (not implying you or anyone else here). Give me the raw source data so I can do the math and see it for myself.1

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'll be in my bunk.
http://www.myspace.com/babywiththepower
http://members17.clubphoto.com/michael809717/guest-1.phtml

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 6:13 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Even given your statistics, the FACT is that there has been no outbreaks of paralytic polio in the US since mass vaccination. What you have indicated to me is that you're willing to write off the numbers of people who were permanently paralyzed before the vaccine. "1977 - The National Health Interview Survey reports that there are 254,000 persons living in the United States who had been paralyzed by polio....

Do you not consider this a significant benefit? Or did this major fact escape your statistical 'analysis'?

There are really two issues here. The steady decline of polio incidence since 1955, and absence of polio outbreaks since 1955.

Steady decline of incidence: This decline is seen across the board in all infectious diseases, whether vaccines were available or not, from the turn of last century to present. This trend suggests other factors besides vaccination were mainly responsible for the decline, such as better sanitation, hygiene, refrigeration, etc. Vaccines probably helped, but to claim sole credit would be ignoring the "controls" (diseases for which there were no vaccines which also disappeared).

Absence of polio outbreaks: Before 1955, polio was diagnosed based on clinical presentation alone (i.e. no lab work). There is a number of other diagnoses that present with acute flaccid paralysis, such as Coxsackie virus, adenovirus, West Nile Virus, echovirus, and aseptic meningitis. It is reasonable to postulate that many of the polio cases/outbreaks before 1955 were actually NOT polio, but any of these similar diseases. (In all probability, the 254,000 who were told they had polio probably included misdiagnosed patients.) After 1955, the definition changed, and outbreaks of acute flaccid paralysis were assigned to other names. There HAVE been outbreaks of acute flaccid paralysis since mass vaccination in the USA. When physicians find out someone has been vaccinated for polio, they are encouraged to look for another diagnosis. It is possible that the absence of polio outbreaks is simply an artifact of differential diagnosis. Again, this is not to discount any role vaccines may have played, but to put it in perspective, that their claim for sole credit is probably exaggerated.

Sample literature on outbreaks of acute flaccid paralysis
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=1551054&pageind
ex=1

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5331a2.htm
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=154677&tools
=bot


Can't Take My Gorram Sky
---------
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' (I've found it!), but 'That's funny...'
--Isaac Asimov

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 6:13 PM

BABYWITHTHEPOWER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Polio vaccines did eradicate polio. How do I know this? B/c there are no longer hundreds of thousands of people in the US with paralysis or who have died from it.



It actually didn't. As was said by CANTTAKESKY way earlier in this thread, conveniently at the same time the Polio vaccine was given out in droves, the WHO and FDA changed the definition of what could be diagnosed as Polio versus Coxsackie virus or aseptic meningitis. A direct quote from his post:

Quote:

Before the vaccine, anyone with non-paralytic symptoms and anyone with paralysis lasting at least 24 hours was diagnosed with polio. After the vaccine was introduced in 1955, the diagnosis was changed to only paralytic cases lasting at least 30 days. The good majority of polio cases, those with nonparalytic symptoms, were renamed something else. A big fraction of paralytic cases recover within days to 2 weeks, so this subset was automatically eliminated as polio cases as well.

People who would have been diagnosed with polio before 1995 were now labeled with Coxsackie virus or aseptic meningitis.



Convenient, huh?

Also, I'm not going to post all of them, but he also lists reference to the definition chages in the US, Canada and Germany. If you didn't read them already, I suggest you do. I didn't know any of that until this thread started. I've been an advocate for vaccines for things like polio, but after reading that (and doing some of my own research on the topic) I have to seriously reevaluate the effectiveness of the 'cure' when the definition of the disease changed so drastically that about 90% of what was diagnosed Polio before the vaccine would be classified as something else now. Kinda' makes you think, unless of course you refuse to.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'll be in my bunk.
http://www.myspace.com/babywiththepower
http://members17.clubphoto.com/michael809717/guest-1.phtml

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 6:44 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Polio vaccines did eradicate polio. How do I know this? B/c there are no longer hundreds of thousands of people in the US with paralysis or who have died from it.

This is a good segue into my next segment.

Correlation does not equal causation.

Both anti-vaccine and anti-choice camps make this mistake. It goes something like this.

A happened.
Then B happened.
Therefore it is a fact that A caused B.

With anti-vaccinationists, it looks like this.
My kid got vaccinated.
My kid got autism.
Therefore it is a fact that vaccines caused autism.

With anti-choice proponents, it looks like this.
People got vaccinated.
The disease disappeared.
Therefore it is a fact that vaccines caused the disappearance.

Both groups fail to consider other factors may have been involved, or even something as simple as coincidence may have happened.

(The following are examples of possible scenarios. I am not presenting them as facts.)

To illustrate other factors:
1. The autism may have been caused by increased TV watching and electromagnetic radiation, for example, which happened at the same time the kid was old enough to be vaccinated.
2. The disappearance of the disease may have been caused by increased hygiene and sanitation, which happened at the same time as vaccine deployment.

To illustrate coincidence:
1. The autism may have been developing all along, but became noticeable by the time the kid was old enough to be vaccinated.
2. The incidence of disease may have been declining all along, but became noticeable by the time vaccines were used.

Sometimes correlation DOES correctly represent causation. But correlation alone does not PROVE causation, by scientific standards. In absence of hard proof, individuals should be allowed to make up their own minds in interpreting correlations.

I am not here to convince anyone of my personal views of vaccines *I* am perfectly fine with disagreement. Perhaps this is a pipe dream, but my continual hope and goal is this: that you all can be fine with my disagreeing with you, and let me take care of my kids the best way I see fit.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius--and a lot of courage--to move in the opposite direction.
--E. F. Schumacher

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:08 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


CTS,

"When physicians find out someone has been vaccinated for polio, they are encouraged to look for another diagnosis."

Your insinuation about medical testing is insulting both personally and professionally. Having worked in a federal medical lab, I can state without reservation NO ONE is encouraged to, hinted at, ordered to, or in any way steered to falsify the type of tests run, skew the protocols used, or alter the results. And to claim that somehow people have missed polio in these days of PCR when polio is genetically confirmed and typed by strain is beyond ignorant.

If you have a point to make, make it without your load of ignorance and paranoia.

------------------------

Furthermore, I find your ability to carp at small points while missing the big picture to be unparalleled by anyone save PN. Polio is a modern international problem. It is strain-tracked from outbreak to outreak, from one vulnerable unvaccinated population to the next. Countries whose backs are to the wall KNOW that to contain polio, you need to vaccinate.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=10275

An outbreak of polio has hit children in the Nigerian state of Kano. Kano is one of the muslim states that had boycotted the use of the polio vaccine. Many muslim states in Nigeria banned the polio vaccine because those in charge said the Americans were using the vaccines to make their population infertile. Many of them said the vaccine would also be used to spread AIDS in the region. Despite appeals from neighbouring countries to vaccinate its population, the conspiracy theorists in Nigeria got their way.

Now, as expected, polio is beginning to spread among children in the region. Now the local authorities are appealing for urgent assistance.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2005/10/13/AR2005101301733.html

The first outbreak of polio in the United States in 26 years occurred earlier this fall in an Amish community in central Minnesota, state and federal health officials reported yesterday.

Four children have been infected with the virus, although none has become paralyzed. The Amish typically decline to vaccinate their children. The last large outbreak of polio occurred in numerous Amish communities in several states in 1979.

http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/indonesia_28428.html

Indonesia had been free of polio for over a decade as a result of a global campaign to eradicate the disease, which at its peak paralyzed or killed one thousand children a day. Before March 2005, (before the polio outbreak) only half the children in Girijaya had been inoculated. A disease of poverty, polio thrives where sanitation is poor and spreads through water contaminated by human waste. So far this year, 240 cases of polio have been reported in Indonesia.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=23598

Polio outbreak spreads across Yemen
Low immunization rates among Yemen's children may facilitate the spread of the virus.

http://in.news.yahoo.com/061123/137/69o1q.html

Poor immunisation blamed for India polio outbreak
The WHO has said the Uttar Pradesh strain of the virus had spread to neighbouring Nepal and Bangladesh besides faraway Angola and Nambia. All four nations had been polio free.

--------------------

Modern tests not only unambiguously diagnose polio, they type it by strain as well. Anyone who claims that somehow polio is misattributed as another virus, or that other viruses are misattributed as polio, is woefully ignorant of the state of modern medicine.

This is not to say I trust everything the government does. I know there are policies intended to bias science amd medicine (especially under the Bush administration). But a blanket state of denial over well-founded facts serves NO ONE well.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:14 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Baby,

See my reply to CTS.

The FACT is that mass polio vaccination works. If you don't want to trust the evidence of hundreds of thousands of paralyzed UN-vaccinated people and NO paralyzed vaccinated people (how DO you ignore that?), then look to the modern world (pick up your head and smell the coffee, dude) where polio is still a health threat.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 7:50 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


http://jama.highwire.org/cgi/content/abstract/285/9/1183
Essentially no correlation was observed between the secular trend of early childhood MMR immunization rates in California and the secular trend in numbers of children with autism enrolled in California's regional service center system. For the 1980-1994 birth cohorts, a marked, sustained increase in autism case numbers was noted, from 44 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1980 cohort to 208 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1994 cohort (a 373% relative increase), but changes in early childhood MMR immunization coverage over the same time period were much smaller and of shorter duration. Immunization coverage by the age of 24 months increased from 72% to 82%, a relative increase of only 14%, over the same time period.
Quote:

Originally posted by babywiththepower:
Okay, Rue, I have a question about these figures. "At the same time there was a a 373% relative increase in autism, there was a 14% relative increase in MMR vaccination."


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:14 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Your insinuation about medical testing is insulting both personally and professionally

It was not a comment about medical testing professionals. It was a comment about which tests the physician is likely to order to begin with.

However, I apologize that I had worded that statement rather badly. I should have said, "When physicians believe polio is unlikely (because of assumed vaccine effectiveness), they are encouraged to look for another diagnosis."

I got this impression from reading statements such as the following:
"E33 and other enteroviruses should be considered in the course of AFP surveillance activities in countries where poliovirus has been eradicated." http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=154677&tools
=bot

Quote:

If you have a point to make, make it without your load of ignorance and paranoia....Furthermore, I find your ability to carp at small points while missing the big picture to be unparalleled by anyone save PN.
I was answering a question you raised specifically about the US history of polio. If you wish to expand discussion to an international history of polio, by all means, raise the point. But please raise it civilly.

I will not respond to personal attacks. Others don't mind hurling sarcastic hostility at each other. I have no interest in it, and I will not engage.

Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Disbelief in magic can force a poor soul into believing in government and business.
--Tom Robbins (1936 - )

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:15 PM

BABYWITHTHEPOWER


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
http://jama.highwire.org/cgi/content/abstract/285/9/1183
Essentially no correlation was observed between the secular trend of early childhood MMR immunization rates in California and the secular trend in numbers of children with autism enrolled in California's regional service center system. For the 1980-1994 birth cohorts, a marked, sustained increase in autism case numbers was noted, from 44 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1980 cohort to 208 cases per 100 000 live births in the 1994 cohort (a 373% relative increase), but changes in early childhood MMR immunization coverage over the same time period were much smaller and of shorter duration. Immunization coverage by the age of 24 months increased from 72% to 82%, a relative increase of only 14%, over the same time period.



Okay, that puts it a little more in perspective. They're stating the percent increase in infants developing autism and getting the MMR independantly of eachother. I'd be interested to see the figures for a test (if one was even done) testing the difference in the ammount of children developing autism who recieved the MMR versus those that didn't.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'll be in my bunk.
http://www.myspace.com/babywiththepower
http://members17.clubphoto.com/michael809717/guest-1.phtml

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 8:36 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
SUBCLINICAL? That means infections with no symptoms. If there are no symptoms, how is pertussis being diagnosed? Links please?

I'll use this to jumpstart my next segment.

Mild or Subclinical Disease in the Vaccinated

It is widely documented that people often still get the disease for which they were vaccinated, but either do not show any symptoms, or show milder symptoms than normal. This impacts the vaccine debate in two ways:

(1) Subclinical disease usually does not get diagnosed. This decreases the true incidence of the disease and exaggerates the effectiveness of the vaccine.

(2) Persons with subclinical disease often spread the disease to others unknowingly. In contrast, unvaccinated persons with full-blown symptoms are easy targets for blame. This can make unvaccinated persons look completely responsible for transmission when vaccinated persons are silently infecting others.

Here is an example. In 2000, researchers in Israel reported a 4 month old infant who died of pertussis. The infant had had one dose of the pertussis vaccine at age 2 months. His entire family was fully vaccinated for pertussis. The two daycare centers for his two siblings were fully vaccinated for pertussis. So they tested everyone, to find out how the infant got infected. Ten% of one daycare and 55% of the other daycare tested positive for recent pertussis infection. The researchers concluded:

Quote:

We tested 46 fully vaccinated children in two day-care centers in Israel who were exposed to a fatal case of pertussis infection. Only two of five children who tested positive for Bordetella pertussis met the World Health Organization's case definition for pertussis. Vaccinated children may be asymptomatic reservoirs for infection....even young, recently vaccinated children may serve as reservoirs and potential transmitters of infection...We found that immunity does not even persist into early childhood in some cases. We also observed that DPT vaccine does not fully protect children against the level of clinical disease defined by WHO. Our results indicate that children ages 5-6 years and possibly younger, ages 2-3 years, play a role as silent reservoirs in the transmission of pertussis in the community. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol6no5/srugo.htm


To me, it is entirely conceivable that had the daycare had one unvaccinated child, they would have zeroed in on him first. If he had had pertussis, they probably would not have looked any further, and placed the burden of blame entirely on him.

Whether or not this sort of thing actually happens, underdiagnosis and silent vaccinated carriers should be considered in evaluating effectiveness and transmission threats.

Here are abstracts of other studies on subclinical disease.
http://www.vaccinationnews.com/scandals/july_5_02/mild_or_subclinical_
disease.htm

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Scandals/July_17_02/subclinical_rubella
_vaxed.htm


Can't Take My Gorram Sky
----------
Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize it to an underground dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a republic. The Constitution of this republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom.
-- Benjamin Rush, physician and signer of the Declaration of Independence

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:09 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


CTS

It took very little looking (and I do mean VERY little) to come up with this:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5347a5.htm

"As part of the eradication strategy, a global surveillance system was established to 1) identify acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases in children aged <15 years and 2) deploy a network of accredited laboratories to perform virologic testing of stool specimens to determine whether the paralysis resulted from poliovirus infection."

In other words, the whole AFP surveillance system was set up for polio, and polio is tested for. If negative, other virus testing may be done.

-------------

I did want to point out that your quote "E33 should be considered in the course of AFP surveillance ... where poliovirus has been eradicated" came from New Zealand. Now b/c of this statement "If you wish to expand discussion to an international history of polio, by all means, raise the point" I thought you were restricting your concerns to the US. Apparently not, eh?


But pursuing your link I found many facts you skipped over:

At the time of the patient’s illness there was a community outbreak of echovirus type 33 (E33) infection. A total of 75 cases were reported, mostly involving children with meningitis. Outbreak isolates were submitted by regional virology laboratories to the National Polio Reference Laboratory at the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), Porirua, Wellington, for further characterization. ... All cell lines except the poliovirus-specific L20B cells inoculated with the three fecal specimens yielded E33 viruses, with typing confirmed by sequencing.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:25 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


So CTS,

Now that I hope we've resolved your concern that people just aren't looking for polio, I was wondering what you say about the quarter to half million unvaccinated people in the US with paralysis; and the dearth of paralyzed people after universal vaccination. Any comments?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, November 23, 2024 10:01 - 7494 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:59 - 4753 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:21 - 944 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:11 - 182 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 08:57 - 4795 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:23 - 421 posts
Idiot Democrat Wine Mom
Sat, November 23, 2024 05:26 - 1 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:40 - 11 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:33 - 41 posts
Biden admin quietly loosening immigration policies before Trump takes office — including letting migrants skip ICE check-ins in NYC
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:15 - 3 posts
RCP Average Continues to Be the Most Accurate in the Industry Because We Don't Weight Polls
Sat, November 23, 2024 00:46 - 1 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:54 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL