Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Goremoblie
Monday, May 25, 2009 9:47 AM
WHOZIT
Monday, May 25, 2009 10:36 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Monday, May 25, 2009 10:56 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: Nice, but not cheap enough. First, they need a more efficient compressor. And second, until these wonder-cars can BEAT the price of a Nissan Versa, they will never have the market share to justify supporting them. -F
Monday, May 25, 2009 11:21 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:Originally posted by whozit: Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: Nice, but not cheap enough. First, they need a more efficient compressor. And second, until these wonder-cars can BEAT the price of a Nissan Versa, they will never have the market share to justify supporting them. -F Plus it makes a farting sound going down the road
Monday, May 25, 2009 11:23 AM
Monday, May 25, 2009 4:55 PM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Quote:As Vencat spells it out, the "air cars" plug into a wall outlet, allowing an on-board compressor to pressurize the car's air tank to 4,500 pounds per square inch. It takes about four hours to get the tank to full pressure, then the air is then released gradually to power the car's pistons.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:09 AM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:18 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: I get the feeling that, except for special circumstances, we're mostly gonna be using internal combustion, perhaps paired with hybrid, for the foreseeable future. Unless battery price and technology improve a couple of orders of magnitude, full electrics just cost too much and have too little range. If they do become viable, then the electric grid will have to be upgraded to handle the additional drain. Fuel cells have been "just a year away" from commercial-ready for 20 years now, and still don't seem to be able to make the jump. "Keep the Shiny side up"
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 7:39 AM
Quote:That's a big BANG when something goes wrong.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:35 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Still, while progress may be slow, it IS being made. It'd be nice if maybe we could drag some of our domestic automakers into the future with us, but I'm not holding my breath at this point.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:55 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:14 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: I drive a Hyundai that gets 35 miles per gallon. I believe in freedom, but these SUV and P/U truck drivers make me sick.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:22 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: I drive a Hyundai that gets 35 miles per gallon. I believe in freedom, but these SUV and P/U truck drivers make me sick. Try towing a 5,000 lb trailer or hauling six bales of hay or 20 bags of mulch with your Hyundai. Everyone is not you, nor do they have identical needs, transportation-wise. "Keep the Shiny side up"
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:02 PM
Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: Ha, I laugh at your puny double digit mileage per gallon. -Frem
Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:44 AM
Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:47 AM
Quote:Two-stroke? Hows that thing do on emissions, Frem?
Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:19 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: While pickups and trucks are still popular here in the U.S., their sales are off by MASSIVE amounts.
Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: While pickups and trucks are still popular here in the U.S., their sales are off by MASSIVE amounts. For the first four months of 2009, crossovers and small SUVs had less of a decline than any car segment, including small cars. Cars overall had a 35.7% decline and light trucks, inluding SUVs, pickups, crossovers, and minivans, had a 38.9% decline. The biggest losers were the bigger SUVs and large cars. http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html "Keep the Shiny side up"
Friday, May 29, 2009 3:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Which is pretty much restating what I already said.
Friday, May 29, 2009 6:08 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Which is pretty much restating what I already said. Well, not really. Vehicle sales overall are off by large amounts, but pickup sales aren't off any more than anything else. Actually, so far this year, more crossovers (classified as light trucks) have sold than small cars. So the crap about "Detroit doesn't make the small cars everyone wants" is not backed up by actual sales. "Keep the Shiny side up"
Quote:Cars overall had a 35.7% decline and light trucks, inluding SUVs, pickups, crossovers, and minivans, had a 38.9% decline.
Friday, May 29, 2009 8:35 AM
Saturday, May 30, 2009 1:51 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: According to those stats, CARS declined 35.7%, while LIGHT TRUCKS declined 38.9% - or 3.2% MORE of a decline that cars. And I'm assuming the "cars" category would include the small cars that Detroit doesn't build.
Saturday, May 30, 2009 9:01 AM
Quote: So you consider 3.2% a "MASSIVE" amount? Well, that explains a lot.
Quote: Nine of the top 20 sellers so far in 2009 are trucks of some sort.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL