REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Low-Skilled Workers Get Raw Deal Under Obamacare

POSTED BY: JONGSSTRAW
UPDATED: Saturday, May 25, 2013 07:35
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1035
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, May 24, 2013 4:31 AM

JONGSSTRAW


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/23/low-skilled_worke
d_get_raw_deal_under_obamacare__118516.html



Somebody's lobbyist worked hard for those exceptions. They should have mandated both catastrophic and preventative.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 7:53 AM

REAVERFAN


We can be sure that rightwingers will do everything they can to subvert and ruin any and all aspects of Obamacare, and we'll hear about it through sources like real clear politics.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 8:20 AM

HKCAVALIER


I would rather get my news from a site that doesn't expect its writers to write like asshole forum trolls. Christ, who can even finish reading such an article, who isn't already completely onboard with its hateful premise?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 12:15 PM

JONGSSTRAW


The Wall Street Journal is a troll site??? That may be what liberal gnomes believe, but normal people consider it a respected and honest source for economic news.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 12:40 PM

HKCAVALIER


Um? When did RCP become the Wall Street Journal? The source you posted says Michael Barone is a political analyst for the Washington Examiner and a contributer to Fox News. WTH, Jongs?



HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 3:05 PM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


RCP quotes the WSJ or the authors of the WSJ piece in about 3 or 4 paragraphs. Jong's implication is that ALL the rest is from WSJ. It would be interesting to get the WSJ piece and compare the 2 word for word, but I'm too lazy for that.

It's heart warming to see the sudden concern of RCP, the WSJ and right wingers in general to suddenly care about low-skilled (and probably low-paid) workers. Couldn't possibly be just blind opposition to anything Obama wants to do. Of course not...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 3:56 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, to be truthful why not just write "low skilled workers get raw deal under corporations". Because, yanno, the biggest problem that low-skilled workers have is NOT from the gubmint!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 25, 2013 7:35 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Bing-go! But it does sicken me. The Republicans played such games around Obamacare, and Obama and the Dems caved at every turn, now we'll start finding out what they hid in it, and it will probably only get worse.

If our government WORKED, like if both parties had the good of the people and the country at heart...yeah, right. I realize Dems/Obama caved left and right because they thought it was better than nothing, and single payer didn't have a snowball's chance in hell, AND they're not like the right, willing to "stand for principle" and flush the baby with the bath water, but my hopes that Obamacare could be improved over time like SSI and Medicare are fast fading.

When one party makes it's sole, entire focus defeating a President and anything, ANYTHING he might agree with, the country and the people are who pay the price. And boy, is we payin'!

It would be amusing if it weren't so sick: In essence, the right was quite happy to go on having us bankrupted by health-insurance companies and let taxpayers foot the bill for the uninsured, so they fought tooth and nail and pretty much stripped Obamacare of all the good stuff it COULD have done, only to make the situation quite possibly WORSE in the end, without coming up with ANYTHING themselves--because, of course, they were quite happy to go on having us bankrupted by health-insurance companies and let taxpayers foot the bill for the uninsured!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:41 - 943 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:23 - 421 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 06:28 - 4794 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, November 23, 2024 06:14 - 7491 posts
Idiot Democrat Wine Mom
Sat, November 23, 2024 05:26 - 1 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:40 - 11 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:33 - 41 posts
Biden admin quietly loosening immigration policies before Trump takes office — including letting migrants skip ICE check-ins in NYC
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:15 - 3 posts
RCP Average Continues to Be the Most Accurate in the Industry Because We Don't Weight Polls
Sat, November 23, 2024 00:46 - 1 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, November 22, 2024 23:52 - 4752 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:54 - 9 posts
Looks like Russians don't hold back
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:18 - 33 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL