Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
The "inconvenient truth" that you fail to mention.... the part right before the sentence that you quote, is... The court ruled that the film was substantially founded upon scientific research and fact. There were nine points in dispute in the film, of those, three are definitely wrong and the remainder are more correct than not according to the scientific consensus.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
The film is clearly a call for action. Does that make it "political"? I guess it is if you assume ANY call for action is political. In that view, Silent Spring by Rachel Carson would also be deemed "political", as would Capitalism and Freedom by Milton Friedman. What I don't understand is the idea that this movie is somehow "partisan" i.e. supporting one political party over another. It's been a while since I saw the film; I wasn't particularly impressed with it but I didn't get the feeling that it was a Republican v Democrat film.

---

Quote:

---

You may be right if my original point was that the movie was not based on scientific fact. Righteous and I are clearly discussing the partisan nature of the film, not the science.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
For example: The earth is round

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
So if you would care to be specific about the partisan nature of the film- especially by providing examples- that would be helpful.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:


Terminally silly Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Alliethorn7:
Don't know if I'm reiterating here, as I'm too lazy to read the thread, but didn't ANYONE think that it may be just a natural thing? Seein' as we just got out of the Lil' Ice Age, maybe this is just the opposite of it, like the Lil' Apocalypse of Damnation and Hellfire?

-Danny

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AnthonyT:

I will say now what I have said before.... There are plenty of good, selfish reasons to change the behavior of mankind that have nothing to do with Global Warming.... It might also help the planet, or it might not. Who cares? It helps me!

So shove Global Warming up your rectum and give me a car that delivers a mile per penny. That would be progress.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Further proof of the scam.

I am wondering which excuses and rationalizations the Libtards and other disciples of the global warming religion will rely upon and use to deflect the mythical basis for their false claims. How will they dismiss the facts, as they do whenever the facts and science get in the way of their belief system?

---

Quote:

---

Federal laboratory has been shut down due to extensive data manipulation regarding the fake science perpetuating the myth of global warming.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Federal laboratory has been shut down due to extensive data manipulation regarding the fake science perpetuating the myth of global warming.

---

The first link said nothing about global warming, or even what the lab analyzed for. The second link went nowhere.

---

Quote:

---

Neither supported your babbling. So I looked further - what was this really about?
The lab appears to be a single-instrument lab that only uses that one kind of instrument called an ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer) Where I work we have a plethora of instruments, including two ICP-MSs.
An ICP-MS is useful for analyzing any solid that can be dissolved in acids, and gives you how much of the various elements are in each solid. So it's very useful for analyzing rocks, soils (made of broken down rocks), and dusts (made of broken down soils).
What it CAN'T do is analyze elements that combine together to form gases - like when one atom of the element carbon combines with four atoms of the element hydrogen to form the gas methane; or when one atom of the element carbon combines with two atoms of the element oxygen to form the gas carbon dioxide; or when one atom of the element carbon combines with two atoms of the element chlorine and two atoms of the element fluorine to form the gas dichlorodifluoromethane otherwise known as Freon-12 (all these gazes being important to global warming).
So, an ICP-MS can measure elements found in the various forms of rocks and other dissolveable solids, but can't measure important greenhouses gases. I'm not finding a direct connection between the lab and data vital to verifying global warming.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
More linkies:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3443201/posts?page=44

http://talk.baltimoresun.com/topic/272518-federal-lab-shut-down-after-
18-years-of-disturbing-data-manipulation/

http://whatifthereisnorapture.blogspot.com/2016/06/disturbing-data-man
ipulation-forces.html

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/23/federal-lab-forced-to-close-after-di
sturbing-data-manipulation/

http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=878032

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
The second link repeatedly generates an error -

The connection was reset

The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.

The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
(or repeatedly, over days)
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
(get every page I try, just not this one)
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy (no), make sure that is permitted to access the Web. (accessing 'the Web' is fine, just not that page)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2016/07/investigators-us-lab-w
orker-colorado-faked-test-results


Investigators: U.S. Lab Worker in Colorado Faked Test Results

A worker at a federal laboratory in Colorado intentionally manipulated test results for years, possibly tainting research that includes toxic metals in the Everglades, uranium near the Grand Canyon and coal in Afghanistan, investigators say. ... The manipulation occurred between 2008 and 2014 at the USGS Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in the Denver suburb of Lakewood, the inspector general said. The test samples were mostly coal and water.

---

Quote:

---

http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2016/07/investigators-us-lab-w
orker-colorado-faked-test-results

Investigators: U.S. Lab Worker in Colorado Faked Test Results
A worker at a federal laboratory in Colorado intentionally manipulated test results for years, possibly tainting research that includes toxic metals in the Everglades, uranium near the Grand Canyon and coal in Afghanistan, investigators say. ... The manipulation occurred between 2008 and 2014 at the USGS Energy Geochemistry Laboratory in the Denver suburb of Lakewood, the inspector general said. The test samples were mostly coal and water.- KIKI

And this has what to do with AGW?- REAVERFAN

---