Is Dexter a Fraud? by AnthonyT

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Is Dexter a Fraud?

POSTED BY: ANTHONYT
UPDATED: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 14:56
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1128
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, December 21, 2011 6:18 AM

Freedom is Important because People are Important

http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_c3#/video/bestoftv/2011/12/20/ac-tuch
man-murder-suicide-evidence.cnn

Hello,

I found this CNN video interesting. Apparently there is some doubt about the quality of blood spatter evidence in this murder case.

Perhaps this man did murder his wife, or perhaps he didn't, but it is interesting that the evidence in the case- the specific evidence used to convict- is in doubt.

--Anthony

_______________________________________________

"In every war, the state enacts a tax of freedom upon the citizenry. The unspoken promise is that the tax shall be revoked at war's end. Endless war holds no such promise. Hence, Eternal War is Eternal Slavery." --Admiral Robert J. Henner

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:33 AM

CANTTAKESKY

Yes, very interesting indeed. Thanks for sharing.

I think some aspects of blood splatter forensics is more reliable than others. For example, forward splatter would be more convincing than back splatter in this case.

This brings up the issue of paid expert testimony. It feels like 'justice' for hire to me.

-----
"Christmas is a time when kids tell Santa what they want and adults pay for it. Deficits are when adults tell the government what they want - and their kids pay for it." - Richard Lamm

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, December 21, 2011 9:37 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!

Science is a tool, nothing more. The problem here is, more weight is being given to 1 plausible explanation, than another explanation.

Was T.Rex a hunter, a scavenger, or a bit of both ? Despite all having the same evidence, not all paleontologists agree.

And yes, same goes for global warming, and a host of other issues.

So, no, I do not believe the science is wrong. It's us, who sometimes make the mistakes.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:56 PM

FREMDFIRMA

Oh don't even get me started - our "justice" systems misuse of science, pseudoscience and downright make-believe pretending to be science is legion.

From crime labs manufacturing or skewing evidence...

http://reason.com/blog/2010/01/13/more-problems-at-the-houston-c
http://truthinjustice.org/scandal-labs.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/30/north-carolina-crime-lab_n_88
7516.html
http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-03-28/news/20447406_1_drug-lab-crime-l
ab-lab-scandal
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/They-sit-in-prison-but-crime-la
b-tests-are-1139478.php

Note: DOZENS of these, and that's just the ones we know about.

Phony "Science" like bite-mark analysis or scent lineups, shady "ballistics"...

http://reason.com/archives/2009/05/15/a-forensics-charlatan-gets-cau
http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2010/09/dog-scent-lineups-discre
dited-at-tx.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,66007,00.html

Drug tests KNOWN to create false positives, and deliberately used to create them...

http://www.ndsn.org/summer99/test2.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/01/man-arrested-on-drug-char_n_9
44630.html
http://www.drbronner.com/punk_rock_soap_opera.html

Note: If they're testing your soap/shampoo, they're KNOWINGLY going for a false positive as an excuse.

The constitutional end-run, denial of probable cause and general unreliability of drug dogs

http://reason.com/archives/2011/02/21/the-mind-of-a-police-dog
http://reason.com/archives/2011/02/18/four-legged-warrants

To the general unreliability of "Forensic" info, despite massive propaganda, designed and intented to influence potential jurors, an act which, if not committed by the State, would be jury-tampering.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/forensics/4325774

Which, in combination with police perjury, and the rampant violation of discovery...

http://www.constitution.org/lrev/slobogin_testilying.htm
http://thatlawyerdude.blogspot.com/2005/05/testilying-where-perjury-go
es.html

http://www.post-gazette.com/win/default.asp
(note: this is excellent journalism, this one.)

http://www.southcarolinacriminaldefenseblog.com/2008/06/caldwell_and_t
he_problem_with_1.html
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2011/05/judge-accuses-dc-of-discover
y-violation-so-extreme-as-to-be-literally-unheard-of-.html

Anyhows, on and on and on it goes - so you can perhaps understand that my opinion of any such "evidence" brought by the State is in general, nasty sarcastic laughter, especially in regards to the railroad train that "justice" has become in this country, to the point where people have begun to even forget what courts, trials, and jurys are FOR, if not rubber stamping verdicts and throwing people in jail.

Believe me, Anthony - it should be "in doubt" far, FAR more often than it ever is!

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE