Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
did the bbc have foreknowledge ?
Monday, February 26, 2007 9:00 AM
VINCENOIRROCKNROLLSTAR
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:03 AM
CITIZEN
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:19 AM
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:20 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:25 AM
YINYANG
You were busy trying to get yourself lit on fire. It happens.
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: All this time, and we're STILL getting nonsense like this? Ughhh! People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss " They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:32 AM
Quote:Originally posted by vincenoirrocknrollstar: well according to the bbc programme `the conspiracy files ` the wtc7 collapsed due to intense heat from the other towers
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:43 AM
MAL4PREZ
Monday, February 26, 2007 1:28 PM
Quote: citizen wrote: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:32 Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by vincenoirrocknrollstar: well according to the bbc programme `the conspiracy files ` the wtc7 collapsed due to intense heat from the other towers -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The twin WTC towers did, WTC7 did not. And don't mind AURaptor, it's one of the resident trolls.
Monday, February 26, 2007 1:41 PM
Monday, February 26, 2007 10:28 PM
SOUPCATCHER
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 2:47 AM
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 3:18 AM
SIMONWHO
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:43 AM
HERO
Quote:Originally posted by vincenoirrocknrollstar: i was sent this today and wondered what you guys make of it ...is this the smoking gun ?
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 5:47 AM
REDLAVA
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 5:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SimonWho: That's because the side of the building that was damaged was the side that had 1 and 2 Trade Centre burning and collapsing onto it. But you can see pictures of the damage here: http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:03 AM
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:36 AM
Quote:Originally posted by vincenoirrocknrollstar: the origins of my thread was to try and figure out whether anyone still believes in the bbc`s credibility as world news reporting leaders after showing an unbalanced view of the whole 9/11 subject followed by a shoddy piece of reporting about dr david kelly ,the weapons inspector found dead a few years back
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:52 AM
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Quote:Originally posted by vincenoirrocknrollstar: the origins of my thread was to try and figure out whether anyone still believes in the bbc`s credibility as world news reporting leaders after showing an unbalanced view of the whole 9/11 subject followed by a shoddy piece of reporting about dr david kelly ,the weapons inspector found dead a few years backHow was the reporting of 9/11 unballanced? And what are you talking about with David Kelly? More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes! No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see. ] the conspiracy files (is what i was referring to when i said unbalanced reporting )interviewed many people for the show ,sadly they chose to show more views supporting the u.s governments official story than the `conspiracy theorists` versions of events ...and surely if a tv station makes claims that they give a unbiased and balanced viewpoint then they should have balanced out the conspiracy theorists vs the official theory so that the viewer could decide for themselves what they think is the correct version of events ..even if both viewpoints are incorrect at least the programme makers couldn`t have been accused of fueling the conspiracy behind the reporting of 9/11..instead it has caused a serious flurry of complaints to the bbc and many viewers are now questioning the validity of its reporting and programme makers as for dr david kelly ,if you dont already know he was found dead (i was going to say in mysterious circumstances ..but thats just too spurious)he was a wepons inspector who was sent into iraq to inspect saddams wmd ..dr kelly`s conclusion was that there were none and none would be found ,a few days later he was a dead man http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3076869.stm http://dr-david-kelly.blogspot.com/ shoot the moon ...shoooooot the mooon
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:06 AM
Quote:Originally posted by vincenoirrocknrollstar: the conspiracy files (is what i was referring to when i said unbalanced reporting )interviewed many people for the show ,sadly they chose to show more views supporting the u.s governments official story than the `conspiracy theorists` versions of events ...and surely if a tv station makes claims that they give a unbiased and balanced viewpoint then they should have balanced out the conspiracy theorists vs the official theory so that the viewer could decide for themselves what they think is the correct version of events ..even if both viewpoints are incorrect at least the programme makers couldn`t have been accused of fueling the conspiracy behind the reporting of 9/11..instead it has caused a serious flurry of complaints to the bbc and many viewers are now questioning the validity of its reporting and programme makers
Quote:as for dr david kelly ,if you dont already know he was found dead (i was going to say in mysterious circumstances ..but thats just too spurious)he was a wepons inspector who was sent into iraq to inspect saddams wmd ..dr kelly`s conclusion was that there were none and none would be found ,a few days later he was a dead man http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3076869.stm http://dr-david-kelly.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:21 AM
OLDENGLANDDRY
Quote:Originally posted by mal4prez: I find it odd that there's no clock being displayed in the corner of the screen, which most news channels have... Hence, I very much question the clock syncing. The commenters - whoever they are - say that the theme music bit is 5:00, but I know that BBC plays that more than once an hour! It would line up fine if that music was 5:30. Then BBC would have made the announcement at 5:25 - perfectly sensible. As for the building still standing behind the reporter, There's no proof that what they point to is actually the building. I'm not a New Yorker, and I don't where the buildings were, but I was at the site several months after and remember several large buildings still up. What these conspiracy theorists need is a diagram of where exactly the reporter is, and where the building is. Or pictures of the skyline before and after. Somehow, I doubt these folks can provide such solid evidence, or they would. In the end, nothing in this vid is proof of anything. Go figure. How this theory is still around is beyond me. ----------------------------------------------- I'm the president. I don't need to listen.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:15 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 7:26 PM
ROY
Quote:Originally posted by citizen: Oh the BBC planned the whole thing. Tony Blair and Osama Bin Landen are the same person, which is why you never see them in the same room at the same time. George Bush is really the Devil, that's why you don't see them in the same place at the same time. But wasn't the building brought down?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:01 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: They, like many lazy or busy news agencies, simply cut the reporter out and pasted them over a stock footage image.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:02 PM
KANEMAN
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:45 PM
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:58 PM
FLETCH2
Saturday, March 3, 2007 8:32 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL