REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Arab pilots forgot to read airline manual...

POSTED BY: PIRATENEWS
UPDATED: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 06:47
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3366
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:07 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


$200-Million Airbus with zero hours is a total loss without leaving runway.

www.rense.com/general85/Airbus340.pdf
www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/etihad.asp



Airbus boffins outsmart pilots, again. DOH!

Airbus crash test video



Airbus computer pumps out all fuel over Atlantic Ocean at night, airliner glides 30 minutes with engines off
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_23

Soon aircraft will be too complicated for human pilots, and only robots will be allowed to fly.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 6:57 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

If this plane can glide 30 minutes without engine power, it's got to be one of the best commercial jetliners ever.

--Anthony



"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 8:06 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Oh the Airbus 300-series is indeed a pretty tough airframe, although PN got the link wrong, that was flight 236
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_236
Also, the airplane ditched in the Hudson recently was an Airbus.

Boeings 737-747 line is also notoriously durable.

The Gimli Glider was an even crazier incident.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

As was flight 009.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_009

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:05 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Your Snopes link says there's a lotta "if" comin' off that story, PN.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/etihad.asp


That the incident occurred is not in doubt. But HOW it occurred doesn't quite match the claims of the Rense link.

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 6:24 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


SOP when there's a mechanical FU is to NEVER speak the names of customers or sponsors at fault.

This is so extreme that racers AND JOURNALISTS must sign non-disclosure agreements as condition of employment at racetracks. So when a tire fails or an engine malfunctions, racers are not allowed to speak that fact, and must take the blame on themselves.

In this Airbus shunt, its like a drunk driver tries to switch seats with a passenger after a crash. Airbus and the French govt wisely refuse to blame a customer that paid them $200-million cash, and will pay them billions more. What do they care whos at fault, so long as they get paid? Even the official report says they have no idea which pilot is at fault. That's the only part of the story not "true" (Airbus does build the world's largest double-decker plane, but that was the single decker). The CPU faked out the pilots, all of whom were very experienced. The engineers faked out the pilots with counterintuitive programming for the robot drone computer, that no other aircraft uses.

New jets can literally takeoff, fly to the destination and land themselves, without any human input. Next step is removal of all human pilots, just like 50% of all freight trains already do.

The Airbus glider was piloted by a convicted felon dope dealer accustomed to flying into 3rd world crap runways, accustomed to surviving daily murder attempts and seeing people murdered in prison. So the stress of flying an airliner over the ocean at night without engines for 30 minutes, without electricity, without instruments, windsheild fogged up, was no need to panic. That's a normal glide ratio for most airliners at 40,000 feet to sea level. What's not normal is a jet not losing hydraulics to operate the flight controls, though he had no brakes and had to literally grind the flaming landing gear into dust to keep from rolling off a cliff into the ocean. He was also dam lucky there was an island nearby with a NASA Space Shuttle runway. It was a Commie Chinese engine rebuild in Canada that caused the fuel leak, then the computer faked out the pilots and pumped out the rest of the fuel. This a great 1-hour documentary on TV:

Mayday: Flying on Empty


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayday_(TV_series)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:04 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


That's an old photo. My brother who use to work for Boeing , sent me that a while ago. Can't recall exactly, but I want to say over a year ?

*edit* - I was right. The accident occurred back in the fall of '07.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:56 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Airbus crash was in 2007. The redacted reports are just now leaking out.

What's scary for pilots is the French govt isn't explaining exactly what went wrong.

A large percentage of plane crashes are coverups for liability or murder. Dozens of airline crashes were murders without investigations, carried out by govt operatives.

This Airbus crash should have cost the careers of many folks investigating themselves. Hence the coverup. Will they actually fix the software and training problems, or will it happen again?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:28 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by piratenews:


Airbus and the French govt wisely refuse to blame a customer that paid them $200-million cash, and will pay them billions more. What do they care whos at fault, so long as they get paid? Even the official report says they have no idea which pilot is at fault. That's the only part of the story not "true" (Airbus does build the world's largest double-decker plane, but that was the single decker). The CPU faked out the pilots, all of whom were very experienced. The engineers faked out the pilots with counterintuitive programming for the robot drone computer, that no other aircraft uses.

New jets can literally takeoff, fly to the destination and land themselves, without any human input. Next step is removal of all human pilots, just like 50% of all freight trains already do.

...So the stress of flying an airliner over the ocean at night without engines for 30 minutes, without electricity, without instruments, windsheild fogged up, was no need to panic. That's a normal glide ratio for most airliners at 40,000 feet to sea level. What's not normal is a jet not losing hydraulics to operate the flight controls, though he had no brakes and had to literally grind the flaming landing gear into dust to keep from rolling off a cliff into the ocean.



This is what happens when you let Socialists build aircraft...

That's why , if it's not a Boeing , I ain't going !

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/airbus.html?q=airbus.html

" There are reasons (despite the weight savings) why Douglas Aircraft and Boeing have never used composites this way - and you're looking at one. As the delamination of the composite progressed, the entire 37-ft. tall vertical tail would have fluttered briefly & violently. That would explain why both engines were literally shaken off the airplane. (This is particularly remarkable, because unlike Douglas and Boeing, Airbus has bragged of purposely designing their engine mounting pylons to keep the engines in place no matter what!) One wing tip was found several blocks away from the main wreckage.

" BTW, you'll be hearing a lot about an encounter with wake turbulence. That is a red herring. Wake turbulence can make it difficult - maybe even impossible to control the airplane - but no amount of wake turbulence can remove the vertical tail at such low flight speeds unless there is a pre-existing structural fault.

" What is flutter? This morning, I got an email from a friend who is the Director of Structural Engineering of a major American aircraft maker. He described a chilling picture: "Flutter modes often have an explosively quick onset, rising from nothing to catastrophic in the blink of an eye. Furthermore, the shaking can happen so fast that, despite the large (huge) deflections involved, an observer on the ground might not see it. It's just a blur. The people in the back of the airplane would have been shaken senseless and worse as the seats tore loose and everything was homogenized back there; but it was all over a few seconds later."

" The design weakness can and will be fixed on other Airbuses. If not, there are plenty of nice Boeing jetliners mothballed in the Mojave Desert, that can trade places with the Airbuses. In the meantime, I'm not riding Airbus."





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:38 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


This is so extreme that racers AND JOURNALISTS must sign non-disclosure agreements as condition of employment at racetracks. So when a tire fails or an engine malfunctions, racers are not allowed to speak that fact, and must take the blame on themselves.



Just a bit of a funny side note...

Some years back, I was watching an IndyCar race live on the tube, and one of the drivers (I want to say Roberto something-or-other, but can't remember for sure) lost a tire and crashed. He got out okay, and hiked back to the pits. One of the pit-lane reporters shoved a camera and mic in his face and asked him what happened. He didn't even hesitate: "Eet was zee goddam Firestone tires - all day long zeeze Firestone tires, zey ees SHEET!"

Oddly enough, the very next race he was NOT on Firestone tires anymore...



Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:50 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by piratenews:
Airbus crash was in 2007. The redacted reports are just now leaking out.

What's scary for pilots is the French govt isn't explaining exactly what went wrong.

A large percentage of plane crashes are coverups for liability or murder. Dozens of airline crashes were murders without investigations, carried out by govt operatives.

This Airbus crash should have cost the careers of many folks investigating themselves. Hence the coverup. Will they actually fix the software and training problems, or will it happen again?



I'm already hating myself before I even ask, but what exactly was the cover up? I knew about this over a year and a half ago. A very large plane crashed through a wall.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:04 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by out2theblack:
" BTW, you'll be hearing a lot about an encounter with wake turbulence. That is a red herring. Wake turbulence can make it difficult - maybe even impossible to control the airplane - but no amount of wake turbulence can remove the vertical tail at such low flight speeds unless there is a pre-existing structural fault.

" What is flutter? This morning, I got an email from a friend who is the Director of Structural Engineering of a major American aircraft maker. He described a chilling picture: "Flutter modes often have an explosively quick onset, rising from nothing to catastrophic in the blink of an eye. Furthermore, the shaking can happen so fast that, despite the large (huge) deflections involved, an observer on the ground might not see it. It's just a blur. The people in the back of the airplane would have been shaken senseless and worse as the seats tore loose and everything was homogenized back there; but it was all over a few seconds later."



These statements seem pretty obvious to me. Most wake turbulence comes from vortex shedding from the end of the wings and is only dangerous to small aircraft. Even with small aircraft it won't do structural damage unless you count the impact with the ground when the small plane flips over.

I believe Flutter is a type of Simple Harmonic Motion and therefore capable of inducing resonance at a given frequency for a material. You could go from a low frequency shake to total destruction in seconds.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:20 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:

...These statements seem pretty obvious to me.

Most wake turbulence comes from vortex shedding from the end of the wings and is only dangerous to small aircraft. Even with small aircraft it won't do structural damage unless you count the impact with the ground when the small plane flips over.

I believe Flutter is a type of Simple Harmonic Motion and therefore capable of inducing resonance at a given frequency for a material. You could go from a low frequency shake to total destruction in seconds.



Your statement would also be more accurate if it read : is only dangerous to smaller aircraft...


Still not an entirely true statement , but better...

In other words , if one's own aircraft is smaller than the other , be careful...

Also , the vortexes can be shed from any aircraft surface , not just the wings , but the wings are the largest aircraft surface contributing to the wake turbulence profile of a given aircraft...Some aircraft are more notorious producers of dangerous wake...

The engine wakes on turbine aircraft are significant contributors too , as are the props or fans on those aircraft...

When a controller advises , " Caution , wake turbulence " it's best given heed , regardless of the size of the aircraft being encountered...

I exercise particular caution in the presence of heavy jet aircraft and the larger helicopters...

As for flutter , while the explanation may seem relatively simple , even a very minor amount of flutter is extremely hair-raising and uncomfortable...If it is a harmonic or an imbalance whereby the amplitude is increasing , the results may be catastrophic...Often , a loud bang is heard as a surface departs the aircraft...

And that's never fun...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:33 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by out2theblack:
the results may be catastrophic...Often , a loud bang is heard as a surface departs the aircraft...

And that's never fun...


Especially if it's your Primary Buffer Panel.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:38 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
Quote:

Originally posted by out2theblack:
the results may be catastrophic...Often , a loud bang is heard as a surface departs the aircraft...

And that's never fun...


Especially if it's your Primary Buffer Panel.



I was thinking that , also .

But , I like hearing you say it...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:44 PM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by piratenews:
Airbus crash was in 2007. The redacted reports are just now leaking out.

What's scary for pilots is the French govt isn't explaining exactly what went wrong.

A large percentage of plane crashes are coverups for liability or murder. Dozens of airline crashes were murders without investigations, carried out by govt operatives.



I'm already hating myself before I even ask, but what exactly was the cover up? I knew about this over a year and a half ago. A very large plane crashed through a wall.




It was Semitic folk flying the plane...Despite their skills at debate , they engaged with a flight-control computer in an argument...And lost !

Airbus folk and Froggy-Socialists don't like folk knowing that is possible...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 10:57 PM

JAYNEZTOWN


Quote:

Originally posted by piratenews:
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Transat_Flight_23

Soon aircraft will be too complicated for human pilots, and only robots will be allowed to fly.



I don't think the plane was 'too complicated' to fly

but I do think there was something wrong with the people trying to fly it

Sudden jihad syndrome







NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 5, 2009 2:09 AM

PIRATECAT


Airbus, the most sofisticated commerical aircraft in service. These aircraft are totally high tech. Everything is tied into the on board computers. On the A-330 they have at least 82. Your cockpit door has service checks as detailed like a flight control surface. A maintenance technician has to realize the days of being a grease monkey are over you have to be avionics knowledgeable. Structurally they are airworthy. They are not equal to Boeing designs which still comes from the B-29 wing design today. But where Boeing is lacking is there avionics packages compared to the Europeans. That would be the German touch because of the Folkers. Now Boeing who had Airbus on the ropes for a knock out punch what do they do? They lay off thousands of workers in the early 90s when the recession was on under Bush 41. What does Airbus do? They keep building jets putting them unsold out on the tarmack. Guess what the recession ends bang Airbus has the jets for the major carriers around the world. They didn't get fancy standardized the cabins but the jets where ready for revenue. American buisness is short sighted. Now we let smelly french men back into the aerospace game. They have been out of it since WW One. Another thing was the Boeing 757 a niche aircraft great design from the laidoff designers and engineers from McDonnell Douglas who went to work in Seatle. The recession under Reagan airlines canelled orders. Then the 80s boom hits this plane is a money maker. When not if the cargo bays are full it has made a profit. The passengers are all extra cream. Great for Carribean routes or transcontinental ones. Incidents like in the picture are workers not following procedures and paperwork. You'll find a lack of training, pressure to do the job quicker, and a lack of standards. Short cuts on these new high tech aircraft will continue to lead to accidents. A highly trained work force leads to quality, safety, and efficiency which brings long term profit. But the jackasses at the top are bean counters so there ya go.

"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 5, 2009 4:18 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Meh, you'd have to go pretty far to beat the near legendary toughness of the Boeing 737 series, damn that was a well built aircraft.

Conversely, you got the DC-9/DC-10 deathtrap, given a cosmetic makeover and renamed the MD80 to convince folks who otherwise knew better to fly on one again, not that it made it any damn safer - and of course what with airlines overloading the things by putting extra seats in and cramming folk like a freakin sardine can...

And the in-flight movie, on a pulldown screen to a captive audience was so horrific I was almost hopin the damn tail end WOULD fall off and end the misery!

The return flight I hooked up with a smaller carrier and a Saab 340B - which I gotta tell you is a damn nice aircraft, big comfy well unholstered seats, a decent amount of elbow room with very logical and sensible tray-table and enviro configurations so simple they were intuitive...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_340
So why they hell can't they build a car for shit, I wonder ?

These days I don't fly anywhere commercial because the freakin HomeSec/TSA goons are puffed up little asswipes and I don't feel like missing another flight I PAID FOR and got no reimbursement over while dealing with their goddamn shakedown cause I happen to be 30% metal and plastic, right-O ?

Fuck that, I either ring up some buddies in the small plane/airshow community, or I friggin drive.

And to HELL if imma sit in reproduction kit TP-51D (Basically a 2 seater P-51D Mustang trainer built from a kit) for that long, ever again, dear me that was WORSE than a 90 minute jaunt in a WWI era barnstormer, which was itself bad enough!

Oh, and should you ever ride a Huey, load up on dramamine and bring your range day earmuffs, you'll need em, heh.

These days my ass stays on the GROUND, where it belongs... airborne can kiss mah ass!


-Fremthechairborneranger
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 5, 2009 5:52 AM

PIRATECAT


FF, I knew I had left something out. You touched on the B737. A great airplane. Not to many improvements. Just TCAS, CFM engines, and glass cockpits. There is a problem with the new generation aircraft from the 300 series on is metal fatique. The older 737s with the JT-8 engines with clam shell thrust reversers were built like tanks. Still in use. Good quality maintenance and corrosion control extended these aircraft into the 21st century. The newest 737s being a global economy have metal from around the world. America the leader in metalurgy has higher standards of quality. The airplanes are suffering cracks around the fwd and aft pressure bulkheads along with frames at the overhead bin installation. There are repairs for this and of course reskinning but will these jets last as long as there predisecors. I think the best commercial jet every built was the Lockheed Tristar L-1011 hands down. Airport night mares, you pay for this first your taxes then parking then the ticket and one time fees for everything. Sporting event prices for gum and water. Microwaved munchies and $10 beer to wait for something you paid in advance. Not to mention strippen down in front of strangers. Then people with phobias who can't deal with not being in control of weather, delays, lost tickets or luggage, and hey the fat drunk who drools on you cross country. Not to mention the bus trash lurking around. Its just great, hancuffs for the assholes please. Lator Gator.

"Battle of Serenity, Mal. Besides Zoe here, how many-" "I'm talkin at you! How many men in your platoon came out of their alive".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 5, 2009 6:41 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Oh, did I mention it was SNOWING during that little barnstormer jaunt, making the plane a little too heavy, which combined with it's stall speed and unpredictable winds made for a rather "adventurous" flight ?

I felt like I was riding a roger clemens curveball en route to the batter...

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, May 5, 2009 6:47 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by PirateCat:
FF, I knew I had left something out. You touched on the B737. A great airplane. Not to many improvements. Just TCAS, CFM engines, and glass cockpits. There is a problem with the new generation aircraft from the 300 series on is metal fatique. The older 737s with the JT-8 engines with clam shell thrust reversers were built like tanks. Still in use. Good quality maintenance and corrosion control extended these aircraft into the 21st century. The newest 737s being a global economy have metal from around the world. America the leader in metalurgy has higher standards of quality. The airplanes are suffering cracks around the fwd and aft pressure bulkheads along with frames at the overhead bin installation. There are repairs for this and of course reskinning but will these jets last as long as there predisecors. I think the best commercial jet every built was the Lockheed Tristar L-1011 hands down. Airport night mares, you pay for this first your taxes then parking then the ticket and one time fees for everything. Sporting event prices for gum and water. Microwaved munchies and $10 beer to wait for something you paid in advance. Not to mention strippen down in front of strangers. Then people with phobias who can't deal with not being in control of weather, delays, lost tickets or luggage, and hey the fat drunk who drools on you cross country. Not to mention the bus trash lurking around. Its just great, hancuffs for the assholes please. Lator Gator.



Boeing now builds 737s in Communist China, as part of the massive military technology transfer to our enemies, funded by US taxdollar rebates from the private "Federal" Reserve Bank. Quality control is walking the manager behind the factory and putting a bullet in his head.

Here at McGhee Tyson Intl Airport in Knoxville TN, no US aircraft are used by the airlines. TN ANG flies nasty old KC135 707 tubojets, poisoning TN Valley with their oily smoke (smokes like Reaver ships). Our Skull & Bones mayor/abbassador Victor Victoria Ashe, gay lover of GW Bush, bulldozed the beautiful airport, and built a new one for twice the price adn half the size, which bans all public lounges to observe the aircraft. Family can no longer say hello or goodbye at the gate. No more fun to go to the local airport, which is now run by the same drug-dealing jewish CIA contractor that trained the 9-11 hijackers at Venice Florida.

Even the local TANG wing commander was jailed in the loonybin by local deputies for a DUI arrest without alcohol or drugs, the nthe DUI deputy was allegedly killed by the DUI prosecutor's son at the DUI prosecutor's house who then allegedly killed himself, but colonel still pled guilty while banging his head on the table.

If Americans were more intelligent, millions would invest in an voluntary pilot license and rent or buy a plane for less than the cost of a used car. No stinkin TSA checkpoints run by illegal aliens, no stinkin speed limits, no stinkin traffic jams or parking fees, and infinitely more fun. Yes, no pilot license or vehicle registration is required to fly yourself in USA today. Why does freedom scare people? Because freedom requires free thinking and responsibility.

But I must admit having a 120-lb drunk hottie crawling all over me on an airline flight, begging me to come stay at her house, was a nice benifit in coach.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:31 - 564 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:13 - 7497 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:06 - 952 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, November 24, 2024 16:24 - 4799 posts
US debt breaks National Debt Clock
Sun, November 24, 2024 14:13 - 33 posts
The predictions thread
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:15 - 1189 posts
The mysteries of the human mind: cell phone videos and religiously-driven 'honor killings' in the same sentence. OR How the rationality of the science that surrounds people fails to penetrate irrational beliefs.
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:11 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:05 - 4762 posts
Sweden Europe and jihadi islamist Terror...StreetShitters, no longer just sending it all down the Squat Toilet
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:01 - 25 posts
MSNBC "Journalist" Gets put in his place
Sun, November 24, 2024 12:40 - 2 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sun, November 24, 2024 10:59 - 422 posts
The Islamic Way Of War
Sun, November 24, 2024 08:51 - 41 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL