REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

So what's shut down for you?

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Thursday, October 10, 2013 13:48
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 8589
PAGE 3 of 3

Sunday, October 6, 2013 9:39 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:

Washington post Left enough for you?


Dope. It's not about left or right. It's about reality, and as Kirk said, it probably lies somewhere in between.

I'll leave it to anyone silly enough to keep trying to get ANYTHING through Rap's thick skill to take it from here. -Niki 2013

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 6, 2013 11:30 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Dope. It's not about left or right. It's about reality, and as Kirk said, it probably lies somewhere in between.



But you apparently think it's Left Vs. Right, as in "LOL, an ultra right wing hate fest site? Really?"

Don't you understand that Left and Right are just two arms of the same monster? That they both want you to think as they think and do as they do?


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 3:02 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Agreed, but I can't believe that anyone in their right mind would point the finger at Obama while it's clear the house chose to shut down. It's like shooting the tires of a Greyhound bus doing 50 and then blaming the driver for running over people.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Succinctly and accurately put, Byte. I don't know who decides what stays open and what closes when there's a government shutdown, but aside from politics, it seems logical that tourist attractions wouldn't be high on the "necessary" list. Unfortunately a LOT of people are getting caught in the middle, which is sad.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 3:07 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Your kidding right.............

Palin, Michelle Bachmann, Ted Cruz (especially him), Boehner.........shall I go on.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

C'mon Niki, you know the Left LOVES the theatre more than those on the Right.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 10:11 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Dope. It's not about left or right. It's about reality, and as Kirk said, it probably lies somewhere in between.



But you apparently think it's Left Vs. Right, as in "LOL, an ultra right wing hate fest site? Really?"

Don't you understand that Left and Right are just two arms of the same monster? That they both want you to think as they think and do as they do?





A truth I think everyone acknowledges on some level... But still have preconceived notions based on where they get their information from and so end up being more one side than the other. Neither side is able to understand where the other is coming from, and sometimes not even people on their OWN side, so all they can do is yell across the gap, and the echo is too loud to hear the response.

Tribalism is a creeping attitude, don't know you're in the grips of it until you've broken a keyboard and started a flame war.

As for who's to blame, it depends on your point of view and your opinion about certain issues. Ultimately the politicians are simply trying to keep their jobs on BOTH sides - it just so happens that those jobs kinda involve massive amounts of shitheadery as standard operating procedure. And they always end up taking a dump on the public in favour of whoever's got money.

Which is why, of course, both sides would rather play the blame game instead of FIXING THE PROBLEM. Because they could lose supporters which means a loss of cashflow. Someone might have to admit they don't crap roses. Oh no that election cycle! Get those spin wheels a-spinnin'!

Seriously, it doesn't matter who started what unless they're all five-year-olds on a school playground... Or rather, they think WE are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 11:00 AM

BYTEMITE


This pretty much sums it up.

Imagine, if you will, a metaphorical and physical intersection of the National Mall and Wall Street. Then apply the following concepts lavishly, minus any misspellings.



With maybe a little "whorehouse networks" and "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore."



Then top it off with a smidgen of corrupt conspiracy and inept bullshit.



And that's basically the state of our nation and has been for longer than I've been alive. No wonder no one wants to take credit for all the inspiring workings of government and the economy - one side digs a hole, the other side pisses in it, then they fight over the NEXT one. Thus, MY attitude. Briefing concluded. Please continue.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 12:31 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


" It's like shooting the tires of a Greyhound bus doing 50 and then blaming the driver for running over people."

Amen, Shiny!

I disagree that "Neither side is able to understand where the other is coming from"--the Tea Partiers who shut down the government were about as clear as it's possible to be: "Defund or delay Obamacare or we'll shut down the government". Everyone understood that meant they wouldn't vote for a budget, which is precisely what they did, and the government shut down. Simple as that, if we take them at their word.

Sure, Obamacare wasn't the actual reason, they just started coming up with that recently and I've detailed step by step how the budget didn't get passed, but I think their--what, 44 votes to kill it?--made their position perfectly clear.

On the other hand, unquestionably "it just so happens that those jobs kinda involve massive amounts of shitheadery as standard operating procedure. And they always end up taking a dump on the public in favour of whoever's got money". On BOTH sides, I fully agree. Problem is when you get enough of this type in office who are quite willing to REALLY shit on the public, it starts becoming really bad, as opposed to just "bad".


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 1:16 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
But you apparently think it's Left Vs. Right, as in "LOL, an ultra right wing hate fest site? Really?"

Wanna point me to a place that says Obama has made no serious mistakes during his Presidency? Then you'll hear me say "LOL, an ultra left wing kiss-up site? Really?"

I'll leave it to anyone silly enough to keep trying to get ANYTHING through Rap's thick skill to take it from here. -Niki 2013

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 1:26 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


When someone quotes Breitbart, or InfoWars, or FauxNews, they are simply snarking, and can have no expectations of being taken seriously. Either that, or they have to accept ThinkProgress, MSNBC, Rightwingwatch, Crooks and Liars, The Young Turks and such sites as equally valid, which they never do. I try to avoid obviously partisan sites for my information, because I know places such as those listed above OBVIOUSLY slant things. Given that Rap and others have dismissed many, many sites which aren't "left-leaning", to put up Breitbart is nothing but a joke.

Chris doesn't have to dismiss that transparently lying article from Breitbart; I debunked it in several different places, specifically, with it's very own quotes.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 9:50 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
When someone quotes Breitbart, or InfoWars, or FauxNews, they are simply snarking, and can have no expectations of being taken seriously. Either that, or they have to accept ThinkProgress, MSNBC, Rightwingwatch, Crooks and Liars, The Young Turks and such sites as equally valid, which they never do. I try to avoid obviously partisan sites for my information, because I know places such as those listed above OBVIOUSLY slant things. Given that Rap and others have dismissed many, many sites which aren't "left-leaning", to put up Breitbart is nothing but a joke.

Chris doesn't have to dismiss that transparently lying article from Breitbart; I debunked it in several different places, specifically, with it's very own quotes.




And since you've never cited a partisan, slanted, left-wing site as the basis for one of your posts...

Sad that you can't realize that you're playing the same game - just from the other side.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, October 7, 2013 11:10 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:

Sad that you can't realize that you're playing the same game - just from the other side.


More sad that you can't see the bigger picture and who's more complicit in the hate game...
hate, as in us vs. them
as in the we need to shut down compassion & silly progressive nonsense.
Gays and poor hungry kids and sexually active teen girls can all go to Hell where God will judge them (and we Tea Partyers who know the whole 'God-thing' is crap anyway can profit from the cuts).
Hi-five!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:54 AM

BYTEMITE


No way! I have the monopoly on hate. I TOLD you guys. That hate is finely distilled and not intended for distribution!

You'll all just direct it at specific groups or causes anyway, and water it down with things you don't hate. It's MINE give it back.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:08 PM

BYTEMITE


Also I found an illuminating report about political differences and why those arguments leads to situations like what we see in Congress and other places.

http://faitfeed.com/2013/10/08/why-do-politicians-fight/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:24 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
When someone quotes Breitbart, or InfoWars, or FauxNews, they are simply snarking, and can have no expectations of being taken seriously. Either that, or they have to accept ThinkProgress, MSNBC, Rightwingwatch, Crooks and Liars, The Young Turks and such sites as equally valid, which they never do. I try to avoid obviously partisan sites for my information, because I know places such as those listed above OBVIOUSLY slant things. Given that Rap and others have dismissed many, many sites which aren't "left-leaning", to put up Breitbart is nothing but a joke.

Chris doesn't have to dismiss that transparently lying article from Breitbart; I debunked it in several different places, specifically, with it's very own quotes.




And since you've never cited a partisan, slanted, left-wing site as the basis for one of your posts...

Sad that you can't realize that you're playing the same game - just from the other side.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."



She says, specifically, why she doesn't post from those sites....

And then you just wave your hand, "You post from those site, so its okay for me to..."

Do you even TRY to actually read, or do you go right to your stash of pre-selected talking point bullshit?

Amazing.






"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:43 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Finding flaws in partisan logic is now seen as being partisan?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:40 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Chris - for the very last time, the WMD in Iraq never was 'phantom'.

Kurds are proof.

Game over.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:41 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Story, Magons, just "hee, hee, hee".

Yes, I quite specifically do NOT read or post at the sites I listed; which is why I find it hysterical that the sites I DO quote from, like CNN, Forbes, Christian Science Monitor, etc., always get dismissed by Rap, etc., and "partisan bullshit". Then Rap goes and puts up a screed by BREITBART, of all places, and expects us to swallow it. It's to laugh...


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 1:31 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Chris - for the very last time, the WMD in Iraq never was 'phantom'.

Kurds are proof.

Game over.

I think rappy is time-traveling again. WMD in 1988 were an existential threat in 2003? The boy is confused!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 1:48 AM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Story, Magons, just "hee, hee, hee".

Yes, I quite specifically do NOT read or post at the sites I listed; which is why I find it hysterical that the sites I DO quote from, like CNN, Forbes, Christian Science Monitor, etc., always get dismissed by Rap, etc., and "partisan bullshit". Then Rap goes and puts up a screed by BREITBART, of all places, and expects us to swallow it. It's to laugh...




'Partisan' appears to mean does not agree with my partisan views.

I find arguing with American right wingers pointless. It's just an endless amount of strawman and false dichotomies and strings of words that are otherwise devoid of meaning.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 8:25 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:

Sad that you can't realize that you're playing the same game - just from the other side.


More sad that you can't see the bigger picture and who's more complicit in the hate game...
hate, as in us vs. them
as in the we need to shut down compassion & silly progressive nonsense.
Gays and poor hungry kids and sexually active teen girls can all go to Hell where God will judge them (and we Tea Partyers who know the whole 'God-thing' is crap anyway can profit from the cuts).
Hi-five!



As opposed to stirring up hate against the greedy capitalists and gun nuts?

Both sides do it, Chris. Maybe you should figure out the big picture.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 10:29 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
As opposed to stirring up hate against the greedy capitalists and gun nuts?

Greedy Capitalists are neither left nor right- they simply manipulate the least expensive politicians.
Also, nuts should not own guns, only sane & responsible citizens.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 10:42 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/10/05/list-obama-closures
-for-shutdown



LOL, an ultra right wing hate fest site? Really? Probably 10% of what's listed is even partially true.



Washington post Left enough for you?

Quote:


Losing a hard-fought battle confers no dishonor, but losing a badly chosen battle is embarrassing.

And then there’s ridiculous.

Into the last category goes the decision to close the nation’s monuments to make sure that the government shutdown strikes the hearts of all The American People, whose constant invocation by pandering politicians fills one with self-loathing. (Who wants to be an “American People,” given the quality of our spokesfolksen?)

Then again, ridiculous is perhaps too generous a word. Closing the monuments, especially the World War II Memorial, can be reduced, fittingly, to a single syllable: Dumb. It is fitting because the seated patron of the Mall, Abraham Lincoln, was famously monosyllabic. In trivia you can use, more than 70 percent of the words in the Gettysburg Address are of one syllable.

In more recent history, when a group of World War II veterans recently faced barriers blocking entry to the memorial — an open space requiring not so much as an attendant — these elderly warriors took a page from their Normandy playbook and stormed the barricades.

Can there be an image more inspiring than members of this venerable club, whose living roll declines each day by about 640, pushing their way through flimsy, useless, pointless barriers to roam among pillars erected to their heroism? What was Washington thinking?

Dumb, dumb, dumb.

President Obama, whose grandfather was a World War II veteran, might have known better. We may have to close down the government, he could have said, but don’t touch the monuments.

Instead, the Office of Management and Budget ordered the barricades.

That’ll show ’em.

Among the many reasons this was so clumsy, one stands out starkly: It isn’t as though the WWII guys can always come back another day. All are in their late 80s and early 90s, and time is of the essence. Moreover, most plan these trips well in advance and at considerable expense.

Thanks to the monument liberators, Washington officials were forced to rethink their decision and removed the barriers. The American People are now free to roam their public spaces that remember sacrifices beyond most imaginations.

Optically, symbolically and every other way, this seems too little too late. Shutting out veterans from their memorial touchstone was more than a bad call, a lapse of judgment, a mere moment of tone-deafness. In reality, it may have been the tidy effort of a box-checking bureaucrat, but it reeked of the small work of a petty bully.

Ditto the closing of the D-Day cemetery in Normandy, France, where more than 9,000 Americans are buried. And this is the president who recently declared that The American People are not political pawns to be used to score political points?

Barack Obama must have been an inkling in the prescient mind of H.L. Mencken when the curmudgeon from whom all op-eds flow once described democracy as “the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”

While one may sympathize with Obama’s contempt for his congressional adversaries, he may have cut off his own nose with an unforced error of magnified proportions. Spite is unbecoming a president, as Richard Nixon proved in another era of national disruption. But beyond personality, it is baffling to imagine anyone thinking that the way to winning hearts and minds is by disrespecting the nation’s most beloved demographic.

I’ve often lamented the prospect of a world without my parents’ generation, not because they were perfect but because these mothers and fathers take with them a national treasure — their personal experiences and memories of the Great Depression and World War II and the lessons of sacrifice, thrift, courage and duty that defined them.

In their place, we have a bickering, twittering, snarling, snarky, toxic public square that has contaminated even our highest offices. How surreal it must seem to our oldest and wisest citizens to witness the breaking bad of America.

Nearly any but the die-hardest tea party member regrets the shuttering of the U.S. government. It was unnecessary, counterproductive and punishes all the wrong people — including federal employees, who do yeoman’s work for which they receive little credit.

Tying the defunding of Obamacare to the shutdown was folly, which sensible House Republicans knew even as they ignored their better judgment. Even so, the White House and Democrats seem determined to prove their own toughness by punishing the least deserving.

As we approach the next battle, over the debt ceiling, would that all of Washington remember the rule of the savvy negotiator: Always leave your opponent an exit.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kathleen-parker-obamas-monument
al-mistake-in-the-shutdown/2013/10/04/82f735bc-2d22-11e3-8ade-a1f23cda135e_story.html



"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."



You always post articles by CONSERVATIVE WRITERS at the WaPo, and say, 'Hey, neutral source!'

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 6:28 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


KPO, I post from the WaPo too, and--just my opinion--I don't mind stuff from one side or the other, I can look the person up, check out the facts they put forth, etc., when it's them or the NYT or WashingtonTimes or Forbes or something; it the OBVIOUS sites which do nothing but post extremely-slanted stuff that I object to. Hard to get a truly "neutral" source these days...for me, CSM comes pretty close, and Time to a degree.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 9, 2013 9:24 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


I don't mind people posting partisan articles/opinion pieces, but Geezer was making out like his source was not right-leaning (and perhaps was even left-leaning?). That's what I took issue with.

I read and post from WaPo all the time...

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:46 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I get 'ya. And it is kind of amusing to post what he did and write "Washington post Left enough for you?" The only objection I have is to sites that are patently, obviously propaganda and never offer anything else.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:48 PM

STORYMARK


I like how every time Geezer gets caught being ultra-partisan (while complaining about partisanship) he always just goes "Both sides do it" and then hides.




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sat, December 21, 2024 19:06 - 256 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:55 - 69 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:29 - 4989 posts
Music II
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:22 - 135 posts
WMD proliferation the spread of chemical and bio weapons, as of the collapse of Syria
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:15 - 3 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:11 - 6965 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, December 21, 2024 17:58 - 4901 posts
TERRORISM EXPANDS TO GERMANY ... and the USA, Hungary, and Sweden
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:20 - 36 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:00 - 242 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, December 21, 2024 14:48 - 978 posts
Who hates Israel?
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:45 - 81 posts
French elections, and France in general
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:43 - 187 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL