Quote:

---

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
I sense the good within you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
weaponised nuclear energy is "the fire of the gods" and thus, a blasphemous usurpation mankind should not have, and cannot be trusted with - harnessing our stolen fire for the benefit of all can be forgiven or atoned for, but smiting each other with the gods fire ?

That's like bogarting one of Zeus's lightning bolts and dropping it on your boss, it's a blasphemy, a usurpation and an insult to the divinities all at once, you see.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Rappy, it's dead bang simple.

I Do Not Agree.

So either "everybody agrees" is a lie, or you do not consider me a person.

Which is it ?

-F

PS. I see we crossposted there Anthony, lil bit of Sesquipedalian Loquaciousness goin on there, eh ?

I like to keep it simple.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:

Quote:

---

I also have never accused anyone of being "un-American", "terrorist", "terrorist-lovers" or the like for disagreeing with the administration, so that is outright lie on your part.

---

Oh, no Finn. You're not anywhere near as noble and dispassionate as you think you are, 'cause I've been on the receiving end of your hate. You called me all kinds of names, including un-American.

And all because I dare to ask you questions about your viewpoints, which you can't even answer.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
To what do you not agree ? That R v W is bad law ? As I tried to explain, I say so not because of what it allegedly legalizes, but simple based on its lack of merit . Whether you agree w/ a " woman's right to choose " or not , isn't the issue here. When I say 'everyone agrees', it's simply a commentary that , those both for and against R v W will tell you that it's a poorly arrived at decision. Your opinion doesn't change that fact, sorry.

---

Quote:

---

And certainly it lacks any kind of constitutional justification, which is something any constitutional attorney will tell you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
And certainly it lacks any kind of constitutional justification, which is something any constitutional attorney will tell you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
And certainly it lacks any kind of constitutional justification, which is something any constitutional attorney will tell you.

---

Ahhh Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
Blasphemy!!! The Constitution is not a goddamned piece of paper!!

It’s a goddamned piece of parchment.

---

Quote:

---

Was that before or after you went into great detail to malign my character with manipulative mean-spirited commentary on how I was born with mental disability and grew up to be a murdering bastard? Although, the truth is that even in that case, your accusations are unlikely.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
HOW LONG have I been posting that Obama is more conservative than most people realize ? HOW LONG have I been posting that I wasn't pro-Obama, just anti-McCain ? HOW LONG have I been posting that the real work doesn't being until AFTER the election ? Have you not been reading anything, just skating along posting responses to your own assumptions ?

---

Quote:

---

or too confrontational

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Being truly "moderate" is the ONLY way for a President to be. IMHO.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
:

Quote:

---

Your posts are either too complex

---

Poor reading comprehension?

Quote:

---

or too confrontational

---

THIS from the person who said:

Quote:

---

The Left has been going totally apeshit over Bush... No amount of criticism of Obama ... could ever even register on the deranged-hate syndrome scale that Liberals created and perfected with Bush

---

Ah yes, time to skate indeed!


---------------------------------

---

Quote:

---

I have been civil to all who post here since the election. I think that must bother you the most. Why else you busting my balls? Are you that lonely and attention starved?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:

Quote:

---

I have been civil to all who post here since the election. I think that must bother you the most. Why else you busting my balls? Are you that lonely and attention starved?

---

Riverlove: If I said that you suffered from deranged-hate syndrome would you consider that a civil comment?

---------------------------------
Let's party like its 1929.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
"I'm flattered that I'm on your radar."

Uhhmm ... you're not in any special way (until you post to me). You may have noticed (or maybe not) I was just going down the thread and responding as I saw fit to a number of people.

"I have been civil to all who post here since the election."
And here's a couple of examples of Riverlove's civility ...
"... deranged-hate syndrome scale that Liberals created and perfected ..."
"Are you that lonely and attention starved?"

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

---

Quote:

---

The actual words of my original post said " since 1999". I was obviously referring to the "Left" in general, not the Leftists here. This board didn't exist in 1999; or do you need a cite for that? Yer a tad too sensitive for someone who's so quick to be mean to Browncoat posters.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:

I had no idea I had so much power. But if I could have power, I'd rather make you into a real little boy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
"When I say 'everyone agrees', it's simply ..." another 'fact' I made up out of thin air !

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
No, dumbass, everyone as in scholars from both sides of the argument.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by swish:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
No, dumbass, everyone as in scholars from both sides of the argument.

---

The usual question:

Cites please?

The usual reply:

---

Already posted above, brainless.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#Critiques



It is not those who use the term "Islamo-Fascism" who are sullying the name of Islam; it is the Islamo-Fascists. - Dennis Prager


" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:

Quote:

---

Was that before or after you went into great detail to malign my character with manipulative mean-spirited commentary on how I was born with mental disability and grew up to be a murdering bastard? Although, the truth is that even in that case, your accusations are unlikely.

---

Can you find a quote where I said anything remotely like that? I doubt it very much. What I mainly find troubling about you is that you DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
I think Finn gets SignyM and me mixed up. He says SignyM says things which I said. Though,

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
Finn:
"a human fetus is by definition human"

So is my liver, my nose, my finger (here, see ?). It doesn't make it a human.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
Finn:
"Americans have more personal freedom then exists in much of Western Europe."

And now you're visiting Rap land. Well, we all go there from time to time. Just don't move there.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
Finn

"Was that before or after you went into great detail to malign my character with manipulative mean-spirited commentary on how I was born with mental disability and grew up to be a murdering bastard?"

I find you pedantic in the extreme, intent on manipulating individual words to meet your needs (rather than using standard definitions) and yet, somehow unable to see the whole argument. I find that to be a sign of certain inabilities - that was I who made that argument, not SignyM.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
"until such time as you can demonstrate that a human liver, nose or finger evolved into a human"

So you are saying it's not a human YET ? Then we agree --- some day it MAY become a human but that day it not arrived. And until it does, and while it's not a human, it's not covered by the Consitution.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by swish:
And that short paragraph represents the opinions of EVERYONE? How about the MAJORITY of supreme court justices who ruled for Roe v Wade? Were they not people? Were they not experts?

Yeah, I have a brain. I can recognize people. You recognize nothing but your own pathetically small worldview. I do truly pity you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
Like your use of 'it seems' or it appears' ? No like, your inability to use the phrase 'human life' appropriately, as in abortion is wrong because it takes a human life, but bombing civilian areas is OK because those things there are just collateral damage.

---

Quote:

---

Can you find a quote where I said anything remotely like that? - Signy

Probably, but what the hell makes you think that you are immune to supporting your own claims?- Finn

---

Quote:

---

What I mainly find troubling about you is that you DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK. - Signy

As you accuse me of being stupid : “you DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.”- Finn

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
Why don't you start by supporting yours? Find me a quote where I said you were a murderous bastard (or whatever it is that you claim that I said)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SignyM:
I always suport my claims.

---