Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:
How do you know she was even angry?

---

Quote:

---

The senate thanking the police was such an obvious kiss-up - they are scared and should be - they probably get dozens of threats every day over recent events.
The MSM struggled to make a story of this - all they have are dozens of eye-witnesses talking about gun shots and what they sounded like and how many there were. It's starting to drop off the front pages of some like WSJ.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Honestly, I think there would have to be something affecting the mental state of a person to do this kind of thing with her one-year-old in the car.

---

The thing is AR, we don't know exactly what happened to initiate the events that led up to her being surrounded with guns with a 1 year old in the car. There was some tipping point, some first action that caused the confrontation. In my example, if I had escalated the confrontation and told the police officer to "eff off, I'm on public land, I have my rights" how do we know what his next step would have been? So far the reporting has been full of errors and backtracks. "She had a gun." etc. - they can't be trusted, and certainly the DC police's retelling has to be suspect (especially if the woman was innocent).

Just this week a motorist in NYC was surrounded by motorcyclists causing the car to stop in the middle of the freeway. While surrounded the motorcyclists were threatening and doing damage to the car. The motorist's life was not threatened (imo) - but there was a 2yr old and wife also in the car. The motorist did what the DC women maybe did; he stepped on the gas and ran over a couple of the motorcyclists to get away. A complete freak out, foot down on the accelerator, anywhere but here action.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
G - Ms Bachmann & others did NOT use Vets as a prop. She, as a public servant, was there to HELP them get into the WW2 site. And she did, too .

---

You just described a photo op, thx.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Geezer:
There has been a good bit of criticism of the Capitol Police for their response to the Navy Yard shooting here a few weeks ago, with members of a heavily armed tactical team that responded to radio calls for help claiming they were tolkd to stand down by higher ups, leaving the response to D.C. Metro forces less well armed and armored. Capitol Police officials are supposed to be investigating, but it's kind'a fallen off the radar.

Could be the Capitol Police were a bit keyed up after this.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
I get that, but she wasn't surrounded by unidentified violent strangers attacking her car but by police. You'd think trying to deescalate would be the first instinct.

I'm not at all saying she was to blame, at all. I know far too little and if she was unarmed, this surely could (should) have ended differently.

But for that vast majority of people (especially with their baby in the car), even with adrenaline running, her actions would probably not be the ones they would take. Vehemently asserting their unarmed status, the presence of their baby and emerging from the car hands up to prevent further escalation would be. This is why I suspect something substantive affected her state of mind and pushed it beyond rational thought.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:
Don't see what this woman's race has to do with anything.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
"crazed shooter ? White male ? TEA party type?"

If not any of those, Who did shoot the poor woman?
Cops, right? Could fit the above.


======================
Did Dirty Harry shoot her?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:
Don't see what this woman's race has to do with anything.

---

Ultimately, not in the least. But when you FIRST heard the story of shots being fired at the US Senate building, were you thinking crazed shooter ? White male ? TEA party type?

Turned out to be exactly none of that at all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:
Don't see what this woman's race has to do with anything.

---

Ultimately, not in the least. But when you FIRST heard the story of shots being fired at the US Senate building, were you thinking crazed shooter ? White male ? TEA party type?

Turned out to be exactly none of that at all.

---

Trollin Trolling Trolling
Raw hide

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I can understand, from the POV that there were conflicting reports of multiple shooters, that the CP were thinking that sticking to their post during the Navy Yard shooting was the right call.

Go running off to deal w/ 1 crisis, and that leaves your primary duty open to attack.

---

Quote:

---

“no need for a gun to be used when
there was no gunfire coming from the vehicle.”

---

Quote:

---

Remember Mayor Bloomberg, in NYC, and the Times Square bomber ? Said it was probably some guy angry over the healthcare bill. Why ? Because the Left want to paint anyone who opposes this President as a deranged, gun toting nut job, when in fact, it was an allah lovin' jihadist.

And the shooter in Aurora CO ? Was reported , early on , that he belonged to a local TEA party organization. Completely false.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:]

Rappy's a racist through and through

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Then you don't know what a racist is. I'm not one. Not even remotely. And to be honest, you and those on the Left falsely screaming 'racist' at anyone dares to disagree w/ a black person, only proves YOU to be the racist. You don't see blacks to be on par w/ whites, so you must invent a reason for why anyone would DARE to oppose anything a black person does or says. It can't be because of their ideas, can it ? Actually, it is.

---

Quote:

---

one giant troll attack and you know it

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
Hahahahah.

Good one. That's why you chose the title with 'angry black woman' in it. Coz you were trying to prove a point, you even said it.

---

Quote:

---

No really, you did it the same reason you post 'Islam: Religion of Peace' Stories

You just want the reactions.

You're a tiresome troll. And you bring down the IQ in these threads.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:


You're wrong. Intentionally so. Never heard of Tyler Perry's ' Diary of an mad black woman' ? I guess it's an Atlanta thing. You wouldn't understand.

---

Quote:

---

Sorry if it annoys you, but when 1 religion is the basis for so much of today's terror and violent attacks, it's gonna get mentioned.

Deal w/ it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
storybook - nothing I posted was not factual.

The person was a black woman. Correct ? Of course it is.

She was upset, angry, agitated, was she not ?

And it was a legitimate RWED story

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
storybook - nothing I posted was not factual.

The person was a black woman. Correct ? Of course it is.

She was upset, angry, agitated, was she not ?

And it was a legitimate RWED story

---

Why not "Angry distraught black 5'6" woman with stylish yet affordable boots shot to death in D.C."?
Because it was important for you you to establish her race, and unconsciously you were linking her to how you see Obama.

You need professional help, dude.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
34 year old woman
Mother of an infant
Unemployed dental technician
Post Natal Depression sufferer
Sister
Friend

So many ways to describe her

---

Quote:

---

Ultimately, not in the least. But when you FIRST heard the story of shots being fired at the US Senate building, were you thinking crazed shooter ? White male ? TEA party type?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:

Quote:

---

Ultimately, not in the least. But when you FIRST heard the story of shots being fired at the US Senate building, were you thinking crazed shooter ? White male ? TEA party type?

---

Turned out she wasn't angry either. And who knows if she was 'tea party type' or are they all white males?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
storybook - nothing I posted was not factual.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
storybook - nothing I posted was not factual.

---

I didn't say it wasn't

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Because it was important for you you to establish her race, and unconsciously you were linking her to how you see Obama.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
storybook - nothing I posted was not factual.

---

I didn't say it wasn't

---

Then you have absolutely no reason to be a blithering idiot, other than you just feel like it.

Thanks.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---