REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

US crowd beats passenger to death

POSTED BY: KHYRON
UPDATED: Friday, June 29, 2007 16:03
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5721
PAGE 1 of 2

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:59 AM

KHYRON


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6224538.stm

Iran has recently reintroduced stoning as an official punishment, but I bet even they would be hard-pressed to top this (EDIT: in terms of making shocking headlines... as if that needed saying... which apparently it did...).



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:19 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

The incident happened near Austin, Texas, as crowd of between 2,000-3,000 people gathered for the annual Juneteenth festival, which commemorates the freeing of American slaves.




First of all, I'm gonna go out on a (rather short) limb here and say that the crowd was comprised almost entirely of blacks. And alcohol might even have been involved too, but that's just a guess. Given the victim's name, Morales, and that most of the attackers were black, it's likely there was a racial factor to this story. Or maybe not. I seem to recall something similar to this happening a while back,involving a car and either hit and run or something like that. The victim ( who was black ) was dragged from a car and beaten in similar fashion. I forget whether it was a fatal incident or not.

Having said all that, I fail to see how this remotely compares to the Iranian 'official punishment' of stoning. A public stoning sanctioned by the Gov't far and away 'tops' a random, albiet brutal, act of mob mentality.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:19 PM

OLDENGLANDDRY


Now, the PIRATENEWS version of these events would have a headline something like: "TEXAN PATRIOTS PREVENT ILLEGAL ALIEN FROM MURDERING CHILD".


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:26 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Having said all that, I fail to see how this remotely compares to the Iranian 'official punishment' of stoning. A public stoning sanctioned by the Gov't far and away 'tops' a random, albiet brutal, act of mob mentality.

It was supposed to allude to the barbarism of the acts, and how a nation that (rightfully) finds Iran's policies primitive is itself capable of producing headlines such as this.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:54 PM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
It was supposed to allude to the barbarism of the acts, and how a nation that (rightfully) finds Iran's policies primitive is itself capable of producing headlines such as this.


You think Americans will not find this act of barbarism primitive?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:57 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Having said all that, I fail to see how this remotely compares to the Iranian 'official punishment' of stoning. A public stoning sanctioned by the Gov't far and away 'tops' a random, albiet brutal, act of mob mentality.

It was supposed to allude to the barbarism of the acts, and how a nation that (rightfully) finds Iran's policies primitive is itself capable of producing headlines such as this.



One can find acts of crowd violence almost anywhere on the globe. Just look at the violence which erupts from soccer ( Futball ) matches around the world, for example. That can't be viewed entirely as any accurate reflection of a nation. On the one hand, we have state mandated acts of public execution, and on the other, we have spontaneous, illegal acts of violence. You're comparing apples and oranges.

And as Paul Harvey is famous for saying, here's the REST of the story.....

Quote:

In Milwaukee...
--------------
Police Release More Detail About Juneteenth Violence
By Jon Byman

Milwaukee Police say a 33-year-old man has a broken tooth and cuts all over his face after a group of teenagers pulled him from his car and beat him following Milwaukee's Juneteenth celebration.

It happened after the festival ended in the 3000 block of north 1st Street which is a short distance from the actual festival. Police say hundreds of teenagers started kicking the man's car. Today's TMJ 4 video from the scene shows the teenagers damaging at least several cars.

The man who was pulled from his car was treated and released from a local hospital.

Meanwhile, a few blocks away a group of girls started fighting. When police went to break up the fight near 1st and Auer, the department says a 17-year-old girl started punching and kicking a 15-year veteran officer.

She hit him in his face shield, which shattered into his face. He needed three stitches and has scratches on his neck. That 17-year-old was arrested and police are recommending charges for battery to a police officer.

Police say there was also a fight earlier in the day in the 3000 block of north 1st Street. In that case, three women were fighting. Police say a 15-year-old boy tried to break up the fight when an 18-year-old man got involved in it.

According to police, the 18-year-old got angry, walked away and told the boy he was coming back with a gun. The 18-year-old did in fact return with a gun and fired five shots into a crowd where the boy was standing. The 15-year-old's 39-year-old uncle was hit in the shoulder. He was treated and released from a local hospital.

Some people think the violence takes away from the real meaning of Juneteenth.

"I think it should be continued," said Earnestine Rogers. "It shouldn't be stopped because of some youngsters."

It's the second year in a row that violence has broken out at the celebration.
--------------
www.620wtmj.com/news/local/8092297.html



Seems to be a cultural thing, where the children of one group haven't been taught well enough to understand the point of the celebration. Hard to vilify an entire nation for that, I think.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:10 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by BigDamnNobody:
You think Americans will not find this act of barbarism primitive?

Of course they will. I was talking about making headlines.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:15 PM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
One can find acts of crowd violence almost anywhere on the globe. Just look at the violence which erupts from soccer ( Futball ) matches around the world, for example. That can't be viewed entirely as any accurate reflection of a nation. On the one hand, we have state mandated acts of public execution, and on the other, we have spontaneous, illegal acts of violence. You're comparing apples and oranges.

I was talking about making headlines. Are people on RWED being more obtuse today than usual!?
Quote:

Seems to be a cultural thing, where the children of one group haven't been taught well enough to understand the point of the celebration. Hard to vilify an entire nation for that, I think.
I agree, to a certain extent, but not like this had much to do with my point...



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:15 PM

KANEMAN


What do you expect from a bunch of drunk black hommies drinking 40 oz beers....Oh, and we are all the same......4000 on 1, sounds about right...........

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:20 PM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Are you being intentionally dense? Of course they will. I WAS TALKING ABOUT MAKING HEADLINES.


Didn't get that from your opening post. You linked an article about mob violence and then got P.O.'d when the first few responders were not on the same track as you.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:22 PM

KHYRON


BDN, I edited my post before you replied because I was being too harsh towards you. I apologise for my first sentence in my initial response to you.

Having said that, I don't give a damn if other posters are on the same track as me. There wasn't any change in the meaning of my opening post.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:49 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Iran has recently reintroduced stoning as an official punishment, but I bet even they would be hard-pressed to top this (EDIT: in terms of making shocking headlines... as if that needed saying... which apparently it did...)


Sorry, but your meaning is pretty obscure. Yes, WE are shocked by the pointless crowd beating of what seems to be an true accident. But you ask if Iran could 'top this', to which I reply....they already HAVE topped it. The STATE has sponsered the stonings, RE-issued it, to be exact. I'd hope there would be a level of disgust on the part of the general public in Iran, but it's how things are in that country. It's NOT how things commonly are here in this country. I have no doubt there's more shock and dismay here at the headlines of what happened in Texas than there in Iran at the announcement of MORE barbaric acts by the State.

It's not the rest of us being obtuse, just you not making a logical point. It's that simple.



People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:20 PM

MAGHAFFAR


While Iran may re-instate Stoning to death as an "official" punishment, there is no sanction or commandment for specifically stoning to death for any offense in the Holy Quran. The popular belief that Islam allows stoning to death for adultery is false. The punishment is 100 lashes, ch. Al-Nur -- but the offense must first be attested to by 4 eye-witnesses. The historical references of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) stoning adulterers to death stems from a case involving two Jews caught in adultery, who were asked whether they wanted to be judged by their book (the Torah) or the Islamic law. The Jews chose their Holy Book.


==================================================================
Jonathan M.A.Ghaffar - Your Firefly/Serenity MP3 Ringtone Smuggler!
Free MP3 uploader (PC) at: www.tonethis.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MAGhaffar@wayoftheseekers.com
http://www.WAYoftheSEEKERS.com
http://www.TombofJesus.com --> www.alislam.org

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:43 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6224538.stm

Iran has recently reintroduced stoning as an official punishment, but I bet even they would be hard-pressed to top this (EDIT: in terms of making shocking headlines... as if that needed saying... which apparently it did...).

I’m not sure the comparison you’re making here is valid. Gang related violence occurs all the time in the US and Iran, but the US does not sanction gang related murder as a form of capital punishment. As far as shocking headlines go (which may have been your point), I think the stoning in Iran is still at the top. If you go to Canada, France, UK, Germany, etc you’ll find similar things happening. It unsettling to see it, but it’s been going on everywhere for a very long time. It’s hardly a shocking headline to discover that people in gangs can be violent; that’s primitive activity. Gangs are violent in Iran too, but in Iran, unlike the aforementioned nations, the government is so brutal that it often overshadows typical criminal activity. In Iran the government is not far removed from a gang, and that is exactly what the government is no supposed to be.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:49 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by MAGhaffar:
While Iran may re-instate Stoning to death as an "official" punishment, there is no sanction or commandment for specifically stoning to death for any offense in the Holy Quran. The popular belief that Islam allows stoning to death for adultery is false. The punishment is 100 lashes, ch. Al-Nur -- but the offense must first be attested to by 4 eye-witnesses. The historical references of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) stoning adulterers to death stems from a case involving two Jews caught in adultery, who were asked whether they wanted to be judged by their book (the Torah) or the Islamic law. The Jews chose their Holy Book.




I don't recall seeing anyone in this thread make mention of the Quran, but only 'official' Iranian law. But the fact of the matter is, Iran ( a Muslim state ) and the Taliban ( before it fell ) both engaged in public executions via stoning to death. Israel allows no such thing. Nor does the U.S.

That is all.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:36 PM

KHYRON


Okay, it's the morning after and I can now see why people thought I was taking a big swipe at the US. Yes, what I wrote was obscure, and people were not being obtuse (sorry AURaptor and BDN), but late last night I was too tired and frustrated by Rue to see that. But here was my train of thought: In terms of a nation making a headline for a barbaric act, this was more shocking (to me, at least) than anything else I've heard of recently. Iran would have a tough time beating this one. I was NOT saying that this is indicative of America as a whole, but that American people are capable of barbaric acts that shock the world.

Finn, I don't think one can attribute this to gang violence, at least not from the way the BBC article described it. It sounded like up to 20 or so onlookers decided to stomp on a passenger, which is different. But it'll be interesting to see how far people will go to excuse this. First, "it's just 'em crazy black folk and Mexicans", then "they were also in a gang". Most foreigners aren't privy to the inside information you guys apparently are, we just know what's on the BBC.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:03 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Okay, it's the morning after and I can now see why people thought I was taking a big swipe at the US. Yes, what I wrote was obscure, and people were not being obtuse (sorry AURaptor and BDN), but late last night I was too tired and frustrated by Rue to see that. But here was my train of thought: In terms of a nation making a headline for a barbaric act, this was more shocking (to me, at least) than anything else I've heard of recently. Iran would have a tough time beating this one. I was NOT saying that this is indicative of America as a whole, but that American people are capable of barbaric acts that shock the world.

The world is shocked to discover that gang violence occurs on the streets of America? The world needs to get out more.

Who are you addressing this to? Certainly not Americans, because we know damn well that crime occurs on our streets. We live with it – some more directly then others, but we know it’s here, and no American that I know of is going to doubt that. And I can’t imagine anyone outside of the US doubting it either. So I guess I’m not really sure what your point is.
Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Finn, I don't think one can attribute this to gang violence, at least not from the way the BBC article described it. It sounded like up to 20 or so onlookers decided to stomp on a passenger, which is different. But it'll be interesting to see how far people will go to excuse this. First, "it's just 'em crazy black folk and Mexicans", then "they were also in a gang". Most foreigners aren't privy to the inside information you guys apparently are, we just know what's on the BBC.

What else would it be other then gang violence? “20 or so onlookers” constitutes a gang.

And as far as the BBC is concerned, they’re not always a reliable source of information, particularly where the US is concerned, but in today’s world, there really isn’t any excuse for this to be the only source of information. I don’t know exactly what transpired in this event, but I’m going to wait for a local perspective, which means an Austin new source. Austin, Texas is as far from me as Rome, Italy is from London. So I don’t know what all I can say about the sequences of events or the fault until I have some reliable news source. But the fact that such an event may have occurred is in not shocking to me at all.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:09 PM

KHYRON


Finn, there's a big difference between a gang and a crowd of onlookers. It's true, look it up.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:22 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Finn, there's a big difference between a gang and a crowd of onlookers. It's true, look it up.

Okay.

Gang. noun. b : GROUP: as (1) : a group of persons working together (2) : a group of persons working to unlawful or antisocial ends; especially : a band of antisocial adolescents
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary

A gang is defined as a group of people working together. When that “crowd of onlookers” stopped being a crowd of independent passers-by (if indeed that is what they were) and decided to attack a person, they became a gang.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:32 PM

KHYRON


Ask anybody what a gang is, especially in an American context, and they'll think of the second definition (LA's gang problem is well-known worldwide). By calling this an act of "gang violence" you're deliberately trying to give the impression that an actual gang (the type that has matching tattoos, gold teeth and too much testosterone) was responsible for the violence, which would fall into the territory of "Oh okay, nothing unusual about that". Calling them a "mob" would be much more accurate, but counterproductive to your attempt at spin.

The point is, for all we know these were normal, everyday people who spontaneously stomped a guy to death. There's nothing "same-ol', same-ol'" about that, unless America is far more violent than foreigners are aware of.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:03 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Ask anybody what a gang is, especially in an American context, and they'll think of the second definition (LA's gang problem is well-known worldwide). By calling this an act of "gang violence" you're deliberately trying to give the impression that an actual gang (the type that has matching tattoos, gold teeth and too much testosterone) was responsible for the violence, which would fall into the territory of "Oh okay, nothing unusual about that". Calling them a "mob" would be much more accurate, but counterproductive to your attempt at spin.

Damnit Kyron, substitute the word “gang” with the word “mob” if that makes you happy. It doesn’t change my point one damn bit. Stop accusing me of deliberately distorting the issue because I didn’t tell you what you wanted to hear or use the word you wanted me to use. Grow up.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:17 PM

KHYRON


I really don't think you have a reason to feel you're being victimised here, Finn. It's not just substituting one word for another, words have connotations and "gangs" and "mobs" aren't interchangeable, and "gang violence" in particular to most people can mean only one thing. It's not trivial or about me being pedantic, it's about you making this sound like something it's not (for all we know).

And you've decided to ignore my second paragraph in my previous post, but that's fine.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:29 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
I really don't think you have a reason to feel you're being victimised here, Finn. It's not just substituting one word for another, words have connotations and "gangs" and "mobs" aren't interchangeable, and "gang violence" in particular to most people can mean only one thing. It's not trivial or about me being pedantic, it's about you making this sound like something it's not (for all we know).

You could have asked me what I meant by “gang,” if you had such a hard time understanding it. Obviously, the definition from the dictionary supports my usage, and the denotation of word supercedes whatever connotation you want to apply. Instead you chose to accuse me of deliberately distorting the issue.

Either way, if you have such a problem with the word “gang” then substitute the word “mob.” It doesn’t change my point.
Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
The point is, for all we know these were normal, everyday people who spontaneously stomped a guy to death. There's nothing "same-ol', same-ol'" about that, unless America is far more violent than foreigners are aware of.

Some information is starting to emerge: the event occurred at a Juneteenth festival in which there where as many as 3000 people gathered. The number of people involved in the act is between 2 to twenty black men, which means it might be just a couple of people not a MOB. Because it was a festival it is likely that alcohol may have been involved. A little girl was injured, which likely spurred emotions and accusations. A family member or members of the child was likely involved. This is sounding less and less unusual. And if we are going to start talking about someone distorting things, perhaps we should consider the possibility it is you or the BBC.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/06/20/crash.assault.ap/index.html

http://www.myfoxaustin.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=3547296&v
ersion=3&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=1.1.1






Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:34 PM

FREMDFIRMA


No, I'm not surprised, hell, ain't even shocked.

Didn't the events at Abu Gharib show you what most americans are really like when the polite fictions are stripped away ?

Don't the actions of our troops in Iraq, the way they just kill anyone they please ?

Americans are really good at seeing other people not in their little clique collectives as non-human, and politicians have been playing that card for many a year.

If anything surprises me, it's that this even made the news, given how many similar incidents all the time do not.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:06 AM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
Obviously, the definition from the dictionary supports my usage, and the denotation of word supercedes whatever connotation you want to apply.

You chose one of the definitions, the more obscure one. It's like calling somebody who's happy "gay". Technically true, but not how the word is commonly interpreted.
Quote:

Either way, if you have such a problem with the word “gang” then substitute the word “mob.” It doesn’t change my point.
Your point being that this is completely common in America. Yeah, that's not better, in fact that's saying what everybody else accused me of doing, namely calling America barbaric.
Quote:

Some information is starting to emerge: the event occurred at a Juneteenth festival in which there where as many as 3000 people gathered. The number of people involved in the act is between 2 to twenty black men, which means it might be just a couple of people not a MOB.
... or GANG (by the way, I said "up to 20")...
Quote:

Because it was a festival it is likely that alcohol may have been involved. A little girl was injured, which likely spurred emotions and accusations. A family member or members of the child was likely involved. This is sounding less and less unusual.
Most of this information was already contained in the BBC article. And it's shocking and disturbing that these sort of incidents apparently aren't unusual in America, and that Americans on here brush it off as nothing of note. Maybe a comparison with Iran would be appropriate after all...
Quote:

And if we are going to start talking about someone distorting things, perhaps we should consider the possibility it is you or the BBC.
???



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:20 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Maybe a comparison with Iran would be appropriate after all.

And I’m sorry that I didn’t realize earlier that this was really all you looking for. Some pre-text to spout Imperialist American rhetoric. I really wasn’t expecting this from you, but whatever. I don’t have time to respond to lunatic arguments and I’m tired of debating semantics.

In the United States, as anywhere, tempers can flare and fights break out, especially over emotionally charged issues, like the injuring of a 4-year old girl. The more people that are gathered the larger the number of people that can be involved. It occurred all the time in my neighborhood when I was growing up. It occurs all the time in neighborhoods in the UK and it very likely occurs in Iran quite frequently too. Big surprise.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:33 AM

KHYRON


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
And I’m sorry that I didn’t realize earlier that this was really all you looking for. Some pre-text to spout Imperialist American rhetoric.

LMAO! Yeah, sure. That was it. That comment was in response to your argument. But go ahead, talk yourself into a corner and claim you're a victim of somebody's agenda.
Quote:

I don’t have time to respond to lunatic arguments and I’m tired of debating semantics.
Lunatic? And what sucks for you is that semantics matter.
Quote:

It occurs all the time in neighborhoods in the UK
Okay, never heard of that so keep me posted (and I'm talking about situations similar to this one, i.e. where the people involved are "normal", that means football hooliganism or neo-Nazi activities don't count since the people involved are already commonly viewed as primitive, barbaric and ready to be institutionalised).

I'm very naive and I find the fact that attacks such as this happen in the civilised world, and according to you happen all the time, quite shocking.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:31 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Well, the blame-America first crowd is at it again....yep...someone gets murdered and it MUST be America's fault. You make me sick...leave the f'ing country if you think so little of its' people and laws. Congrats to those who de-bunked this b.s.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:54 AM

KHYRON


Jongsstraw, I think you missed the point.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 2:04 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Whatever, Rosie.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:04 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
No, I'm not surprised, hell, ain't even shocked.
Didn't the events at Abu Gharib show you what most americans are really like when the polite fictions are stripped away ?


How many Americans were involved / disciplined over Abu Gharib and compare that to the total population of America.
Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Don't the actions of our troops in Iraq, the way they just kill anyone they please ?


How many American soldiers have been involved / disciplined over killing innocents compared to the total number who have served?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:09 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
And I’m sorry that I didn’t realize earlier that this was really all you looking for. Some pre-text to spout Imperialist American rhetoric.

LMAO! Yeah, sure. That was it. That comment was in response to your argument. But go ahead, talk yourself into a corner and claim you're a victim of somebody's agenda.

My guess is that this is exactly what you’re looking for. I don’t know why. But it explains the approach you’re taking in this thread. You have yet to explain to me who it is you’re addressing. Why you think that MOB violence is shocking given the circumstances. Why you feel intent on biasing the argument away from organized gangs, and instead insisting this violence is indicative of “normal” Americans. And most surprising of all, why you believe that the government of Iran instituting MOB violence as an official form of capital punishment is less shocking then violence that erupts from distress over an injured daughter. As I already said, I don’t know what you’re point is and you won’t tell me, instead you're quibbling over semantics, so I have to go by what you have told me.
Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
Okay, never heard of that so keep me posted (and I'm talking about situations similar to this one, i.e. where the people involved are "normal", that means football hooliganism or neo-Nazi activities don't count since the people involved are already commonly viewed as primitive, barbaric and ready to be institutionalised).

First of all, you don’t know that the people involved in this incident are “normal.” Remember, you were just throwing a fit because the connation of one of my words might have biased the character of these people. You’re imposing an assumption on this, and you’re not doing it because of the connotation of word. You’re intentionally excluding any group you don’t think is “normal.” Like a black-separatist group? An organized inner-city gang. A Nations of Islam group. The Black Panthers. Any of which might have played a part in this given the setting, as far as you know. In any event, it is entirely possible and I think likely that this was not an organized event.

You think that fights between individuals or groups of "normal" people don’t break out in London? Or Belfast? Or Derry? I guarantee you that they do. Quite frankly it likely happens a lot. It doesn’t always end in death maybe, but then my guess is that the individuals involved in this incident weren’t trying to murder anyone they were reacting out of passion and/or alcohol. If the victim hadn’t have died, we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation.

The whole event is entirely possible. You take a large enough group of “normal” people in one place, introduce (probable) alcohol, have the daughter of one member of that group mistakenly injured in a lifethreatening way and that’s a recipe for a brawl, no matter where you are. And if someone happens to die, now it’s MOB murder. No religious or political zealots, no militias with guns, no oppressive government stoking the flames of anti-Americanism to hide their tyranny. Just regular human distress, magnified many times by crowd confusion and drugs. It happens, everywhere.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:10 AM

KANEMAN


"While Iran may re-instate Stoning to death as an "official" punishment, there is no sanction or commandment for specifically stoning to death for any offense in the Holy Quran. The popular belief that Islam allows stoning to death for adultery is false. The punishment is 100 lashes, ch. Al-Nur -- but the offense must first be attested to by 4 eye-witnesses."

And this is better how?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:13 AM

KANEMAN


"too tired and frustrated by Rue to see that."


Don't let her get to you........

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:22 AM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
No, I'm not surprised, hell, ain't even shocked.

Didn't the events at Abu Gharib show you what most americans are really like when the polite fictions are stripped away ?

Don't the actions of our troops in Iraq, the way they just kill anyone they please ?

Americans are really good at seeing other people not in their little clique collectives as non-human, and politicians have been playing that card for many a year.

If anything surprises me, it's that this even made the news, given how many similar incidents all the time do not.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it




Holy over the top batman..........Fremd move to Tunisia....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 5:14 AM

MALBADINLATIN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Didn't the events at Abu Gharib show you what most americans are really like when the polite fictions are stripped away ? Americans are really good at seeing other people not in their little clique collectives as non-human, and politicians have been playing that card for many a year.


Quote:

Originally posted by Kaneman:
What do you expect from a bunch of drunk black hommies drinking 40 oz beers....Oh, and we are all the same......4000 on 1, sounds about right...........



These two men are the only people telling what in my oppinion is the clear truth on this thread. People can be rotten, and even more rotten within the strength found in numbers. You don't even have to feel responsible for murdering someone if you only share 1/4000th of the blame. It's all sucky but every country has it's mobs
Iran is not more bad than most. The US is not more bad than most. If you think any different you are a product of political/media brainwashing, PERIOD!, if you don't agree with that you're in denial. Ky is right that the US has no room to talk, we do waaaaaay too much of that for our own good in matters that shouldn't concern us. Iran may have it's problems but they didn't sign the US Constitution therefore what they consider cruel and unusual punishment is THIER business. Because they have THIER OWN country, it's called Iran, not the 52nd State! I pitty the delusional minds in Iran, the US, and Austin who think thier side is completely blameless and shiny



"How drunk was I last night?"
"I don't know I passed out"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:53 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Who said anything about blame ?

I'm just tellin it like it is, we're violent barbaric imperialists, and worse, not even any good at it!

Hell, even the Romans toward the end when they got all halfassed about it were still better at it than we are... but I digress.

I'm just pointin out that this is the way we are when you strip off the bullshit, wasn't all THAT long ago lynch mobs were common, first the tories, and then black people and right now it's mexicans, and some day down the road they'll be helping the rest of us lynch the new unwanted of the month.

You ever actually READ my sig, folks ?

And as for the behavior of our troops there mister apologist, when I see one roach, I know damn well that there's not JUST one of em, and so do you.

I don't apologise for shit, wasn't MY decision to stick our nose into that business, and I have jack damn all to do with it, so why the hell should I feel personally responsible or bear any guilt ?

America, the america we've built in the last hundred years, is not a nice place, in fact it's downright dystopic, you think I carry a piece just for show ? I neither approve of nor participate in such behavior, but damned if imma blind myself to it in the name of patriotic loyalty, that's just asinine.

That bein said, the UK has enough issues of it's own on the dystopia front, and is well on it's way to becoming a full on surveillance society right out of Orwells 1984, so it's not like they got a lotta room to point fingers at us on that one.

Anyhow, be damned if imma apologise for it, but nor am I gonna sit here and deny it, neither.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:14 AM

KHYRON


Okay Finn, it's a long one, but it's civil, so don't worry.
Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
My guess is that this is exactly what you’re looking for. I don’t know why. But it explains the approach you’re taking in this thread.

It wasn't and still isn't. Honestly. As I said, I realised after reading them again this morning why the initial posts could be seen that way, but I wasn't trying to take a big swipe at America. Had this happened in France, Germany or the UK I probably would have made a similar comment, just not with Iran (I chose Iran because of the diplomatic tensions between it and America). But I wouldn't have expected a discussion, just people saying "Those crazy Brits/Germans/French". Btw, I'm also not saying that this thing is more likely to happen in the US than in those countries - I'm shocked it happens in civilised countries at all.
Quote:

You have yet to explain to me who it is you’re addressing.
I was addressing RWEDers on one level and the America apologists on here on another level. As I've said, I found this shocking when I read it. I can't remember ever reading something like it happen in Europe or America (Africa, yes, Middle East, yes, but mob violence seems to be common behaviour in the third world countries, not so in America or Europe), that's why I thought I'd post it and draw attention to it. So that was a FYI for all RWEDers. But I was also curious to see how the apologists on here would react to it, if they'd condemn this or get defensive about it and argue that posting this is yet another example of anti-Americanism. So far, it's the latter, in fact the reaction is much stronger than I thought, although not exactly by the people I was expecting.
Quote:

Why you think that MOB violence is shocking given the circumstances.
Well, because it is. I find mob violence very disturbing. In fact, your last paragraph sums it up nicely, I'll get to it in a moment.
Quote:

Why you feel intent on biasing the argument away from organized gangs, and instead insisting this violence is indicative of “normal” Americans.
Two things: i) I wanted to get it away from organised gangs because it wasn't an organised gang who did it. If some bored school kids robbed a jewellery store, would it be acceptable to argue that it was a group of professional thieves who did it? No, because they didn't do it. There's a difference between fact and fiction. Also, the reason why I thought it was disturbing and why I thought others would find it disturbing too was that it was a crowd of onlookers who did it. As far as we know, common people, until we find out otherwise. I would not have found it quite as disturbing had this been actual gang violence, as in turf warfare or something (but very disturbing nonetheless, seeing as it was in a very busy place during the day and all).
ii) The issue is largely normal people, not normal Americans. This happened in America, so I call the people involved Americans. Had this happened in France, I would have called the people French.
Quote:

And most surprising of all, why you believe that the government of Iran instituting MOB violence as an official form of capital punishment is less shocking then violence that erupts from distress over an injured daughter.
Because I expect Iran to do messed up stuff like that. I also expect that people living in a civilised country react differently to an event such as this. Physically attacking the driver is not a reaction I'd expect, fatally attacking the passenger even less so.
Quote:

As I already said, I don’t know what you’re point is and you won’t tell me, instead you're quibbling over semantics, so I have to go by what you have told me.
My point is quite clear: I find mob violence revolting, and I'm highly disturbed that this kind of stuff happens in civilised nations. I also disapprove of writing it off as some kind of gang violence when it wasn't. And finally, I also wanted to see how some people on here would react to it.
Quote:

First of all, you don’t know that the people involved in this incident are “normal.” Remember, you were just throwing a fit because the connation of one of my words might have biased the character of these people. You’re imposing an assumption on this, and you’re not doing it because of the connotation of word. You’re intentionally excluding any group you don’t think is “normal.” Like a black-separatist group? An organized inner-city gang. A Nations of Islam group. The Black Panthers. Any of which might have played a part in this given the setting, as far as you know.
Granted. The article says "crowd of onlookers". Maybe they happened to be a part of one of the groups you mentioned. Maybe they weren't. As long as I don't know for sure, I'll assume that these people weren't. If it turns out that it really was a gang, then yes, that indeed would make the incident less disturbing. But until then, I still find it highly disturbing.
Quote:

In any event, it is entirely possible and I think likely that this was not an organized event.
I agree, although I'm not exactly sure what your point is here.
Quote:

You think that fights between individuals or groups of "normal" people don’t break out in London? Or Belfast? Or Derry? I guarantee you that they do. Quite frankly it likely happens a lot. It doesn’t always end in death maybe, but then my guess is that the individuals involved in this incident weren’t trying to murder anyone they were reacting out of passion and/or alcohol.
Yeah, it happens a lot. But it's usually "just" fights, usually not a small crowd attacking one person, usually the assailants know the victim and usually it's at night in some alley, not during the day amongst 2000 to 3000 other people. In any event, I can't remember mob violence of the sort we're talking about happening before, fatal or non-fatal. Probably has, just haven't heard of it, that's why the shock (PS I don't think it's that common, otherwise BBC wouldn't have had it as one of the big headlines yesterday evening).
Quote:

If the victim hadn’t have died, we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation.
Well, if he were seriously injured we maybe would, but nonetheless I agree with that sentence in principle.
Quote:

The whole event is entirely possible. You take a large enough group of “normal” people in one place, introduce (probable) alcohol, have the daughter of one member of that group mistakenly injured in a lifethreatening way and that’s a recipe for a brawl, no matter where you are. And if someone happens to die, now it’s MOB murder. No religious or political zealots, no militias with guns, no oppressive government stoking the flames of anti-Americanism to hide their tyranny. Just regular human distress, magnified many times by crowd confusion and drugs. It happens, everywhere.
Haven't heard it happen before, but kudos to a nice summary. If you say it like that... I'm just as shocked as before.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:36 AM

BIGDAMNNOBODY


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
And as for the behavior of our troops there mister apologist, when I see one roach, I know damn well that there's not JUST one of em, and so do you.


I once read an article about a cab driver who sexually assaulted his inebriated female fare. I guess all Cabbies are rapists.
Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
I don't apologise for shit, wasn't MY decision to stick our nose into that business, and I have jack damn all to do with it, so why the hell should I feel personally responsible or bear any guilt ?


It wasn't the soldiers decision either. Should they feel personally responsible or bear any guilt?
Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
America, the america we've built in the last hundred years, is not a nice place, in fact it's downright dystopic, you think I carry a piece just for show ? I neither approve of nor participate in such behavior, but damned if imma blind myself to it in the name of patriotic loyalty, that's just asinine.


Who is blinding themselves to such behaviour in the name of patriotic loyalty?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:46 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"too tired and frustrated by Rue" Amazing - I hadn't even posted in this thread and I got blamed. Some people are incredibly biased (ahem - Khyron).

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:06 AM

KHYRON


I was referring to the Vertical Farming thread. Obviously.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:07 AM

FREMDFIRMA


A - Cabbies are a rough bunch, and far from the most trustworthy folk in the world, and no, you *shouldn't* trust them, you think imma sit there and defend a collective of people that I know to be corrupt just cause they're my co-workers ?
Burn your strawman somewhere else.

B - At this point, it *is* their decision, when clearly illegal orders are given, and then obeyed, sorry, but the onus of that act lies directly on the troop obeying them.

IF they believed the order illegal, and obeyed it out of fear of what happens to folk who defy illegal orders (that lesson being drummed into them from day one), then yes, that's their responsibility to bear.

IF they believed the orders were legal, even if stupid, then why the hell should they ? who here has never executed a boss's dumbass plan before ?

The primary responsiblity for this mess lies with the CiC and JCS, not the individual troop, so long as the troop is operating within their understanding of the UCMJ.

And now that the spin has been washed off, when a troop CLEARLY violates the UCMJ and the Rules of Engagement, hell yes they're responsible, and such violations occur on a regular and steadily increasing basis both major and minor, good heavens, just look up some of the DR's from returning units which are now sufferening from drastic levels of psychological casualty.
http://news.findlaw.com/ap/o/51/05-24-2007/a8ab00074ba0fb5d.html
http://www.wavy.com/Global/story.asp?S=5285708
There's HUNDREDS of these, those are just two of more extreme examples.

C - Your point is incomprehensible, I am pointing out some raw and ugly facts about our history and society, and thus fail to understand why you would accuse me of blinding myself with patriotism at this point ?

Just cause I can see the warts and scars, doesn't mean I don't love the old bitch, you know.

-Frem


It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:13 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Which you filled with personal insults b/c I didn't enthusiatically jump on board. And you decided to carry that here. Is that how you normally respond when people disagree with you?
Quote:

Originally posted by Khyron:
I was referring to the Vertical Farming thread. Obviously.



***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:43 AM

KHYRON


i) I didn't personally insult you until the very end, in response to your personal insult.

ii) I was quite exasperated because I countered each of your arguments (actually, the website I linked countered most of them, I just highlighted them since you apparently missed them when you were looking through the site), yet you kept coming back with the same arguments. It was quite obvious that you weren't open to being convinced about anything, you were just waiting for me to lose my patience so that you could play the martyr again. Which is what has happened.

iii) I don't give a damn if you "enthusiastically jump on board", but I do give a damn if none of your objections make any sense yet you still persist in your way of thinking. It means I wasted a lot of my precious time trying to convince somebody who couldn't be convinced from the get-go.

iv) I was frustrated, yes, because of you. That's partly the reason why I wasn't careful enough in my wording when I started this thread. Poor wording is my own fault entirely, obviously, but if you're the reason why I was frustrated, am I not supposed to say so? And "carry that here"? Lol, no. If you're frustrated with me, feel free to mention that in other threads if it's applicable, I really don't care.

v) Many people disagree with me. That's not an issue for me, in fact I like it as long as they're open to being convinced otherwise once their arguments have been countered successfully (and in your case, repeatedly), but it's the first time I've had somebody follow me to another thread and goad me into continuing the fight there.

Now kindly leave me alone, I'm not interested.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:47 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


This is what you SAY happened: "i) I didn't personally insult you until the very end, in response to your personal insult." This is what REALLY happened:



RUE
"do you think something like this would be more resource-intensive than conventional modern agriculture?"

The only people I know of who make money on this kind of resource intensive farming are pot-growers.

****************

KHYRON

Here we have a seemingly good, eco-friendly idea that's being dismissed out of hand by the so-called environmentalists on this board, without valid explanation or reason.

Rue - But the fact that the only people you know who make money from "this kind of" farming are pot-growers tells us a lot about what kind of acquaintances you have and how limited your knowledge on the subject is.

****************

My first post, your first reply to me. You replies to my rather innocuous posts were filled with personal insults from the very first.


***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:50 AM

KHYRON


And I apologised for that because I misread your statement. Is that what you were talking about? Something that was sorted out in the beginning of the discussion already. That's sad.
Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
You replies to my rather innocuous posts were filled with personal insults from the very first.

The first one (which I aplogised for) and the last one (which was in response to your insult). Everything else was snarky at worst, and completely warranted considering how you were trying to push my buttons.

Now kindly leave me alone, I'm not interested. Please.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:54 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"Now kindly leave me alone, I'm not interested. Please."

No. I will not allow myself to be blamed for things I didn't do.

We parted company here:

RUE
It's 5Am and I've been up all night so I'm just going to post a short one -
"Indoor farming modalities proposed for the vertical farm will vary by location of the farm and the desired crop product. Systems to consider include: hydroponics systems (liquid medium and float systems), aquaponics, soilless solid systems and aeroponics."

It was this very phrase that made me go back and re-read the first time through. The are a lots of 'coulds', 'mights', 'considers', 'options', and so on, but very little actual calculations that say specifically if and how it would work - where's the pencil whipping? I grow plants indoors as a hobby. The biggest limiting factor is light - it's literally food for the plants, and without enough they ail and die. (And I wasn't entirely joking when I said the only people I know of who make a profit at that kind of farming are pot-growers. Even here where there are nurseries and greenhouses, MOST plants spend most of their lives out-doors.)

That was rather specific and on-topic, don't you think?

And here's where the snark starts to creep in ...
KHYRON
"Hey, if we use this type of rocket, we could go to the moon!"
"COULD!? What do you mean could!? You mean you're not sure!? You haven't worked out all the details yet!? Well, then forget the whole damn thing, we should just stick to what we know!".

... and continues in your next post ...

"Did you maybe forget to scroll down when you looked at those pages before?"

... and here ...

""Yes, just ignore the work they have done, ignore the references to previous work done on related topics, ignore the fact that this project is still in its conceptual stages and that many things will remain uncertain until a proper full-scale trial run, then claim they haven't done any significant amount of work, and it therefore follows, somehow, that the ground-breaking idea can't be expected to be taken seriously. Brilliant. You should write a book on debating."

This despite the fact that ALL of my comments were specific, topical and neutral (with the exception of the one response to your snark). My posts just happened to disagree with your posts. Sorry bub, I'm giving you a for your performance.



***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:22 AM

KHYRON


I already said that I became snarky eventually. I have no problem with that. Do you consider snarky comments to be the same as personal insults? If so, then you're very thin-skinned (feel free to take that as a personal insult if you wish, although people who aren't thin-skinned wouldn't).
Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
This despite the fact that ALL of my comments were specific, topical and neutral (with the exception of the one response to your snark).

I think 'all' is an exaggeration, but be it as it may, your comments were for the most part also repetitive and kind of dumb.

I'm not going to ask again you to leave me alone, unless you want to see how personally insulting I can be.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:25 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Actually, I'm kinda curious about how insulting you can be. Since you were holding yourself down to snark before, I'd like to see what it's like when you really lay it on. BTW this is not snark. I am truly curious. So, with any luck ...

As to repetitious, I thought my comments were VERY specific and diverse. Your replies tended to consist of (don't you read, didn't you read, didn't you bother to read) and (WHAT !!??? You want details !!???)


***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:49 AM

KHYRON


Well, you asked for details, there were details on the website and I referred you to them, they weren't good enough so I asked you what details you were looking for, and told you that these might be in the references, which I didn't get a proper answer to and the references apparently weren't good enough either.

I could accuse you of seriously misrepresenting our discussion because that's what you're doing at the moment, but it's not worth my time. And on second thought, I won't insult you personally here, even though you deserve it, because that's what you want so that you can hold it against me for the next few months and indulge yourself further in your innocent-victim-fantasies. Instead, I'm going to make dinner and imagine how much better the world will be once we have cool vertical farms that significantly reduce our impact on the globe.

See ya, sunshine.



Questions are a burden to others. Answers are prison for oneself.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, November 28, 2024 17:48 - 4779 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:32 - 1163 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:10 - 45 posts
Salon: How to gather with grace after that election
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:04 - 1 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:59 - 215 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:58 - 1540 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:46 - 650 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:41 - 4847 posts
Dubai goes bankrupt, kosher Rothschilds win the spoils
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:31 - 5 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:29 - 7515 posts
Jean-Luc Brunel, fashion mogul Peter Nygard linked to Epstein
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:27 - 14 posts
All things Space
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:17 - 270 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL