Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

"It made its November through January prediction in October."

Two out of three ain't bad. Only January was cold, November and December were quite mild. Does being right two out of three count as being 'WAY' off?

MEANWHILE - NOAA: January 2014 Was 4th Warmest on Record.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Bye guys, it's been fun.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:
Predicting weather more than a couple of weeks in advance is notoriously difficult.

It's not personal. It's just war.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Sorry, but an anecdote about weather disproving climate change is not proof. The science done by real scientists is, and they agree.

---

Quote:

---

The Old Farmer’s Almanac, which made its winter predictions way back during the summer, used terms like “bitter,” “biting” and piercing” to describe how cold it was going to be, according to CBS News — and it was spot on.

---

Quote:

---

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2014/2

The contiguous U.S. February temperature was 32.2°F, 1.6°F below the 20th century average, and the 37th coldest February on record.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Sorry, but an anecdote about weather disproving climate change is not proof. The science done by real scientists is, and they agree.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:

So I'm still unclear from our resident denialists, whether they believe climate change is happening but not man made, or it's not happening at all. They seem to find posts that say both from time to time.

---

Quote:

---

Meh, stuff science. It's just another religion, right? So let me open my front door and float away, seeing as the theory of gravity is likely to just be more ALARMIST bullshit from these trouble makers.

---

Quote:

---

I don't get it.
FA is ignoring the realities of Global Warming?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, little rappy - don't you get tired of being wrong? I mean, here's a title - bold as day, unerasable and uneditable, with your name publicly and permanently attached - and so very, very wrong. Again. I mean really. Are you THAT much of a troll where the thrill of getting paid ANY attention to is actually worth the pain of being the village idiot?


OONJERAH
We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

And yet, repeatable observations give rise to the theory. So, unless you deal with reality by closing your eyes, blocking your ears and ... oh, wait, that's EXACTLY what you do.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:

Quote:

---

I don't get it.
FA is ignoring the realities of Global Warming?

---

Correct. You don't get it. AGW doesn't make specific predictions about the weather on particular days, weeks, months or even seasons.

It's not personal. It's just war.

---

Quote:

---

The Old Farmer’s Almanac, which made its winter predictions way back during the summer, used terms like “bitter,” “biting” and piercing”,,, -FA

---

Quote:

---

FA simply predicted there'd be a colder winter. -rappy

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:

Quote:

---

I don't get it.
FA is ignoring the realities of Global Warming?

---

Correct. You don't get it. AGW doesn't make specific predictions about the weather on particular days, weeks, months or even seasons.

It's not personal. It's just war.

---

Actually, not correct. FA simply predicted there'd be a colder winter. And there was . The methodology differs from other ways, because it takes into account the single biggest driver of this planet's weather, the Sun.

Seems pretty sensible, if you think about it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So your point is, the FA got it right?

It didn't. It predicted extreme cold - which didn't happen. Two months were mild. One was barely below average. It predicted lots of precipitation, ending drought problems. That was wrong as well.

What part did it get right?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
KPO - You agreed that FA is ignoring the "realities " of AGW. In fact, it DOES go on to make predictions on the weather.

WEATHER.


It doesn't bother w/ 'climate' change.

Good grief.

---

Quote:

---

The Old Farmer’s Almanac, which made its winter predictions way back during the summer, used terms like “bitter,” “biting” and piercing” to describe how cold it was going to be, according to CBS News — and it was spot on.

---

Quote:

---

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2014/2

The contiguous U.S. February temperature was 32.2°F, 1.6°F below the 20th century average, and the 37th coldest February on record.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kpo:

Quote:

---

I don't get it.
FA is ignoring the realities of Global Warming?

---

Correct. You don't get it. AGW doesn't make specific predictions about the weather on particular days, weeks, months or even seasons.

It's not personal. It's just war.

---

Actually, not correct. FA simply predicted there'd be a colder winter. And there was . The methodology differs from other ways, because it takes into account the single biggest driver of this planet's weather, the Sun.

Seems pretty sensible, if you think about it.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---