Quote:

---

If a man tells you he is going to kill your family how much more evidence do you need.

---

Quote:

---

If the police search a place illegaly but find evidence that can stop a serial killer justice is not done by not allowing such evidence in a court of law. Now I would agree that police may need to be punished to breaking the law in the first place, but to now ignore the evidence as if it does not exists serves in that case only to protect the guilty.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ANTHONYT:

Quote:

---

If a man tells you he is going to kill your family how much more evidence do you need.

---

Hello,

More than you think. I was in this exact situation. If the man in question hadn't actually taken a shot at my wife, nothing would have happened to him. Even so, it still took several weeks for the perpetrator to be kept behind bars.

Quote:

---

If the police search a place illegaly but find evidence that can stop a serial killer justice is not done by not allowing such evidence in a court of law. Now I would agree that police may need to be punished to breaking the law in the first place, but to now ignore the evidence as if it does not exists serves in that case only to protect the guilty.

---

You are wrong. If the system gets any boon whatsoever in conducting illegal proceedings, they have a motivation to do so in the future. It protects all of us when they are prevented from getting a conviction based on such tainted evidence.

--Anthony

---