Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
What if Republicans don't compromise?
Monday, July 25, 2011 3:57 PM
KPO
Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.
Monday, July 25, 2011 4:18 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Monday, July 25, 2011 8:10 PM
RIONAEIRE
Beir bua agus beannacht
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:14 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 2:46 AM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:39 AM
HERO
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:44 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote: It's Obama who isn't compromising
Quote: According to the remarks obtained by Fox News, Boehner said Obama initially expressed a willingness to reform all three entitlement programs in exchange for "a list of tax increases." Boehner said he refused, but came back with an offer to discuss corporate and personal "tax reform." Further, Boehner said he wanted "fewer tax rates and a top rate less than it is today" by early next year. ..... Boehner's statements come as he seeks to assure his caucus he's on their side when it comes to taxes and spending cuts. Tea Party loyalists have had concerns Boehner was edging too close to the White House position on taxes, creating friction between him and Cantor, the House majority leader and favorite of Tea Party Republican freshmen. http://newmediajournal.us/indx.php/item/2213
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:08 AM
NEWOLDBROWNCOAT
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:37 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Geezer, you may consider it a tax hike, but the Democrats have asked for an end to subsidies to ultra-rich corporations and closing of tax loopholes...
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:38 AM
Quote:The GOP has a deal where it'll raise the debt ceiling ( again ) along w/ real , actual cuts in spending. There. That's compromise.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Quote: It's Obama who isn't compromising ...and that's all your remarks deserve.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:53 AM
Quote:Originally posted by kpo: Quote:The GOP has a deal where it'll raise the debt ceiling ( again ) along w/ real , actual cuts in spending. There. That's compromise. Agreeing to not blow up the economy so long as we give you exactly what you want in terms of cuts -- that's your idea of compromise? This is what we're up against... It's not personal. It's just war.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:19 AM
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:39 AM
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:49 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Congress DID its job. Not kowtowing to Obama's extreme Marxist ideas of massive govt spending isn't a failure to do its job. If anything, it's exactly what they're there to do. And as for impeachable, the Fast & Furious gun running program , which resulted in the death of a US Fed agent, should be what's mentioned more here. Holder, at the very least, should be getting his prison slippers ready. " I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:50 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: What you're up against is sensible, sober politicians who have said enough to mindless , pointless spending, and are at least LOOKING at taking back control of our budget.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:48 PM
PHOENIXROSE
You think you know--what's to come, what you are. You haven't even begun.
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: (a) Let the U.S. default. The voters blame the economy, the crash, and the debt ceiling debacle as being the fault of the Republicans. They also by a 3-to-1 margin WANT tax increases to be part of any plan to reduce the deficit and pay down the debt. They always have, even when Bushy was handing out $600 checks and telling people that there was absolutely no need to pay down our debt (and the GOP backed him up on that) So let the government default. CONGRESS has to raise the debt limit. If they don't, it's on them. If the GOP wants to tell the people of the world that the United States has absolutely no intention of ever paying back the money it has borrowed (the vast majority of it borrowed by Republicans, don't forget!), then by all means, let them tell the world that. And when it's time to stop sending out those checks, make damned sure to start with those Congresspeople who voted against raising the limit, and cut off their funding first. After all, it IS what they wanted.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:23 PM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:29 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:40 AM
Quote:It's the GOP who is TRYING to make Obama accountable for the mess they've caused.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:42 AM
DMAANLILEILTT
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:14 AM
Quote:No money is being " handed over " to the rich! The very thought of that being the case shows just how upside down is your thinking.
Quote:YOU want to burden this nation's children and grandchildren with debt which none of us should have to carry, simply for purely selfish reasons.
Quote:It's the GOP who is TRYING to hold Obama accountable for the mess he's caused.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:09 AM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:32 AM
BYTEMITE
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:33 AM
Quote: The Democrats had a fine chance for either a 'tax hike' or a 'loophole closing' (your choice) by letting the Bush-era tax cuts die, but they apparently realized that there are a lot of rich, politically active, Democrats that'd hurt, and left them in place.
Quote: The standoff amounts to a game of political chicken, but it also raises questions about what is best for pulling the country out of the recession, chipping away at unemployment and paying down the deficit. In comments at a backyard town hall in a Northern Virginia suburb, President Obama delivered another pointed defense of his plan to extend the cuts for middle class and working families, while letting others — specifically the cuts for high-income earners — come to an end. "We could get [tax cuts] done this week, but we're still in this wrestling match with John Boehner and Mitch McConnell about the last 2 to 3 percent" of upper-income taxpayers, Obama said. ..... Boehner, however, appears to have stated that he would support the president's plan over the alternative of not extending the tax cuts at all, though the interpretation of what he meant is still up in the air. [Just like right now, Boehner appears to understand that compromise is what makes government possible, but his cohorts are staunchly "all or nothing" and refuse to consider anything but "All"] ..... Will raising the top tax rates hurt small business? One of the most common objections to letting the cuts expire for those in the highest tax brackets is that it would hurt small businesses. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) recently said that allowing the cuts to lapse would amount to "a job-killing tax hike on small business during tough economic times." This claim is debatable. Less than 3 percent of tax returns reporting small-business income are filed by taxpayers who fit Obama’s definition of a “high-income” taxpayer. According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, small-business income makes up a majority of the income for about 40 percent of households in the top bracket and a third of households in the second-highest bracket. Based on this analysis, if the objective is to help small businesses, continuing the Bush tax cuts on high-income taxpayers isn't the way to go. Moreover, much small-business income is taxed at low or zero rates right now. Small business also fully deduct wage payments, so a higher tax rate should not impact their choice of hiring people.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:18 AM
M52NICKERSON
DALEK!
Quote:That said, I thiiiink I'm okay raising the debt ceiling, and I'm even okay raising taxes for now, but I also really think we need to cut out some of the spending and pay some of this back somehow. In the very least so it doesn't get held over us and we're forced into stuff that's basically slavery or "kill us all."
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:52 AM
Quote: you know in your heart that the adults in this debate are exclusively found on the Right
Quote: What you're up against is sensible, sober politicians who have said enough to mindless , pointless spending, and are at least LOOKING at taking back control of our budget.
Quote:Congress DID its job. Not kowtowing to Obama's extreme Marxist ideas of massive govt spending isn't a failure to do its job. If anything, it's exactly what they're there to do.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:04 AM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:23 AM
Quote: Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) took the rhetoric in the debt ceiling debate to a new level on Monday, saying via Twitter that President Obama could be impeached if he lets the U.S. default on its debts. ... Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) has also mentioned impeachment, should Obama raise the debt ceiling without congressional approval. ... Let's hope the GOP tries this nonsense: "Impeachment would be a good thing," says Steve M. at No More Mister Nice Blog. Not because Obama deserves it, but because such an attack "without any semblance of an impeachable offense would smack some sense into America." It would prove once and for all that our political system isn't broken, it's "being destroyed by a specific cabal of sociopaths known as the Republican Party."
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:25 AM
Quote:The only way the US is going to reduce its deficit, get a balanced budget and start to pay down the debt is a mix of revenue increases and spending cuts. Those cuts are going to have to come from a number of places including large cuts in military spending, which is the largest discretionary budget item.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:37 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:38 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:57 PM
Quote:So here we are, in a country with more wheat, and more corn, and more money in the bank, more cotton, more everything in the world; there's not a product that you can name that we haven't got more of than any other country ever had on the face of the earth, and yet we've got people starving. We'll hold the distinction of being the only nation in the history of the world that ever went to the poor house in an automobile. The potter's fields are lined with granaries full of grain. These people that you are asked to aid, why they are not asking for charity, they are naturally asking for a job, but if you can't give them a job why the next best thing you can do is see that they have food and the necessities of life. You know, there's not a one of us has anything that these people that are without it now haven't contributed to what we've got. I don't suppose there is the most unemployed or the hungriest man in America that hasn't contributed in some way to the wealth of every millionaire in America. It was the big boys themselves who thought that this financial drunk we were going through was going to last forever. They over-merged, and over-capitalized, and over-everything else. That's the fix that we're in now. - Will Rogers, October 18, 1931
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: BTW, Nick - welcome to RWED, make sure to don your moshpit armor and wear a raincoat, cause it gets kinda wacky around here sometimes. -F
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:06 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:09 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: Because in your mind all money "belongs" to the rich, and anytime the rich don't get "their" money clearly someone is "stealing" it from them? Speaking of backward ...
Quote: AFA the debt, I don't want to saddle future generations with crushing debt anymore than I want to saddle them with environmental debt, like global climate change, a radiologically-contaminated globe, and an ecology impoverished by mass extinction. OTOH, I'm not using "debt" as a boogeyman and you shouldn't be either. The USA debt is actually lower than many developed nations, so what's the problem? Please, explain yourself clearly and specifically, using facts and figures.
Quote: Uh- huh. The problem Obama caused. How? Again, please elucidate. Cite facts and figures.
Quote: In any case, we all know what you and your religion represent. If it wasn't clear before, it's getting clearer by the day.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:20 PM
Quote:...this is pointless to even waste time going over again. We've only been discussing the reckless spending by Obama for 3.5 years now.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:21 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:45 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:50 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: It belongs to those who worked for it, yes. Rich, poor, who ever, it's not the GOVERNMENT'S money! The "rich" already pay for most of everything in this country already. They pay FAR more than their fair share.
Quote:No one wants dirty air and polluted water, so this is the biggest straw man argument you on the Left continue to fall back on. Of course, AGW is 100% bogus, but it sure does sell to the dumb masses, huh? ( about as good as religion. Oh, the irony )
Quote:No, the debt is NOT lower than many developed nations, and for you to even suggest as such is nonsensical. I guess what you don't know can't hurt you, huh?
Quote:ObamaCare, which we don't have the $ for, Recovery and Reinvestment, which was a complete waste of nearly a trillion $'s , upping the over all baseline for how much $ the Federal govt spends,... this is pointless to even waste time going over again. We've only been discussing the reckless spending by Obama for 3.5 years now.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:06 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote:...this is pointless to even waste time going over again. We've only been discussing the reckless spending by Obama for 3.5 years now. After you've spent far longer than that defending the reckless spending of Bush, who spent more than three times as much! (He also got a whole lot more Americans killed on his watch)
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:16 PM
Quote: Oh, and part of the money you earn is the governments. That is what taxes are the share you pay the government to live here.
Quote: I suppose without regulations or government regulators everyone will just behave and not pollute. That worked so well in the past.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:25 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:31 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:36 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: What Mike said, every time, especially the last one. If you disagree, prove it. Prove it with facts and figures, I dare you.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:37 PM
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:39 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: The rich pay far less in taxes than the middle class, as a percentage of income.
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:42 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I pay the government to LIVE HERE ? ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS !! OMFG, you are so deluded!!! Half the people in this country don't " pay to live here ". And it never occurred to you that ,maybe, we could have sensible, reasonable regulations and inspections , and still have clean air, food and water ? For you, it's either the iron fist of the imperial federal govt, or it's anarchy ? And your wiki link is ridiculous. Doesn't remotely deal w/ the non-discretionary spending we're going to have to deal with, in the years to come, even BEFORE ObamaCare ( which absolutely does NOT save any $, but will cost us 1 trillion $ , from the very start ) The R&R act helped anyone ? Maybe a few, who lined their pockets at the tax payers expense. Sure. but did it help the economy ? Hell no. Which is even funnier, since most of that $ was suppose to kick in LAST summer ( not immediately, in '09, when we needed it ). The Dems were praying for that 'Summer of Recovery' to take place, and then ride that tide of good feeling all the way to November. How'd that work out for the Dems, hmmm?
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:47 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Oh, dear, (is it Ms. Nickerson?), you were warned. None of those very reasonable and cogent arguments will go anywhere with Raptor, and from this day forward he will inevitably call you names and hurl epithets at you; I'm so sorry. Trying to communicate will bring the Wrath Of The Right Wing" down upon your head. So proceed at your own risk, but know we'll be right there backing you up. (I think he's right on one point, tho', I think Obama's already "spent" more than Bush by far, but then if you balance that out with how much Bush LOST, and that he hid the wars from the budget...well, you know.) You see, Raptor doesn't use public roads, has never attended a church or school the government subsidized in any way, never used the library, avoids street lights, doesn't feel responsible for stuff like stop lights/signs, painting of crosswalks, police or fire protection, you know ANY of the stuff the rest of us pay for to live here. He's special. Do Not Look For Common Sense Here, okay? (and thanx for the graphic!) Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani, Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”, signing off
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: The rich pay far less in taxes than the middle class, as a percentage of income. Doesn't matter about a % of income, they fund far more than their fair share. Period.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL