REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

$540

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Monday, May 4, 2009 12:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2473
PAGE 1 of 2

Friday, May 1, 2009 11:59 AM

WHOZIT


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,518652,00.html

And I bet afterwards she snacked on $100 per pound beef with Sean Penn, can these people get anymore stupid! $540! That's some peoples rent you dumb bitch! Yea I said BITCH! Sue me!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 12:09 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Did your bagel run off and leave you ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 12:36 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Did your bagel run off and leave you ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

Yes, they cost $540 now.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 12:54 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


My biggest problem with them is that they're UGLY. $540 for those ugly-ass kicks? Yikes. No accounting for taste, I guess.

And where exactly is one supposed to wear $540 sneakers? I mean, anywhere you're going to wear fancy, expensive shoes, you're NOT going to wear sneaks, right?

'Course, I'm a man, so I don't get Manolo Blahniks or Jimmy Choos either... If she wants to spend her money on 'em, who am I to complain?

Or were they bought for her by the Democratic party?

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 3:16 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Dem's some ugly shoes.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 3:21 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Dem's some ugly shoes.






I know, right? $540? They look more like $5.40 at a thrift store!

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 3:48 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Questions of taste aside -

What do you think Drudge would be ranting about if she showed up in $10.00 Shoes4Less sneakers ? Do you think the braying right would complain that she was disrespecting the occassion the same way her husband did with his 'tacky' gifts to the queen ?

Isn't this just another blatant partisan shot at putting the Obamas in a no-win situation ? Too cheap ! Too luxe ! Too casual ! Too formal ! Smearing them no matter what they do until SOMETHING resonates ?

***************************************************************

Of course it is.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:17 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Questions of taste aside -

What do you think Drudge would be ranting about if she showed up in $10.00 Shoes4Less sneakers ? Do you think the braying right would complain that she was disrespecting the occassion the same way her husband did with his 'tacky' gifts to the queen ?

Isn't this just another blatant partisan shot at putting the Obamas in a no-win situation ? Too cheap ! Too luxe ! Too casual ! Too formal ! Smearing them no matter what they do until SOMETHING resonates ?

***************************************************************

Of course it is.



10 $ shoes would certainly fit the moment a whole lot better than those ugly ass " let them eat cake " shoes. Cheap comfortable shoes would reflect a more sensible, dare I say sensitive to the needs of the poor attitude.

Giving cheap, tacky presents, on par w/ a box set of DVDs would be more appropriate here than to the P.M. of England.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:20 PM

KIRKULES


She could have gone all environmental and wore shoes made of homeless people, they would have blended right in.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:27 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


Wait Rap ! Michelle Obama made $273,000 a year as head of community relations for Chicago University hospitals. Are you saying she SHOULDN'T be entitled to enjoy the fruits of her success in this free-market system ? Or that because she's black and female she's supposed to be humble ? Are you saying she's supposed to be SOCIALIST ?! Or is your point that as a new member of the PC police you're charing her with a violation of not being PC ?

C'mon man - spit it out ! What DO you mean ?


***************************************************************

Take your time. I understand it'll be a while before you untangle all the snakes in your head.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:42 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Michelle Obama made $273,000 a year as head of community relations for Chicago University hospitals.


I wonder how much comunity relations people who's husbands weren't US Senators make on average.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:44 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

This was not a 'let them eat cake' moment. The outrage of a 'let them eat cake' scenario evaporates when the queen is actually handing out cake for people to eat.

Essentially, the argument seems to be that Mrs. Obama should have put on a costume in order to attend this charity event. That she should have pretended to be poor while amongst the poor people. This insults the intelligence of poor people.

Everyone knows she's loaded. Burlap sacks and payless shoes would be nothing more than a Holloween costume out of season. Nobody seems to focus on the important part, that she was contributing her personality and time to a charity.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:48 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Good point, Rue - *I* wouldn't buy those shoes, for any price, but I don't begrudge her her right to buy them. She's an American, right? I guess Democrats aren't allowed to enjoy the fruits of a free-market system and buy senseless shit once in a while...

I wouldn't buy a Ferrari, either, but I don't begrudge anyone who's got the scratch to do so.

Hell, maybe Barack bought 'em for her for an early Mother's Day present.

I'll be pissed if it turns out the Democratic Party paid for 'em, though. Especially if they're part of a $150,000-plus shopping spree they sent her on!

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:49 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:

C'mon man - spit it out ! What DO you mean ?


***************************************************************

Take your time. I understand it'll be a while before you untangle all the snakes in your head.



She's a woman, and should be in the back, cookin' the food, and not even seen.


( That more in line with what you want ? )


I'm just sayin' she should know her audience. Feeding the poor ? Don't rub their faces in how much $$ she has to waste on gawd awful ugly shoes, which cost about as much as they probably spent on food for the entire YEAR.

Imagine the outrage and comparisons to Marie Antoinette if Laura Bush showed up at such a function wearing some expensive piece of jewelry. Oh, how the comedians would run w/ THAT one.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 4:53 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Michelle Obama made $273,000 a year as head of community relations for Chicago University hospitals.


I wonder how much comunity relations people who's husbands weren't US Senators make on average.



According to Salary.com:

Quote:

The median expected salary for a typical Community Relations Manager in the United States is $81,551. This basic market pricing report was prepared using our Certified Compensation Professionals' analysis of survey data collected from thousands of HR departments at employers of all sizes, industries and geographies.


I'd guess being head of community relations for Chicago University hospitals might pay a bit more, even if you're not a Senator's wife. Being a Senator's wife probably can't HURT your salary, though...

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 5:06 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Oh, how the comedians would run w/ THAT one.



Stay tuned. My bet is they'll run with THIS one, too.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 5:16 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"I'm just sayin' she should know her audience."

You mean YOU - right ? YOU are the audience that counts. B/c the only people making a deal about it seem to be - you - and your kind. I certainly didn't hear of anyone in THAT group complaining.

So, which audience do you mean, again ?


***************************************************************

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 5:22 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

There was a recent episode of South Park where Cartman 'helped' Jimmy write a joke.

That episode reminded me of several participants on this board.

--Anthony


"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 5:28 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
"I'm just sayin' she should know her audience."

You mean YOU - right ? B/c the only people making a deal about it seem to be - you - and your kind. I certainly didn't hear of anyone in THAT group complaining.

So, which audience do you mean ?




I just heard about her shoes HERE. So I have no clue WTF your problem is. Cetainly 'extreme, hate filled, far right wing radio " didn't harp on the story, or even report it, that I heard. The folks making ANY sort of deal are apparently Drudge , FOX and anyone who has an ounce of common decency.

What's YOUR excuse ?




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 5:31 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"The folks making ANY sort of deal are apparently Drudge , FOX and anyone who has an ounce of common decency."


OMG.

What a hoot you are ! Say something else ...


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 5:38 PM

KIRKULES


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

I wouldn't buy a Ferrari, either, but I don't begrudge anyone who's got the scratch to do so.



No car dude like yourself Kwicko could resist the 250 GTO if you had the money.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 1, 2009 6:05 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Kirkules:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

I wouldn't buy a Ferrari, either, but I don't begrudge anyone who's got the scratch to do so.



No car dude like yourself Kwicko could resist the 250 GTO if you had the money.






Guilty.

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 1:46 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

"The folks making ANY sort of deal are apparently Drudge , FOX and anyone who has an ounce of common decency."


"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts. They alter the facts to fit their views. Which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering."
-Fourth Doctor.

And since very powerful is obviously out...

That leaves only one alternative, doesn't it ?

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 2:07 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


So, you and kwickie are defending Michelle's wearing of $500 ugly has hell shoes to an event helping out the poor.

I ask you, in all honesty, what if Laura Bush, Lynn Cheney or any GOP had shown up in similar fashion, would you be so dismissive and accepting ? I'm sure you'd rail against their thoughtlessness, insensitivity and callousness.

But because it's a Democrat.....where's the issue ?

Oh, and rue ? You don't do John Stewart very well. Leave the "comedy" to him.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 2:10 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
"The folks making ANY sort of deal are apparently Drudge , FOX and anyone who has an ounce of common decency."


OMG.

What a hoot you are ! Say something else ...


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

Don't forget how bad Sarah Palin was trashed for wearing borrowed dresses during the campain worth thousands of $. We're now just learning how much money the Obama's waste for photo-ops.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 2:23 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Zit, the lady paid for the shoes with her own dosh, ergo I got no issue with it whatever - no more than I had with Piper Palin lugging one of her moms ultra expensive handbags cause Sarah paid for that with *her* own cash.

As long as the person wearin it paid for it out of their own pocket I couldn't give a damn what they wear, or (in the case of super baggy pants) how it might look - people gotta right to make their own fashion choices with their own wallet.

I'll even back it up despite thinking it ridiculous, as I *have* around here versus a certain Dick (pun intended) up in Flint and his little legal tantrum against baggy pants, which is in fact a VERY thinly veiled racial attack - I went so far as to refuse service to one of his off-duty officers because "his pants conformed to his body in a manner I found offensive" complete with official letter to the department after his supervisor got verbally abusive to our dispatcher about it.

So long as you paid for it, what you wear is your RIGHT, and I'll stand behind it no matter what, even if I do think ya look like a damn circus clown.

This is no different, Lady paid for the shoes, they're HER shoes and she's welcome to wear em, end of story - far as I am concerned about it.

-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 3:24 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
So, you and kwickie are defending Michelle's wearing of $500 ugly has hell shoes to an event helping out the poor.

I ask you, in all honesty, what if Laura Bush, Lynn Cheney or any GOP had shown up in similar fashion, would you be so dismissive and accepting ? I'm sure you'd rail against their thoughtlessness, insensitivity and callousness.

But because it's a Democrat.....where's the issue ?




And on the flipside, if this were Laura Bush, Lynn Cheney, or "any GOP", would you be so quick to attack them for their thoughtlessness, insensitivity, and callousness? Or would be be dismissive and accepting?

But because it's a Democrat... THERE'S your issue!


In another thread about politics and fashion, Geezer had this to say:

Quote:


Sorry, but Gov. Palin's wardrobe has nothing to do with how the RNC or the Republican Party works, except in the minds of those who would criticize them if they gave away free bread. All the whining and finger-pointing just makes you look like spiteful children.



Rappy, I think someone just called you a spiteful child!



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 3:34 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

And on the flipside, if this were Laura Bush, Lynn Cheney, or "any GOP", would you be so quick to attack them for their thoughtlessness, insensitivity, and callousness? Or would be be dismissive and accepting?


I'd find it, if nothing else, a poor choice and yes, thoughtless. But we've been brainwashed by the MDM and the Left wing propaganda to view the Left as more 'caring, heartfelt and aware ' of such things. Clearly, that's a load of crap.

Actually, Geezer makes my point for me, and shoots down YOUR empty argument. But I won't waste time explaining this to you. You'd dismiss it, out of hand, even if you understood it.







NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 4:46 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Zit, the lady paid for the shoes with her own dosh, ergo I got no issue with it whatever - no more than I had with Piper Palin lugging one of her moms ultra expensive handbags cause Sarah paid for that with *her* own cash.

As long as the person wearin it paid for it out of their own pocket I couldn't give a damn what they wear, or (in the case of super baggy pants) how it might look - people gotta right to make their own fashion choices with their own wallet.

I'll even back it up despite thinking it ridiculous, as I *have* around here versus a certain Dick (pun intended) up in Flint and his little legal tantrum against baggy pants, which is in fact a VERY thinly veiled racial attack - I went so far as to refuse service to one of his off-duty officers because "his pants conformed to his body in a manner I found offensive" complete with official letter to the department after his supervisor got verbally abusive to our dispatcher about it.

So long as you paid for it, what you wear is your RIGHT, and I'll stand behind it no matter what, even if I do think ya look like a damn circus clown.

This is no different, Lady paid for the shoes, they're HER shoes and she's welcome to wear em, end of story - far as I am concerned about it.

-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

She paid for them out of her own pocket, good. But if Nancy Reagan had done the exact same thing she likely (I said likely not definatley) would have gotten flack from the pundits. Plus she could've bought a pair of "Converse" sneakers that ar'nt ugly and paid less then $50. I have a pair of "PUMA" sneakers (forgot what I paid, not $540) that have lasted for years, I bet she would'nt wear them in the rain, I bet they'd fall apart

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 4:59 AM

2BY2GINGERBLUE


Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,518652,00.html

And I bet afterwards she snacked on $100 per pound beef with Sean Penn, can these people get anymore stupid! $540! That's some peoples rent you dumb bitch! Yea I said BITCH! Sue me!




And the Bush family never spent money on designer clothing while in office? Go check it out what they had on their backs all the time. It certainly wasn't from w*llmart.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 5:04 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by 2by2gingerblue:
Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,518652,00.html

And I bet afterwards she snacked on $100 per pound beef with Sean Penn, can these people get anymore stupid! $540! That's some peoples rent you dumb bitch! Yea I said BITCH! Sue me!




And the Bush family never spent money on designer clothing while in office? Go check it out what they had on their backs all the time. It certainly wasn't from w*llmart.

$540 for sneakers! Com'on!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 5:06 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I'd find it, if nothing else, a poor choice and yes, thoughtless. But we've been brainwashed by the MDM and the Left wing propaganda to view the Left as more 'caring, heartfelt and aware ' of such things. Clearly, that's a load of crap.

Actually, Geezer makes my point for me, and shoots down YOUR empty argument. But I won't waste time explaining this to you. You'd dismiss it, out of hand, even if you understood it.




You find it thoughtless that Michelle Obama went to volunteer at a food bank, because of what shoes she wore? You find her to not be "caring, heartfelt, and aware" because of her shoes, NOT because of her volunteering in the first place. Is that right? You care more about what she wears and how she looks than about what she's doing to help the poor. Is that your point? You base someone's ability to be "heartfelt" and "caring" entirely on what they wear? You care less about her actions and more about her wardrobe? Is that your point?

Oddly, I think you'd have far less of a problem with this if it were Miss California, and she wore a diamond-studded tiara to hand out food to the homeless. Then you'd be glad she put their needs first, and looked great doing it. Right?

So your ENTIRE problem with this isn't the shoes or the clothes - it's Michelle Obama. You hate what she did, not because of what she DID, but because of what SHE did.

Please, don't waste my time trying to explain your position. I think we all see quite clearly what your position is, even if you don't.


Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 5:19 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I'd find it, if nothing else, a poor choice and yes, thoughtless. But we've been brainwashed by the MDM and the Left wing propaganda to view the Left as more 'caring, heartfelt and aware ' of such things. Clearly, that's a load of crap.

Actually, Geezer makes my point for me, and shoots down YOUR empty argument. But I won't waste time explaining this to you. You'd dismiss it, out of hand, even if you understood it.




You find it thoughtless that Michelle Obama went to volunteer at a food bank, because of what shoes she wore? You find her to not be "caring, heartfelt, and aware" because of her shoes, NOT because of her volunteering in the first place. Is that right? You care more about what she wears and how she looks than about what she's doing to help the poor. Is that your point? You base someone's ability to be "heartfelt" and "caring" entirely on what they wear? You care less about her actions and more about her wardrobe? Is that your point?

Oddly, I think you'd have far less of a problem with this if it were Miss California, and she wore a diamond-studded tiara to hand out food to the homeless. Then you'd be glad she put their needs first, and looked great doing it. Right?

So your ENTIRE problem with this isn't the shoes or the clothes - it's Michelle Obama. You hate what she did, not because of what she DID, but because of what SHE did.

Please, don't waste my time trying to explain your position. I think we all see quite clearly what your position is, even if you don't.


Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

Facts

#1 If designers want to sell shoes, skirts, blouses "as seen on Michelle" they should put her in crap the average girl can afford.

#2 Showing up at a Food Bank and handing out food to the poor in $540 sneakers was just a dumb idea.

#3 Scion's are ugly.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 5:56 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:

Facts

#1 If designers want to sell shoes, skirts, blouses "as seen on Michelle" they should put her in crap the average girl can afford.



Agreed. I'm not sure Nancy Reagan would and Oscar de la Renta would agree, though...

Quote:


#2 Showing up at a Food Bank and handing out food to the poor in $540 sneakers was just a dumb idea.



Which part, the handing out food to the poor, or wearing sneakers to do it? Or is it the $540? Would it be okay if she were wearing a $540 wedding ring while she handed out food to the poor? Bear with me; I'm just trying to gauge what and where your "outrage thresholds" are.

Quote:

#3 Scion's are ugly.


So you say. They're not high on my wish-list, either. I do find the early xB terribly cute, though, in a cuddly-tech, utilitarian way. Let's just say it's cuter than a $540 pair of sneaks!





Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 6:04 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

Do you think if she wore Payless shoes it would disguise the fact that she arrived in a million dollar limousine?

The things people focus on baffle me. Here is a woman handing out food to the poor and all anyone can do is point and say, "Look at her shoes!"

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 6:16 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:

Facts

#1 If designers want to sell shoes, skirts, blouses "as seen on Michelle" they should put her in crap the average girl can afford.



Agreed. I'm not sure Nancy Reagan would and Oscar de la Renta would agree, though...

Quote:


#2 Showing up at a Food Bank and handing out food to the poor in $540 sneakers was just a dumb idea.



Which part, the handing out food to the poor, or wearing sneakers to do it? Or is it the $540? Would it be okay if she were wearing a $540 wedding ring while she handed out food to the poor? Bear with me; I'm just trying to gauge what and where your "outrage thresholds" are.

Quote:

#3 Scion's are ugly.



So you say. They're not high on my wish-list, either. I do find the early xB terribly cute, though, in a cuddly-tech, utilitarian way. Let's just say it's cuter than a $540 pair of sneaks!





Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

Wearing ugly $540 sneaker to a food bank is just REALLY bad PR, it makes the little guy say; Oh thank you for desending from the clouds and giving us our Government Cheese hand outs.

As for the Scion, I have'nt heard about them being crap. I have'nt heard about recalls or them being unreliable etc. I thing they look like somthing a Kindergardener would draw.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 8:43 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Posted by WhoZit:

Wearing ugly $540 sneaker to a food bank is just REALLY bad PR, it makes the little guy say; Oh thank you for desending from the clouds and giving us our Government Cheese hand outs.



Then by that rationale, it's not what she's wearing that grinds your gears, but rather that she deigns to come out of her mansion at all. After all, before she "descends from the clouds to give out government cheese", she has to emerge from the White House first, right?

So since she can't even leave the house without seeming at least a little bit above us mere mortals, she probably shouldn't even TRY to help out or cast publicity on the needy, right?

Quote:


As for the Scion, I have'nt heard about them being crap. I have'nt heard about recalls or them being unreliable etc. I thing they look like somthing a Kindergardener would draw.



Nope, haven't heard anything bad about them. One friend of mine has an '04 xB, and he just loves it. He ditched his '98 Dodge Ram for it, and has never regretted that. A girl at work drives a supercharged TC, and she's crazy about it.

The xB pictured above is really the only Scion that does anything for me. The TC looks oddly-proportioned to me; its "greenhouse" - the roof and windows - looks like it was designed for a larger car, and doesn't really integrate with the body of the car. And the new xB just looks like it was designed by several different committees, each working on different areas; one on the front, one on the back, another on the middle, etc. The xA and xD just look like transportation pods to me.

But to each their own. Some people actually bought Pontiac Azteks and Chevy Avalanches, so there's no accounting for taste. In fact, the Avalanche did so well that Honda modeled their first "full-size" truck after it - the Ridgeline. Or as I call it, the Ridge-a-Lanche. It's a Honda even a Honda geek like me couldn't love...





Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 12:14 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


kwickie,

Now you're just running around in circles, straining all bounds of credulity, as you try to turn this around to something it's not, and stick up for Michelle. She is what she is, and her shoes tell the whole story here. Spin all you want, but you have nothing.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 12:16 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Did Nancy Reagan ever show up at a food bank wearing Oscar de la Renta gear?

That'd be no

You have no case. (again)




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 12:20 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Posted by WhoZit:

Wearing ugly $540 sneaker to a food bank is just REALLY bad PR, it makes the little guy say; Oh thank you for desending from the clouds and giving us our Government Cheese hand outs.



Then by that rationale, it's not what she's wearing that grinds your gears, but rather that she deigns to come out of her mansion at all. After all, before she "descends from the clouds to give out government cheese", she has to emerge from the White House first, right?

So since she can't even leave the house without seeming at least a little bit above us mere mortals, she probably shouldn't even TRY to help out or cast publicity on the needy, right?

Quote:


As for the Scion, I have'nt heard about them being crap. I have'nt heard about recalls or them being unreliable etc. I thing they look like somthing a Kindergardener would draw.



Nope, haven't heard anything bad about them. One friend of mine has an '04 xB, and he just loves it. He ditched his '98 Dodge Ram for it, and has never regretted that. A girl at work drives a supercharged TC, and she's crazy about it.

The xB pictured above is really the only Scion that does anything for me. The TC looks oddly-proportioned to me; its "greenhouse" - the roof and windows - looks like it was designed for a larger car, and doesn't really integrate with the body of the car. And the new xB just looks like it was designed by several different committees, each working on different areas; one on the front, one on the back, another on the middle, etc. The xA and xD just look like transportation pods to me.

But to each their own. Some people actually bought Pontiac Azteks and Chevy Avalanches, so there's no accounting for taste. In fact, the Avalanche did so well that Honda modeled their first "full-size" truck after it - the Ridgeline. Or as I call it, the Ridge-a-Lanche. It's a Honda even a Honda geek like me couldn't love...





Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

Again! I'm not saying they're junk, I think they're ugly. I'm sure they're well built, but ugly.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 2:50 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
kwickie,

Now you're just running around in circles, straining all bounds of credulity, as you try to turn this around to something it's not, and stick up for Michelle. She is what she is, and her shoes tell the whole story here. Spin all you want, but you have nothing.




I'm simply asking questions, trying to get answers, like Signy does. Does this make you uncomfortable? You claim I'm running around in circles trying to stick up for Michelle. Have you not read anything I've posted in this thread?

YOU are the one here claiming that you can tell everything about the woman by the shoes she's wearing. I'm asking why you think that. And do you think that about others, or only Mrs. Obama?

It's your apparent position that what a person wears is more important than what they do. I'm trying to figure out why.

You seem to be getting quite dizzy from trying to spin your position into something credible, and from trying to make a metaphorical sow's ear from a silk purse.

I take food and clothing to some of the homeless in my area. I give them my old shoes when I buy new ones. Am I rubbing their nose in it and trying to show them up because I have new shoes that are nicer than the ones I'm giving away? Should I stop helping them, because they might not appreciate someone "rich" showing off how superior they are? Or are they just grateful that I give them something without forcing them to sit through a sermon?

Quote:

Did Nancy Reagan ever show up at a food bank wearing Oscar de la Renta gear?



Did Nancy Reagan ever show up at a food bank at all?

Let me get this straight, though, so we don't have any confusion between us. Is it your belief that wearing very expensive designer clothes is not shameful in and of itself? If so, I can only conclude that your problem with Michelle is that she tried to help out at a food bank. Do you not want people to volunteer to help the needy?

Seriously, I'm just trying to clarify what exactly your problem with this is. You certainly seem to have an issue with it.

Mike

Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 2, 2009 3:54 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Hey now, don't bag on Government cheese - it's a time honored tradition dating back to 1837!

http://www.whitehousehistory.org/04/subs_pph/PresidentDetail.aspx?ID=7
&imageID=1303


" A New York dairy farmer sent President Jackson an interesting gift: a 1,400-pound cheese. Jackson left it in the Entrance Hall of the White House to age for two years. In 1837 the President invited the public to come and eat it. The cheese was gone in two hours, but the stain and smell in the Entrance Hall lasted for a long while."

Ironically, it's also explosive - one summer in indiana the heat and pressure caused in a storage room that wasn't temperature controlled caused a stockpile of it to explode wiped out part of the building.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 6:27 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


All my shoes, total for what I payed for them, cost less than Michelle's "sneakers". Dress, casual, work boot, running, and various Croc type footwear all added up, I have about a dozen pair. For the amount of $ her shoes cost, I could buy all new shoes and have enough left over to take 20+ homeless folk to Wendy's for a full meal, and a Frosty.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 6:43 AM

JONGSSTRAW


This debate is ridiculous. Besides, none of ya got the balls to say it to her face even if ya could. You see her arms? Lebron James wants her muscles. She gets you in a headlock, and it's all over.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 6:44 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:


Isn't this just another blatant partisan shot at putting the Obamas in a no-win situation ? Too cheap ! Too luxe ! Too casual ! Too formal ! Smearing them no matter what they do until SOMETHING resonates ?

Of course it is.



Yes - always TOO something, absolutely - it's so obvious they have nothing, I think most intelligent people see through it.
She's helping out at a foodbank but they have to talk about her shoes. So very petty - go to Texas and secede already.

Been watching F*x news lately - the desperation is so amusing. Today it was Whatif day (again): "What if John Edwards hadn't been caught cheating until AFTER the election and what if he was the VP?? Wouldn't Obama be in trouble then?!"
I'm not making it up.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 6:46 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
All my shoes, total for what I payed for them, cost less than Michelle's "sneakers". Dress, casual, work boot, running, and various Croc type footwear all added up, I have about a dozen pair. For the amount of $ her shoes cost, I could buy all new shoes and have enough left over to take 20+ homeless folk to Wendy's for a full meal, and a Frosty.






Slight difference:

You could but you won't - you'll just whine about it here.

She can and she does.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 7:07 AM

RIPWASH


Michelle Obama volunteered to help the homeless and the hungry for which I give her kudos.

I don't have a huge problem with the shoes only in that she should have thought that wearing something that pricey was not in the best taste considering the occasion? Is it possible she didn't know how much they cost? Sure. And I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt there. Heck I'm even willing to bet the people she served didn't even notice the shoes or knew how much they cost themselves.

Kwicko, I also applaud you helping those in need. I wish I could do more myself. We donate gently used clothes to Good Will and Salvation Army outlets. I only know that when my shoes are old . . . they're worn out and done. Not much use to anyone. I imagine you buy sensible shoes, though, and not $540 ones. Myself? I get the cheapo brand at WalMart. $10-20 a pair is all I can bring myself to spend on something that I seem to tear through in a matter of months. Once or twice in the last few years I splurged on $40 shoes, but that was about it. LOL

Mal: You think she'll hold together?
Zoë: She's torn up plenty, but she'll fly true.
Mal: Could be bumpy.
Zoë: Always is

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 7:51 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by pizmobeach:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
All my shoes, total for what I payed for them, cost less than Michelle's "sneakers". Dress, casual, work boot, running, and various Croc type footwear all added up, I have about a dozen pair. For the amount of $ her shoes cost, I could buy all new shoes and have enough left over to take 20+ homeless folk to Wendy's for a full meal, and a Frosty.




Slight difference:

You could but you won't - you'll just whine about it here.

She can and she does.




She does what? Takes the homeless to lunch on her own dime?the hell she does! Or didn't that time, at least. I help the homeless by NOT BEING ONE myself.

The lack of true compassion on the Left never ceases to amaze.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 8:17 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I help the homeless by NOT BEING ONE myself.



Careful, you'll strain something...



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 4, 2009 9:41 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Careful, you'll strain something...



Oh, I give to those who NEED my help, but not to those who can do for themselves, and decide.. " nawww....I'll let someone else do it for me " .




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, November 28, 2024 06:06 - 7511 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 28, 2024 06:03 - 4846 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Thu, November 28, 2024 05:58 - 4776 posts
Trump, convicted of 34 felonies
Thu, November 28, 2024 03:56 - 44 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Thu, November 28, 2024 03:51 - 48 posts
Where Will The American Exodus Go?
Thu, November 28, 2024 03:25 - 1 posts
What's wrong with conspiracy theories
Wed, November 27, 2024 17:06 - 21 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Wed, November 27, 2024 17:05 - 238 posts
Bald F*ck MAGICALLY "Fixes" Del Rio Migrant Invasion... By Releasing All Of Them Into The U.S.
Wed, November 27, 2024 17:03 - 41 posts
Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Wed, November 27, 2024 16:43 - 32 posts
Joe Rogan: Bro, do I have to sue CNN?
Wed, November 27, 2024 16:41 - 7 posts
Biden will be replaced
Wed, November 27, 2024 15:06 - 13 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL