REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

A remaining realm of American excellence

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 16:08
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1792
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, October 22, 2011 4:32 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Glenn Greenwald has written another excellent article that I felt is important to pass along.

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/22/a_remaining_realm_of_american_excellen
ce
/

Quote:

When President Obama announced the killing of Osama bin Laden on the evening of May 1, he said something which I found so striking at the time and still do: “tonight, we are once again reminded that America can do whatever we set our mind to. That is the story of our history.” That sentiment of national pride had in the past been triggered by putting a man on the moon, or discovering cures for diseases, or creating technology that improved the lives of millions, or transforming the Great Depression into a thriving middle class, or correcting America’s own entrenched injustices. Yet here was President Obama proclaiming that what should now cause us to be “reminded” of our national greatness was our ability to hunt someone down, pump bullets into his skull, and then dump his corpse into the ocean. And indeed, outside the White House and elsewhere, hordes of Americans were soon raucously celebrating the killing with “USA! USA!” chants as though their sports team had just won a major championship.

....snip....

It is difficult to articulate exactly why, but there is something very significant about a nation that so continuously finds purpose and joy in the corpses its government produces, while finding it in so little else. During the Bush years, I frequently wrote about how repetitive, endless fear-mongering over Terrorism and the authoritarian radicalism justified in its name was changing — infecting and degrading — not just America’s policies but its national character. Among other things, this constant fixation on alleged threats produces the mindset that once the government decrees someone to be a Bad Guy, then anything and everything done to them (or ostensibly done to stop them) is not merely justified but is cause for celebration. That was the mentality that justified renditions, Guantanamo, vast illegal domestic surveillance, aggressive war against Iraq, and the worldwide torture regime: unless you support the Terrorists and Saddam, how could you oppose any of that?

....snip....



I hope you guys get to read the entire article. I am worried about America's national character, as it were. What is happening to us? How can we change and heal?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 22, 2011 4:56 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Yet here was President Obama proclaiming that what should now cause us to be “reminded” of our national greatness was our ability to hunt someone down, pump bullets into his skull, and then dump his corpse into the ocean.
And we have the chutzpah to scold Iran for trying to assassinate people, when it is our current tool of choice for statecraft? Has nobody understood the irony of that????

Anyway, CTS, our "national character" has already been corrupted by the fact that we have been an empire for decades. Not only an empire, but an empire in denial about what it is and what it does.

I thought it was very interesting that people were very happy that Kadafi was killed, but upset over the fact that the media showed his moments just before death, and his dead body, over and over.

You spoiled my dinner! was a pretty common refrain.

Heh.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 22, 2011 4:59 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

Yet here was President Obama proclaiming that what should now cause us to be “reminded” of our national greatness was our ability to hunt someone down, pump bullets into his skull, and then dump his corpse into the ocean.
And we have the chutzpah to scold Iran for trying to assassinate people, when it is our current tool of choice for statecraft? Has nobody understood the irony of that????
Heh.



No, not really. Considering who Iran's leaders are, the terrorism they're engaged in, and all. They should be scolded. And severely. I just find it curious that Obama didn't support freedom in Iran , and yet is all a flutter over supporting anarchy over here.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I just find it curious that Obama didn't support freedom in Iran , and yet is all a flutter over supporting anarchy over here.
Obama is supporting anarchy here???

Just in the other thread, weren't you saying that Obama was getting a lot of money from Wall Street? Or the one about Obama being sympathetic to Muslims? Or the other idea that Obama is destroying our freedoms?

I have to know, rappy... do your ideas EVER meet each other and check each other out for logical consistency? Or do they each wander the lonely space that describes your brain, encased in bubbles which guarantee that none of them will ever contact any of your other thoughts? Because the multiplicity of contradictory sound-bites that fill your brain... seems to me that if they ever cross-reacted, they'd cause a meltdown or something!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 22, 2011 10:38 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Posted by Rappy:

Considering who Iran's leaders are, the terrorism they're engaged in, and all. They should be scolded. And severely.



There are those around the world who say the exact same things about us. And with just as much justification.



"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, October 22, 2011 12:22 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Ditto Mike...but you and Sig are once again trying to talk sense to one incapable of sense, common or otherwise. Waste of time...his obvious dichotomy about virtually EVERYTHING, depending on which side says/does it, so completely overrides everything else, "talking" to him is like hitting your head against a brick wall.

I'll keep right on saying it, in the hopes that maybe someday I can convince you to ignore him as some of the rest of us do; if ignored, perhaps he'll go away, perhaps some good voices will come back, perhaps threads wouldn't devolve into "Raptor getting attention by being an ass and Sig/Mike/whoever responding to his every idiotic statement". Any of the three would be lovely.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:35 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Okay, so my dad and I were talking about Osama earlier today. Do you guys remember that heli crash that killed all those guys right after the Osama killing situation? How many of those guys were part of SEAL team 6? And the media sure hushed that whole thing up fast, we hardly heard about it when it should have been a big thing. My dad wonders if the government allowed those guys to get hit for some reason. I'm not saying that I believe that persay, just wondering if anyone knows more about it than I. Because it is suspicious sounding when you look at it sideways, or even if you look at it frontways.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 3:07 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by RionaEire:
Because it is suspicious sounding when you look at it sideways, or even if you look at it frontways.

Esp when the AP reported that most of the heli fatalities were members of the Seal Team 6, which was the branch that killed Osama.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/06/seal-team-6-marines-who-killed-o
sama-bin-laden-died-in-helicopter-crash-ap
/

But later CNN said none of the heli Seal Team 6 members were members of the Osama team.

So... you weren't the only one thinking the same thing. They felt they had to clarify and address it on CNN.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 3:24 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:]

There are those around the world who say the exact same things about us. And with just as much justification.





Only there is zero justification , at all. True, there are those who want to destroy this country, and what it stands for, simply because a weakened USA is the best way to grow socialism, or expand a global jihad. Either of which you'd probably prefer to freedom, until it arrives on your front door. Then you'll be crying how unfair it is, and there'll be no one left to help you.

Pity.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 3:31 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Quote:

I just find it curious that Obama didn't support freedom in Iran , and yet is all a flutter over supporting anarchy over here.
Obama is supporting anarchy here???

Just in the other thread, weren't you saying that Obama was getting a lot of money from Wall Street?




Obama’s key advantage over the GOP field is the ability to collect bigger checks because he raises money for both his own campaign committee and for the Democratic National Committee, which will aid in his reelection effort.

As a result, Obama has brought in more money from employees of banks, hedge funds and other financial service companies than all of the GOP candidates combined, according to a Washington Post analysis of contribution data. The numbers show that Obama retains a persistent reservoir of support among Democratic financiers who have backed him since he was an underdog presidential candidate four years ago…

Obama has raised a total of $15.6 million from employees in the industry, according to the Post analysis. Nearly $12 million of that went to the DNC, the analysis shows.

Romney has raised less than half that much from the industry, while Texas Gov. Rick Perry brought in about $2 million. No other Republican candidate has raised more than $402,000 from the finance sector, which also includes insurance and real estate interests.


http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/20/obamas-raised-more-money-for-dem
ocrats-from-wall-street-donors-than-all-republican-candidates-combined
/

Seems Obama is talking out of both sides of his mouth.

Quote:


Or the one about Obama being sympathetic to Muslims?



His biological father was Muslim, in case you missed that. He was raised Muslim, early in life, then ( sort of ) chose to be a Christian.

Quote:

Or the other idea that Obama is destroying our freedoms?

I have to know, rappy... do your ideas EVER meet each other and check each other out for logical consistency? Or do they each wander the lonely space that describes your brain, encased in bubbles which guarantee that none of them will ever contact any of your other thoughts? Because the multiplicity of contradictory sound-bites that fill your brain... seems to me that if they ever cross-reacted, they'd cause a meltdown or something!



Sorry, but you continue to ignore facts on the way to trying to vilify those with whom you disagree. One day, you'll see the light. Maybe.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 3:54 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Only there is zero justification , at all.


I'm not sure which implication of this to agree with, that our own justifications against nations that are hostile to us are also largely manufactured of late, or whether to agree that when it's your own people being shot at/killed/exploded and so on, that it is difficult to call terrorism on yourself, but very easy to call terrorism on the people who are shooting/killing/etc.

Ultimately we can't just call any act of hostility against us terrorism, and we can't call any form of justice involving corporeal and capital punishment terrorism, nor can we call the ALL of the acts of hostility we perpetrate on other groups terrorism. Rather, we must strictly define terrorism to mean an intent to cause civilian casualties for a political or ideological message. I'm still out to lunch on whether gross negligence, rogue soldiers, or failure to properly distinguish civilians from military targets can also constitute terrorism, but I am reasonably sure that US soldiers have participated in such actions.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 4:04 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
- but I am reasonably sure that US soldiers have participated in such actions.



Far more have participated in building schools, medical and water treatment facilities, homes, roads... But that's far less fun for the media to report about, or our enemies to demagogue, so we'll just ignore all that, huh?

My memory isn't so short that I don't recall what was being said about the US before Iraq and Afghanistan. Before the USS Cole was bombed, before the US Embassies in E. Africa, before 9/11, hell...even before the 1st Gulf War. Before all that the US was still being painted as the villain, as the global imperialists, blah blah blah... and we did nothing but send more $ and aid, and pretended such talk would just go away.

Those who have an interest in defeating the US, and what it stands for, aren't going away. They have to be SENT away.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 4:22 AM

BYTEMITE


You said that there was zero justification, whether more soldiers have built schools is irrelevant. One bad soldier is enough to create yet more hostility and enmity and perpetuate a cycle of violence. It makes all the US soldiers look bad. A large part of the wars we're fighting is PR, and killing civilians, accidentally or not, is bad PR.

Unfortunately, we're up against almost a century of putting up governments (like the Shaw) that exist only for our benefit and screw over the population under their jurisdiction. So we have an uphill battle ahead of us convincing them that we aren't there for selfish motivations, or that aid we send isn't just to buy people off. Angry populations who believe they have been wronged have long memories.

I am pleased that you also have zero tolerance for Americans targeting civilian populations.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 5:36 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Those who have an interest in defeating the US, and what it stands for, aren't going away. They have to be SENT away.
Where are you going to "send" them to? Their own countries?

Don't forget, rappy, we are in THEIR countries, not the other way around. Int the last few hundred years, we have only been "defeated" when we have occupied a nation, not because someone else has invaded. When they come HERE... when we have Saudi troops occupying military bases in Texas and Iranian troops quartered in Seattle... then you have a point. But not until then.


Also, the idea that all we were doing is sending aid is inexcusably naive, especially for someone who believes that "we" have the fundamental "right" to be in any country, anywhere, at any time, and that anybody who objects has to be "sent away".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 6:30 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Rather, we must strictly define terrorism to mean an intent to cause civilian casualties for a political or ideological message.

Yes.

Or not use "terrorism" as a label at all. Right now, "terrorism" just means when you kill civilians, you're evil. When I kill civilians, it is collateral damage in the pursuit of freedom and self-defense. "Terrorism" is the political equivalent of "asshole." Everyone has one, but somehow, yours stinks, but mine is ok.

I've been watching a History Channel series on American history on DVD with my kids. They don't want to watch it anymore, because the entire successful history of America was built with the blood of Indians, slaves, Mexicans, fellow Americans, and all the people we went to war with. They are tired of learning about all the people--civilians--we've killed.

When will we be tired of killing them to begin with?




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 6:32 AM

CANTTAKESKY


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Where are you going to "send" them to?

Rap means send them away to the afterlife.

If some farmer in Indonesia is interested in defeating the US--say he daydreams about it--he needs to be "sent away." This from someone who says there is zero justification behind accusing the US of terrorism, or "sending away" civilians for political/ideological gain.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 6:42 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Yes, I know. But I was trying to make the point that they are in their own country so the only place left for us to "send" them to IS the afterlife. That is the position you wind up being in when you assume that you have the right to invade anywhere at any time, and that anyone who objects is automatically an enemy.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 9:28 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Yes, I know. But I was trying to make the point that they are in their own country so the only place left for us to "send" them to IS the afterlife. That is the position you wind up being in when you assume that you have the right to invade anywhere at any time, and that anyone who objects is automatically an enemy.



Germany exists w/ out NAZIs. Japan exists still , even with an Emperor, with out an expansionist military.

Yes, send the radicals to the afterlife, and allow the sane, free loving people to govern their home. Seems like a fairly straight forward concept.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 9:40 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Yes, send the radicals to the afterlife
But many of the people who are fighting us are not radicals. They just want us out of their country. Wouldn't you want to get rid of anyone who occupied our country? That doesn't make YOU a radical, does it?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 10:31 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


allow the sane, free loving people to govern their home.


Like most of my generation, I believe in FREE LOVE. The commercial kind is too expensive. But in this disease ridden age, ya gotta be REAL careful about safe sex. and that's pretty sane.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 10:34 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Clearly, I meant 'freedom' loving, but with respect to companioning, as long as it's between consenting adults, why not ? Some sort of a guild might be preferable.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 1:33 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Bytemite:
- but I am reasonably sure that US soldiers have participated in such actions.



Far more have participated in building schools, medical and water treatment facilities, homes, roads... But that's far less fun for the media to report about, or our enemies to demagogue, so we'll just ignore all that, huh?




Why not? After all, you are completely willing to ignore the fact that far more Muslims have participated in peaceful acts than have acted as terrorists. Instead, you'll just demagogue the bad actions of a few, while completely ignoring those few "bad apples" in your country.

The "justifications" you use for labeling people "terrorists" and then torturing and killing them, others can just as easily use on many Americans as well. By your reckoning, that makes them fair targets. Once again, soldiers at Fort Hood? "Enemy combatants", in the eyes of many, and therefore, legitimate targets. Contractors and private companies that support the war effort? Legitimate targets. CEOs? Targets.





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 1:35 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Germany exists w/ out NAZIs. Japan exists still , even with an Emperor, with out an expansionist military.




Sounds like there's hope for America after all!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 1:53 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


So, the SEAL team 6 members who died in that crash weren't the ones who were part of the kill Osama group? Because that is a much less conspiratorial reason that it hasn't been covered very much on the news. I still think its stupid to have the best of the best flying low enough that such things are likely to happen, getting RPGed etc.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 3:26 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by RionaEire:
So, the SEAL team 6 members who died in that crash weren't the ones who were part of the kill Osama group? Because that is a much less conspiratorial reason that it hasn't been covered very much on the news. I still think its stupid to have the best of the best flying low enough that such things are likely to happen, getting RPGed etc.



Gibb's Rule #39 - There is no such thing as 'coincidence'.

And Kwickie, how DO you live in a country which you absolutely hate, with a white hot passion?

Man, that must really suck.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 4:45 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Clearly, I meant 'freedom' loving .."

Why is there always such a large gap between what little Rappy posts and reality? Just curious ...


EVERY SINGLE YEAR BETWEEN 1996 AND 2005 66% OF ALL FCDS CORPORATIONS PAID NO TAXES.
I think the current tax structure is about right for corporations. - Geezer


Without the benefit of the surrounding society, a corporation dies. If society looks at a corporation and says 'work, or die', what work should be demanded of the corporation for it to earn its survival?

While Wall St. is going through the roof, Main St. is paying all the bills.

Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in taxpayer funded bailouts, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes?

Yeah, me neither....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 5:11 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"Clearly, I meant 'freedom' loving .."

Why is there always such a large gap between what little Rappy posts and reality? Just curious ...



Because your view or reality is up side down.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 24, 2011 7:55 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


And now little Rappy is trying to say that his post, which he himself said was wrong, is wrong not b/c HE got it wrong, but b/c I didn't see how it was REALLY right!

Mai gott. Could his brain GET and more twisted. Seriously. It really is quite a spectacle.




EVERY SINGLE YEAR BETWEEN 1996 AND 2005 66% OF ALL FCDS CORPORATIONS PAID NO TAXES.
I think the current tax structure is about right for corporations. - Geezer


Without the benefit of the surrounding society, a corporation dies. If society looks at a corporation and says 'work, or die', what work should be demanded of the corporation for it to earn its survival?

While Wall St. is going through the roof, Main St. is paying all the bills.

Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in taxpayer funded bailouts, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes?

Yeah, me neither....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:13 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


You're the one posting in rainbow bright colors.

Never said I was wrong, so I'm not sure why you're even trying to say here.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:22 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


And Kwickie, how DO you live in a country which you absolutely hate, with a white hot passion?

Man, that must really suck.




Guess it sucks to be you then, eh?

Quote:

Friday, September 24, 2010
I hate Obama's America. You're damn right about that.


Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.



Why DO you hate America so much, Rappy?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:08 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"You're the one posting in rainbow bright colors."

I'm so glad you noticed. As hobbies I paint landscapes, do photography, and design clothes. I LOVE colors and I went to a minor effort to select these. I'm just waiting for a good quotable quote to put in red.

And, oh yeah, you did say you were wrong. But hey, if you can't read YOUR OWN POSTS with understanding, that's OK with me!



EVERY SINGLE YEAR BETWEEN 1996 AND 2005 66% OF ALL FCDS CORPORATIONS PAID NO TAXES.
I think the current tax structure is about right for corporations. - Geezer


Without the benefit of the surrounding society, a corporation dies. If society looks at a corporation and says 'work, or die', what work should be demanded of the corporation for it to earn its survival?

While Wall St. is going through the roof, Main St. is paying all the bills.

Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in taxpayer funded bailouts, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes?

Yeah, me neither....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:41 - 943 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:23 - 421 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 06:28 - 4794 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, November 23, 2024 06:14 - 7491 posts
Idiot Democrat Wine Mom
Sat, November 23, 2024 05:26 - 1 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:40 - 11 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:33 - 41 posts
Biden admin quietly loosening immigration policies before Trump takes office — including letting migrants skip ICE check-ins in NYC
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:15 - 3 posts
RCP Average Continues to Be the Most Accurate in the Industry Because We Don't Weight Polls
Sat, November 23, 2024 00:46 - 1 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, November 22, 2024 23:52 - 4752 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:54 - 9 posts
Looks like Russians don't hold back
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:18 - 33 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL