The Insult Thread by Magonsdaughter

"That's nothing more than Obamabots grasping at straws. " Auraptor

"By the way, Rappy, in your childish example, the child with his hand in the cookie jar is caught only with his hand in the cookie jar; have you PROVEN that he ever took a cookie?" Kwicko

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:33 PM

America loves a winner!

Why?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:34 PM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Is this a good idea? Maybe if we each, individually (or at least, those of us willing to) made an effort to avoid our uglier nature, those who DON'T choose to would stand out, without inviting a thread just for people to be nasty to one another... just a suggestion, nothing more.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:34 PM

"It is for Obama and Holder and their ideological goons. John Dean called it "Blind Ambition" back in his day." Jongstraw

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:36 PM

"With 'Cheley Batshit Bachmann quitting the House, Looney Louie now gets to compete for the title of Craziest Right-Wing Fucktard in the House of Representatives. Apparently there's still a lot of inbreeding in certain backwoods parts of Texas... " Kwicko

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:37 PM

Not inviting people to be nasty, inviting people to repost examples of nastiness by other posters.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:39 PM

"The entire TEA party crowd endorses that ? Or are you just being a whiner, for no real good reason ? " Auraptor

"Yes, Rappy, every right-wing teabagging idiot endorsed that, just like the ENTIRE "Left" thinks Obama's god.

[/sarcasm]" Kwicko

"Hard for dead folks to 'listen', now isn't it ? So the whole 'assassinate' meme Niki is fabricating is beyond asinine. And false. " Auraptor

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:47 PM

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

"Frelling morons." - Rappy

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:48 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Well, I see this as a public acknowledgment effort, which I agree with in principle but am a little short on time to contribute at the moment. I'll keep tabs on this.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:52 PM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Oh, well, I see this took off in a hurry. I guess it couldn't make things any WORSE, anyway. I was doing it privately, just to see if I've been viewing things wrong FOR MYSELF, but since this took off, I'll join in.

Jong, 6/2/13: "The author ought to spend some time in RWED if he really wants to understand naked liberalism. " http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=55221

Rap, 6/2/13: "But what I can't stand is Niki's obvious and disingenuous spin.... So the whole 'assassinate' meme Niki is fabricating is beyond asinine." http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=55214

Rap to Agentrouka, 6/2/13: "And as for the term ' hate speech' , that's nothing but an attempt at controlling what people think." http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=55213

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:52 PM

"Mocking your great Messiah, genius." - Rappy

"Easier for you to just yell 'racist! ' and run away.

Coward that you are." - Rappy

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 12:52 PM

If people are not happy with it, let it die. But I thought it might keep people accountable for what they say. I do see some issues arising, as some people are very easy to call on their insults *coughkwickocough* and some are a bit more devious about how they derail the threads.

For example, I find 'Libtards' offensive, seeing as how I am perceived as a liberal on this board. So its an indirect insult.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 1:03 PM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Well, I don't see "libtard" as an indirect insult at all, any more than I would Repugs or any of the other idiotic names. Never liked Tea Bagger at all. But yeah, some are more subtle, that's one reason I've been wondering if I've been misperceiving the "extent" of the nastiness.

Hey, if ANYTHING can bring down the temperature around here, I'm all for it. Onward...

Jong, 6/2/13: "It {the law being irrelevant} is for Obama and Holder and their ideological goons...", http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=55219

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 1:07 PM

Done that one ^

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 1:11 PM

"Commander-IN-Chief, dumbass." NOBC

Okay, maybe we should pass on past insults, and leave the thread for new ones.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 1:34 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Well, I don't see "libtard" as an indirect insult at all, any more than I would Repugs or any of the other idiotic names. Never liked Tea Bagger at all. But yeah, some are more subtle, that's one reason I've been wondering if I've been misperceiving the "extent" of the nastiness.

"Teabagger" is a name they gave themselves. If it's an insult, then blame those who called themselves teabaggers in the first place.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 1:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
"Commander-IN-Chief, dumbass." NOBC

Okay, maybe we should pass on past insults, and leave the thread for new ones.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't EVERY insult a "past insult"? Once a thing is said, it's in the past. There is no such thing as "the present" - only the future and the past. The moment you think you realize something, you only realize that the moment has passed.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 2:30 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

This is like trying to have a discussion w/ a child about taking cookies from a cookie jar, as the child is denying they've ever taken cookies from the cookie jar, while the child's hand is actually still IN the cookie jar.

It's so inane, brazen and absurd, that I really do think some folks are buying this load of go-se.

lil' rappy 130602

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 2:38 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.

No one will be surprised to hear that I approve of this thread

After a period of time I would like to see a results thread with a tally of posters' insults, broken down into type of insult. Something like:

Type 1: Indirect insult - e.g. an insinuation that somebody is stupid

Type 2: Generic insult - e.g. asshole, moron, dumb-ass, libtard...

Type 3: Especially foul-mouthed, or very personal insult (personal being something that nastily refers to a person's known condition or trait, e.g. age, race, sexual-orientation, mental illness)

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 2:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't EVERY insult a "past insult"? Once a thing is said, it's in the past. There is no such thing as "the present" - only the future and the past. The moment you think you realize something, you only realize that the moment has passed.

Sorry not to make myself clear.

I was wondering whether it would be useful to post insults that had been made after this thread was started, and not trawl through posts that had already been made.

It seemed contrary to natural justice to start a thread and post insults made previously, which is what I initially did, I suppose to get the ball rolling.

is this reply just more confusing?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 2:48 PM

Nah, I get ya - I was mostly just having some fun with the whole past-versus-present idea.

I've no doubt there will be insults aplenty flying around here in no time.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 2:55 PM

Watching too much Doctor Who, well I have been....

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 4:33 PM

And tomorrow you will have been...

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 4:46 PM

Too timey whimey for poor little me.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 4:49 PM

Is it wrong that I get so many of the Whovian insider jokes even though I've never seen an episode of the show? So many of my friends - virtual and real - are into it that I've been overexposed to most of it already, and it can likely never live up to the expectations they've instilled in me!

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 5:25 PM

You're experiencing it by proxy. Only fitting perhaps...

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 5:47 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
"Commander-IN-Chief, dumbass." NOBC

Okay, maybe we should pass on past insults, and leave the thread for new ones.

Aw, Hell.

How 'bout: "This thread is just another Jong/Rappy circle jerk. Get a room already."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, June 2, 2013 5:53 PM

who said it?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 12:22 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
Quote:
Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
"Commander-IN-Chief, dumbass." NOBC

Okay, maybe we should pass on past insults, and leave the thread for new ones.

Aw, Hell.

How 'bout: "This thread is just another Jong/Rappy circle jerk. Get a room already."

Mags posted:

Quote:

Who said it?

Aw, Hell, twice. Hell, Hell! Yer not payin' attention. Was only a couple of weeks ago. I'm normally so modest I wouldn't mention it, but since I'm getting singled out for a pretty simple one, I thought Id throw up one that I posted that I'm proud of. Worth repeating, ya might say.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 5:33 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Quote:
I was wondering whether it would be useful to post insults that had been made after this thread was started, and not trawl through posts that had already been made.

As I mentioned above, that's what I started doing, just for myself; I went through every current thread and only read stuff starting with THAT date. Partly I wanted to see if my perceptions were off, and partly I was curious if all our recent discussions of nastiness would have any future effect. I'll be curious to see if they/this DO have an effect; I think publicizing the nastiness is actually not a bad idea. It will be interesting to watch and see if it moderates anyone's behavior, and/or if this thread itself turns into a snark-fest flame war of people bitching at one another (which it hasn't as yet).

I guess "I approve of this experiment", in essence, and yes, I think it's only valid if we go from NOW; I, for one, am attempting to moderate my behavior and it will be interesting to see if anyone else does. I hope the thread sticks around, or is revived if it dies and things continue in the ugly vein they've become.

As to things like "Teabagger", Mike's defense is irrelevant; they discovered their error quite quickly and ceased using the term and he knows it. It's like saying the "n-word" is still valid because it was the original term. Whatever insults we've used on one another in the past, I'm only going to look at what we call each other from now on. JMHO.

Poor Mike; I'm on the fence about Who; I've watched it for a while now, but have found that since the departure of Tennant, it seems to have become a lot more convoluted and makes less sense (yes, I know, it's unfair to expect it to make sense, that's not what it is). It's starting to lose me, and I really enjoyed it for a while...

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 12:46 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.

Kwicko to Auraptor, Type 1:

"Jongs could answer better than I." - Rappy

No doubt.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 1:58 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by kpo:
Kwicko to Auraptor, Type 1:

"Jongs could answer better than I." - Rappy

Just noticed, Ol Rap still struggling with English. It's that old I/me. he/him thing that they teach in English 100, 9th grade, in any educated state. It's called subjective/objective pronoun case, If I remember correctly, it was a LONG time ago that I studied it, learned it so well that it's automatic.

I threw the ball.
He threw the ball.

I threw the ball to him.
He threw the ball to me.

Better than I.
Better than me.

Better than he.
Better than him.

'Course it reverses if you actually include a verb on the end.

I threw the ball better than he did.

I also remember hearing that using I in that fashion was pretentious, phoney, and egotistical. I leave you to draw your own conclusion.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 2:31 PM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Confused; the way I always remembered it was to make the sentence about myself and see what fit, and your "hint" thing has BOTH "better than I" AND "better than me"; which is it?

For me, I'd have switched it around in my head "I could answer better..." so what Rap wrote would have been correct. Obviously totally unimportant, I'm just a language nut so that "subjective/objective pronoun case" ditty you wrote made me wonder.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 2:56 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:
Confused; the way I always remembered it was to make the sentence about myself and see what fit, and your "hint" thing has BOTH "better than I" AND "better than me"; which is it?

For me, I'd have switched it around in my head "I could answer better..." so what Rap wrote would have been correct. Obviously totally unimportant, I'm just a language nut so that "subjective/objective pronoun case" ditty you wrote made me wonder.

Quote:

I threw the ball. He threw the ball.

I threw the ball to him. He threw the ball to me.

Better than I. Better than me.

Better than he. Better than him.

I didn't tag 'em right and wrong. I meant to suggest, " Say 'em in your head, see which sounds right."

I threw the ball. He threw the ball. Both subjective case. Both correct.

I threw the ball to him. He threw the ball to me. I and he subjective case. Me and him objective case. All four correct.

Better than I. (subjective case in objective usage. Incorrect.) Better than me. (Objective case, objective usage. correct.)

Better than he. (subjective case in objective usage. Incorrect. Should sound obviously wrong.) Better than him. (Subjective case, subjective usage. Correct, should sound right. The last case of the set, to make the example complete, finish the comparison of I/me, he/him.)

My trick is to just use a simpler sentence of the same structure. -- "He threw the ball to me. He threw the ball better than me. He could answer the question better than me. "

Probably gonna get me sneered at, not by you, as a "Grammar Nazi." But that one doesn't bother me. Ignorance of the rules of the English language suggests ignorance of other things as well. Not to mention phoniness, pretention and egotism.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 3:27 PM

America loves a winner!

Hyper analyzing grammer in place of any real substance...

Good grief.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 4:41 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Hyper analyzing grammer in place of any real substance...

Good grief.

Boy, it really seems to piss you off whenever someone tries to learn to communicate more effectively. Why is that? I mean, it's not like you're any great shakes when it comes to the written English word. You could absolutely do with a bit more education on the subject.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 4:55 PM

America loves a winner!

It`s a forum on the net. Stop this phoney b.s. of pretending that your grammar nazi routine is anything other than juvenile pettiness - or as niki would say, being "snarky".

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 5:00 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
It`s a forum on the net. Stop this phoney b.s. of prentending that your grammer nazi routine is anything other than juvenile pettiness - or as niki would say, being "snarky".

So people should try NOT to communicate effectively when they're online?

In your case one would have to say "Mission Accomplished!" You've proven yourself unable and unwilling to learn, a hallmark of someone with a low IQ. And as usual, in your pettiness, you lash out at others for your failings, and blame them for noticing, while you'll nit-pick every word, sentence, phrase, joke, or statement made by others.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 5:02 PM

Back to the insults:

"Stop this phoney b.s. of prentending that your grammer nazi routine is anything other than juvenile pettiness..." - Rappy

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 5:12 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Back to the insults:

"Stop this phoney b.s. of prentending that your grammer nazi routine is anything other than juvenile pettiness..." - Rappy

Not an insult, and you're lying when you claim I don't communicate clearly.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 5:21 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Back to the insults:

"Stop this phoney b.s. of prentending that your grammer nazi routine is anything other than juvenile pettiness..." - Rappy
Not an insult, and you're lying when you claim I don't communicate clearly.

No, you're lying when you say I claimed that.

Show me where. Quote the words back to me. Put up or shut up.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, June 3, 2013 6:45 PM

America loves a winner!

I'm not lying, nor am I wrong.

And if using " I " instead of " me " is enough to confuse you, you're more simple than I thought.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 1:29 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:
No, you're lying when you say I claimed that.

Show me where. Quote the words back to me. Put up or shut up.

I'm not lying, nor am I wrong.

And yet you can't show me where I said what you claim I said.

Quote:

And if using " I " instead of " me " is enough to confuse you, you're more simple than I thought.

Who said anyone was confused? Again, you seem to be responding only to the voices in your head, and not to what anyone here has actually posted.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 1:52 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.

Kwicko to Auraptor, type 1:

it's not like you're any great shakes when it comes to the written English word. You could absolutely do with a bit more education on the subject.

You've proven yourself unable and unwilling to learn, a hallmark of someone with a low IQ.

Auraptor to Kwicko, type 1:

And if using " I " instead of " me " is enough to confuse you, you're more simple than I thought.

Man, it's going to be hard work keeping up with these two!

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 2:28 AM

To those who insult one another on the thread meant to keep track of insults.

LOL.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 2:31 AM

"Maybe you should contact her with your "juvenile pettiness" and your "grammer nazi routine"." Kwicko to Auraptor

"Who wizzed in your corn flakes this morning ? ROFLMAO!! WOW! " Auraptor to Kwicko

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 2:35 AM

America loves a winner!

This is beyond tedious and pointless. OCD comes to mind.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:53 AM

Hey, RAP, this is an INSULT THREAD. I'm saying it right out loud, and it's aimed square at YOU: "You're too dumb to have learned public high school English. SO any opinion you express is too DUMB to be given the respect we'd give an 8th grader."
And this will be the third time I've said this , also aimed directly at
YOU : You're pretentious, phoney and egotistical.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, June 4, 2013 5:51 AM