..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Angle thinks she's 'mainstream'...?

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Thursday, September 9, 2010 13:30
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1558
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, September 7, 2010 9:29 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle just might be the Tea Party's biggest gamble yet.

A staunch conservative with a history of making bold and sometimes controversial comments, Angle insists her comments have been taken out of context in her campaign to oust Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in upcoming midterm congressional elections.

"I'll be a mainstream senator," said Angle.

In past remarks during the campaign, Angle has said Social Security and Medicare should be phased out. She's also advocated the elimination of the Departments of Education and Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency and the IRS.

Angle established herself as an ardent conservative during her six-year tenure in the Nevada State Assembly. "Sharron Angle was the Tea Party before the Tea Party existed," Nevada political journalist Jon Ralston said of the Republican, adding she was a "far right" candidate.

While Angle's controversial stances have bolstered her standing with the Tea Party, they have provided fodder for Democrats. Reid has called his opponent "too extreme" in TV ads airing across the state, and even President Obama weighed in at a July event for Reid, saying, "[Angle] favors an approach that's even more extreme than the Republicans we've got in Washington. That's saying something."

complained some of her more controversial statements had been taken out of context.

"As you speak, as we're conversationally speaking, sometimes when you pick out words, they're not the best words you could have used," she told CNN in a rare one-on-one interview. "When taken out of context, you can make anybody look like they don't know what they're talking about," she said.

"It's a little hard to take out of context when they say they want to phase out Social Security," Reid responded to CNN. "Her words are what she is. My words are what I am. So I don't think you can run from what you say and what you do."

Angle has also made some contentious comments on friendly conservative talk radio programs, which have bolstered her detractors' views that she is an extremist.

In a January appearance on the Reno, Nevada-based Bill Manders Show, Angle implied the purpose of the Second Amendment right to bear arms might be to keep the federal government in check. "I'm hoping that we're not getting to Second Amendment remedies.

When CNN asked about Angle's ominous-sounding warning, she laughed off the notion she was promoting an armed revolution. "Those are not the issues people are concerned about. They're concerned about our economy, our homes, our jobs. That's what people are concerned about," she said, not offering an explanation of her remarks.

CNN also asked Angle about her affirmation of the same conservative host's observation that there are "home-born, homegrown" enemies operating in Congress.

"The larger focus of that conversation is what has happened domestically here and our country for the last 18 months," Angle said, pointing out that no names were mentioned during the conversation, and again not addressing directly the intent of her statement.

It's easy to see how Angle's staunch views appeal to the Tea Party, but even some of her fellow Nevada Republicans are wary that she is too conservative.

Reno Mayor Bob Cashell, who is a Republican from Angle's hometown, called Angle "an ultra-right winger" who he will not support in November.

Another prominent Nevada Republican, former Rep. Barbara Vucanovich described Angle as "rigid" in her beliefs in an interview to the Las Vegas Review Journal. "She's a very difficult person. She's very positive in her own way, but when you're elected you have to work for everybody," Vucanovich told the newspaper.

But it's not just politicians who are concerned. In a poll released by the Las Vegas Review Journal on August 27, 71 percent of Nevada Republicans admit they would prefer to see a different Republican candidate take on Reid. Of those Republicans who voted for Angle in the primary election, 66 percent now say they'd like another nominee.

The high-profile race is considered a statistical dead heat where, even in the gambling capital of the world, there is no odds-on favorite, making it a bellwether of just how influential the Tea Party might be in future elections.

I hope it's a bellwether that radical Tea Party candidates will be rejected by the voters; I got nothing against Republicans, but some of these nutwings scare the hell out of me!





Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 7, 2010 10:08 AM

BYTEMITE


What are the alternatives she's proposing to social security and the Dept of Education? Both have problems and both do need reforms... Maybe even to be dismantled and rebuilt in a manner that better serves Americans.

Some kind of safety net is needed for older folks who don't have family who can't be hired under the current retirement system. So we need to figure out how to serve these needs, and stop the costs from ballooning out of control.

Abruptly cutting people off from something they depend on isn't the best option, though, so I don't agree if she has no plan for afterward. But if she's just talking about a need to fix social security, I don't disagree.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 7, 2010 10:18 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Angle would only be "mainstream" if she was incarcerated in an insane asylum. She's a delusional whack job of the most demented kind, but if I lived in Nevada I'd still vote for her over Harry Reid.





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 7, 2010 1:04 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


It's no surprise that she considers herself "mainstream"; most of the tea-baggers consider THEMSELVES mainstream, too. They honestly have no idea how out of it they really are.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 7, 2010 6:03 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
It's no surprise that she considers herself "mainstream"; most of the tea-baggers consider THEMSELVES mainstream, too. They honestly have no idea how out of it they really are.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.




This coming from a gay shipping clerk who spends his time as one of only 14 people in the US that watches MSNBC...and you talk about being not mainstream....Man, you homosexuals are delusional.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 7:00 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Byte: Right on, every word. MANY things in our government badly need reforming, but to toss them out? Obviously she and hers have finances set aside for their old age...something like "I got mine, screw you!" That seems to be the theme for a lot of Tea Partiers...the things they want done away with, either they would suffer for themselves or they are protected against so don't want for anyone else.
Quote:

Angle would only be "mainstream" if she was incarcerated in an insane asylum.
...or a Tea Party rally. Oh, but wait, that's kind of the same thing in a way, isn't it?

Not to mention that SSI, etc., are things we've all PAID INTO all our lives; small point to her I'm sure, but to the rest of us it might be rather important...

Kane, if you've got nothing of any value to contribute to a discussion, please do feel free to "contribute" it. Do you ever actually THINK about the discussions we have, or just jump into everything to spew?


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 7:58 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
It's no surprise that she considers herself "mainstream"; most of the tea-baggers consider THEMSELVES mainstream, too. They honestly have no idea how out of it they really are.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.




This coming from a gay shipping clerk who spends his time as one of only 14 people in the US that watches MSNBC...and you talk about being not mainstream....Man, you homosexuals are delusional.



Boy, you sure are hung up on the gay thing. You can't go a day without bringing it up. Methinks Kaneman is dealing with some uncomfortable issues, and resorting to some angry projection to cover it.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 9:13 AM

KANEMAN


Who is angry? I'm just pointing out facts...I take none if this rubbish seriously....and definantly not personal.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 9:27 AM

STORYMARK


*Whoosh as my point flies over Kane's tiny head....*

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 9:49 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


I too think we need to phase out SSI. It's a horrific waste and an illegal state sponsored Ponzi scheme.

Just because someone points out that the Emperor has no clothes doesn't make them out of the main stream. We need more folks who think and speak like her.

A lot more.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 10:52 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


So what do you propose to replace SSI with? Private accounts that can be wiped out by a crash, or would they be insured by the government, or is it just fine with you when people who are no longer able to work (or to be hired) just curl up and die?

And how would you plan on reimbursing the millions who've been paying into it for decades?

It wouldn't be a ponzi scheme, by the way, if legislators, etc., just kept their filthy HANDS out of it! I'm for a LOCKED fund which they can't get into...if it had been that from the start, it would still be working well.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 10:57 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


I'd phase it out, and tell those who 'contributed - via force ', those who had the least to lose..." too bad. We screwed up, but we owe it to the older folks who paid in the longest "

Maybe give a small amount back, and tell them to go invest or save on their own. Learn how to be accountable and not rely on the Gov't to save your ass.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 11:46 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


So what happens when things outside their control, like the market crashing or disaster or disease or something, wipe out those funds? Leaving stupidity out completely (from which many suffer), I see these things as protected money, money we can't touch and nobody can take from us, in a way the government "ensuring" that money is safe. I sure as shit don't look at it as the government "saving my ass"! What would you say to those who had nothing left when they were too old or infirm to work through no fault of their own?

And would you really be quite happy to let millions (because it would be millionS, people aren't very bright) starve, live in abject poverty in their old age or infirmity, watch them die on the streets? I imagine you'd want government to sweep the bodies up or something so they didn't disturb you, but that WOULD be the outcome if there was no safety net.

Or would you argue for SOME kind of safety net, and if so, what pray tell? Who would pay for it and how? You intend to make families completely responsible for the elderly? How about those of us with no families? You like the idea of poor houses, maybe?


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 11:57 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Learn how to be accountable and not rely on the Gov't to save your ass.





If only someone had said that to Iraq 8 years, 4400 dead American soldiers, and over a trillion dollars ago...

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 12:10 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Just because someone points out that the Emperor has no clothes doesn't make them out of the main stream.




True, it's the other batshit crazy stuff she says that puts her out of the mainstream.

Quote:

We need more folks who think and speak like her.

A lot more.




I'd say we have more than enough nut jobs around.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 12:37 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

True, it's the other batshit crazy stuff she says that puts her out of the mainstream.




Well, you say " the other batshit crazy stuff she says " , and I ask... like what ?

Phasing out SSI is anything but batshit crazy, yet to some who view Gov't as big daddy, such a concept is completely foreign.

I'm sorry, but too many here in this country are entitlement junkies. Too addicted to having things provided to them, for a price. It's sort of like the Matrix.... you might not see the walls which keep you in prison at first, but over time, if you're honest w/ yourself, you see them.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 5:59 PM

FREMDFIRMA



SSI/Soc Sec/Disability is basically gunpoint-mandatory insurance, you think about it.

You pay all this money in, huge amounts of it, on the agreement that if something happens to you, or you survive to retire, they kick some of it back to you - which is kind of a ripoff cause most folk never get back anywhere near what they put into it, and on top of that in the case of disability the first thing they do is use the entire legal machinery of government to try and get out of upholding their end of the contract.

I will support no effort involved in shitcanning it that doesn't involve returning every fucking penny to the folks from whom it was taken via threat of force.

And don't even get me started on corporate pensions, the way they either get robbed out as the execs run off to Dubai - or get folded into spin off companies which quickly declare "bankruptcy" to ditch those pesky obligations, then get liquidated and reabsorbed into the main company, the Auto industry is NOTORIOUS for this shit.

Paying into a pension plan these days is a fools game, just as it was with 401Ks, just one more scam, one more carrot at the end of the treadmill you ain't NEVER gonna get.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 10:25 PM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
What would you say to those who had nothing left when they were too old or infirm to work through no fault of their own?



These benefits are an illusion, a carnival circus trick, a hotel casino trick, or religion. It preys on our collective emotional need for a Fairy Godmother or Lottery Winning which will take care of us--if we pay "into it" long enough.

It's simple math. Think about it.

1. If everyone pays exactly what they would get back, well, what's the point? Why not just save it yourself?

2. If everyone pays LESS than what they would get back, where is the extra money coming from? It comes from a LOT of people not getting theirs, despite the fact that almost everyone eventually gets old or infirm (accidental deaths notwithstanding).

3. If everyone pays MORE than what they get back, well, someone is robbing all of us blind.

I was as disabled as they come for 10 years. I was repeatedly denied Social Security, despite the fact that I paid into all my adult life.

From my point of view, I was FORCED to buy a defective product. I was FORCED to be ripped off. The common terminology is "robbed." That is exactly how this program works: it robs Peter, Paul, and Mary to pay Bob. We all go along with it, because we all have the starry-eyed hope that WE will be Bob.

Where did my money go? I'd say it went into paying some other guy who got disabled, AND the pockets of a lot of bureaucrats for shuffling that money from one desk to another.

I say you shouldn't FORCE people to buy lottery tickets, or gamble in casinos, or tithe to Fairy Godmother churches.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 10:38 PM

CATPIRATE


I just moved to Nevada. This state has alot of independents. Neither party can win with out that vote. But Harry Reid is a crook. So I here.

You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 8, 2010 11:08 PM

FREMDFIRMA



In light of that post, CTS, imma quote Spooner.
Quote:

“The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit. He does not pretend to be anything but a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a 'protector,' and that he takes men’s money against their will, merely to enable him to “protect” those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection. He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful 'sovereign,' on account of the 'protection' he affords you. He does not keep 'protecting' you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults, and villainies as these. In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or his slave.”

-Lysander Spooner


And that, in a nutshell, is the issue here.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 1:29 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Too addicted to having things provided to them, for a price.


I think they call such a system a "free market" system. You get things provided to you, for a price. Sounds like you've got a problem with that. :/

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 1:36 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Where did all the money go? It's still there - over 2.5 TRILLION dollars of it. The government borrowed against it by issuing treasury bills which have the full faith and credit of the U.S. behind them. In the history of this country, as far as I recall, the U.S. has never defaulted on its treasury bills.

Meanwhile, where is all the money that people put into their private retirement accounts in investments like Enron, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, GM, Chrysler, Bernie Madoff's firm, etc.? What was the security that was backing those investments? Where's the money now?

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 2:07 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Too addicted to having things provided to them, for a price.


I think they call such a system a "free market" system. You get things provided to you, for a price. Sounds like you've got a problem with that. :/





Things aren't " provided " for you, you go out and make choices. That's the tiny detail you overlook. With Gov't run mandates, like SSI, you have no choice. Which seems to suit you just fine, unless the issue is abortion. Then you're for all manner of choice.

As long as the choice is for abortion.


As for Angle, I've still yet to see anything she's said that's so outlandish. What Obama and Biden have said/ done, .... are truly incomprehensibly stupid. But folks want to attack Angle ?

Some are just afraid of an opinionated woman.






NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 5:21 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Meanwhile, where is all the money that people put into their private retirement accounts in investments like Enron, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, GM, Chrysler, Bernie Madoff's firm, etc.? What was the security that was backing those investments? Where's the money now?


A good point about corporate law... But not a commentary on the usefulness of SSI.

There does need to be a safety net for the genuinely sick, injured, dying, and very possibly for children and elderly. Our current one appears to be broken, however.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 6:54 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Where did all the money go? It's still there - over 2.5 TRILLION dollars of it. The government borrowed against it by issuing treasury bills which have the full faith and credit of the U.S. behind them.


So you're saying that instead of honoring my claims for an insurance policy they forced me to buy, they leveraged it to make more money for themselves. To finance wars and such.

If you think about it, this money eventually ends up in the private sector, in the pockets of some government contractor, making some CEO very rich. (Halliburton, anyone?)

The govt route is a bit more inefficient than the corporate one, and takes a bunch of bureaucratic detours, but the end result is the same as corporate robbery. A few scumbags get rich, and no one else gets what they paid in for.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 7:11 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I don't see it the same as everyone else, apparently. I think the vast majority of people get what they paid in out, if they live that long or need it. I know getting Disability is damned hard and yes, they do try everything to get out of it. But I also know that everyone I've ever met who has stuck with it has gotten it...and when you do, you get "back paid" from the day you filed. There are lots of legal services (many free) that will help you fight, too. I was lucky; for some unknown reason I got mine in less than a month after filing, for which I've always been very grateful. But I know far too many others who've suffered and been denied time after time. No argument on that point.

But on the rest, I disagree. Like Mike, I ask: what about all of those with "private" retirement funds, whether their own or a 401K, who lost tons of money recently while the CEOs and traders walked off rich? If we had private SSI accounts, what would you say to all of THEM? "Tough shit?"

SSI has been mishandled. But I ask again, which nobody has answered so far: WHAT would you do for people who become unable to work, or grow too old to be hired, if you did away with SSI? You just want to let them die on the streets? I've yet to hear a viable answer; private accounts are NOT a viable answer, as they are vulnerable to the economy going up and down. To say "save it yourself or do without" is illogical; humans have enough trouble getting by, and too many of them have lost their jobs, their homes, etc., because of the economy...how would those be able to save/invest in a retirement account on their own? Your family comes first; to save it and your home, most people would use everything at their disposal.

I won't go into those too stupid to save, but I'll ask again: Even with them, you wanna let them die on the streets or live in abject poverty (and guess who would pay for their hospital costs THEN, even if MediCare were done away with)? What about people who worked hard all their lives but were unable to put money away on their own? It's a no-win situation; nothing but a way to keep the money safe, no matter what, is going to protect people. If you think "we" wouldn't somehow end up paying more if it wasn't for SSI and Disability, you're too short sighted. People who live without those wouldn't live even slightly healthy lives; they'd end up sick more often than even now; the public would end up paying their hospital costs one way or another. I think we'd end up paying a heckofalot more if we forced them to live like that, in the end.

Even now, SSI barely makes survival difficult, and people are working longer and longer just to try and put away enough to survive on even WITH SSI. Jim's 72; he's still working, and we have two retirement accounts; but when he stops and we have to live on just those and SSI, we'll barely get by. It's easy to say "do away with SSI" when you're young; talk to me when you're in your sixties! If Jim lost his job, at his age he couldn't GET another one, so what're we to do?

And some kind of savings account people have to put money into themselves and aren't allowed to take out would have to have conditions under which they were allowed to get into it--that's just the way the government works, it provides safety nets. I know most people here aren't in favor of safety nets; all I can say is wait until you need one.

Something to remember is it's not just what we put in; that money earns interest, which helps to pay for us and/or others when our time comes. It's a logical thing...doesn't work as well as it should, but if you look at how people survived BEFORE SSI, you might feel differently.

I believe one of the needs for central government IS safety nets, and it's something I'm proud of America for doing. Just look at how the elderly and infirm live (if you can call it that) in countries who don't have some form of SSI, then talk to me about how bad ours is. Afghanistan is a good example; when people get old, they beg on the street, or they die. With the kuchis, when someone can't keep up with the group, they fall behind and die in the desert. Sound good to anyone here?

It needs to be fixed, absolutely. It needs to be inviolate, so legislators and such can't get their greedy hands on it, or use it (as people would) to bail the government out. But to do without it? No. Even now, it's barely enough to survive on, but it DOES allow survival.

So aside from grousing about SSI and MediCare and blaming the government and saying it's "robbing" us, give me a truly VIABLE alternative. I have yet to see one. The "I got mine, fuck you" mentality simply doesn't WORK, unless you're willing to let people die when they get old or infirm. If you are, screw you.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 7:13 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

True, it's the other batshit crazy stuff she says that puts her out of the mainstream.




Well, you say " the other batshit crazy stuff she says " , and I ask... like what ?





Oh, I'd say her "second amendment solution" comments - thinly veiled calls for outright violence - firmly place her in the crazy column.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 7:15 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


CTTS, I fault your reasoning. Our TAXES end up that way in large part; fix that. But SSI for the most part doesn't, it earns money if they'd just leave it alone, money for the next generation. If we'd make it so they can't get their hands on it, that would be a BIG step forward. Government is like people; if it needs something, it tries to take it from wherever it can get it. If we made it something they cannot get their hands on, no matter WHAT, it would roll along quite happily--we'd even be able to pay for the influx of us "boomers" if it hadn't been touched all this time, from the interest it garnered.

Talk about TAXES...that's what pays for all the assinine things government does...SSI is only one small part of that and separate from all the things government blows money on: TAXES, not SSI and Medicare. They, and Disability, are taxes, certainly, but to put them in the same category as regular taxes which the government can spend any way they want is flawed, in my opinion.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 7:52 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

I don't see it the same as everyone else, apparently. I think the vast majority of people get what they paid in out, if they live that long or need it. I know getting Disability is damned hard and yes, they do try everything to get out of it. But I also know that everyone I've ever met who has stuck with it has gotten it...and when you do, you get "back paid" from the day you filed. There are lots of legal services (many free) that will help you fight, too. I was lucky; for some unknown reason I got mine in less than a month after filing, for which I've always been very grateful. But I know far too many others who've suffered and been denied time after time. No argument on that point.


On that note, my friend with the collapsed lung and herniated diaphragm and asthma STILL can't get in, which pisses me off to no end. He's actually tried to work and then just found that he couldn't with all the respiratory problems he's dealing with. And he's going blind in one eye. It's ridiculous. Got all these hospital bills and such... The creditors are getting angry.

He tried to see if he could get a disability lawyer interested, and no dice. There must have just not been enough of a cut left after paying off everything else to entice someone to take the case. Oh, and ONE of the shitty doctors he went to that the state recommended for his physical evaluation just bullshitted the whole thing, said my friend didn't have any problems so he'd have no chance of consideration. Everyone at the hospital he went to before when they found the collapsed lung and herniated diaphragm, they were amazed he was ALIVE.

Hell, at this point I kinda just want to pay some of it off for him, except he won't let me. 9_9

Quote:

You just want to let them die on the streets? I've yet to hear a viable answer; private accounts are NOT a viable answer, as they are vulnerable to the economy going up and down.


No, no, I have some agreement there. It needs a fix or it needs an alternative. If we do dismantle it, there has to be SOMETHING.

In Utah, we have this system, works by the Mormon church and which is voluntary. They bring elderly people and families in trouble meals and such. Aside from the non-secular nature of the program, though they do help out people who aren't church members, it seems like a good model, so a community based charity organization for people isn't IMpossible.

The question is, would it work elsewhere, could it be expanded to include medical needs? That's a harder one, and I think to pull it off people would have to develop creative work arounds the exorbitant prices of the pharmaceutical industry. Syringes shouldn't cost $200 a box. Over in India, there was a guy so bothered by the population's increasing problems with eye trouble, because no one could afford corrective lenses for cataract surgery. He invented a process to manufacture these lenses for only two dollars, and now hospitals out of country are buying them, and his hospital is doing over 10,000 corrective surgeries a year.

Another question: is this something that should come from taxes or be voluntary? I'm willing to pay in to a SSI-like system if I can see the direct immediate turn around to people in distress. Other people might not be...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 8:14 AM

RIVERLOVE


I'm totally against privatizing Social Security. Sure, during the 1990's it might have looked like an attractive idea, considering folks were seeing huge gains in their 401k's. But if those same folks had their SS money invested in 401k's during this decade instead of the Govt's SS, they would have seen their retirement funds evaporate. There's nothing worse than a destitute senior citizen. Social Security is one of the very few Govt. programs I support. It just needs to be tightened up a bit in terms of fraud and misuse, and it needs its' funding shored up.

They say you should not rely on Social Security for your retirement, and that is true. But with todays's interest rates at all time lows, a person cannot have enough of a nestegg to make it without that Social Security check as the foundation of your retirement.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 8:21 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


As to Angle, yes, I agree. If she wants to play that game, she should come right out and SAY "we'll have a revolution if you don't give us what we want" (which is exactly the blackmail she's HINTING at); she doesn't have the balls, so she uses the "second amendment" gambit over and over, virtually every time she opens her mouth, as a political ploy to HINT at the blackmail without coming right out and saying it. She wants to threaten, let her SAY it!

How about wanting to do away with the Education Department, Energy Department, EPA? None of those work as well as they should and all need revamping. But to do away with them completely??

Hell, even Glenn Beck warned against her early on:

How about "God has called me to run against Harry Reid"? She's using the ploy that appeals to so many right-wingers and tea-partiers, but it's bat-shit crazy if she really BELIEVES it (which I doubt).

--Even Fox News was aghast at her remarks: “We needed to have the press be our friend. We wanted them to ask the questions WE wanted to answer so that they report the news the way WE want it reported”.
http://www.thefoxnation.com/politics/2010/08/03/sharron-angle-too-hone
st-latest-interview


--How about that she was a member of Nevada's Independent American Party, a Christian conservative-cum-libertarian third party, for at least six years while she was getting her feet wet in politics in the 1990s? That group fears a the "North American Union" and other forms of "global government." The small party attracted considerable controversy in 1994 when it took out a newspaper ad titled "Consequences of Sodomy: Ruin of a Nation," which suggested HIV could spread through the water.

Even three members of the Independent American Party admit that Angle, a Nye County, Nevada, school board member at the time, was an active member of the party in the 1990s. They say she only left the Independent American Party and became a Republican out of political expediency when she decided to seek a seat in the state assembly, to which she was elected in 1998.

--How about running a vitriolic anti-gay insert in state newspapers that portrayed LGBT people -- or, as Angle's party called them, "sodomites" -- as child-molesting, HIV-carrying, Hell-bound freaks?

--How about getting us out of the U.N., which she claims “continually threatens U.S. sovereignty? She wants us to withdraw from it and work only with “our willing allies”.

--How about trying to organize a trip to Mexico with fellow lawmakers, to see the Scientology-based drug-treatment program to Nevada that was a sauna-and-massage treatment, at $15,000 per prisoner of tax-payer money?

--How about voting against funding non-profit organizations working with children performing background checks that might eliminate child molesters, pedophiles, rapists, perverts and sex offenders from working with children in Nevada?

--How about opposing ANY Wall Street reform, saying it was “too much regulation” that caused the collapse, and believing Big Banks should be free to give their executives huge bonuses?

--How about signing a pledge to reward companies who ship jobs overseas?

--How about her stand on health care? You’re on your own, essentially; same for maternity care. She was only one of two votes in the State Assembly against a bill requiring insurance companies to screen for cancer?

--How about being a member of the Oath Keepers, an anti-government militia group, one of which’s stances includes preparing for the “coming dictatorship”?

--You like her stance that abortion shouldn’t be allowed even in the case of rape or incest?

--How about her feelings on alcohol—which she would make illegal if she could?

There’s more, but that’s sufficient for me, at least, to prove she’s completely out of touch with reality and stalwart in refusing to even compromise on any of her stances, however weird they may be.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 8:31 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Thank you RL for your eloquent defense of SSI. Our retirement accounts DID take a huge hit recently, and will make it even more difficult to survive in the coming years. I fear for others who don't have any retirement accounts whatsoever; how will they survive on the $1,600 Jim will get monthly--and only because he's worked into his 70s?

As to SSI itself, yes, it needs a LOT of work. But eliminating it completely is, to me, foolish and/or very selfish. When it comes to local charities, that varies hugely from area to area, and isn't terribly workable anywhere. Nonprofits depend on donations; exactly what percentage of the population do you think would donate to them if it were voluntary? Given the huge number of people who need care in their old age, how do you think the nonprofits of today, already struggling to survive, would fare?

Regarding your friend, Byte, I'm so sorry for him; that is criminal! I know it sounds stupid, but I would say keep on fighting. Here in CA there are numerous non-profit legal firms fighting for the disabled, I see their ads daily, and I'll betcha one of them would have taken on his case. Of course, I don't know how it is in Utah or other states, but again, isn't that a reason for people nationwide to have a chance to get disability when they truly deserve it?

I don't know about Utah, but with all those disorders, I KNOW he'd have gotten it here. If he has doctors behind him, and employers who will write letters saying he was unable to function on the job, he wouldn't have any problem here. The situation he's in absolutely disgusts me, and I wish it were as reasonable as it is here to get what he deserves!

Like I said, I know they make it difficult. But to do away with it completely is crazy to me. And I really have met nobody who, if they keep on fighting, hasn't managed it in the end.

I say once again: For those who are so vociferous about doing away with SSI, let's hear a VIABLE alternative.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 8:45 AM

BYTEMITE


Well, he lives in Ohio, I live in Utah. I've never known anyone on Utah's disability program or trying to get on it. Being a red state, and being that there's that whole church welfare thing, I'd suspect it's not easy here, either, but I wouldn't know.

Quote:

But to do away with it completely is crazy to me.


I didn't say that. I'm trying to come up with alternatives (and I agree, privatizing isn't a viable one), but if there aren't alternatives, I don't want it gone. I do want it fixed in that case, though.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 9:40 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I wasn't responding to you with "do away with it completely", Byte; I was replying to all those others who want to.

I, too, BADLY want it fixed, for those who come after me, and try tho' I might, I've never been able to think of anything better. I'm still waiting for those who holler about doing away with it to come up with a VIABLE one.

The Tea Partiers who scream about government interference and too-big government would be sadly disappointed if it actually happened. One needs to consider all the consequences, rather than just saying "do away with it", or even "only use it for national emergencies or war".

There are many flaws in our system of government. But as has been said often, the only thing worse is every other. That's not as true today as it used to be, but I'm for IMPROVING what we've got, learning from other systems, rather than trashing it.

By the way, we have a huge "church thing" here in CA, too, which is why I know how they are struggling to survive. In times like these, people CAN'T give enough to support a private answer to problems like these, and even when they can, it's only on a relatively small scale.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 12:09 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

Oh, I'd say her "second amendment solution" comments - thinly veiled calls for outright violence - firmly place her in the crazy column.





See, you gave me your OPINION on what she said, and not her actual quote. What am I suppose to make of that ?




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 1:12 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

Oh, I'd say her "second amendment solution" comments - thinly veiled calls for outright violence - firmly place her in the crazy column.





See, you gave me your OPINION on what she said, and not her actual quote. What am I suppose to make of that ?




Actual quote:

Quote:

You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years.

I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out.



Sounds pretty batshit to me.


On education:

Quote:

Interviewer: "Would you eliminate the Department of Education or simply cut it back?"

Angle responds, "I would like to go through to the elimination. I think we start by defunding it, and the reason that we should eliminate it is because it's not the federal government's job to provide education for our children."



On underage rape victims:

Quote:

"I think that two wrongs don't make a right. And I have been in the situation of counseling young girls, not 13 but 15, who have had very at risk, difficult pregnancies. And my counsel was to look for some alternatives, which they did. And they found that they had made what was really a lemon situation into lemonade."


Apparently, Angle equate rape of young girls to lemonade. Remind me to stay away from her lemonade stand.

On unemployment:

Quote:

"People don't want to be unemployed," she explained. "They want to have real, full-time, permanent jobs with a future. That's what they want, and we need to create that climate in Washington, D.C. that encourages businesses to create those full-time, permanent jobs with a future, and all [Rep.] Shelley Berkeley and [Senate Majority Leader] Harry Reid want to do is put a band-aid on this by extending unemployment, which really doesn't benefit anyone.


I think close to 100% of the long-term unemployed would argue that unemployment benefits really DO benefit someone, especially in an economy in which there are 3.4 people for every job opening in the country.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 1:17 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:

Too addicted to having things provided to them, for a price.


I think they call such a system a "free market" system. You get things provided to you, for a price. Sounds like you've got a problem with that. :/





Things aren't " provided " for you, you go out and make choices. That's the tiny detail you overlook. With Gov't run mandates, like SSI, you have no choice. Which seems to suit you just fine, unless the issue is abortion. Then you're for all manner of choice.

As long as the choice is for abortion.



You mean like how you love choice, as long as the choice is always to kill every Muslim in the world? You always go for that choice.

Quote:


As for Angle, I've still yet to see anything she's said that's so outlandish. What Obama and Biden have said/ done, .... are truly incomprehensibly stupid. But folks want to attack Angle ?

Some are just afraid of an opinionated woman.




Yes, you do seem terrified of Cynthia McKinney. Seems some are just afraid of an opinionated BLACK woman, eh?



AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 9, 2010 1:30 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Are you kidding!? That's so easily done it's almost a waste of my time!





You can hear her on another radio interview saying:
Quote:

Angle: I feel that the Second Amendment is the right to keep and bear arms for our citizenry. This not for someone who's in the military. This not for law enforcement. This is for us. And in fact when you read that Constitution and the founding fathers, they intended this to stop tyranny. This is for us when our government becomes tyrannical...

Manders: If we needed it at any time in history, it might be right now.

Angle: Well it's to defend ourselves. And you know, I'm hoping that we're not getting to Second Amendment remedies. I hope the vote will be the cure for the Harry Reid problems.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/16/sharron-angle-floated-2nd_n_6
14003.html
(yes, it's Huffpost, but they didn't fake her voice!)

ABC: ( http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/2010_Elections/2010-elections-primaries-test
-republican-strength-california-nevada/story?id=10853479
) quotes her interview with the Reno Gazette-Journal, where she says:
Quote:

"We're called as Americans to be vigilant to protect our liberty," she said in a recent interview. "At some point in each of our lives, we're called to service to defend and protect our Constitution."

In Angle's eyes, the country is under attack and she's willing to go to battle.

"What is a little bit disconcerting and concerning is the inability for sporting goods stores to keep ammunition in stock," she said. "That tells me the nation is arming. What are they arming for if it isn't that they are so distrustful of their government? They're afraid they'll have to fight for their liberty in more Second Amendment kinds of ways?

"That's why I look at this as almost an imperative. If we don't win at the ballot box, what will be the next step?"

http://www.rgj.com/article/20100530/NEWS19/5300350/1232/Sharron-Angle-
s-conservative-credentials-wins-support-of-activist-armyIn


She's trying to ignore what she said before, now, and even refusing to give interviews to national news...as well as dodging references to her OWN POSITIONS.

CBS:
Quote:

When Angle returned from Washington and held an event to greet supporters yesterday in Las Vegas, she was approached by reporter Nathan Baca of CBS affiliate 8 News Now.

When Baca, citing Angle's website, asked why she wants "to eliminate (Social Security) for younger folks, because your plan calls for transitioning out," she accused him of believing "the Harry Reid lie" and said she wants to shift the program to personalized Social Security accounts that the government can't touch.

Then things started to get pretty tense.

Baca said the 2008 stock market crash would have meant millions of seniors having their savings wiped out under Angle's plan; she replied that he is "putting words into my mouth from Harry Reid" and that she is trying to save Social Security.

When he asked why she wants to eliminate the EPA despite the Gulf oil leak, she said, "Where are you getting these questions? The issues are not about the EPA... The issues are homes here in Nevada... He is trying to make this a campaign about me. But, where's Harry? Go ask Harry... Please go ask Harry about the EPA, and why they have failed."

She went on to say the EPA has "failed to do what they needed to do in the Gulf."

Angle then ignored a question about her website once advocating U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations and refused to look at Baca as he asked her repeatedly about her "Second Amendment remedies" comment as she walked in the parking lot after the event. The video is above.

According to Baca, Angle's campaign responded to the exchange by calling him "an idiot" as well as another term that can't be repeated on television.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20008167-503544.html


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, November 23, 2024 10:01 - 7494 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:59 - 4753 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:21 - 944 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:11 - 182 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 08:57 - 4795 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:23 - 421 posts
Idiot Democrat Wine Mom
Sat, November 23, 2024 05:26 - 1 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:40 - 11 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:33 - 41 posts
Biden admin quietly loosening immigration policies before Trump takes office — including letting migrants skip ICE check-ins in NYC
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:15 - 3 posts
RCP Average Continues to Be the Most Accurate in the Industry Because We Don't Weight Polls
Sat, November 23, 2024 00:46 - 1 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:54 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL