REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Measuring politician's misleading statements

POSTED BY: KPO
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 12:31
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 862
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, September 3, 2012 2:24 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Read an interesting article about lies in politics that gave a method to measure how misleading a politician's statement is. It's necessarily subjective, but still useful I feel. I thought it could be an interesting tool for analysing the 'lies' of boths sides, and how bad they are.

Here's the method:

Quote:

1.What was the speaker trying to imply? This is necessarily a judgment call, but it's what gets us away from "lying" and instead focuses our attention on how badly a speaker is trying to mislead us.

2.What would it take to state things accurately? This is the most important part of the exercise. Without getting deep in the weeds (nobody expects politicians to speak in white paper-ese), what would it take to restate things reasonably accurately?

3.How much would accuracy damage the speaker's point? Obviously, if accuracy dents the speaker's point only a bit, not much harm has been done. If it demolishes the speaker's point completely, it's as bad as an actual lie.



The whole article goes on to apply the method to some of the 'whoppers' in Paul Ryan's convention speech, it's quite interesting: http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/09/we-should-focus-deceptio
n-not-lying


I think he's pretty kind to Ryan on the GM plant.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 4, 2012 12:31 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Very interesting, KPO. I'll have to read it over again (gotta go right now), but I found it most illuminating, despite of course being subjective. The GM plant thing pisses me off every damned time I hear it, but of course it's red meat to the base and they'll never hear the truth...

...about any of their lies, no doubt; and probably wouldn't care if they did. Republicans are running quite well on Obama-hate.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
James Woods: ‘Free Speech Is Dead in Liberal America’
Mon, September 22, 2025 23:44 - 37 posts
MAGA Support Group
Mon, September 22, 2025 23:43 - 6 posts
Putin's Russia
Mon, September 22, 2025 22:44 - 89 posts
Gold: up or down?
Mon, September 22, 2025 22:31 - 9 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Mon, September 22, 2025 22:17 - 993 posts
This is a joke. Right? Podesta invited to Satanic dinner?
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:38 - 14 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:37 - 351 posts
Wanna visit the Great Pyramids? The Sphinx ?
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:30 - 36 posts
a rant about North Korea
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:30 - 49 posts
As Palestinians pushes for statehood, Israel finds itself more isolated
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:24 - 322 posts
Hillary Clinton: just because she deserves her own thread
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:17 - 520 posts
Afghanistan
Mon, September 22, 2025 20:04 - 217 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL