Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Romney picks Paul Ryan for VP
Thursday, August 9, 2012 11:35 AM
WHOZIT
Thursday, August 9, 2012 12:08 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Thursday, August 9, 2012 12:46 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: That'll sure piss of Awbummuh.
Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:12 PM
HKCAVALIER
Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:27 PM
Thursday, August 9, 2012 2:01 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Quote:Originally posted by HKCavalier: Too bad there isn't a VP pick that will make Romney not-a-moron.
Thursday, August 9, 2012 3:18 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: There isn't a human alive that Joe would 'demolish'. Ryan's plans are brilliant, and you'd have to have a below room temp IQ not to see it.
Thursday, August 9, 2012 3:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: There isn't a human alive that Joe would 'demolish'. Ryan's plans are brilliant, and you'd have to have a below room temp IQ not to see it. Also, AlGore was never President. HK - Why are you such a Mormon bigot ? Do you hate Harry Reid equally for his Mormonism ?
Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:03 PM
Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:27 PM
M52NICKERSON
DALEK!
Thursday, August 9, 2012 5:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: There isn't a human alive that Joe would 'demolish'. Ryan's plans are brilliant, and you'd have to have a below room temp IQ not to see it. Yes drastically slash government spending in a down economy...how's that working the EU again?
Friday, August 10, 2012 2:03 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: There isn't a human alive that Joe would 'demolish'. Ryan's plans are brilliant, and you'd have to have a below room temp IQ not to see it. Yes drastically slash government spending in a down economy...how's that working the EU again? I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Friday, August 10, 2012 4:00 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Poland and Germany seem to be doing better than most, no ?
Friday, August 10, 2012 4:01 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Playing the devils advocate here.... When you strip away all the bullshit, isn't the massive overspending of the government what got us into this mess in the first place?
Friday, August 10, 2012 6:21 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Friday, August 10, 2012 6:35 AM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Playing the devils advocate here.... When you strip away all the bullshit, isn't the massive overspending of the government what got us into this mess in the first place? No. I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Friday, August 10, 2012 6:41 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Frem: I heard a joke by a standup comedian on tv: "So the choice is between a Mormon and a "Muslim". To some Americans that's like Alien v. Predator". Made me giggle...to some in the South, I'll bet it's even true! As to Ryan, I think his cons outweigh his pros, but I don't expect logic from the Romney campaign, so maybe he will... I kinda hope he does choose Ryan. It'll also serve to energize the left, thank you, so "bring it on" fer shore! I'm dying to see the debates. Obama v. Romney should be a BLAST, and Ryan v. Biden would be amusing.
Friday, August 10, 2012 7:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Frem: I heard a joke by a standup comedian on tv: "So the choice is between a Mormon and a "Muslim". To some Americans that's like Alien v. Predator". Made me giggle...to some in the South, I'll bet it's even true! As to Ryan, I think his cons outweigh his pros, but I don't expect logic from the Romney campaign, so maybe he will... I kinda hope he does choose Ryan. It'll also serve to energize the left, thank you, so "bring it on" fer shore! I'm dying to see the debates. Obama v. Romney should be a BLAST, and Ryan v. Biden would be amusing. Romney, as big of a d-bag as he is, should go ahead and take "Reagan's" Bonzo as VP.... Either way, Obama is a one termer.... I just feel sorry for blacks and Mexicans now... A vast majority of voters today are still white and until that changes that will be the last time they "experiment" with races..... Let's just say that Rosa Parks would be shaking her head at Obama in her grave.... "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." ~Shepherd Book
Friday, August 10, 2012 8:00 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Haha..... Wow... that sounds like a challenge..... Prove me wrong. I'll be here in 2230 when you dig up the evidence you're looking for.
Friday, August 10, 2012 8:11 AM
STORYMARK
Friday, August 10, 2012 8:23 AM
Quote:First Paul Ryan, now Chris Christie. Conservative thought leaders are turning up the heat on Mitt Romney to go bold in his choice of running mate – and away from the “safe” choices of Rob Portman and Tim Pawlenty. The call for Congressman Ryan of Wisconsin – the young Budget Committee chairman dubbed the intellectual leader of the GOP – has more backers, including The Wall Street Journal editorial page and top editors at The Weekly Standard. The chattering classes treat Governor Christie of New Jersey, floated for vice president by Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson, as a less serious possibility, given his blunt style, big persona, and short time in office. But the larger point is this: The conventional wisdom that Mr. Romney will play it safe, and choose between Senator Portman of Ohio and former Governor Pawlenty, has sparked worry among some leading Republicans Why? Just look at the polls. Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, is clearly trailing President Obama, and conservatives are worried that loyal but bland understudies won’t help give Romney’s candidacy the juice it apparently needs. The most recent polls, CNN/Opinion Research and Fox News, have Obama up by seven and nine percentage points, respectively. In their Weekly Standard piece, Stephen Hayes and William Kristol tackle the argument that “the Ryan budget” – a bold, controversial blueprint for spending cuts and entitlement reforms – makes the congressman a risky choice. Romney embraced the Ryan plan during the primaries, and will continue to campaign on it, they say, so why not have its author out there making the case himself? “Having Paul Ryan on the ticket may well make it easier to defend the plan convincingly,” Messrs. Hayes and Kristol write. “Ryan's pretty good at that.” The Wall Street Journal editorial argues that Americans are hungry for a leader willing to take on tough issues – and that the choice of Ryan would reinforce that message The case for Christie may be a tougher sell for some conservatives. While Ryan has been in Congress since 1999, despite his tender age (early 40s), Christie has been governor for just 2-1/2 years and has no Washington experience to flesh out Romney’s own lack of Washington service. More potentially problematic is Christie’s penchant for dressing down voters in public. The clashes make for entertaining YouTube videos, and he is reasonably popular in his Democratic home state, but his Jersey style may not wear well day in and day out on the stump. Mr. Gerson says that Christie’s combativeness, in fact, is exactly what Romney needs, in a campaign that has become a “vicious, negative slugfest.” “Romney needs more than an appealing spokesman,” Gerson writes. “He needs someone to engage aggressively on his behalf in the daily D-Day this campaign has become. All four leading vice presidential prospects might play this role. Christie would clearly play it best.” Christie is also rumored to be the likely convention keynote speaker, which would take him out of the running for veep. In an interview with NBC on Thursday, Romney said he wants a running mate with “a vision for the country that adds something to the political discourse about the direction of the country.” That, NBC’s Chuck Todd says, could point to Ryan. Democrats, meanwhile, are salivating over Ryan as the veep choice. His plan to turn Medicare into a voucher-like system led to a memorable ad showing a Ryan look-alike pushing Grandma in her wheelchair off a cliff. That ad, and many more like it, would surely come back. In addition, putting Ryan on the ticket would center the focus of the Romney campaign on the nation’s unsustainable fiscal path – to be sure, a concern of voters – and away from job creation and the economy, the No. 1 issue. Ryan’s youth could also give voters pause. In the end, only one thing is certain: We’ll get the answer soon. The Republican convention starts in 17 days.In the end, only one thing is certain: We’ll get the answer soon. The Republican convention starts in 17 days.
Friday, August 10, 2012 10:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Playing the devils advocate here.... When you strip away all the bullshit, isn't the massive overspending of the government what got us into this mess in the first place? No. I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man. Haha..... Wow... that sounds like a challenge..... Prove me wrong. I'll be here in 2230 when you dig up the evidence you're looking for. EDITED TO ADD: Don't forget that byou 2230, you'll have another 108 years of Government evil to account for on top of whatever other things you're trying to approve.... "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." ~Shepherd Book
Friday, August 10, 2012 11:24 AM
KPO
Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: There isn't a human alive that Joe would 'demolish'. Ryan's plans are brilliant, and you'd have to have a below room temp IQ not to see it. Yes drastically slash government spending in a down economy...how's that working the EU again? Poland and Germany seem to be doing better than most, no ?
Friday, August 10, 2012 11:28 AM
Friday, August 10, 2012 11:32 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Friday, August 10, 2012 12:21 PM
Friday, August 10, 2012 1:17 PM
Friday, August 10, 2012 4:51 PM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:38 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:14 AM
MAL4PREZ
Quote: News from the Votemaster Romney To Announce Running Mate Today at 8:45 A.M. Mitt Romney will announce his choice for Veep this morning at 8:45 A.M. at the USS Wisconsin in Virginia. Some soothsayers have taken the venue to mean that the choice will be Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI). but none of them really know. Red State, a tea party oriented Website that bitterly opposed Romney during the primaries has one of the best pieces around about the factors Romney should consider. These are as follows: Identity politics: a woman would appeal to female voters, who form a majority Race/ethnicity: a Latino would play well in Nevada, New Mexico, Florida, and Virginia Religion: A Protestant would play well with the base whereas a Mormon/Catholic ticket might not Class: Romney was born rich and became richer so someone born poor or middle class would help Geography: A candidate from a swing state or region might be of some value Age: Romney is an old guy. Someone much younger would make the ticket look less outdated Ideology: Romney can't seem to shake the moderate label, so how about a fire-breathing conservative? Experience: Romney knows nothing about foreign policy so having someone on board who does would help Personality: Face it, Romney is boring. Someone exciting would be nice The bottom line for the author is that Paul Ryan (42) meets more criteria than anyone else. The Wall Street Journal, Weekly Standard, and other staunch conservative publications and punditss are also strongly pro-Ryan. Romney is under a lot of pressure from the right to pick Ryan. If he gives in, the pressure for more concessions will only increase. Ryan is not a safe choice. He is as much of a gamble as Sarah Palin was, but for different reasons. Like Palin, he is a young fresh face who would add a lot of buzz to the ticket, but unlike Palin, he is better vetted and is not likely to become fodder for late-night comedians. He is also a serious ideas person and has laid out a detailed plan to greatly reduce government, spending, and taxes, something Romney has not done. A Ryan pick would plant Romney solidly in the conservative camp and win back all the conservatives who don't trust him. He is also from the Midwest, and might even put Wisconsin in play, although that is far from certain. On the other hand, as Chris Cillizza has pointed out, Ryan is making the Democrats salivate at the prospect of running against him. He is a hard-right candidate who wrote the Republicans' budget plan, which would immediately become the Democrats' exhibit A as to why the Republicans are unfit for public office. The heart of the Ryan budget is a plan to abolish Medicare as we now know it and instead give each senior a voucher that he or she could spend to buy insurance. However, if Obamacare is repealed, which the Republicans want to do, no insurance company would be interested in insuring people who are old and sick although they might offer junk insurance (with high deductibles and co-payments and low annual limits) just to collect the vouchers. No one knows how much the vouchers would be worth, but since the goal is to save the government money, probably they wouldn't be worth all that much. The Democrats would go wild scaring seniors afraid of not being able to get any kind of decent coverage, especially in Florida. Additionally, Democrats would put the Ryan budget under a microscope and no doubt find many other unpopular items in it that Romney would be forced to defend. In effect a Ryan pick would make it impossible to put any distance between himself and anything in it. The Democrats would say: "If you don't like X, why did you pick the guy who proposed X?" Ryan has other liabilities as well. He is a leader of a Congress that people universally hate. He also never worked in the private sector; he has been in politics his whole life. Given how much Romney has praised the private sector and attacked people with no private-sector experience, he is going to have some explaining to do. In addition, Ryan is a policy wonk and his political instincts have never been tested. He is surely going to have to give interviews and may have a tendency to speak the truth--even when that is bad politics. For example, if asked what is going to happen to people who are too sick to buy an insurance policy under Ryancare, he might just say something like "That's their problem, not the government's." While absolutely true, some of those people might not like the answer. Last, Ryan is a Roman Catholic. A Mormon/Catholic ticket would be the first time ever that a major party ticket had no Protestant on it. For those evangelical Protestants who are wary of Romney to start with, this might be enough to make some of them stay home on election day. A Ryan pick has to be seen as a Hail Mary--something the ever-cautious Romney would only do if he felt he was behind and had to go for broke. Unless you are an early bird living on the East Coast, by the time you read this the choice will be known. And all the buzz might just be a distraction before boring Rob Portman or equally boring Tim Pawlenty is announced. Under Wisconsin law, Ryan can run for Vice President and the House at the same time, so accepting the offer has no downside and even if he loses, would make him a serious player--maybe th favorite--in 2016
Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:32 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:37 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 1:42 AM
Quote:Originally posted by whozit: I was right! This means I'm smarter then all of you
Saturday, August 11, 2012 3:34 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 3:40 AM
PENGUIN
Saturday, August 11, 2012 3:54 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 3:56 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 4:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Vice President Ryan I like it. Sounds like a Tom Clancy novel.
Saturday, August 11, 2012 4:09 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 4:23 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 4:26 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 5:14 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 5:25 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 5:36 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:10 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Wikipedia's page on Paul Ryan: "I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero
Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:12 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Romney's announcement: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!" Actual quote. Mitt Romney just introduced his running mate that way.
Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:16 AM
Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:25 AM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:30 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Romney's announcement: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!" Actual quote. Mitt Romney just introduced his running mate that way. Just heard the clip for my own self, & Mitt said "Vice" President. Kwickie- you're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing. So, which is it?
Saturday, August 11, 2012 6:33 AM
Quote:Mitt Romney's announcement Saturday morning of Rep. Paul Ryan as his running mate was going smoothly until the last line. "Please join me in welcoming the next president of the United States, Paul Ryan," Romney said before Ryan walked on stage in Norfolk, Va. Oops.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL