REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Nobel Prize winner too "stupid" in school

POSTED BY: CANTTAKESKY
UPDATED: Thursday, October 11, 2012 13:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 735
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 3:07 AM

CANTTAKESKY


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9594351/Sir-John-Gurdo
n-Nobel-Prize-winner-was-too-stupid-for-science-at-school.html


Quote:

At the age of 15, Prof Sir John Gurdon ranked last out of the 250 boys in his Eton year group at biology, and was in the bottom set in every other science subject.

Sixty-four years later he has been recognised as one of the finest minds of his generation after being awarded the £750,000 annual prize, which he shares with Japanese stem cell researcher Shinya Yamanaka.

Speaking after learning of his award in London on Monday, Sir John revealed that his school report still sits above his desk at the Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, which is named in his honour.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 10, 2012 6:30 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Of course, this presumes most school systems have anything to do with education....
*scoff*
Beyond the very basics, rote learning, memorization and obedience aren't conductive to critical thought, cross examination and exploration of ideas, learning, above all... to THINK, to CREATE, to QUESTION.
Those are dangerous things, since they threaten the disastrous status quo of a stagnated and failing society.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:55 PM

OONJERAH



Without public schools, I believe most of us would be illiterate.
Too many are, anyway.

If most of what we know was learned in PS, we tend to assume that's
the only place to get real knowledge.

This guy was an artist from age 4. An amazing talent.
People sometimes told him, "You didn't draw that. You couldn't." or
"You can't paint that way without training. You wouldn't know how."

Mathematicians don't amaze me so much: They just take the next step.
But folks who make intuitive breakthroughs in physics, I don't get it.
How could they just know that stuff? But at least I don't say, "You'll never
be a real physicist unless you stick to what's known." I say, "WOW!"

In the mists of prehistory, I cannot comprehed how the hobby, practice,
then science of metallurgy began.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Sat, September 7, 2024 19:38 - 3697 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, September 7, 2024 17:49 - 4362 posts
The Honeymoon is Over
Sat, September 7, 2024 14:18 - 298 posts
NGOs: Grassroots, Astroturf, or New World Order?
Sat, September 7, 2024 13:59 - 7 posts
Trumptard terrorism hits new low ...
Sat, September 7, 2024 13:52 - 38 posts
USA Republicans cheer for Italy GiorgiaMelon neo-Fascist. What happened to 'Americans firstly '
Sat, September 7, 2024 13:35 - 179 posts
So, what the heck is libertarianism?
Sat, September 7, 2024 11:57 - 206 posts
Asteroid Coming 27 May
Sat, September 7, 2024 10:30 - 5 posts
Centuries old statue of Buddha blown up in Afghanistan; Fundamentalist Buddhists go on violent rampage!
Sat, September 7, 2024 10:22 - 58 posts
Music people? question
Sat, September 7, 2024 09:46 - 8 posts
Newsweek: Fani Willis Is an Embarrassment to Black People. She's the Proof That DEI Only Hurts Us
Sat, September 7, 2024 09:37 - 14 posts
7 Jaw-Droppingly Dumb Things Republicans Think About Science
Sat, September 7, 2024 09:01 - 32 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL