Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
I would have offered him a knife, and invited him to cut the offending 14% out right there on TV.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I'd not be surprised if I didn't have some native American in my ancestry.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I'd not be surprised if I didn't have some native American in my ancestry.

---

Yet you attack Sen. Warren for believing the same, and she had been taught it from birth.

Funny, that.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
Oh, I see the difference. And its all about you and your sad little anger agenda.

---

Quote:

---

How is it funny.... because you once again reveal your hipocracy... and don't even know how - even AFTER ITS BEEN EXPLAINED!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

... because you once again reveal your hipocracy...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Indian ( sorry, I should have said that the 1st time... 'America' is a derivative for an Italian name, Amerigo )

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AgentRouka:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Indian ( sorry, I should have said that the 1st time... 'America' is a derivative for an Italian name, Amerigo )

---

Are you going for a joke here? It's not always easy to tell, over the interwebs.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Amerigo Vespucci (Italian pronunciation: [ame'rigo ves'putt?i]) (March 9, 1454 – February 22, 1512) was an Italian explorer, financier, navigator and cartographer who first demonstrated that Brazil and the West Indies did not represent Asia's eastern outskirts as initially conjectured from Columbus' voyages, but instead constituted an entirely separate landmass hitherto unknown to Afro-Eurasians. Colloquially referred to as the New World, this second super continent came to be termed "America", probably deriving its name from the feminized Latin version of Vespucci's first name.[1][2] -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerigo_vespucci

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:

Man, he is good at diversion, is Rap. What has any of that shit got to do with a white supremacist finding out he's got African DNA? Not a damned thing; so you gonna let him keep threadjacking this?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Amerigo Vespucci (Italian pronunciation: [ame'rigo ves'putt?i]) (March 9, 1454 – February 22, 1512) was an Italian explorer, financier, navigator and cartographer who first demonstrated that Brazil and the West Indies did not represent Asia's eastern outskirts as initially conjectured from Columbus' voyages, but instead constituted an entirely separate landmass hitherto unknown to Afro-Eurasians. Colloquially referred to as the New World, this second super continent came to be termed "America", probably deriving its name from the feminized Latin version of Vespucci's first name.[1][2] -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerigo_vespucci


I'm funny. But not THAT funny.

---

Quote:

---

There is no evidence that Elizabeth Warren lied about her ancestry.

She said what she believed. According to most here (including Raptor), that isn't a lie.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

... because you once again reveal your hipocracy...

---

"Hipocracy"? Really? Can't be a typo because that's not even close. Try "hypocrisy" next time. And you've got the gall to call other people stupid? Hilarious!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AgentRouka:

I think I communicated this badly. I know who Amerigo Vespucci was. Who doesn't. I was wondering whether you were seriously suggesting that "Indian" is in any way more appropriate term than "Native American"? Or, you know, whether you were creating a very sly, very distracting joke on the side. (I'm a sucker for those.)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

... because you once again reveal your hipocracy...

---

"Hipocracy"? Really? Can't be a typo because that's not even close. Try "hypocrisy" next time. And you've got the gall to call other people stupid? Hilarious!

---

Yes, I misspelled a word. And, as rappy himself likes to point out - when you fixate on a misspelled word, but ignore the actual content of the post - its because you cannot actually refute the point, and are trying to distract with something irrelevant to the discussion.

Thanks for the case-in-point.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:

... because you once again reveal your hipocracy...

---

"Hipocracy"? Really? Can't be a typo because that's not even close. Try "hypocrisy" next time. And you've got the gall to call other people stupid? Hilarious!

---

Yes, I misspelled a word. And, as rappy himself likes to point out - when you fixate on a misspelled word, but ignore the actual content of the post - its because you cannot actually refute the point, and are trying to distract with something irrelevant to the discussion.

Thanks for the case-in-point.

---

Point of fact, you've STILL dodged the issue by not showing how I've been 'hypocritical' in my comments here, in the least.

Wanna take another swing at that one ?

Spell it any way ya like, I'll still answer.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Just commenting on the absurdity of racial purity, is all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
For one - You're claiming she's lying - based on nothing. Yet you deny you lie - even when the words are quoted back.

Additionally - you call her a liar because she couldn't possibly have any Cherokee in her family (despite the fact that statistically, a whole hell of a lot of people do), but you might, based on even less evidence than she has.

Point of another fact - you STILL haven't, after YEARS, posted our non-religious definition of marriage. Will you ever stop dodging that one?

So, I gave my answer, where's yours?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:
God works in mysterious ways...

Quote:

---

He said the results, if accurate, could explain his hatred of blacks, because tribal Africans were hostile to other tribes and feel contempt toward American blacks of mixed tribes.

Cobb said he’d understand if he’s rejected by other white separatists and neo-Nazis because humans should be able to exclude others by choice. He’d also be too black to belong to his own racialist Creativity religion.

Asked about the implications for Leith, Cobb wondered if he’ll be target of “discrimination against octoroons in Leith.”

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:God works in mysterious ways...

---

Anyone else notice how many talented folks come from mixed race backgrounds? Maybe there's some genetics theory to explain it... just saying... *whistles dixie softly*

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
I would have offered him a knife, and invited him to cut the offending 14% out right there on TV.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

I don't know either, but it seems like the stand out % for what I would guess are the percent of racially mixed children seems, hmmm, maybe high.

People get queasy when genetics are discussed, most recent popular discussion involved a certain guy named Hitler. But I'd still be curious about any objective science on the subject if there is any. We know about procreating within ones own family tree = not good. That's all I got.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AgentRouka:

Jumping to genes as an explanation right away.. why? Just to spite the racists? Isn't that playing their own game?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:God works in mysterious ways...

---

Anyone else notice how many talented folks come from mixed race backgrounds? Maybe there's some genetics theory to explain it... just saying... *whistles dixie softly*

---

I don't know how many Cablinasians ( like Tiger Woods ) play golf very well, save for one. We notice stand outs like Tiger, because of how talented they are, as well as for their mixed race. But does that mean they really are more talented, as a group, than anyone else ?

That would be interesting to know.

---

I don't know either, but it seems like the stand out % for what I would guess are the percent of racially mixed children seems, hmmm, maybe high.

People get queasy when genetics are discussed, most recent popular discussion involved a certain guy named Hitler. But I'd still be curious about any objective science on the subject if there is any. We know about procreating within ones own family tree = not good. That's all I got.

---

Quote:

---

The origin of Aboriginal peoples in Australia has been the subject of intense speculation since the nineteenth century. Until recently[when?], no theory of migration had gained wide acceptance. Genetic studies had shown the Aboriginal peoples to be related much more closely to each other than to any peoples outside Australia, but scholars had disagreed whether their closest kin outside Australia were certain South Asian groups, or instead, certain African groups. The latter would imply a migration pattern in which their ancestors passed through South Asia to Australia without intermingling genetically with other populations along the way.[11] A 2009 genetic study in India found similarities among Indian archaic populations and Aboriginal people, indicating a Southern migration route, with expanding populations from Southeast Asia migrating to Indonesia and Australia.
In a genetic study in 2011, researchers found evidence, in DNA samples taken from strands of Aboriginal people's hair, that the ancestors of the Aboriginal population split off from the ancestors of the European and Asian populations between 62,000 and 75,000 years ago—roughly 24,000 years before the European and Asian populations split off from each other. These Aboriginal ancestors migrated into South Asia and then into Australia, where they stayed, with the result that, outside of Africa, the Aboriginal peoples have occupied the same territory continuously longer than any other human populations. These findings suggest that modern Aboriginal peoples are the direct descendants of migrants who arrived around 50,000 years ago.[12] This finding is supported by earlier archaeological finds of human remains near Lake Mungo that date to 45,000 years ago. The same genetic study of 2011 found evidence that Aboriginal peoples carry some of the genes associated with the Denisovan peoples of Asia; the study suggests that there is an increase in allele sharing between the Denisovans and the Aboriginal Australians genome compared to other Eurasians and Africans. The Papuans have more sharing alleles than Aboriginal peoples. The data suggests that modern and archaic humans interbred in Asia before the migration to Australia.[13]

---