REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Myth : You cannot reduce the deficit to an appropriate level without also raising taxes.

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 12:07
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2796
PAGE 1 of 2

Sunday, July 31, 2011 4:50 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Fact : Spending cuts are the most effective way to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio.



http://reason.com/archives/2011/07/29/the-facts-about-spending-cuts



" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 5:00 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


True you could reduce the deficit to zero if you cut enough funding. If does not take a mathematician to understand that. The thing is you will have to make deeper cuts to programs that are important without raising taxes.

So when are you going to reply to my post to you here http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=49183&p=2 or are you conceding?

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 5:09 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


You're not paying attention.

taxing doesn't achieve the goal of reducing the deficit , and that's the POINT ( or should be ), the goal in trying to get our financial house in order.

Growing the economy will pay down the deficit and the debt far quicker and will have a far more positive impact on ALL Americans than raising the incomes taxes on the top 1 or 2 % of wage earners.


And are you still clinging to that silly Nordic model ? C'mon... this is a non issue.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 5:25 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


One, you have not come close to showing how reducing the deficit helps the economy.

Two, increase revenues in some ways will not stop or slow economic growth. To deep of cuts in programs will.

Three, since you think it is a non-issue I will take it that you are conceding.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 5:47 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Last point first, as it's irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

I'm not 'conceding' anything, just stating that, while it may be of trivial interest to get into such a debate, I haven't the time or desire to follow down that rabbit hole. A mostly homogeneous society, contrasted with a far larger, far more diverse group of people, it's apples and oranges. That's all I'll say on that matter.

Quote:

One, you have not come close to showing how reducing the deficit helps the economy.
Sorry, this is basic economics. Look around. Read and pay attention. Lowering of the nation's credit rating is what's at stake here.

Quote:



Two, increase revenues in some ways will not stop or slow economic growth. To deep of cuts in programs will.



" In some ways " ? What's that even suppose to mean ? We're dealing w/ real world issues here, and you're dabbling in 'would of, could of '.

The stimulus failed. Miserably. Don't take my word for it...

Fed's Massive Stimulus Had Little Impact: Greenspan

The Federal Reserve's massive stimulus program had little impact on the U.S. economy besides weakening the dollar and helping U.S. exports, Federal Reserve Governor Alan Greenspan told CNBC Thursday.

In a blunt critique of his successor, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, Greenspan said the $2 trillion in quantative easing over the past two years had done little to loosen credit and boost the economy.


http://www.cnbc.com/id/43598606





" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:32 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Thing is, you have no idea how to "grow the economy". You just don't. The things you say WILL grow the economy have been tried, and they didn't work. The things you say will HURT the economy haven't - if fact, they've GROWN the economy.

You spend a lot, you have to tax a lot to pay for it. And you guys, under the "leadership" of Bush and the GOP, spent A LOT. More than anyone in the history of the country. More than Reagan, more than FDR, more than Obama. Thing is, now the bills have come due, and you don't want to pay your bills, because you're a bunch of useless deadbeats. We get that.

Maybe next time you'll listen when someone tells you that wars actually cost money.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:34 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


And really? You're going to listen to GREENSPAN? Honestly?

He's the one who created this mess!

Why don't you go ahead and ask Bernie Madoff for investment advice?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:38 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Last point first, as it's irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

I'm not 'conceding' anything, just stating that, while it may be of trivial interest to get into such a debate, I haven't the time or desire to follow down that rabbit hole. A mostly homogeneous society, contrasted with a far larger, far more diverse group of people, it's apples and oranges. That's all I'll say on that matter.



Then you are conceding. One it is funny that you think Norwegian countries are mostly homogenous. Second you can't explain why that makes a difference when it comes to an economic model.

Quote:

Sorry, this is basic economics. Look around. Read and pay attention. Lowering of the nation's credit rating is what's at stake here.


If it is so basic explain it then, put your money where you mouth is. Explain how, even if the US credit rating is reduced, it would negatively effect the economy.

Quote:

" In some ways " ? What's that even suppose to mean ? We're dealing w/ real world issues here, and you're dabbling in 'would of, could of '.

The stimulus failed. Miserably. Don't take my word for it...



It means that there is more then one way to raise revenues. Even raising taxes could be done with little effect on the economy if you tax those who have enough money that the increase would not effect their spending.

Really, Greenspan? The man who was the architect of this whole mess. Now that is funny.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:38 AM

DREAMTROVE




he's just stomping for clintonomics ;)

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 9:00 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Ben Stein, noted conservative pundit, had an interesting take on it this morning on CBS:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7375118n&tag=contentMain;conten
tBody


"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 9:05 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


For the most part I think Mr. Stein hits the nail on the head.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 12:07 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Sorry, this is basic economics. Look around. Read and pay attention. Lowering of the nation's credit rating is what's at stake here.



So tell Congress to quit fucking around and pass a one-page bill to raise the debt ceiling, the way they've done over 70 times since Kennedy took office.

The only way our credit rating tanks is if they don't do something.

Simple.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 12:33 PM

LILI

Doing it backwards. Walking up the downslide.


Yes, I think a great deal of money could be saved if we pulled all our troops out of the 200+ countries they're hanging around in. Maintaining those presences has to be expensive.
Oh, wait, that's not allowed, is it?
So what, exactly, could be cut to lower the deficit? What else has that much money tied up in it? Social Security and Medicare have a good deal of cash tied up in them. So, hey, screw those people who need support and medicine in their old age, right? That's a much better idea than eliminating some of the military presence, right? Because that way, soldiers are stuck away from home and there's no support or health care; everybody loses! Hooray!


Facts are stubborn things.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 12:40 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
One, you have not come close to showing how reducing the deficit helps the economy.

Two, increase revenues in some ways will not stop or slow economic growth. To deep of cuts in programs will.

Three, since you think it is a non-issue I will take it that you are conceding.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.




Well, if you lower the deficit by reducing spending...you stop the FED from printing money, thus slowing inflation(which is a tax on lower and middle class families)...Bang. Simply put. One + one = two

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:03 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by LiLi:
Yes, I think a great deal of money could be saved if we pulled all our troops out of the 200+ countries they're hanging around in. Maintaining those presences has to be expensive.
Oh, wait, that's not allowed, is it?




We, the PEOPLE, seems to agree on this, at least some what. And yet, whether Dems or Republicans are in charge in D.C., not much ever gets done.


Why is that ?


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:04 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

The stimulus failed. Miserably. Don't take my word for it...


What you're quoting relates to the Fed's Quantative Easing (QE) program - NOT Obama's stimulus package. Just so we're clear.

Obama's stimulus has undoubtedly saved jobs and increased GDP in the short run. Economists disagree by how much. I don't know that I would say the Stimulus has 'failed', but it's definitely not been as effective as hoped for. And of course many economists think it should have been bigger.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:14 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Well, if you lower the deficit by reducing spending...you stop the FED from printing money

I query this bit... the aim of the Fed's QE was to boost the economy - not to pay down the debt.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:16 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
We, the PEOPLE, seems to agree on this, at least some what. And yet, whether Dems or Republicans are in charge in D.C., not much ever gets done.


Why is that ?


Because no one has the balls or the ability to MAKE THEM - but rememeber, WE are the sovereigns, not them, they work for US, in theory, not vice versa.

But none of "us" is willing to take things far enough out of fear of staring down the gunbarrels of our own so-called protectors.

Why you think I work against them - remove that roadblock, and those bastards would be out on their ear before the weekend.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:23 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

The stimulus failed. Miserably. Don't take my word for it...


What you're quoting relates to the Fed's Quantative Easing (QE) program - NOT Obama's stimulus package. Just so we're clear.

Obama's stimulus has undoubtedly saved jobs and increased GDP in the short run. Economists disagree by how much. I don't know that I would say the Stimulus has 'failed', but it's definitely not been as effective as hoped for. And of course many economists think it should have been bigger.

It's not personal. It's just war.



Correct.

But the point I'm trying to make is, that the stimulus, as you agree, failed to bring us the 'summer of recovery' in '10 and '11, which was so gloriously predicted.

Most of the $ went to a few, likely undeserving areas, and the rest of it was basically flushed down the toilet. And that which did help... at what cost ?


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:34 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Well, if you lower the deficit by reducing spending...you stop the FED from printing money, thus slowing inflation(which is a tax on lower and middle class families)...Bang. Simply put. One + one = two



Well except for the fact that we have not had high inflation rates for many, many years. In fact the danger at the beginning of the crisis was deflation not inflation.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:38 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

But the point I'm trying to make is, that the stimulus, as you agree, failed to bring us the 'summer of recovery' in '10 and '11, which was so gloriously predicted.

Most of the $ went to a few, likely undeserving areas, and the rest of it was basically flushed down the toilet. And that which did help... at what cost ?



Well that money went to someone, they most likely spent it at least some of it, so explain to me how the money was "flushed down the toilet".

....plus remember that hindsight is always 20/20.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:38 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Ben Stein, noted conservative pundit, had an interesting take on it this morning on CBS:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7375118n&tag=contentMain;conten
tBody


"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill



That was very balanced, and well said. I would like to hear a proper, economics critique of Obama's 'wild' spending though.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:49 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Most of the $ went to a few, likely undeserving areas, and the rest of it was basically flushed down the toilet.

Well I wouldn't know about that, but I've read some liberal economists who basically agree - that the stimulus money went in wrong (ineffective) areas. The fact that the current recovery is so anaemic shows that either the original impact of the financial crisis was underestimated, or that the efficacy of the stimulus plan was overestimated. I'm inclined to think a bit of both.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 4:57 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Well, if you lower the deficit by reducing spending...you stop the FED from printing money, thus slowing inflation(which is a tax on lower and middle class families)...Bang. Simply put. One + one = two



Well except for the fact that we have not had high inflation rates for many, many years. In fact the danger at the beginning of the crisis was deflation not inflation.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.



Well, because we keep changing the CPI. If we use the old one(you know the one that takes basic needs such as food and energy into account) inflation is 9% this year and rising. They can play a shell game and fool you, but I was not born yesturday. If you think inflation has not been a problem...go grocery shopping or fill your tank. you scare me

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 5:24 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Gas price hikes are not related to inflation the way you're describing it. Gas prices go up because oil companies can raise gas prices. The top oil companies have made over $900 billion in PROFITS in the last decade. Nearly a trillion dollars just in PROFITS.

You're getting soaked at the pump because basically, what the fuck else are you going to do? Drive a Nissan Leaf?

There is no shortage of gas. There is no shortage of oil. The oil companies will use every opportunity to make you THINK there are shortages: Hurricane in the Gulf! Oil spill! Summer travel season! Winter heating oil season! Shortages of seasonal blends! Unrest in Egypt! Unrest in Libya!

Ever notice the patterns? Prices spike during a "crisis" or a "shortage", and prices rise by a dollar or two for a couple weeks, causing a panic, and causing people to burn 3 or 4 gallons of gas trolling around looking for the cheapest gas so they can save maybe 3 cents a gallon. Then after a couple weeks, prices come down 15 cents or so and stabilize, and everybody breathes a big sigh of relief because, WHEW! - THAT was a close one, but prices are cheap now, right?!

Then a couple months later, prices drop another dime, and people celebrate by buying new full-sized SUVs and the latest Buick Bloatmaster 9000XXL.

Then prices spike, those folks complain and bitch and piss and moan, and the cycle begins anew. "But gas is $4 a gallon under Obama! He raised gas prices!" Yeah? I remember it hitting $5 a gallon under Bush, so Obama lowered gas prices 20%, eh?

Seriously, if you think the price of gas has anything to do with inflation or the economy in general, you're freaking delusional. And if you're following their idiotic logic in making your decisions, then you deserve whatever fucking they give you.



"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, July 31, 2011 8:00 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Eff the Nissan Leaf, I want a VW Polo Bluemotion with SVO conversion, Hybrid modification, and a solar cell roof.

By our best calcultions, 128mpg on a gallon of vegentable oil, which is damn skippy.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 5:29 AM

DREAMTROVE


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
For the most part I think Mr. Stein hits the nail on the head.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.



I generally think Ben Stein is a dick, but I'm listening now. This guy blames evolution for the holocaust.


Lili on the Ron Paul page? Wasn't expecting that. Only a couple of things to add to that: 2/3 of all social security money goes to millionaires, and about the same amount of medicare goes to prescription overcharges* yet no politician ever seems to want to make those two cuts to save us the trillion and a half or so that we're short.

* The overcharges are when a drug company has one price that they sell to public institutions such as the department of veterans affairs or the govt. of Canada, (and also often private corporations like Walmart or Hannaford) which is not cost, but a solid profit; and then they have a second price which they sell to medicare because medicare has no negotiation policy. Sometimes the gap is radical, like $7 a bottle to the VA and $700 a bottle to medicare. One govt, one company, one product, two radically different prices. What sense does that make? Aside from the obvious "rip 'em off because we can."

Oh, and the drugs are overwhelmingly not great new discoveries, but old drugs, or meaningless twists on old drugs done to get a new patent. There are things out there like "Combivent" Yes, two already out of patent protection tradition drugs, together, in one bottle. How in the world is that "a new drug?"

So, yeah, sure, we can slash spending and solve the problem overnight. No work is needed to introduce "negotiation" pricing, because those prices are already set for veterans. No work is needed for cutting welfare to millionaires, their assets are already recorded. Just stop sending out the checks.

Now, dealing with the deficit? Just look around and see who else is getting free checks, like banks, oil companies, war profiteers who don't actually supply anything that we use in war, contracting firms who subcontract in toto (Seriously, this is going on: We pay Mr. X $100 billion and he subcontracts his entire contract to Ms. Y for $10 billion, and keeps $90 billion. Why don't we just fire Mr. X and hire Ms. Y?)

ETA,

Suprised to see Rap on this same page, and Frem agreeing with them both. It's another spontaneous agreement.

Here's something I noticed that has been somewhat effective: Start from the other end. Make the locals unhappy with the American presence so they kick us out.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 5:34 AM

DREAMTROVE


Mike,

Check out a graph of oil prices. It's uncanny. Almost everything most presidents do raise oil prices.

They were at $35 when Bush took office, went up to $100, $35 when Obama took office, went up to $100, and you can see the same thing with Ford and Carter.
Right now, our wars, "revolution fever," the ban on offshore drilling and our sanctions on Iran are kicking up prices. Oil is not rare, they kick up the price by limiting supply. It's like the complete opposite of supply side economics.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 6:42 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:

I generally think Ben Stein is a dick, but I'm listening now. This guy blames evolution for the holocaust




Whoah, huh????

Where does he ever say THAT ??

Ben's right, of course. Sorta. Clinton left us in good shape, had things stayed more or less the same. But that rarely happens in the real world. The dot com bubble burst, the attacks of 9/11, the two resulting wars AND the sub prime crisis , caused almost entirely by the Dems, are what happens in the REAL world.

Supply side economics does work, but it needs prudent, sensible spending to go along w/ the tax cuts for the achievers. Had Congress been able to wisely spend our money, and not run up the credit bill to the moon and back, we'd be in damn good shape.

The morons in D.C., from both parties, have been kicking the can down the road, gettin' theirs while the getting is good. This latest plan does pretty much more of the same. PROMISES of spending cuts which future Congresses aren't in the least bit obligated to follow. Looks fine on paper, but in the REAL world, it's crap.

The only advances we have on this issue are that which the TEA party has demanded. With out them, we may very well be toast. ( still might be anyways, but at least they're giving us a chance )


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 6:55 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Well that money went to someone, they most likely spent it at least some of it, so explain to me how the money was "flushed down the toilet".

....plus remember that hindsight is always 20/20.



Money flushed down a toilet refers to needless, pointless projects which end up costing us more than they contribute back.

Building a bridge to no where, or an airport which isn't needed and rarely has any flights.

Those are examples of how our govt wastes our money. Sure, you get a bunch of construction and a finished project ( hopefully ) but then what ? If they result in some how generating more business and tax revenue, then fine. But if not, they're just white elephants. Useless , one time flurry of spending, which then ends up being a tax DRAIN, for maintenance and staffing costs, with out paying for themselves.

And it's not hindsight when folks warn you in advance. Same goes for ObamaCare. It's a disaster, and will end up costing this country big time, unless we can erase that mistake in the next election.



" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 7:23 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Ben's right, of course. Sorta. Clinton left us in good shape, had things stayed more or less the same. But that rarely happens in the real world. The dot com bubble burst, the attacks of 9/11, the two resulting wars AND the sub prime crisis , caused almost entirely by the Dems, are what happens in the REAL world.



The dot com bubble was because of a lack of regulation in a new market. 9/11 that is trickier, but wasn't it the Reagan Doctrine that gave weapons to groups in that area?

The war in Iraq was not necessary or justified. The sub prime crisis can be traced back to one act. The repeal of the Glass Steagall Act.

Quote:

Supply side economics does work, but it needs prudent, sensible spending to go along w/ the tax cuts for the achievers. Had Congress been able to wisely spend our money, and not run up the credit bill to the moon and back, we'd be in damn good shape.


No it doesn't, it has always been supported by massive deficit spending. Even when Clinton balanced the budget part of that was rolling SS funds into general revenue. Not a huge reduction of spending.

Quote:

The morons in D.C., from both parties, have been kicking the can down the road, gettin' theirs while the getting is good. This latest plan does pretty much more of the same. PROMISES of spending cuts which future Congresses aren't in the least bit obligated to follow. Looks fine on paper, but in the REAL world, it's crap.


I agree with you on this.

Quote:

The only advances we have on this issue are that which the TEA party has demanded. With out them, we may very well be toast. ( still might be anyways, but at least they're giving us a chance )



You do have a point, the ridiculous demands of the Tea Party have forced the issue.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 7:25 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Money flushed down a toilet refers to needless, pointless projects which end up costing us more than they contribute back.

Building a bridge to no where, or an airport which isn't needed and rarely has any flights.

Those are examples of how our govt wastes our money. Sure, you get a bunch of construction and a finished project ( hopefully ) but then what ? If they result in some how generating more business and tax revenue, then fine. But if not, they're just white elephants. Useless , one time flurry of spending, which then ends up being a tax DRAIN, for maintenance and staffing costs, with out paying for themselves.

And it's not hindsight when folks warn you in advance. Same goes for ObamaCare. It's a disaster, and will end up costing this country big time, unless we can erase that mistake in the next election.



Even that money helps that economy, it still puts money in peoples pockets because people are needed to build those useless projects.

Also Heath Care Reform will save money, until you have a better source then the Congressional Budget Office your wrong.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 7:32 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:

Even that money helps that economy, it still puts money in peoples pockets because people are needed to build those useless projects.

Also Heath Care Reform will save money, until you have a better source then the Congressional Budget Office your wrong.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.



It didn't help the economy, and that's the point you're refusing to acknowledge. Those useless projects are built, folks are paid, and then the job is done. Those folks stop getting paid. It's like the " 100,000" cops lie , during the Clinton years. Fed $ was given , for a time. Then, when that $ ran out, there were lay offs because the local govts couldn't continue to pay for all those they had hired.

There was no recovery. It only has made matters worse.

No massive govt program has EVER saved this country any money, and yes, the scoring by the CBO is wrong. Sorry.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 7:36 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Actually, what we need is money that is paid to US workers and stays a little longer in the US economy, for example, projects which not only pay US workers but require US materials.

But according to rappy, since injecting money ANYWHERE into the economy is doomed to failure, we should have never done the TARP either.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 7:50 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
It didn't help the economy, and that's the point you're refusing to acknowledge. Those useless projects are built, folks are paid, and then the job is done. Those folks stop getting paid. It's like the " 100,000" cops lie , during the Clinton years. Fed $ was given , for a time. Then, when that $ ran out, there were lay offs because the local govts couldn't continue to pay for all those they had hired.

There was no recovery. It only has made matters worse.

No massive govt program has EVER saved this country any money, and yes, the scoring by the CBO is wrong. Sorry.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "



Yes the people where let go when the projects where done. You know what that points to, the stimulus was not big enough. The thing is most economist who are not right wing shills agree that the stimulus did have a positive effect, even if small.

Your statement just shows your ignorance regarding health care reform.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 7:56 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



The TEA party is saving the country here. Were it not for them, we'd be done as a nation


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 8:57 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


If the Tea Party get what they want we will still be a nation, a third world one, but still a nation.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 9:36 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


There's no arguing facts with (c)Rappy. Worse than them simply bouncing off the rim, facts only make his delusions stronger.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/07/11/how_facts_
backfire
/

HOW FACTS BACKFIRE

Recently, a few political scientists have begun to discover a human tendency deeply discouraging to anyone with faith in the power of information. It’s this: Facts don’t necessarily have the power to change our minds. In fact, quite the opposite. In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even STRONGER.(emphasis in original)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 10:46 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
If the Tea Party get what they want we will still be a nation, a third world one, but still a nation.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.



That's what Obama and the Dems want...to fundamentally transform this nation. From a super-power to a 3rd world nation, an also ran. It's what Libs have always (wrongly ) believed, that if the US were less strong, less of a threat, then there'd be less violence and aggression in the world, by terrorists and other countries.

There's always been violence and aggression in the world. A strong US is what keeps most of that violence at bay.



" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 10:58 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
There's no arguing facts with (c)Rappy. Worse than them simply bouncing off the rim, facts only make his delusions stronger.original)



Dunning-Kruger. Look into it , why don't you.

But Reagan put it best...

" It's not that Liberals are ignorant. But so much of what they 'know' isn't true "

He was more right than we ever knew.

And w/ regards to the link you provided...

Quote:


There are also some cases where directness works. Kuklinski’s welfare study suggested that people will actually update their beliefs if you hit them “between the eyes” with bluntly presented, objective facts that contradict their preconceived ideas.




The 'direct' approach is often what I tend to present here. Guess I'm not hitting hard enough ?



" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 11:47 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


"I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man." Every time I read that, I sigh and think "boy, you got THAT right". Sigh... especially when it comes to the bullshit-swallowers like Raptor and the Tea Party!
Quote:

But the point I'm trying to make is, that the stimulus, as you agree, failed to bring us the 'summer of recovery' in '10 and '11, which was so gloriously predicted.

Most of the $ went to a few, likely undeserving areas, and the rest of it was basically flushed down the toilet. And that which did help... at what cost ?

-- as usual. As of 2009:
Quote:

economists say that the president’s $787 billion stimulus package has helped blunt the downturn in limited but discernible ways.

A report card on the stimulus plan offered by analysts nearly six months after it was passed by Congress suggests that the punch from increased government spending has helped the economy begin to bottom out faster than it would have otherwise. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/07/business/economy/07stimulus.html

Raptor: "There was no recovery. It only has made matters worse." Again with the "you can't prove a negative", Raptor will always be comfortable saying the stimulus failed and cost too much. It's a useless debate to have with him because the stimulus just SLOWED the downturn and, as said, almost all economists said it didn't do as much as hoped because it was TOO SMALL...for which we can thank the Republicans.

Isn't there a corollary here? With Woodroe Wilson and the current mess?
Quote:

Virtually nothing was done while Herbert Hoover was in office from 1928-1932, and Roosevelt didn't assume the presidency until the Great Depression had been underway for almost four years. In Roosevelt’s “First Hundred Days,” he implemented a number of regulations and programs, but problems were so widespread at that point, that it took many more years for the economy to stabilize and recover. http://www.economicstimulusdetails.com/the-great-depression.html
That's the other unproveable negative. The wonderfully convenient talking point for the right is that Obama didn't FIX the whole mess in, what, three years? Took Bush (and previous presidents) TEN years to get us in this fix, but by gawd, Obama should have totally fixed it in less than two and a half, or he failed completely--so obviously he failed completely.

Good luck; neither of those FACTS will ever penetrate Raptor's desperately-held beliefs.

Also:
Quote:

There are similarities between Great Depression economic crisis and today’s economic crisis:

•both were fueled by speculation and leverage-buying (in stocks in the Great Depression, in houses in today’s recession);

•both were worsened by bank troubles (from a run on banks in the Great Depression, from a weakening of banks because of poor lending practices in today’s recession);

•both were expanded by high unemployment rates, which led to drops in consumer confidence, which led to less purchasing, which led to higher unemployment rates;

•both spread to a global crisis, with America’s troubles leading to worldwide troubles and visa versa.

The main difference today is that there’s been quicker response and more decisive action. (Same source)

I find that interesting...to the best of my knowledge, the "haves" gained from both situations...I wonder if they might have been involved? (Just joking there, we all know they HAVE been!)
Quote:

Now, dealing with the deficit? Just look around and see who else is getting free checks, like banks, oil companies, war profiteers who don't actually supply anything that we use in war, contracting firms who subcontract in toto (Seriously, this is going on: We pay Mr. X $100 billion and he subcontracts his entire contract to Ms. Y for $10 billion, and keeps $90 billion. Why don't we just fire Mr. X and hire Ms. Y?)
I wholeheartedly agree; shame we can't make them do just that!
Quote:

If they result in some how generating more business and tax revenue, then fine. But if not, they're just white elephants. Useless , one time flurry of spending, which then ends up being a tax DRAIN, for maintenance and staffing costs, with out paying for themselves.
Leaving out pork, it appears Raptor is against building or repairing roads, bridges, etc. Because exactly that stimulus he's knocking is happening all over THIS county, doing things we've needed done for decades. They'll never pay for themselves, nor generate tax revenue, so obviously they're useless. Uh..huh. Ask the people of Marin about that!
Quote:

The morons in D.C., from both parties, have been kicking the can down the road, gettin' theirs while the getting is good. This latest plan does pretty much more of the same. PROMISES of spending cuts which future Congresses aren't in the least bit obligated to follow.
I too agree, but only with the first part. This new proposal is to get a commission to cut still further (they're trying to convince the Dems that SOME "revenue" can be in there, but obviously that won't fly with an equally-represented commission, the Repubs will simply say "no"). So if spending cuts in the amount they want DON'T happen, it's set up so either a Balanced Budget Amendment is passed OR a couple of trillion are whacked off the top. So you get yours, Raptor (and you'll regret it), either way, with no new revenue. Except it bloody well better NOT pass...it's a complete gimme.

Ahhh, yes: Facts. As I do my usual and go back to The Authoritarians. Re: Facts:
Quote:

....simply bounces off their hardened position. You might as well talk to a brick wall. Thus authoritarian followers may really mean it when they say no discoveries or facts could change their beliefs about the important things in life.... They are easily incited, easily led, rather un-inclined to think for themselves, largely impervious to facts and reason, and rely instead on social support to maintain their beliefs.
Sound familiar?

Those last posts illustrate perfectly why responding to Raptor is an exercise in futility. I only bothered where it was entertaining, or for the benefit of and communication with OTHERS.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 12:01 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



I love how Niki continues to ignore me.


Crassic


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 12:18 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Money flushed down a toilet refers to needless, pointless projects which end up costing us more than they contribute back.


Yeah, dumbass shit like wars, not just the overseas adventurism, but on 'terror', or 'drugs' - which costs us freedoms too.

But since you're OKAY with those, what are you bitching about, then ?

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 12:48 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
That's what Obama and the Dems want...to fundamentally transform this nation. From a super-power to a 3rd world nation, an also ran. It's what Libs have always (wrongly ) believed, that if the US were less strong, less of a threat, then there'd be less violence and aggression in the world, by terrorists and other countries.



Oh, so to save the world they want to make the US a 3rd world nation. Funny, I don't remember that in any of the meetings or pamphlets.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 12:57 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I love how Niki continues to ignore me.



I'm thinking about ignoring you too.

One study even shows that conservatives will argue and believe misinformation even when shown it to be wrong.

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/nyhan-reifler.pdf

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 1:07 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

But since you're OKAY with those, what are you bitching about, then ?



Been saying the " war on drugs " has been lost, for quite some time now.

Try and keep up. If ya can.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 1:17 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
That's what Obama and the Dems want...to fundamentally transform this nation. From a super-power to a 3rd world nation, an also ran. It's what Libs have always (wrongly ) believed, that if the US were less strong, less of a threat, then there'd be less violence and aggression in the world, by terrorists and other countries.



Oh, so to save the world they want to make the US a 3rd world nation. Funny, I don't remember that in any of the meetings or pamphlets.




Then you weren't paying attention.

Look at Obama's back ground, the company that he keeps.

From the writings of Saul Alinsky, to the 20 + years in the pews of Rev Wright, to William Ayers...



Mr ' At some point, you've made enough money ', who thinks it's up to him to spread the wealth around... as HE sees fit.

yeah, how's that workin' out for America so far ?


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 1:22 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Then you weren't paying attention.

Look at Obama's back ground, the company that he keeps.

From the writings of Saul Alinsky, to the 20 + years in the pews of Rev Wright, to William Ayers...



Mr ' At some point, you've made enough money ', who thinks it's up to him to spread the wealth around... as HE sees fit.

yeah, how's that workin' out for American so far ?



Perhaps you should read them, instead of listening to what Glen Beck tells you.

Who is he to spread the wealth, the President of the United States. I told you before redistribution of wealth is what governments do. Right now it is just going to the rich.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 1:28 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


No little bitty man, I mock you, and I respond to what you write to correct you so OTHERS can read it if they're interested. You're not capable of understanding logic or facts, and only good for making fun of.

Nick, any time you finally decide to stop trying to get through to him, please feel free to give up like the rest of us and just mock his insanity. MUCH more fun than the frustration of clinging to the hope that somehow he'll "get it" or talk sense, trust me. You see, you can respond to the idiocy he writes and correct it for the rest of us, but now that you know it will never get through, it's much more entertaining to make fun of him.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 1, 2011 1:39 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Then you weren't paying attention.

Look at Obama's back ground, the company that he keeps.

From the writings of Saul Alinsky, to the 20 + years in the pews of Rev Wright, to William Ayers...



Mr ' At some point, you've made enough money ', who thinks it's up to him to spread the wealth around... as HE sees fit.

yeah, how's that workin' out for American so far ?



Perhaps you should read them, instead of listening to what Glen Beck tells you.

Who is he to spread the wealth, the President of the United States. I told you before redistribution of wealth is what governments do. Right now it is just going to the rich.




I'm well enough versed in the America hating, socialist teachings of Obama's heroes.

Show me where in the US Constitution that it's the job of the President to "spread the wealth".

I'll wait.

And while you're at it, show me where in the constitution that it's the job of the govt to redistribute the wealth.

"It" is being EARNED by those who work for IT the most. The govt should focus more on what it's suppose to do, and not re-engineer the socio-economic landscape of the country.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL