REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Do you have what it takes ?

POSTED BY: FREMDFIRMA
UPDATED: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:22
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1508
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, July 16, 2007 12:33 PM

FREMDFIRMA


To be an Anti-Federalist ?

Stumbled across this widget this morning, it uses actual historic arguments and original text.

http://www.ushistoryplace.com/learning/federalism/intro.html

Let's see where ya REALLY stand, ehe ?
I dare ya.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 16, 2007 1:33 PM

FREDGIBLET


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
To be an Anti-Federalist ?



Apparently no, I scored a 50-50.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 16, 2007 1:35 PM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by fredgiblet:
Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
To be an Anti-Federalist ?



Apparently no, I scored a 50-50.



Tyrant! I apparently scored 60/40 AntiFed, can't help thinking that's biased....

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 16, 2007 2:02 PM

FINN MAC CUMHAL


Somehow I ended up squarely in the anti-federalists camp with a 70/30.



Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.

Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, nothing more obscure than public opinion, nothing more deceptive than the whole political system.

-- Cicero

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, July 16, 2007 5:23 PM

LEADB


80/20 firmly into anti federalist territory, which rather surprises me. I suspect it's a growing lack of trust with what the feds are doing these days.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:35 AM

FREDGIBLET


Quote:

Originally posted by leadb:
I suspect it's a growing lack of trust with what the feds are doing these days.



I suspect it's a poorly designed test.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:38 AM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by fredgiblet:
Quote:

Originally posted by leadb:
I suspect it's a growing lack of trust with what the feds are doing these days.



I suspect it's a poorly designed test.



I suspect it's actually deliberately biased. In getting 60/40 I deliberately answered some questions "wrong" ie took a line that was excessively authoritarian.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:44 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


If it takes a jaundiced view of politicians, a cynical view of commercial enterprises and a complete lack of faith in "the people" then count me in.

Statistically, I'm 50/50. I somewhat dispute the categorization of the answers, because (for example) while I believe the Presidency will become a singular ruler (simply because of the mechanics of dividing power among 50 Senators and 425 Representatives makes them less efficient than a "Unitary Executive") I think he SHOULD be liable to impeachment. But answering the impeachment question affirmatively places me more in the "Federalist" camp.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:47 AM

FREDGIBLET


Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch2:
I suspect it's actually deliberately biased.



I don't think so, I think that the problem is that they are using quotes from those papers to make the test when they weren't intended for that purpose. The problem being that some of the quotes can be misinterpreted, there was more than one where I'm fairly sure that my reasoning and the reasoning of the author are different and produce different answers from the same statement.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:37 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Fred, I noticed that too, this one seems oversimplified and the sampling is far too small, imop - if I knew anything worthwhile about HTML or related stuff, I could roll out a much better one.

I also suspect the designers grasp of the related history isn't as firm as he thinks, there's much better quotes that could have been used.

Still I found it a thought provoking waste of a couple minutes.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:14 PM

FREDGIBLET


There are sites that let you put in questions and make quizzes without knowing anything about HTML.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, July 17, 2007 12:22 PM

FLETCH2


Quote:

Originally posted by fredgiblet:
There are sites that let you put in questions and make quizzes without knowing anything about HTML.



Yes, but how you then score the result can be biased.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Science given the boot at White House
Tue, July 14, 2026 04:18 - 282 posts
The Conservative vision for America: cut infrastructure, let's see what happens...
Tue, July 14, 2026 03:15 - 75 posts
Long hot summer ... of riots
Tue, July 14, 2026 03:13 - 508 posts
Can we learn from history JUST ONCE??
Tue, July 14, 2026 03:12 - 65 posts
The limits of free speech
Tue, July 14, 2026 03:07 - 103 posts
The Sorrows Of Empire by Chalmers Johnson
Tue, July 14, 2026 03:02 - 112 posts
Who are the worst leaders of the 21st Century...and best?
Tue, July 14, 2026 02:58 - 47 posts
Those who fail to learn from history are idiots.
Tue, July 14, 2026 02:53 - 88 posts
'Youths' in Paris continue to riot.
Tue, July 14, 2026 02:52 - 52 posts
The next boogeyman: China
Tue, July 14, 2026 02:49 - 83 posts
Best Cities to Visit
Tue, July 14, 2026 02:46 - 14 posts
Humanoid and Animal shaped robots are replacing us all...
Tue, July 14, 2026 02:43 - 11 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL