REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Obama wins LIE OF THE YEAR !

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 18:48
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 4284
PAGE 1 of 2

Friday, December 13, 2013 5:31 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Place that right up there on the mantel, next to your Nobel Peace Prize, Barry !

Obama Gets PolitiFact's 'Lie Of The Year' Prize For Healthcare Claims


Quote:

Fact-checking website PolitiFact is out with the latest edition of its "Lie of the Year." In 2013, the dubious prize went to President Obama for his widely derided claim that, "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it."

Many people, of course, found that they could not keep their plans, as the higher standards set by Obamacare rendered them null and void. The administration and Congress quickly moved in with proposed fixes to the mushrooming political problem.

PolitiFact is often criticized for its fact-checking methodology, and some noted that it had rated previous statements by Obama along similar lines as "half true."

Ironically, all three runners-up slots in PolitiFact's roundup went to Republicans for their own statements on Obamacare.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/12/politifact-lie-of-the-year-20
13-obama-health-care_n_4435389.html



And for those who want to make a fuss about the runner ups ?

Like Ricky Bobby says... " If you ain't first, you're last ! "


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 13, 2013 6:06 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Yeah, it seems fair enough. Even though what Obama said had a lot of truth in it (The vast majority of Americans will get to keep their plans).

If you're president, and you bend the truth and wilfully deceive the public to help get some legislation passed - I think there should be political consequences.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 13, 2013 6:38 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Yeah, it seems fair enough. Even though what Obama said had a lot of truth in it (The vast majority of Americans will get to keep their plans).



See ? Now you're doing it too! There was no caveat about "most Americans ". He said what he said, dozens of times over, and it was a lie.

Actually, the lie was that he claimed he DIDN'T say what he said, but why split hairs ?

Quote:


If you're president, and you bend the truth and wilfully deceive the public to help get some legislation passed - I think there should be political consequences.

It's not personal. It's just war.



Well, with a useless media that refused to do its job, there were consequences. He got re-elected.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 13, 2013 6:56 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

He said what he said, dozens of times over, and it was a lie.

'If you like your plan you can keep it' is true for the vast majority of people though.

Quote:

Actually, the lie was that he claimed he DIDN'T say what he said, but why split hairs ?

No, that's not the lie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/dec/12/lie-year-i
f-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it
/

Quote:

Well, with a useless media that refused to do its job, there were consequences. He got re-elected.

Uh-huh. Were there voices on the right warning at the time that some in the individual market would lose their policies?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 13, 2013 7:15 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:


'If you like your plan you can keep it' is true for the vast majority of people though.



I repeat - THERE WAS NO CAVEAT ! Why are we still talking about this ?


Related rulings:

Pants on Fire!



"What we said was, you can keep (your plan) if it hasn’t changed since the law passed."

Barack Obama, Monday, November 4th, 2013.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 13, 2013 8:15 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

I repeat - THERE WAS NO CAVEAT !

The fact that there was no 'caveat' is what makes the statement dishonest. But even without the caveat the statement is broadly true.

Related rulings:

Half True.



"If you're one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance."

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 10:04 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



That's not what he said though.

Fact is, this very well could be the lie of the past 5 years, not just 1.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 11:02 AM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Yeah, it seems fair enough. Even though what Obama said had a lot of truth in it (The vast majority of Americans will get to keep their plans).

If you're president, and you bend the truth and wilfully deceive the public to help get some legislation passed - I think there should be political consequences.

It's not personal. It's just war.



He told a lie and millions of people are getting and WILL get hurt and you still defend this jugeared scumbag. No one trusts him anymore, his approval ratings are in the 30's, his whores in the MSM can't help him anymore.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 11:43 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So we can add Obama's lie to GWB's lies (about taxes, Iraq, and Medicare). Both very consequential, and both very costly to a lot of people.

Obama deserves to squirm, he does. The part in the Bible about not being able to serve two masters? It applies to Obama. He can't look after the public health and the insurance companies' bottom lines at the same time, just as GWB couldn't look after the wealthy's taxes and the nation's bottom line at the same time.

What you fail to realize is that people who are not authoritarians actually manage to parse and criticize policies, not personalities. That fact that GWB was incredibly stupid and needed Cheney to tell him what to think was just a personal foible, just as Obama constantly talks with his nose up in the air is a personal foible.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 12:10 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So we can add Obama's lie to GWB's lies (about taxes, Iraq, and Medicare). Both very consequential, and both very costly to a lot of people.



What lies ?

Quote:


Obama deserves to squirm, he does. The part in the Bible about not being able to serve two masters? It applies to Obama.



Please don't refer to our black President serving his "masters". That's just wrong.

Quote:

That fact that GWB was incredibly stupid and needed Cheney to tell him what to think was just a personal foible, just as Obama constantly talks with his nose up in the air is a personal foible.


That W was " incredibly stupid " is your opinion, not a " fact ". Not any ringing indicator, but by several objective measures, he was every bit as intelligent as John F. Kerry. And W was some how able to run Texas for a couple of terms with out Cheney telling him anything. What the hell did Obama ever run before he was President ?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 12:31 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So we can add Obama's lie to GWB's lies (about taxes, Iraq, and Medicare). Both very consequential, and both very costly to a lot of people.

Obama deserves to squirm, he does. The part in the Bible about not being able to serve two masters? It applies to Obama. He can't look after the public health and the insurance companies' bottom lines at the same time, just as GWB couldn't look after the wealthy's taxes and the nation's bottom line at the same time.

What you fail to realize is that people who are not authoritarians actually manage to parse and criticize policies, not personalities. That fact that GWB was incredibly stupid and needed Cheney to tell him what to think was just a personal foible, just as Obama constantly talks with his nose up in the air is a personal foible.



Bush isn't Prez anymore, let's deal with what's happening NOW. Obama and his whores in the MSM are lying NOW. This jugeared dirtbag is doing a lot of damage NOW and it'll get worse next year.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 12:56 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


WHOZIT, I only bring up Bush's foibles so that the NEXT TIME a GOP President is in office doing incredibly stupid things, you'll unstick your nose out of his (or her) butt-hole long enuf to actually criticize the GOP President for doing exactly what Obama was doing. 'Cause the last time around, when GWB was in office doing incredibly awful things, you were notably supportive of those awful policies. Now, suddenly, they're a problem??? Somehow, by sheer repetition, you MIGHT get the idea that gander sauce = goose sauce, and stop your endless moral relativism.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 1:15 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
WHOZIT, I only bring up Bush's foibles so that the NEXT TIME a GOP President is in office doing incredibly stupid things, you'll unstick your nose out of his (or her) butt-hole long enuf to actually criticize the GOP President for doing exactly what Obama was doing. 'Cause the last time around, when GWB was in office doing incredibly awful things, you were notably supportive of those awful policies. Now, suddenly, they're a problem??? Somehow, by sheer repetition, you MIGHT get the idea that gander sauce = goose sauce, and stop your endless moral relativism.



Bush didn't do awful things, you and your whores in the MSM told us he was awful. During the awful Bush years unemployment 4% to 5%, the Bush years didn't suck. NOW the economy sucks and is not getting better, not that your whores in the MSM will keep saying that it's getting better, they've been saying that since Barry took office. And spare me the "Bush is a war criminal" crap, the Clintons, Kerry and most of the world said that there were WMD's. Barry approval ratings are in the 30's because everything sucks NOW. And specking of war criminals, how many died in Viet Nam during the Johnson years? He was a Democrat...right? Endded by Nixon a Repulican.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 1:33 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I agree, Sig. What's amazing is that Obama's half-truth, which is what it was, gets "lie of the year", while all the incredible, blatant, flat-out lies the right has told about the ACA don't even get "honorable mention".

As to Bush, we all realize Rap will go right on saying "Bush never lied" until the cows come home, just as we realize it means nothing.

Iraq: "Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war", http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/

Iraq: "Bush Did Lie About Iraq", http://consortiumnews.com/2012/04/26/bush-did-lie-about-iraq/

Taxes: "Grover Norquist: George H.W. Bush Lied to the American People", http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/grover-norquist-george-h-
w-bush-lied-to-the-american-people
/

Medicare Part D:
Quote:

The Bush White House lied to Congress about the cost of Medicare Part D. Within two months of signing the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) into law, President Bush quietly informed Congress that the true cost of the program would be $550 billion, not $395 billion, over the next decade. When Medicare actuary Richard Foster sought to present the true price tag to Congress in late 2003, then agency chief Thomas Scully threatened to fire him. By the time the program was launched in 2006, the estimated 10 year price tag for the Medicare prescription plan had increased to $720 billion.

As the New York Times reported later in 2004, the GAO ultimately concluded that the Bush administration "illegally withheld data from Congress on the cost of the new Medicare law." While Scully was later fined for other ethics violations, he was never held accountable for his role in the Medicare fraud. Today, Thomas Scully "now works for a law firm and a private investment firm, has registered as a lobbyist for Abbott Laboratories, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Caremark Rx and other health care companies." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_A._Scully]


I could post articles from reputable sources all DAY, but it's not necessary, as we all know, so why bother further? It will never stop Rap from lying himself to insist "Bush never lied", as we also all know.

As to Obama, everything Sig said. "He can't look after the public health and the insurance companies' bottom lines at the same time", and he never tried. The minute it was obvious there wasn't enough support for single payer (probably even before), he caved to create something which cow towed to the insurance lobby.

At the same time, the FACT is that if insurance companies hadn't canceled policies, people COULD have kept them, which everyone keeps ignoring--the right's done a magnificent p.r. job on that one, as they have on everything else regarding the ACA. Those policies were grandfathered in, the government didn't force their cancellation, and it was pure profit motive that led the insurance companies to cancel them. Obama knew they would, so in that respect he said something he knew would not be true in the end. But it was the insurance companies who made it a "lie", period.

I could list the BLATANT Republican lies all day, but of course none of them will get attention. How about just a few which were repeated, over and over, for a start:

1) Death Panels; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/aug/10/sarah-p
alin/sarah-palin-barack-obama-death-panel
/

2) Obamacare is socialized health care http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/jul/02/rick-scott/ri
ck-scott-says-health-care-law-rations-care-syste
/

3) Muslims are exempt from the health care law; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/may/30/chain-e
mail/dhimmitude-page-107-health-care-law-exempts-muslim
/

4) The health care law is a "government takeover" of health care; http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2010/feb/24/cw-bill-young
/bill-young-claims-house-plan-was-government-takeov
/

5) Obamacare is so bad, Obama gave Congress an exemption from it; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/aug/14/ted-cru
z/sen-ted-cruz-says-obama-just-granted-all-congress
-/

6) Obamacare is . . . the largest tax increase in the history of the world; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/28/rush-li
mbaugh/health-care-law-not-largest-tax-increase-us-histor
/

7) Obamacare will question your sex life; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/sep/19/betsy-m
ccaughey/betsy-mccaughey-says-obamacare-will-question-your
-/

8) The IRS is going to be "in charge" of "a huge national database" on health care that will include Americans’ "personal, intimate, most close-to-the-vest-secrets"; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/may/20/michele
-bachmann/michele-bachmann-decries-huge-national-database-ru
/

We realize none of those count; blatant, over-the-top lies by Republicans mean nothing; a half truth by Obama gets lie of the year.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 2:10 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
I agree, Sig. What's amazing is that Obama's half-truth, which is what it was, gets "lie of the year", while all the incredible, blatant, flat-out lies the right has told about the ACA don't even get "honorable mention".

As to Bush, we all realize Rap will go right on saying "Bush never lied" until the cows come home, just as we realize it means nothing.

Iraq: "Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war", http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/

Iraq: "Bush Did Lie About Iraq", http://consortiumnews.com/2012/04/26/bush-did-lie-about-iraq/

Taxes: "Grover Norquist: George H.W. Bush Lied to the American People", http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/grover-norquist-george-h-
w-bush-lied-to-the-american-people
/

Medicare Part D:
Quote:

The Bush White House lied to Congress about the cost of Medicare Part D. Within two months of signing the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) into law, President Bush quietly informed Congress that the true cost of the program would be $550 billion, not $395 billion, over the next decade. When Medicare actuary Richard Foster sought to present the true price tag to Congress in late 2003, then agency chief Thomas Scully threatened to fire him. By the time the program was launched in 2006, the estimated 10 year price tag for the Medicare prescription plan had increased to $720 billion.

As the New York Times reported later in 2004, the GAO ultimately concluded that the Bush administration "illegally withheld data from Congress on the cost of the new Medicare law." While Scully was later fined for other ethics violations, he was never held accountable for his role in the Medicare fraud. Today, Thomas Scully "now works for a law firm and a private investment firm, has registered as a lobbyist for Abbott Laboratories, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Caremark Rx and other health care companies." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_A._Scully]


I could post articles from reputable sources all DAY, but it's not necessary, as we all know, so why bother further? It will never stop Rap from lying himself to insist "Bush never lied", as we also all know.

As to Obama, everything Sig said. "He can't look after the public health and the insurance companies' bottom lines at the same time", and he never tried. The minute it was obvious there wasn't enough support for single payer (probably even before), he caved to create something which cow towed to the insurance lobby.

At the same time, the FACT is that if insurance companies hadn't canceled policies, people COULD have kept them, which everyone keeps ignoring--the right's done a magnificent p.r. job on that one, as they have on everything else regarding the ACA. Those policies were grandfathered in, the government didn't force their cancellation, and it was pure profit motive that led the insurance companies to cancel them. Obama knew they would, so in that respect he said something he knew would not be true in the end. But it was the insurance companies who made it a "lie", period.

I could list the BLATANT Republican lies all day, but of course none of them will get attention. How about just a few which were repeated, over and over, for a start:

1) Death Panels; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/aug/10/sarah-p
alin/sarah-palin-barack-obama-death-panel
/

2) Obamacare is socialized health care http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/jul/02/rick-scott/ri
ck-scott-says-health-care-law-rations-care-syste
/

3) Muslims are exempt from the health care law; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/may/30/chain-e
mail/dhimmitude-page-107-health-care-law-exempts-muslim
/

4) The health care law is a "government takeover" of health care; http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2010/feb/24/cw-bill-young
/bill-young-claims-house-plan-was-government-takeov
/

5) Obamacare is so bad, Obama gave Congress an exemption from it; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/aug/14/ted-cru
z/sen-ted-cruz-says-obama-just-granted-all-congress
-/

6) Obamacare is . . . the largest tax increase in the history of the world; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/28/rush-li
mbaugh/health-care-law-not-largest-tax-increase-us-histor
/

7) Obamacare will question your sex life; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/sep/19/betsy-m
ccaughey/betsy-mccaughey-says-obamacare-will-question-your
-/

8) The IRS is going to be "in charge" of "a huge national database" on health care that will include Americans’ "personal, intimate, most close-to-the-vest-secrets"; http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/may/20/michele
-bachmann/michele-bachmann-decries-huge-national-database-ru
/

We realize none of those count; blatant, over-the-top lies by Republicans mean nothing; a half truth by Obama gets lie of the year.




Half truth?! Call it what you want, (he lied) but no one is buying this crap anymore. Even his whores in the MSM can't help him now, his approval ratings suck. Historians will not be kind to Barry...and his whores in the MSM.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 2:44 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
The fact that there was no 'caveat' is what makes the statement dishonest. But even without the caveat the statement is broadly true.

Related rulings:

Half True.



"If you're one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance."



This rating was in June 2012. Politifact rated the "You can keep your insurance" quotes as "Pants on Fire" after people actually started losing their insurance in Nov. 2013.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/dec/12/lie-year-i
f-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it
/

You could read the Politifact article, if you'd like.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 2:59 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Bush didn't do awful things
Well, I see you've still got your head stuck up the elephant's ass. What you're complaining about about Obama doing... BUSH did.
Quote:

During the awful Bush years unemployment 4% to 5%, the Bush years didn't suck.
Yup. I like that selective rewrite of history. Everything was great, ON FIRE!! as rappy (you?) would say, until that fateful day DURING BUSH'S TERM when Shearson Lehman folded and the entire worldwide financial system threatened to fold with it. Oh, and those bank bailouts? ALSO begun on Bush's watch.

The facts just don't bear you out, son. And the fact that you can't see that points to serious.... deserving of medical study... flaw in your mentation.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 5:32 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Niki - Bush 41 is not Bush 43.

You're mixing the two as if it some how makes your case. It doesn't.

"Read my lips " cost 41 a second term, as well it SHOULD have. Lie, broken promise, what ever it's every bit as bad as " If you like your plan, you can keep it. Period. " And we've had to wait 3+ years ( again, by design ) for the consequences to catch up w/ Barry.

As for W and his " lies " ? ... still waiting.


@ Siggy -
Quote:

During the awful Bush years unemployment 4% to 5%, the Bush years didn't suck.


And it still burns you up that that statement is fact.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 5:48 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Bush didn't do awful things
Well, I see you've still got your head stuck up the elephant's ass. What you're complaining about about Obama doing... BUSH did.
Quote:

During the awful Bush years unemployment 4% to 5%, the Bush years didn't suck.
Yup. I like that selective rewrite of history. Everything was great, ON FIRE!! as rappy (you?) would say, until that fateful day DURING BUSH'S TERM when Shearson Lehman folded and the entire worldwide financial system threatened to fold with it. Oh, and those bank bailouts? ALSO begun on Bush's watch.

The facts just don't bear you out, son. And the fact that you can't see that points to serious.... deserving of medical study... flaw in your mentation.



Bad news, I'm NOT Rappy. He's smarter then me....but not as sexy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 5:53 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


"the Bush years didn't suck"...until it all came due, so that by the end of his Presidency we were in the worst recession in history, and unemployment "rose again to 6.1% in August 2008 and up to 7.2% in December 2008". Bush left us in an enormous hole, and we're still crawling out...if we ever manage to do so completely.

As to all the PROVEN lies of George W. Bush, obviously Rap can go right on saying "the sky is green" all day, so why bother? Until he actually REFUTES the facts I've already offered, screw him.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 6:02 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

"the Bush years didn't suck"...until it all came due, so that by the end of his Presidency we were in the worst recession in history, and unemployment "rose again to 6.1% in August 2008 and up to 7.2% in December 2008". Bush left us in an enormous hole, and we're still crawling out...if we ever manage to do so completely.

As to all the PROVEN lies of George W. Bush, obviously Rap can go right on saying "the sky is green" all day, so why bother? Until he actually REFUTES the facts I've already offered, screw him.




It all came due , thanks to the DEMOCRATS who pushed the housing bubble.

2nd worse, behind Carter's debacle.

Barry's "LIE" tops anything W said, and it's not even close.

41's broken promise wasn't TECHNICALLY a lie, unless he knew at the time that he was in, fact , going to raise taxes. I'd not put it past him, so that can go either way.

But Barry knew full well, YEARS in advance, that what he was pitching was 100% full bullshit.

And he didn't care. All he needed to do was get elected, then the damage was done.

For that, I say FUCK OBAMA.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, December 14, 2013 9:25 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

It all came due , thanks to the DEMOCRATS who pushed the housing bubble.

2nd worse, behind Carter's debacle.

Barry's "LIE" tops anything W said, and it's not even close.

But Barry knew full well, YEARS in advance, that what he was pitching was 100% full bullshit.

And he didn't care. All he needed to do was get elected, then the damage was done.


As the guys from "A Night At The Roxbury" say, No ... YES!




Quote:

For that, I say FUCK OBAMA.

Hey, NSA guys .... he means that in the most respectful way. Honestly!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 8:15 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

He said what he said, dozens of times over, and it was a lie.

'If you like your plan you can keep it' is true for the vast majority of people though.



Is this really true?

My brother keeps telling me that their family plan is going to skyrocket next year. (I'm not sure that THAT is true either until it happens).

Granted, my sis-in-law makes quite a bit more than most people as a pharmacist, but she's hardly "rich". The fact that they're virtually a single income household has its perks, but with two people on her income and a baby on the way, that really doesn't look like too much cheddar, especially when you consider the years it will take to pay back the college loans.

Meanwhile, because I'm a smoker, I will still be uninsured next year because my state isn't expanding medicaid. At least I won't have to pay the tax penalty though because the cost of health insurance will be WAY over the 8% that lets you off the hook.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:32 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Quote:
Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:
He said what he said, dozens of times over, and it was a lie.

'If you like your plan you can keep it' is true for the vast majority of people though.


Is this really true?



Yes.

Quote:

My brother keeps telling me that their family plan is going to skyrocket next year.

Is your brother in the individual market? If he gets it through his employer like most people then Obamacare won't affect him. Some in the individual market will be worse off, some will be better off (including some who've had their plans cancelled). Mostly the losers are rich people.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:41 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Is your brother in the individual market? If he gets it through his employer like most people then Obamacare won't affect him. Some in the individual market will be worse off, some will be better off (including some who've had their plans cancelled). Mostly the losers are rich people.

It's not personal. It's just war.



If by individual, you mean does he and his wife get insurance through her job? If yes, than yes.

"Won't effect him".... I don't know about that though.....

At least, if what he is telling me is true,(I won't know until he shows me after it's done), their plan is going to cost thousands more next year.

Even if that's an exaggeration and it's only hundreds more, that's A LOT more than the cost of inflation.

They're both in their late 20's and in the demographic MOST LIKELY TO BE HIT by this because of their age and income.

I'm all about sticking it to people making 1/4-1/2 a million dollars and avoiding SSI/Medicaid taxes for 95% of their income, but this new plan SHOULD NOT penalize a single person/couple that still pay those two BS taxes for every dime they collectively make.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:06 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

This rating was in June 2012. Politifact rated the "You can keep your insurance" quotes as "Pants on Fire" after people actually started losing their insurance in Nov. 2013.

Fair point.

Quote:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/dec/12/lie-year-i
f-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it
/

You could read the Politifact article, if you'd like.



I already glanced at it. Notice that despite the "Pants on Fire" rating, the language is measured: "Boiling down the complicated health care law to a soundbite proved treacherous, even for its promoter-in-chief."

The line itself is not a million miles from the truth. It's a gross simplification more than a 'lie'. If Obama had said it once, in throwaway fashion, there would have been little fuss (certainly it wouldn't have been lie of the year). But it's the fact that it was so oft-repeated, and so clearly crafted, that makes it so bad.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:21 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

If by individual, you mean does he and his wife get insurance through her job? If yes, than yes.


The individual marketplace is people not covered by their employer, buying their own insurance. It's this marketplace that Obamacare tries to fix (not employer based insurance). Tell your brother his increased premiums are not down to Obamacare.



It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 10:38 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


And just who is the Kaiser Foundation?

I never heard of them until they were the main internet calculator of benefits.... :) Not saying it's bad.... just saying what I noticed.

I'll be 1/10 without insurance. I'm surprised they admit a 10% deficiency....

Since 24% of us still smoke, I wonder how much of that 10% not included will be smokers. I bet it's over 5% of legal taxpaying Americans.....

I'm in Indiana. We're not expanding medicaid. Unfortunately, my state can allow insurance companies to increase premiums by 50% which are not paid by subsidies. This turns a $240 a year policy (2% of my income) to $2,080 (far over 8% of my income, so I don't have to pay $695 a year in taxes not to have it). In the end, I can still lose my house if I get in a drastic car accident, or get shot by a junkie, or have a brain aneurism.....

Fun times :)



By the way..... If this video wasn't voiced by Baz Lurhmann himself, this video was voiced by the voice of the Baz Lurhmann video Sunscreen, which I'm an obvious fan of in these parts....



Honestly, I'm more interested in this possible truth.

Did the guy who voiced Sunscreen voice this YOUTUNES video?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 11:37 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

And it still burns you up that that statement [unemployment at 5% during Bush's term of office] is fact.
Yes, it's a fact, but its' not the COMPLETE set of facts. This is where your thinking goes off the rails, because you cherry-pick your "facts" pretty hard, looking for the ONE fact that supports your views, even if that fact is limited to a tiny smidgen in time and contradicted by dozens of other facts. If you could fix that problem in your mentation... yanno, do an actual compare and contrast against ALL known facts.... most of you delusions would disappear.

Did you know that in 2006- DURING BUSH'S TERM - housing starts fell 33%? The depression really began in 2006, long before BUSH crawled out of office. It was a harbinger of things to come, but a fact that our one-fact-Johnny cares to ignore.


Consumer confidence, on Bush's watch


That while the top 5% got richer and richer the bottom 50% stayed the same, leading them to having no extra disposable income at all ....


Do you know what the unemployment rate under CLINTON was? End-of-term to end-of-term, Clinton crated job, Bush lost jobs, Obama created jobs


And now here's a rappy-fact that is 100% delusion:
Quote:

It all came due , thanks to the DEMOCRATS who pushed the housing bubble.
THIS belongs with a pants-on-fire rating. There is not a single piece of evidence that the Democrats had fuck-all to do with the housing boom. No, the REAL perpetrators were the FED- who conveniently left interest rates at a historic low so that GWB could continue to borrow at cheap prices to cover up his disastrous "don't tax and spend" plan, and the BANKS and NONBANK lenders like Countrywide who chose to create fraudulent loans, and repackage them into A+-rated bundles.

I could go into the mechanisms that Freddie and Fannie DID NOT CREATE LOANS, they merely bought the top grade one on the market (which means that the liars loans and blow-up loans represented less than 15% of their portfolio), and that the banks themselves were responsible for writing what they wrote. But I'd rather refer to ANTHONY- when he was here, he worked in a bank in the mortgage department, and what HE said was that it was a clusterfuck of greed, pure and simple, CREATED BY ABNORMALLY LOW INTEREST RATES.

Now, I know this doesn't fit in with your "Blame the Dems" fixation, but the recession is ENTIRELY in the hands of GWB. Yes, it took him eight years to create it, but - by god, he did.

If there were awards for "pants on fire" lies by media personalities, Rush would take the top honors and his droids would get their own little ditto-heads.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:13 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Bush lied and it got us into a war which cost a lot of lives. Obama lied and people ended up with better health insurance.

I will take Obama's lie all day every day.

...more so since everyone seems to think the law was magically prevent insurance companies from dropping people that the statement was a lie.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:18 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


"Kaiser Family Foundation, is a U.S.-based non-profit, non-partisan, private operating foundation headquartered in Menlo Park, California. It focuses on major health care issues facing the nation, as well as U.S. role in global health policy. The Foundation states that it is a "non-partisan source of facts and analysis for policymakers, the media, the health care community, and the general public."[1"

From Wiki.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:26 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Bush lied and it got us into a war which cost a lot of lives. Obama lied and people ended up with better health insurance.



If Bush lied, then so did every single high level Democrat lie as well.

Quote:


I will take Obama's lie all day every day.



Obama's lie was intentional, and will do far more harm. At worst, Bush was wrong. He didn't lie.

Quote:



...more so since everyone seems to think the law was magically prevent insurance companies from dropping people that the statement was a lie.




the law IS making Ins.companies drop people. Millions of people.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:36 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

the law IS making Ins.companies drop people. Millions of people.


1. People in the individual market change their plans quite regularly. They'll be able to get new plans.
2. Many of those people will get better plans
3. This is a one-time adjustment to the market

In summary:

Obama's reform of the individual marketplace = good
Obama's lying about the one-time disruption it would cause (for some) = bad

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:53 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
If Bush lied, then so did every single high level Democrat lie as well.



No, they just trusted Bush.

Quote:


Obama's lie was intentional, and will do far more harm. At worst, Bush was wrong. He didn't lie.

Not unless you can prove he was psychic.

Quote:



he law IS making Ins.companies drop people. Millions of people.



Only after the insurance companies choose to change the policies.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 6:00 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Thank you KPO and Nick, I fully agree. And thank you Sig; unfortunately, all that time and energy will go for naught where Rap is concerned because he will, as always, ignore any facts in favor of "The economy was on FIRE under Bush!" or somesuch idiocy and go merrily on his way. But some of us appreciate the realities.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:37 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


So we have the "But Bush..." parade yet again.

Anyone want to dispute Politifact's "Pants on Fire" and "Lie of the Year" calls on their own merits?

I'd be interested in hearing why you think they're wrong.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 2:58 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"So we have the "But Bush..." parade yet again."

Yes, we do. They're handy facts to point out your hypocrisies, little rappy's hypocrisies, little jongsie's hypocrisies, the zit's hypocrisies, and 6-ix's alcoholic hypocrisies.

No one on this end has claimed Obama is perfect. We've certainly lobbed our share of criticism his way.

But YOU all? You can't even begin to admit your god, dubya, did anything wrong. So when that 'but Bush' comes out, it's just our way of pointing out TO YOU that YOU can't begin to even think that Bush ... might have done some really bad things.

So how about it midget-minds. Let's see some valid criticisms of Bush, the same way we criticize Obama.


As evidence of "rape mentality"

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:11 PM
MAL4PREZ
And just remember, according to Rappy, the term befitting a women who wants the insurance she pays for to cover medications affecting her reproductive organs is

whore

Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:23 PM
little rappy
The term applies.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 3:16 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Niki- Just 2 cents on your spamming by tossing out red herrings to cover Obama's LIE OF THE YEAR.

Most of those are actually not lies, and where they 'may' be true, so what ? They weren't legitimate criticisms made by the Right in the first place.

Obama lied. Deal w/ it.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 4:20 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"So we have the "But Bush..." parade yet again."

Yes, we do.



Glad you agree.

Now can we talk about Obama's "Pants on Fire" and "Lie of the Year" ratings? That's what this thread is about.

If you want to talk about Bush lying, please feel free to start a thread.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 5:00 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Now can we talk about Obama's "Pants on Fire" and "Lie of the Year" ratings?"

Why? When did you ever talk about Bush's wrongdoings with anything but denial? This is a DISCUSSION, not required homework. If you couldn't discuss in the past, why should should we discuss now?


As evidence of "rape mentality"

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:11 PM
MAL4PREZ
And just remember, according to Rappy, the term befitting a women who wants the insurance she pays for to cover medications affecting her reproductive organs is

whore

Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:23 PM
little rappy
The term applies.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 7:34 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


We already HAVE discussed Obama's statement...in great depth. The simple fact is that he said people could keep their insurance, and they COULD HAVE, if the INSURANCE COMPANIES hadn't canceled the plans. The government can't FORCE insurance companies to offer a specific insurance plan, that would be the very "government control" the right keeps lying by saying the ACA IS, which it is not. They even specifically "exempted" the policies in question by grandfathering them in, so if they'd remained available, people would have kept their policies, just as he said.

Obama no doubt knew that once the ACA was enacted, insurance companies would most likely see that the grandfather'd insurance plans wouldn't be sufficiently profitable for them, so they'd cancel them. Ergo, he probably knew that what he said WOULDN'T BE TRUE IN THE END, and it was politically expedient to make the statement. But it would have been true if it weren't for the insurance companies' decision to cancel the plans.

What else is there to discuss? The usual people will say the usual things to try and claim that someone Obama absolutely knew that people wouldn't be able to keep their plans because the insurance companies would cancel them. But they hadn't canceled them when he said it, so technically it wasn't even a lie at the time.

Of course Politico went from "half true" to "pants on fire"; the right-wing p.r. machine was in full swing and has done a magnificent job of selling. But the fact that even Politico didn't realize it wouldn't be true AT THE TIME shows perfectly that nobody absolutely KNEW the insurance companies would cancel those policies until they did. And of course Politico now gives it "lie of the year"; it's been the story in the news and, like everyone else, they want attention.

There will never be agreement, and we've been around the horn on it many times already. Nobody on the right will ever admit the facts, and everyone on the left has already admitted that in the end, Obama's statement proved false. What else is there to discuss?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 7:37 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Same lie by Obama went from being not a lie, to a half truth, to pants on fire.

Only, we knew it was a lie, from day 1. Why did it take Politico so damn long to figure out the lie ?

THAT is the issue here.

( And that Obama lied, of course )


LOL @ Niki. Nobody "knew" ? Really? I guess those on the Right just had magical seeing stones, not unlike the Palantiri, from Lord of the Rings ?

*ETA -
Quote:

, Obama's statement proved false. What else is there to discuss?


Wrong again, dear. It was a LIE. W's WMD may have proved to be false, but Barrack Hussein Obama knowingly LIED.

Say it!

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 7:47 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


So, did Iraq have WMDs? Yes or no.

I'm ready to laugh.


As evidence of "rape mentality"

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:11 PM
MAL4PREZ
And just remember, according to Rappy, the term befitting a women who wants the insurance she pays for to cover medications affecting her reproductive organs is

whore

Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:23 PM
little rappy
The term applies.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 8:10 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


It was not a lie until the insurance companies CHOSE to cancel policies. Simple as that.

Rap can say Bush didn't "lie", he just "believed" his advisors when they told him there were WMDs. Fine, Obama didn't lie either, he just believed his advisors when they told him insurance companies wouldn't cancel policies.

The fact is Bush KNEW there were no WMDs, but it was politically expedient to say there were in order to drum up support for the invasion. No doubt Obama knew the insurance companies would cancel policies, but it was politically expedient to say it to drum up support for the ACA. The difference is that Bush KNEW there were no WMDs and said it anyway; Obama couldn't know for absolute, positive certainty that insurance companies would cancel policies.

And jezus, beyond that, I'm not going to bother. Rap will write the same things over and over like a dog with a bone, no amount of actual debate or real facts will ever change his tune.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 16, 2013 10:46 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
We already HAVE discussed Obama's statement...in great depth. The simple fact is that he said people could keep their insurance, and they COULD HAVE, if the INSURANCE COMPANIES hadn't canceled the plans.



Oh, come on.

Both Politifact (in the article I cited above, that this thread is based upon) and the Washington Post ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2013/12/16/the-big
gest-pinocchios-of-2013
/ ), hardly bastions of right-wing thought, have given the lie to this excuse.

Regardless of what you think of the ACA, the Administration's dissembling about it's results, the failure of the Healthcare.gov rollout, the delay in the small business rollout, the failure to foresee the underwhelming amount of signups by young people and Hispanics, the HHS secretary's plea to the insurance companies to cover folks who couldn't sign up by Jan. 01, 2014 due to failures in the exchange, and many other ACA-related failures should give anyone applying even a bit of critical thinking pause.

The idea of providing health care for everyone is commendable, but the implementation by this administration has been massively botched.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:42 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Actually, Bush 41's " read my lips " is closer to Barry's pledge to close Gitmo in year 1 of being in office. May have meant it at the time, but failed to carry through.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 17, 2013 1:54 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

The idea of providing health care for everyone is commendable, but the implementation by this administration has been massively botched.

The individual market was a mess, and reforming it was always going to cause disruption in that market. There were always going to be winners and losers, and there was no way to reform it that would have allowed everyone to keep their plans.

See: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/11/08/wonkbook-ob
ama-shouldnt-apologize-for-blowing-up-the-terrible-individual-market
/

Quote:

Obama is rightly taking flack for making a promise he wasn't going to keep, and he's right to apologize for it. But he shouldn't apologize for blowing up the individual market. It needed to be done.


Quote:

Obama was wrong to promise that everyone who liked their insurance could keep it. For a small minority of Americans, that flatly isn't true. But the real sin would've been leaving the individual insurance market alone.


Amen.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:03 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Lie of the Year ... Worst Year in Washington ... Top Ten Kardashian Moments of the Year. It's all the same self-serving stupid crap. These things mean nothing.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:49 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Amen indeed, KPO. All this will pass eventually and the ACA will still be around, just like SSI, Medicare and Medicare Part D, who all had difficult beginnings.

After the mention of "half true" and "true" and finally "lie of the year", I wanted to understand all this better, so I looked into it. I found these analyses interesting:
Quote:

Barack Obama: If you "already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have."

Obama is correct that the plans under consideration do not force those who currently have insurance to change plans. The proposals seek to build on the current system, where many Americans get coverage through work. Right now, employers have the freedom to change or drop coverage, and they will continue to have that freedom under health reform. Doctors, too, can opt in or out of accepting various insurance plans, including Medicare.

Given what we know about reform, it seems likely that at least some people will have employers who decide to change plans when insurers alter their offerings under the new regulations. This would be most likely for any small businesses that currently offer health insurance. They will be allowed to use a national exchange where insurers compete to offer insurance, and prices are expected to be lower.

Obama's statement is true, there is nothing in the plan that proactively forces these kinds of changes, and the bills clearly intend to leave much of the current health care system in place. We rate Obama's statement True. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/sep/09/barack-
obama/health-insurance-through-work-stays-place-under-re/
]


Quote:

Barack Obama: "If you're one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance."

First, a March 2012 study by the Congressional Budget Office, the nonpartisan number-crunching arm of Congress, projected that 3 million to 5 million fewer non-elderly people would obtain coverage through their employer each year from 2019 through 2022 than would have been the case before the law was passed. Including those with individually purchased policies enlarges that decline by an additional 1 million to 3 million Americans.

CBO’s estimate is broadly in line with a number of other independent estimates. A study by the Urban Institute projected a decline of about 500,000 people. The Lewin Group predicted a decline of about 3 million people. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services actuary pegged the number at about 1 million fewer people. And the RAND Corp. projected that about 4 million more individuals would be covered by employment-based coverage by 2016.

Why are these changes occurring? Some will be made voluntarily by Americans seeking better health care options outside of their employer’s plan, but we think it’s reasonable for Obama to ignore these changes in his calculation.

Other switches will be involuntary. As we have previously noted, many Americans already lose their current health plan for reasons that have nothing to do with the new law. Your employer may change insurance carriers, for instance, or your insurance carrier may unilaterally modify the terms of your plan.

How common is this? The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, found that in 2007, just over 14 percent of the entire U.S. population "switched" health insurance. However, this underestimates the rate of switching, because the study included people of all ages (including those covered by Medicare, who rarely switch) and because it doesn’t count a switch from one plan to the other within the same insurance company.

The latter scenario is common. Mercer, a private consulting firm, found that in each of the years from 2005 to 2008, roughly a quarter of companies said they made changes to their plans that would result in employees paying a greater share of the cost. In 2009 and 2010, it rose to one-third.

The number becomes substantial if you add up the workers who lose coverage entirely; who change jobs (voluntarily or involuntarily); who work for companies that change insurance carriers or adjust plan terms significantly; or whose employer’s insurance carrier is merged or bought out. And knowing that many workers every year are already required to change plans provides a different impression than what Obama is suggesting.

Our ruling

Obama has a reasonable point: His health care law does take pains to allow Americans to keep their health plan if they want to remain on it. But Obama suggests that keeping the insurance you like is guaranteed. In reality, Americans are not simply able to keep their insurance through thick and thin. Even before the law has taken effect, the rate of forced plan-switching among policyholders every year is substantial, and the CBO figures suggest that the law could increase that rate, at least modestly, even if Americans on balance benefit from the law’s provisions. We rate Obama’s claim Half True. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jun/29/barack-
obama/barack-obama-says-under-his-health-care-law-those-/
]


Quote:

Sorting out the real story on 'If you like your plan, you can keep it'

The debate over the health care law has been particularly messy and misleading in the past week, and there is plenty of blame to go around over who created the confusion.

Spin from the left

Make no mistake, the blame for the mess happening now starts with Obama. His promise that you could keep your plan if you like it was always going to be correct for some people — and wrong for others.

His comment oversimplified the changes that the health care law imposed on insurers and overemphasized the two biggest ways people receive health insurance, through their work or through government.

For many, if not most of those people, their health care will largely stay the same — except for the usual, annual adjustments that pre-dated the health care law. The regulations implementing the new law included a technical out — that employer and individual plans in place before the health care law was passed could remain in place so long as they weren’t changed substantially. That’s the "grandfather" clause.

In a technical sense, insurers are pulling the plug on these old, grandfathered policies. But that’s deceptive. The law places grandfathered plans in such a straitjacket — unable to attract new individual policyholders and unable to adjust terms to market conditions — that it’s only a matter of time before companies choose to pull the plug.

Spin from the right

The president’s opponents have done their fair share to mangle an already-complicated issue.

The universe of people facing significant changes or insurance cancellations remains small, with talk ranging between 6 and 10 percent. Stated in the reverse, most people will be able to keep their health insurance plan, if they like it.

Yet, it didn’t stop conservative talk radio host Glenn Beck from claiming this week that "half of the population of the United States would lose their health insurance." And Fox News aired a segment Monday entitled "Expert predicts 129 million people will lose health coverage."

Both claims are wrong, even by the admission of the person who created an estimate that Beck and Fox News cited as proof. We rated Beck’s claim Pants on Fire.

Christopher Conover, a scholar at the Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research at Duke University and an adjunct scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, recently estimated the number of people that would lose their existing health insurance coverage by the end of 2014. His number: somewhere between 18 million and 50 million. He specifically wrote: "Let me clear that I am not predicting that 135.8 million Americans have or will have their policies canceled due to Obamacare."

Many people will keep their insurance, while others will find insurance elsewhere. And, though it’s gotten lost in the back-and-forth, uninsured Americans will get insurance because of the health care law. Official estimates from the Congressional Budget Office show the law should lower the number of the uninsured from 55 million in 2013 to 29 million in 2017.

Conclusion

Talking about the health care law in the context of Obama’s "if you like your plan, you can keep it" promise is challenging, particularly in 30-second sound bites. That’s led to distortions by Republicans and Democrats.

Here are three, key points to help you understand what’s happening:

1. "If you like your plan, you can keep it" is true for the majority of Americans who have insurance but not for everyone, particularly people in the individual market.

2. The health care plan was largely designed so that some health care plans would go away. If not this year, then at some point down the road. That’s what ultimately makes Obama’s promise such a misstep.

3. Opponents of the law are so obsessed that they have consistently overstated attacks against the health care law, and they are guilty of oversimplifying Obama’s original "if you like it" promise. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/nov/06/sorting-ou
t-truth-if-you-your-plan-you-can-keep/



I'm quite willing to accept everything Politifact has analyzed above, and it shows how a statement can go from "true" to "half true" to "pants on fire" to "lie of the year", depending on how carefully it's phrased. I now recognize that Obama's 'If you like your plan, you can keep it' was given "lie of the year" not because of how BIG a lie it was, but because of how much attention and media coverage it got. Given that, for the vast majority of Americans, it is true, that how it was phrased depended on how accurate it was, and that the BLATANT LIES from the right were much more obviously false, even according to the person they "cited" for their "facts", I feel I now better understand.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 18, 2013 3:31 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Put it right next to:

Read My Lips

Mission Accomplished and, my favorite

WMDs


SGG

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Trump Presidency 2024 - predictions
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:54 - 15 posts
U.S. Senate Races 2024
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:49 - 9 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:47 - 35 posts
Are we witnessing President Biden's revenge tour?
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:44 - 7 posts
No Thread On Topic, More Than 17 Days After Hamas Terrorists Invade, Slaughter Innocent Israelis?
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:35 - 35 posts
Ghosts
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:30 - 72 posts
U.S. House Races 2024
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:30 - 5 posts
Election fraud.
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:28 - 35 posts
Will religion become extinct?
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:59 - 90 posts
Japanese Culture, S.Korea movies are now outselling American entertainment products
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:46 - 44 posts
Elon Musk
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:33 - 28 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:24 - 594 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL