Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
When sentencing a man for possessing child pornography, Nevada Judge Bill Maddox said, "These kinds of offenses are problems with impulse control. When I say that, it's my understanding that most men are sexually attracted to young women. When I say young women I don't just mean women that ... you should be attracted to. I mean women from the time they're 1 all the way up until they're 100."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
In his ruling, Maddox defined child pornography as "malum prohibitum" (an act that isn't inherently wrong) as opposed to "malum in se" (an act that is inherently wrong).

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
If the only reason your judges don't have sex with infants is because the law says it's wrong I do wonder about the future of your nation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
And here I thought the linked article was about ONE Judges ruling on a child pornography case. You sure don't mind making large leaps when it serves your purposes.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
And you certainly don't mind writing attack emails when it suits your purposes.

---

Quote:

---

Compared to some of the leaps and lies you've spouted adding an 's' to a sentence isn't even on the radar.

---

Quote:

---

But I guess selective reading and history is something you sure don't mind doing when it suits your purposes.

Hypocrite much?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
...I do wonder about the future of your nation.

That is I wonder more about the future of your nation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
Enough of that already. I sent you one discrete PM about making changes to your post after posting it. Since you are apparently not mature enough to handle that, I guess it's now everyone's business. It must have struck close to home if you are still bringing it up.

---

Quote:

---

Please link al least two 'leaps and lies' I have made.

---

Quote:

---

Do not personally attack me without proof, that could be misinterpreted as trollish behaviour.

---

Quote:

---

And I am well aware of how anti-troll you are.

---

Quote:

---

So adding the 's' to judge was a simple mistake on your behalf? I would be more inclined to believe that if you didn't follow it up with the following

---

Quote:

---

Posting to stir stuff up.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
If the only reason your judges don't have sex with infants is because the law says it's wrong I do wonder about the future of your nation.

---

And here I thought the linked article was about ONE Judges ruling on a child pornography case. You sure don't mind making large leaps when it serves your purposes.



Posting to stir stuff up.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
Why, pretty much every post passes for it. I'll quote every post on RWED if you like.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
You mean, don't act like you? Sounds pretty hypocritcal and trollish, especially coming from the poster who only ever posts to make insinuations about other posters. When was the last time you made an on topic responce?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
I am aware how pro troll you are.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
I mean, posting to stir stuff up and defending the trolls of the board and so on.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
So when you do it (the S I mean) its nothing when I do it it says this an that about me (not that insinuating something erroneous about me is a personal attack of course).

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:
You're opening post, as is true of this one, is much in line with the blowing out of proportion and hyperbole I was talking about in the other thread. You should work for the Daily Mail, tabloids need people like you, you know.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=18&t=27904#473527

---

Quote:

---

Well, I am talking to you.

---

Quote:

---

I have never defended anybody who I consider to be a troll.

---

Quote:

---

like insinuating all American judges would have sex with infants if it wasn't illegal.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WhoDied:
I appologize for my crappy sarcasm. I was in no way defending those idiots or attacking you--quite the opposite really. Sadly, I often mangle these things. (The 'poofter' was a Spike thing.)

--WhoDied

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by citizen:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WhoDied:
I appologize for my crappy sarcasm. I was in no way defending those idiots or attacking you--quite the opposite really. Sadly, I often mangle these things. (The 'poofter' was a Spike thing.)

--WhoDied

---

I was talking about Kaneman, but thank you anyway. Sorry for the confusion.

---

More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

---