REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Why the Left is so dangerous

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 05:11
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 9022
PAGE 2 of 5

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:12 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

But at a profit margin of around 9% , they're doing far better than many other industries.
Well, yeah, there's ExxonMobil exploration with it's 9%. Then they sell the lease rights to ExxonMobil production, with it's 9%. Which sends it via ExxonMobil shipping, to the ExxonMobil refineries, and then the ExxonMobil gas stations, chemicals, lubricants and specialty products. Poor ExxonMobil. It's being gouged by... itself.

www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/About/what_we_do.asp



---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Every March-to-May, there's a cluster or rash of "incidents" resulting in astonishingly little harm or damage, and a nice fat price spike - every single year.
Pretty much like the Las Vegas and Snohomish power plants that were specifically taken offline during a critical energy shortage to allow Enron to jack up energy futures through the roof.

www.cfo.com/article.cfm/3641541/c_5434995/
www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/37/8796
www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/03/enron.tapes/

Or the "planned refinery turnarounds" that seem to occur JUST before any major regulations are adopted.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:46 AM

CHRISISALL


Hey everyone, American corporations are first and foremost AMERICAN! They would never do anything illegal or imoral or dangerous. They are made up of patriots and citizens who want the best for us all!
Why would they knowingly hurt their own country in the name of profits when they have to live right here in the same country with us?????

...well, not EXACTLY "with" us, but, you know, penthouses and beachfront properties NEAR us...or maybe not so near...actually in Italy, and the Virgin Islands...Hawaii....

...never mind Chrisisall





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 7:43 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
I mean, surely the CIA has cut off their funding by NOW?


That really is one of the bottom line benchmark realities with all of this isn't it? A tiny example of the architects of the War on Terror's almost absolute inablity to do anything, or at least anything right. For the billions spent in Iraq we could have put a one million dollar bounty on every single Al Qaida maniac killer in the world, and mercenaries all around the globe would have come a'callin with glee. Aren't there some crazy Hessians descendants around somewhere, or at least some KKK skinheads, Dogg Chapman-type hunters and trackers, or maybe Armies of Dirty Dozen types...death row swells with the promise of commuatation for killing Al Qaida killers?...And why not turn it all into entertainment at least?...Put it all on TV live as it happens...Richard Dawson-type to host ala Running Man...our bad guys versus their bad guys so to speak. Now that would be a reality show I know I'd watch. If this report is true, and there is no evidence that it is not, it is an absolute indictment of ineptitude, and gross negligence resulting in continued vulnerability to attacks and thousands of wasted lives. I also can't stop thinking that just a mere ONE of these billions that have been spent could have instead given, for example, every kid with cancer or abused kid in America their own Make A Wish-type dream experience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 8:01 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


...well, not EXACTLY "with" us, but, you know, penthouses and beachfront properties NEAR us...or maybe not so near...actually in Italy, and the Virgin Islands...Hawaii....


The Caymans... Switzerland...

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 8:21 AM

CHRISISALL


"Why the Left is so dangerous"
Because they always want to start wars for less than honourable reasons- they lie to start 'em, spin to keep 'em going, and care nothing for our troops after they come back wounded. Those Lefty scumbags... I just wish they could be in the trenches to see and feel what they always promote!!!

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 8:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


"Why the Left is so dangerous"
Because they're media moguls, oil tycoons, energy traders, CEOs, CFOs, CIOs, Presidents, Vice Presidents and Board Members and they're all so bloody rich they control everything

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 10:39 AM

CITIZEN


Really? I thought the Left was dangerous because they extrapolate from one word uttered by one person with connections to the American Left (which by no means constitutes THE left), into being indicative of 'the Left', and thus everyone who can be identified as having left leaning politics, as being dangerous. I thought the left was dangerous because they would then take these extrapolations and bundle them all up into a silly inflammatory nonsense thread (I assume that's what Finn means when he goes on about the 'inflammatory nonsense' in the RWED), with a title eerily reminiscent of something Heinrich Himmler would have chucked out on 'Das Reich'.

Or maybe Dick Cheney on 'Das White House'.

This post bought to you by 'If the shoe fits, wear it' Incorporated.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 12:07 PM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Really? I thought the Left was dangerous because they extrapolate from one word uttered by one person with connections to the American Left (which by no means constitutes THE left), into being indicative of 'the Left', and thus everyone who can be identified as having left leaning politics, as being dangerous.



Does America even have a political "left" as we understand it in European politics? I mean the Democrats would be considered a center-right party in a lot of southern European states?

I've often wondered in the so called "left-leaning" actors in the US speak out like they do because there really isn't a political outlet anywhere else. In the UK we don't really care what actors political thoughts and affiliations are because their opinion tends to fit somewhere in the spectrum of political discourse that's taking place anyway. In the US if a Martin Sheen speaks out it's big news, possibly because what he's saying doesn't map so easily into political space....



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 12:30 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
Does America even have a political "left" as we understand it in European politics?

Not really no.

That's probably why so many Americans seem to think Europe is horribly skewed to the left.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 12:56 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Pretty much like the Las Vegas and Snohomish power plants that were specifically taken offline during a critical energy shortage to allow Enron to jack up energy futures through the roof.


Siggy, via pure accident (I was lookin for something else) stumbled over that WHILE IT HAPPENED, and a friend was in the middle of the rolling blackouts resulting.

I commented on it too, and got called a nutter for it - then went and did some digging, and got REALLY pasted for daring to bash Enron before all that crap came out.

That's what really enrages me about this kinda stuff, is that it happens over and over, and until they've been caught out, dragged out in court and downright admitted it, anyone who brings it up is roundfiled as a nutter - one reason you'll prolly never see me bashing PN.

Crazy is watchin it happen over and over, then claimin it's an isolated incident.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 1:11 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


The European Left in the US is very small, but it may be growing, and not just among fruity celebrities, but politicians as well. One of the reasons why the Left is seen as dangerous, I suspect, is because many in the US are not sure how to deal with these new ideas. In the UK, Socialists have existed for a while; their beliefs and goals are better understood, but in the US socialism is a relatively new and untested idea. And when new political theories enter into the political spectrum there is a real danger involved that the end result could upset the balance of power and lead to policies and practices we may come to regret. And that I think is why we need strong criticism of the Left.

The Right represents the establishment and in the US the establishment is a liberal secular federal republic with strong democratic tendencies and rule of law. In my mind, it really isn’t a good idea to start thinking about making large changes to that kind of philosophy, because I truly believe that we are pretty close to the peak and large movements one way or the other could be destructive to our liberty and our economy. The Left represents opposition to the establishment, and I really feel that while Americans may quibble over the finer points, most of us agree that the current system is pretty close to the best we’re going to get right now. So the idea of a large political body in the US, opposing in any kind of real way the current system, is not going to gain a lot of support outside of certain marginal groups.

That being said, it seems to me that a true European type Left may be forming in the US, and I don’t know why, but I’m afraid it is because certain minority opinions are gaining favor due to a disproportionate distribution of ideas.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 1:25 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
FINN: I have been accused of being an "attention whore" because I ask questions.

I don’t think that’s why you get accused of that.
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
ETA It sounds to me like YOUR definition of patriotism is a convenient way to forestall criticism of specific administrations. ANY administration is subject to criticism, and the more they fuck up, the more criticism they should get.

Really? Because it sounds to me like you didn’t read my response very carefully, since I didn’t disagree with your sentiment, I just don’t think you can call it patriotism and doing so I believe is more likely an attempt to add justification to one’s political motivations, then any sort of real application of patriotism. Patriotism and republicanism are not undefined as you insist. They actually have definitions, which you can look up. And if you do, you’ll find that my interpretation of patriotism as a love for one’s country is a far more consistent with that definition then your description as attacking the government.
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
ETA I don't know of ANY liberals who go around saying "I want my country to be a failure." I want my country to be a success. To me that means a transparent government, self-reliant production and energy, the availability of a decent-paying job for everyone who wants to work, safety from foreign enemies, and environmental stewardship so that generations of Americans after us can continue to prosper. It does NOT mean rampant corporatism. And I don't think we need to sacrifice our ideals in order to meet these goals.

I do know of Liberals who have said as much, but they are generally fruitcakes. Many others imply it by supporting positions they know would lead to an American failure or finding gratification in the failings of America or they imply it by making broad negative generalizations about Americans. Whether this means they lack patriotism, I don’t know, but it definitely seems to imply it. However, these people are often a minority even on the Left in the US.

And once again you correlate your opinion about how America could be successful with the desire for American success and therefore continue to confuse patriotism with politics. Patriotism is not qualified by a political agenda it is independent of it. You either want America to be successful or you don’t, and then you decide how to go about it. A person can believe that American success hinges on not going to war with Iraq, but once involved in such a war, a patriotic person does not wish for an American defeat to validity their political positions. There is a danger with entwining patriotism with politics. I think some people end up supporting causes they later regret or routing for the US to fail, because they end up confusing their love for their country with their political opinion on policy.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 2:04 PM

SERGEANTX


The 'left' is so dangerous because those who claim to represent the 'right' (neo-cons) have traded in the virtues of conservatism in exchange for power. In doing so, they've given liberals the ammunition they need to tear down the last vestiges of freedom. Nice going assholes!

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 2:13 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Data mining, the USPATRIOT Act, indefinite secret jailings, illegal wiretaps - these are just the highlights of Bush's reign - brought to you by the supposed 'conservatives' who are busy taking away liberty. You can't blame the 'left' for that. Look no further than the WH.

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 2:44 PM

SERGEANTX


Ayup

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 2:46 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
And once again you correlate your opinion about how America could be successful with the desire for American success and therefore continue to confuse patriotism with politics. Patriotism is not qualified by a political agenda it is independent of it. You either want America to be successful or you don’t, and then you decide how to go about it. A person can believe that American success hinges on not going to war with Iraq, but once involved in such a war, a patriotic person does not wish for an American defeat to validity their political positions. There is a danger with entwining patriotism with politics. I think some people end up supporting causes they later regret or routing for the US to fail, because they end up confusing their love for their country with their political opinion on policy.

Wanting to leave Iraq would not necessarrily be unpatriotic to America, but would be viewed by some as a defeat.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 2:57 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
and thus everyone who can be identified as having left leaning politics, as being dangerous



I'll tell you who's dangerous Cit....

Those crazy gun-toting nut-jobs leaning towards the right* when the lefty Communist idiots make us pay for Universal Health Care every month on top of the next 20 tax hikes on cigarettes and booze, who are going to take public service upon themselves in a big way by making breathing easier for everyone when they make a lot of new holes in people so the oxygen can get straight to the lungs without all that wasted time spent traveling through the mouth and nose and the rest of the resperatory track....


*By right, it is meant the real definition of Right... not the redefined Illuminated Globalist NeoConartist Warmongering BigCorp serving right.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:01 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Wanting to leave Iraq would not necessarrily be unpatriotic to America, but would be viewed by some as a defeat.



You know I've never thought we should have been there in the first place Cit. I hated on Bush before it was the cool thing to do.

I don't feel one little bit less patriotic for it either.

And when we do finally bring our kids home from the unwinnable "war", it won't be America that lost, but the Evil Administration which decieved the entire world. The faster we get this behind us the better, I say.

God Bless America.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:05 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SergeantX:
The 'left' is so dangerous because those who claim to represent the 'right' (neo-cons) have traded in the virtues of conservatism in exchange for power. In doing so, they've given liberals the ammunition they need to tear down the last vestiges of freedom. Nice going assholes!



Don't think it could possibly be summed up better than that Sarge. We're F'd in a big way when Clinton & Obama run on the same ticket in '08.

That's my prediction right now. They're just figuring out who to put as the frontrunner now.

With the Trifecta of the Female demographic, the Minority demographic, and a universal hatered for the Administration (also religion and Rethuglicans in general), we're looking at the Dems owning the whole show and Communism sweeping from sea to shining sea by 2016.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:06 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Finn, I have this weird feeling that we're going to keep going round and round unless we find the nub of our discrepancy. You keep using the word "patriotism" to mean something that I'm just not getting, altho I'm trying.

You say that patriotism is love of country. Then you say that attacking the "government" is unpatriotic. But that is only true if you equate "the country" with "the government". What happens in the conundrum that you posed where you love your country but the government is an evil dicatorship? Is is possible to love your COUNTRY but hate your GOVERNMENT? Or does patriotism mean loving your government?

Quote:

Many others imply it by supporting positions they know would lead to an American failure
What kinds of "failure are you talking about? Military? Economic? Moral? Can you give examples of what you mean?
Quote:


And once again you correlate your opinion about how America could be successful with the desire for American success and therefore continue to confuse patriotism with politics.

Now here you have totally lost me. I haven't a clue what you mean by "correlating your opinion... with the desire for American success".
Quote:

Patriotism is not qualified by a political agenda it is independent of it. You either want America to be successful or you don’t, and then you decide how to go about it. A person can believe that American success hinges on not going to war with Iraq, but once involved in such a war, a patriotic person does not wish for an American defeat to validity their political positions. There is a danger with entwining patriotism with politics. I think some people end up supporting causes they later regret or routing for the US to fail, because they end up confusing their love for their country with their political opinion on policy.
Okay, call me clueless but none of this makes sense to me on any level. Do I want my country to go over a cliff, if I perceive it to be so? What do you think I- or anyone- should be doing if we think our government is making a grave mistake? Specifically in Iraq, I am working towards w/drawal. Do you equate that with "defeat" or "change in policy"?

So, OOC I loooked up republicanism on wikipedia which says

Republicanism is the ideology of governing a nation as a republic, with an emphasis on liberty, rule by the people, and the civic virtue practiced by citizens. Republicanism always stands in opposition to aristocracy, oligarchy, and dictatorship. More broadly, it refers to a political system that protects liberty, especially by incorporating a rule of law that cannot be arbitrarily ignored by the government. Much of the literature deals with the issue of what sort of values and behavior by the citizens is necessary if the republic is to survive and flourish; the emphasis has been on widespread citizen participation, civic virtue, and opposition to corruption

I don't find anything is this definition that contradicts my definition of patriotism. If you think that your definition of patriotism los matches this decription then we are clearly reading different things from the same document.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:06 PM

CITIZEN


Jene verrückten Gewehr-toting Nuß-Jobs, die nach rechts sich lehnen, wenn die linksgerichteten kommunistischen Idioten uns Bezahlung für Universalgesundheitspflege jeder Monat auf die folgenden 20 Steuerwanderungen auf Zigaretten und Schnäpsen bilden, die allgemeinen Service nach selbst mit großer Begeisterung nehmen werden, indem sie die Atmung einfacher für jeder bilden, wenn sie Menge von den neuen Bohrungen in den Leuten also im Sauerstoff bilden, können an die Lungen ohne alles gerade gelangen, das das Zeit aufgewendete Reisen durch die Öffnung und die Nase und den Rest der Atmungsschiene....

Jetzt ist es vollkommen!



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:08 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


English son....

And not that Benny Hill English either, but the real kind....

The kind they speak in Texas.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:10 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Citizen, my German consists of two semesters at univerity 35 years ago. What did you just say????

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:11 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You know I've never thought we should have been there in the first place Cit. I hated on Bush before it was the cool thing to do.

I don't feel one little bit less patriotic for it either.

And when we do finally bring our kids home from the unwinnable "war", it won't be America that lost, but the Evil Administration which decieved the entire world. The faster we get this behind us the better, I say.

God Bless America.

Here's something I mostly agree with, I never supported the war in Iraq, I didn't like Bush before he was elected, by the way, but I didn't like Clinton either. I hear not agreeing with the American government 100% makes you an anti-American, so just paint me Castro.

But, you shit on someone elses door step, it's only polite to try and clean it up.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:12 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Citizen, my German consists of two semesters at univerity 35 years ago. What did you just say????

Just some crazy stuffs.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:14 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Citizen, my German consists of two semesters at univerity 35 years ago. What did you just say????




Quote:

By Cit:
Just some crazy stuffs.



That would be my crazy stuff Signy. Citizen is being cute.

He reposted my post in German, and I must say, I don't think he put it in Babel Fish either. Either he has a much better translator, or he has a fine grasp on two languages.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:17 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
He reposted my post in German, and I must say, I don't think he put it in Babel Fish either. Either he has a much better translator, or he has a fine grasp on two languages.

Actually it was Babel Fish, most of my german is limited to basic conversation picked up from my time working for the Man in Germany.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:17 PM

BABYWITHTHEPOWER


Was ist mit dem deutschen Herrn douche beutel?

You know? You're right. English is so passe. You're just too cool for school Cit.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'll be in my bunk.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:18 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Actually it was Babel Fish, most of my german is limited to basic conversation picked up from my time working for the Man in Germany.



Ya don't say....

Babel must do a much better job translating from English to German than vice versa...

(Try putting that German back into English now.)

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:29 PM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

Sargeantx-
The 'left' is so dangerous because those who claim to represent the 'right' (neo-cons) have traded in the virtues of conservatism in exchange for power. In doing so, they've given liberals the ammunition they need to tear down the last vestiges of freedom. Nice going assholes!



very simply put.. but thats what i believe. conservatism used to be a strict adherence to the constitution, but i think the precedent set under president Wilson and the 'new deal', forever compromised the competitiveness of the message of consistutional liberty, and ushered in a new era of liberal politics.

ill give the democratic party credit, you know what youre getting with them. they dont hide their loyalties towards the 'secular', socialist, Marxist crowd.. except that its highly diluted (for mass consumption reasons)

on the other hand the last 30 years of so called 'conservatives', are relatively 'left' leaning by constitutional standards. they have succumbed to the same 'pork' and entitlements, and have forsaken their original principles. i guess republican has taken on a new meaning, since the party has split into left leaning neocons, who only give lip service to the constitution when it benefits them politically, or conveniently

Finn made the point pretty well that our system of government, at least intended by the constitution, is antithetical to socialism, and the two are principally mutually exclusive(without major problems and inconsistencies). i could go on about this for awhile.. but at the root of this is a conspiracy to deliberatly force socialism on Americans by diception and conditioning. its been happening from our beginning, but this century has taken the turn to epic

for example, this is why conservatives have always been against the department of Education. its a federal state mandated curriculum.. there to intentionally propagate and condition AMericas youth into accepting secular theories, like socialism(and atheism), and away from our (if nothing else) deistic historical constitutional republic

so... now what we get are two parties beholden to private interests, political minorities(at the extremes) and a fraudulent monetary system, which itself was designed to perpetuate socialism (as well as debt and war and instability and serfdom). and from their we all know how the game is played, using the 'extremes' to polarize discourse, to instigate division so real issues arent(or cant be) dealt with

but the bottom line should be that any members of congress unwilling to abolish the Federal Reserve, be it left or right, are 'leftists', because they are by default abandoning constitutional principles(like sound money), and permitting and aiding this big government socialist virus to overtake us









NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:32 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Did I do it again ... miss a joke by thinking it was serious ? My only excuse is that some pepole say that stuff and mean it - it's so hard to tell the ironic from scary but sincere sometimes.
Quote:

Originally posted by SergeantX:
Ayup

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock



***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:32 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
"Antimason's Entire Post as opposed to Sarges'



I stand corrected.... it can be said better.

"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:37 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Ya don't say....

Babel must do a much better job translating from English to German than vice versa...

(Try putting that German back into English now.)

The differences between English and German are much less than between English and most other languages, English grew out of the Germanic languages from the influences of the Angles and the Saxons, they share a similar grammatical structure, but the differences are there. The problem is that computer translators only ever translate on the word level, they can make some use of grammatical corrections, but binary translations are never all that good. They can only ever translate the words in the sentence, not what the sentence actually means. That's why Human translators are always better, they translate what the sentence means, rather than what the sentence says.

Anyway, my rather pigeon German indicates that the translation isn't great, but adequate.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:40 PM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by babywiththepower:
Was ist mit dem deutschen Herrn douche beutel?

You know? You're right. English is so passe. You're just too cool for school Cit.

I love you too sweety, but keep the piss away from the gentlemen.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 3:54 PM

VETERAN

Don't squat with your spurs on.


Finn,

Your point, that a major change in philosopy may be dangerous to our liberty and econcomy is a good one. However, there's a good case that this administration is the cause of just such a change.

For instance, the appointment of Judge Alito and Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Supreme Court further to the right and more likely to support the postions against abortion while supporting big business, and the "unitary executive" interpretation of the constitution.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 5:57 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Finn, I have this weird feeling that we're going to keep going round and round unless we find the nub of our discrepancy. You keep using the word "patriotism" to mean something that I'm just not getting, altho I'm trying.

I’m using the word patriotism exactly as the dictionary suggests it should be used. If you don’t get it, I don’t know what I can do about that. It means love for one’s country, not love for one’s country, as long as its government leans to the Left.
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Then you say that attacking the "government" is unpatriotic.

At no point did I say that attacking the government (verbally I assume) is unpatriotic. And frankly, I don’t think any reasonable interpretation of what I said could come to that conclusion.

If you believe you’re patriotic for wanting to withdraw from Iraq, wonderful, but I don’t know what you want from me, or expect me to say to that. You’re equating a political opinion to patriotism. People do it all the time, but that’s just rhetoric.

Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
I don't find anything is this definition that contradicts my definition of patriotism. If you think that your definition of patriotism los matches this decription then we are clearly reading different things from the same document.

And why would you? It’s a discussion about republicanism, not patriotism.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:02 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by Veteran:
Finn,

Your point, that a major change in philosopy may be dangerous to our liberty and econcomy is a good one. However, there's a good case that this administration is the cause of just such a change.

For instance, the appointment of Judge Alito and Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Supreme Court further to the right and more likely to support the postions against abortion while supporting big business, and the "unitary executive" interpretation of the constitution.

Like I said, major shift either way probably aren’t beneficial, but I believe we are the least prepared for major shifts to the European Left.

And I don’t think Judge Alito and Chief Justice Roberts represent a major shift. Remember Kelo vs. New London? The case in which it was ruled that the government could take private property from one owner and give it to another owner if it could be shown to further economic development. That borders on Communism, and it was supported by all the Liberal judges and none of the Conservative judges. So frankly I think the addition of Alito and Roberts does more to prevent major shifts then cause them.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:15 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


government could take private property from one owner and give it to another owner if it could be shown to further economic development. That borders on Communism ...

Terrible, just terrible.

See ya in Gitmo ... I hear it's pretty nice. And not a bad trade-off for land.

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:30 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
conservatism used to be a strict adherence to the constitution, but i think the precedent set under president Wilson and the 'new deal', forever compromised the competitiveness of the message of consistutional liberty, and ushered in a new era of liberal politics.



What's often lost in these left vs. right debates is the other axis of distinction. I think most of you have seen the Nolan chart that posits adding a perpendicular axis to the usual left/right line to represent authoritarian/libertarian leanings. That's the one that matters. Todays liberal and conservative leaders are cut from the same authoritarian cloth. Limited government isn't necessarily a conservative notion. Liberals love freedom just as much as conservatives, and more and more of them are beginning to see the dangers of giving government too much power.

As far as the constitution goes, it's not a really big issue with me. It's not a perfect document and won't protect us at all if we no longer value its principles. It is, after all, just a piece of paper. Don't get me wrong, it's a valuable tool for keeping the government in check, but as we've seen, it only works if the people maintain the will to follow it.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:39 PM

SERGEANTX


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Did I do it again ... miss a joke by thinking it was serious ? My only excuse is that some pepole say that stuff and mean it - it's so hard to tell the ironic from scary but sincere sometimes.



Hehe.. well, the joke continues because I was serious. But maybe less than clear. My point was that I see liberal and conservative leadership as tag-teaming on all of us. [See above post for clarification] Your post seemed in agreement with my sentiments on the topic.

SergeantX

"Dream a little dream or you can live a little dream. I'd rather live it, cause dreamers always chase but never get it." Aesop Rock

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, July 13, 2007 6:59 PM

FREMDFIRMA


I do love my country, but she's pretty sick right now and bordering on terminal illness.

That's why I'm takin her to the Doctor.

Ron Paul, 08.

Nuff said.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 4:44 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
I’m using the word patriotism exactly as the dictionary suggests it should be used. If you don’t get it, I don’t know what I can do about that. It means love for one’s country, not love for one’s country, as long as its government leans to the Left.

Patriotism is the 'love' of the abstraction of a country, it's ideals, what it stands for.

You're definition of Patriotism seems to suggest that you'd have to want any action taken by the government to succeed, or you are unpatriotic, even if those actions are detrimental to the country, and it's ideals.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:16 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
You're definition of Patriotism seems to suggest that you'd have to want any action taken by the government to succeed, or you are unpatriotic, even if those actions are detrimental to the country, and it's ideals.

I don’t see how anything I’ve said suggests that.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:34 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
I don’t see how anything I’ve said suggests that.

It seems, to me, that you are equating 'government' with 'country', and assuming that patriotism is therefore the desire for the government to succeed.

If the actions of the Government are antithetical to the best interests of the country, it would in fact be patriotic to wish one's government to fail, because such failure could well be a success for the country.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:37 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by citizen:
Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
I don’t see how anything I’ve said suggests that.

It seems, to me, that you are equating 'government' with 'country', and assuming that patriotism is therefore the desire for the government to succeed.

I’m not equating government with country though. In fact, I’ve stated that they are different things.

Actually, your argument would better explain signym position. It is signym that is trying to equate government with country. Signym is trying to correlate his particular theory and opinion of how the government should work with love for your country.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:14 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I’m not equating government with country though. In fact, I’ve stated that they are different things.
Finn- I know this may seem arcane but I'm reading your posts rather closely because I really am trying to figure out what you're saying. The confusing thing is that you seem to be saying tow different things at the same time.


You said
Quote:

And if you do, you’ll find that my interpretation of patriotism as a love for one’s country is a far more consistent with that definition then your description as attacking the government.
And
Quote:

I’m using the word patriotism exactly as the dictionary suggests it should be used. If you don’t get it, I don’t know what I can do about that. It means love for one’s country, not love for one’s country, as long as its government leans to the Left.


If you had said Patriotism is love for one's country, not attacking one's country that would have made logical sense. But you used the words "country" and "government" as equivalents.

So if "country" and "government" are not equivalent as you say, under what circumstances might love of country conflict with love of government? What happens in the instance you posed where you love your country but the government is an oppressive tyranny? What would patriotism look like in such an instance? If love of country and love of government come into conflict, which is the higher duty?

------------------------------------

AFA Republicanism and patriotism, you said
It’s probably better described as republicanism. I assumed that you meant Patriotism is probably better described as republicanism but perhaps that's not what you meant.

If in your mind they are two different things, under what circumstances might patriotism conflict with republicanism? Where they conflict, which one is the higher duty?

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:31 AM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
If you had said Patriotism is love for one's country, not attacking one's country that would have made logical sense. But what you did was use the words "country" and "government" in an equivalent sense. So my question remains, although I've asked it several times in several guises:

No what I did was point out how YOU are using the government and country in an equivalent sense.
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Under what circumstances might love of country conflict with support of government? What happens in the instance you posed where you love your country but the government is an oppressive tyranny? What would patriotism look like in such an instance?.

Let’s hope we never have to find out.
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
AFA Republicanism and patriotism, you said
It’s probably better described as republicanism. I assumed that you meant Patriotism is probably better described as republicanism but perhaps that's not what you meant.

No what I meant was that what you’re saying sounds more like republicanism, then patriotism.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:59 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

No what I did was point out how YOU are using the government and country in an equivalent sense.
Huh? Where did I do THAT?
Quote:

Under what circumstances might love of country conflict with support of government? What happens in the instance you posed where you love your country but the government is an oppressive tyranny? What would patriotism look like in such an instance?.=SIGNY

Let’s hope we never have to find out.= FINN

So, which in your mind is the higher duty: love of country or support of government? And AFA the potential conflict between patriotism and republicanism, do you see this as a possibility? If so, which is the higher duty?

ETA: I don't know about you but I feel like we're understanding each other better.
---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:04 AM

CITIZEN


Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
I’m not equating government with country though. In fact, I’ve stated that they are different things.

Actually, your argument would better explain signym position. It is signym that is trying to equate government with country. Signym is trying to correlate his particular theory and opinion of how the government should work with love for your country.

I don't know, it seems that Signym's position is that one doesn't have to support the actions of one's Government, inorder to support one's country. But, and forgive me if I have this wrong, you seem to be saying that you have to support, and want to succeed, the actions of Government, in order to support one's country. In other words, wanting America to withdraw from Iraq before the goals have been secured, would be a failure for America and thereby anyone supporting that position would not be 'patriotic'.



More insane ramblings by the people who brought you beeeer milkshakes!
No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russian losses in Ukraine
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:32 - 1163 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:10 - 45 posts
Salon: How to gather with grace after that election
Thu, November 28, 2024 14:04 - 1 posts
End of the world Peter Zeihan
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:59 - 215 posts
Another Putin Disaster
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:58 - 1540 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:46 - 650 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:41 - 4847 posts
Dubai goes bankrupt, kosher Rothschilds win the spoils
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:31 - 5 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:29 - 7515 posts
Jean-Luc Brunel, fashion mogul Peter Nygard linked to Epstein
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:27 - 14 posts
All things Space
Thu, November 28, 2024 13:17 - 270 posts
White Woman Gets Murdered, Race Baiters Most Affected
Thu, November 28, 2024 07:40 - 20 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL