REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Objectivity and Ukraine

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, May 27, 2024 05:28
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5735
PAGE 2 of 2

Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:58 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

... pay attention to the Myths section because a lot of what you are claiming is in there, including the IMF part which had nothing to do with the agreement.
AH yes, those "myths". Anyone would probably believe the EU's after-the-fact explanations if they hadn't actually been following events.

The EU had a number of requirements that Ukraine had to meet, BEFORE the agreement was even signed. One of them (you may recall) was the release of Yulia Tymoshenko. You won't find it anywhere in the agreement, of course, because it was a precondition.

So during negotations, when Ukraine requested to be part of both the EU trade region and the Customs Union, according to European Commission José Manuel Barroso

Quote:

At the time President Yanukovych was also in negotiations with Russia to "find the right model" for cooperation with the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia. But also on 25 February 2013 President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso made it clear that "one country cannot at the same time be a member of a customs union and be in a deep common free-trade area with the European Union".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine%E2%80%93European_Union_Associati
on_Agreement


Now, in terms of loans, the document itself says...
Quote:

ARTICLE 453
Ukraine shall benefit from financial assistance through the relevant EU funding mechanisms and instruments. Such financial assistance will contribute to achieving the objectives of this Agreement and will be provided in accordance with the following Articles of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 455
The priority areas of the EU financial assistance agreed by the Parties shall be laid down in relevant indicative programmes reflecting agreed policy priorities. The indicative amounts of assistance established in these indicative programmes shall take into account Ukraine's needs, sector capacities and progress with reforms

ARTICLE 456
In order to make the best use of the resources available, the Parties shall endeavour to have EU assistance implemented in close cooperation and coordination with other donor countries, donor organisations and international financial institutions, and in line with international principles of aid effectiveness.

In other words, Ukraine is bound to accept loans only through EU funding mechanisms (ECB, IMF) and tied to internal economic reforms. (This is from the link that you provided http://eeas.europa.eu/ukraine/assoagreement/assoagreement-2013_en.htm)

THOSE requirements are laid out in the IMF loan agreement, as described ny the NYT
Quote:

“For months, the International Monetary Fund has refused to sign off on a nearly $15 billion dollar bailout loan that Ukraine needs by March to refinance its external debt. The IMF wants Ukraine to accept harsh conditions including raising domestic gas prices, and imposing strict budgetary austerity. These conditions could also lead to more political upheaval.”




Now, what did the DCFTA, as proposed to Yanukovich, say about NATO?

Quote:

The Treaty calls for a “political dialogue” to promote “convergence on foreign and security matters with the aim of Ukraine’s ever deeper involvement into the European security area (and) strengthen cooperation and dialogue between the Parties on international security and crisis management, notably in order to address global (!) and regional challenges and key threats” (Article 4, Sec. 1, Sec. 2(c)).

This political military dialogue is coordinated at various levels in several structures:

The EU’s Political and Security Committee (which coordinates both (1) the EU Military Committee, where the Defense Ministers coordinate operations, as well as (2) the Political Military Group) (Article 5 Sec. 3 (a))

“all diplomatic and military channels between the Parties, including appropriate contacts in third countries (United States) and within the United Nations, the OSCE, and other international fora (ie, NATO)” (Article 5 Sec. 3 (b). “Cooperation…shall aim at increasing policy convergence and effectiveness, and promoting joint policy planning. To this end, the Parties shall make use of bilateral (ie, including US-Ukrainian), international (ie NATO) and regional fora” (Article 7, Sec. 1)

And “regular meetings both at the level of high officials and of experts of the military institutions of the Parties,” (Article 5, Sec. 3(c));

And the European Defense Agency (Article 10 Sec. 3) which reports to the European Commission.

The Treaty calls for “increased participation of Ukraine in EU-led “civilian and military crisis management operations as well as relevant exercises and training” (Article 10, Sec. 1). Article 10, Section 3 specifically mandates the kind of military technological cooperation necessary for the degree of interoperability critical for unified command and control and combat efficiency; anticipating that Ukraine would sign onto this agreement, on June 24, 2013 the EU-Ukraine Cooperation Council which was established to implement the agreement published the “EU-Ukraine Association Agenda to prepare and facilitate the implementation of the Association Agreement” including: “increase interoperability where appropriate between Ukrainian peacekeeping units and EU Member States forces through lessons learned from relevant EU crisis management operations to which Ukraine participated, and through involvement of the units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine into the formation of EU Multinational Tactical Battle groups.”



http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-un-says-the-ukrainian-people-must-dec
ide-their-fate-nato-wants-something-else/5362936


How does the EU see the situation now?
Quote:

[Foreign minister] Paet said that Ukraine needs the political and economic support of the European Union and NATO to quickly move forward towards European integration. "The first step will be the signing this week of the political chapters of the EU-Ukraine Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) Association Agreement at the meeting of the EU Heads of State or Government, the foreign minister said. Paet also considers it important to remove customs duties on Ukrainian exports to the European Union.


And, just so you don't miss this point the next time

Quote:

Paet also emphasized the importance of continued and visible support for the reform efforts of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. "The cooperation and tightening of the relationship between the European Union and its Eastern Partners is very important in the current situation in order to alleviate the security crisis and to add a sense of confidence to all of Europe," he said. "The European Union Association and Free Trade Agreements with Georgia and Moldova must be concluded soon," he added.
Under NATO forces, just like Ukraine.
http://www.vm.ee/?q=en/node/19502

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 17, 2014 7:25 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Your reading comprehension really sucks. Perhaps you are just wanting to see what want.

You're right that Ukraine could not be part of a customs union with Russia and a free trade agreement with the EU. That is not really hard to understand. If you would have read the Myths page closely would would have seen it says the same thing. It also says that Ukraine could be part of a trade union with Russia as well. "Trade" and "Customs" are two different things.

You should also read the articles regarding financial help. Terms like "shall endeavour" do not mean must. So the agreement does not mean the Ukraine would have to take loans from the IMF but that would be preferred instead of taking money from Russia.

While NATO was looking to add Ukraine the trade agreement calls for increased co-operation, but not membership. God, forbid trade partners work together for a common defense.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:15 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

it's OK for the USA to have enough nuclear weapons to slag the world three times over, but not OK for Iran. Because we're the reasonable ones (although we're the only nation that used nuclear weapons on a population).


Of the two, Iran and the US, the US isn't the one who has openly called for the destruction of another country, and for it to be wiped off the face of the Earth.

Yeah.We ARE the reasonable ones. And anyone who can't see that, isn't worth listening to.

Funny thing, I was listening to a talk radio show from Sydney, Australia. The host called it " The Ukraine ", just as it's been referred to over here. Or use to be. Wonder how that sort of thing happens.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:27 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


In contracts and regulations, the word SHALL means MUST, not MAY. So, what I said was 100% correct... In the event that the Ukraine needed a loan (a forgone conclusion, given its debt)
Quote:

Ukraine is bound to accept loans only through EU funding mechanisms (ECB, IMF) and tied to internal economic reforms.
Unlike your mistaken impression, this is not a preference but a requirement.

So... your point was?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:20 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Of the two, Iran and the US, the US isn't the one who has openly called for the destruction of another country, and for it to be wiped off the face of the Earth.
Actually, we have....

Quote:

He said: “I just got this memo from the Secretary of Defense’s office. It says we’re going to attack and destroy the governments in 7 countries in five years – we’re going to start with Iraq, and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.”

http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/wes_clark_and_the_neocon_dream/

M52, the previous quote speaks to your misunderstanding
Quote:

Each case is different.
No, according to the neocons, all cases were the same. And the idea of destroying all those nations was thought up BEFORE 9-11.
Quote:

In Afghanistan we very well could have had lasting change and a stable government however we took our focus away from there and put in on Iraq.

The Iraq war was ill conceived. Colin Powell warned the Bush administration that if we went into Iraq we would have to own it. Powell understood that you were not going to get people in that country to come together to form a stable government. The administration at the time did not agree.

Libya we did accomplish the first goal, help the revolution get rid of the current government. We hoped that they could then come together and form something stable with us letting them do it without much interjection, unlike Afghanistan and Iraq. It has not worked. It was a different strategy.

Egypt, well that has worked in our favor. The Egyptian military whom now controls the country is much more friendly to us than the previous government.

Syria has it's own complications because of ties to Russia.

So it has not been the same strategy that has not worked, each case was different.

Wow, are we clumsy, or what?

So, what's our excuse with Sudan - "Oops"?

Ukraine - "Double oops"?



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 7:45 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


A memo isn't exactly an open declaration.

Good grief.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:12 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


So, I was telling some coworkers about you and your posts. They listened and two of them said simultaneously 'oh he's a troll' shrugged and went back to what it was they were doing. Like - whyever would anyone even both with that?

Why indeed.



OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:27 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Yes, because EVERY country with a "kill list" of countries is going to publicly declare open-season!

Sheesh.


Troll indeed!

However, it did interest me to post about the topic, because I had heard several quotes from Wolfowitz along those lines, describing the Bush Administration's list of targets. So, good on the troll for bringing up an important point.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:28 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
So, I was telling some coworkers about you and your posts. They listened and two of them said simultaneously 'oh he's a troll' shrugged and went back to what it was they were doing. Like - whyever would anyone even both with that?

Why indeed.



Simple minds flock together. I get that. I really do.

Seriously, what sort of fast food place do you work at that allows you free time to chat about what others say on internet forums ?

Why would they even care about a site they don't frequent ?



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:37 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yes, because EVERY country with a "kill list" of countries is going to publicly declare open-season!

Sheesh.



Well, there's Iran. And I believe N.Korea has made mention of nuking the United States....

Quote:



Troll indeed!

However, it did interest me to post about the topic, because I had heard several quotes from Wolfowitz along those lines, describing the Bush Administration's list of targets. So, good on the troll for bringing up an important point.




Sure ya did. And quotes from former a Deputy SecDef generally aren't what set foreign policy for the United States.

Meanwhile...

Quote:



Iran announced missile tests on Sunday and threatened to wipe Israel "off the face of the earth" if the Jewish state attacked it, brandishing some of its starkest threats on the day Europe began enforcing an oil embargo and harsh new sanctions....

The threat against the Jewish state echoed words President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad spoke in 2005, saying Israel "must be wiped off the page of time" — a phrase often translated as "wiped off the map" and cited by Israel to show how allowing Iran to get nuclear arms would be a threat to its existence.



Repeated public declarations of intent hardly compare w/ inter office memos sent out by DEPUTY SecDEf Wolfie.



Laughably sad, you are.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:40 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.






OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:46 PM

JONGSSTRAW



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 1:58 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


I WISH it was only one.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:05 PM

JONGSSTRAW


That wouldn't be any fun.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, May 18, 2014 2:09 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.






OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 19, 2014 12:49 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


HEY RAPPY!
Quote:

The "wiped off the map" translation originated from the state-controlled Islamic Republic News Agency.[81] This translation's use in the media has been criticized.[82] Arash Norouzi, artist and co-founder of The Mossadegh Project, says the statement "wiped off the map" did not exist in the original speech and that Ahmadinejad directed his comment toward the "regime occupying Jerusalem". Norouzi's translation of the Persian quote reads; "the Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."[83] Juan Cole, historian of the Middle East and South Asia, concurs; Ahmadinejad's statement should be translated as, "the Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)," noting that there is no Persian idiom to wipe something off the map.[84] Shiraz Dossa, a professor of Political Science at St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia, Canada, also believes the text is a mistranslation.[85]
“ Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini in the specific speech under discussion: what he said was that "the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time." No state action is envisaged in this lament; it denotes a spiritual wish, whereas the erroneous translation – "wipe Israel off the map" – suggests a military threat. There is a huge chasm between the correct and the incorrect translations. The notion that Iran can "wipe out" U.S.-backed, nuclear-armed Israel is ludicrous.[86][87][88]



But yanno, if these Iranians are terrible terrorists and a threat to Israel's survival, why did Reagan sell and ship them arms?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:18 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


A NATO general makes some very good points about the identity of some of the separatist gunmen:

Quote:

President Barack Obama, Chancellor Angela Merkel, Prime Minister David Cameron, President François Hollande, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and many others have publicly stated their belief that Russian forces are behind the events in Ukraine. I would like to provide some observations from our analytical experts to help explain why I strongly agree with these world leaders.

* The pro-Russian "activists” in eastern Ukraine exhibit tell-tale military training and equipment and work together in a way that is consistent with troops who are part of a long-standing unit, not spontaneously stood up from a local militia.
* The weapon handling discipline and professional behavior of these forces is consistent with a trained military force. Rifle muzzles are pointed down, fingers not on triggers, but rather laid across trigger mechanisms.
*Coordinated use of tear gas and stun grenades against targeted buildings indicates a level of training that exceeds a recently formed militia.
*Video of these forces at checkpoints shows they are attentive, on their feet, focused on their security tasks, and under control of an apparent leader. This contrasts with typical militia or mob checkpoints, where it’s common to see people sitting, smoking, and so forth.
* The way these forces target government buildings, hit them in coordinated strikes and quickly secure the surrounding area with roadblocks and barricades is similar to what we’ve seen in Crimea. Again, indicative of a professional military force, acting under direction and leadership, not a spontaneous militia.
* Finally, the weapons and equipment they carry are primarily Russian army issue. This is not the kind of equipment that civilians would be likely to be able to get their hands on in large numbers.

Any one of the points above taken alone would not be enough to come to a conclusion on this issue, but taken in the aggregate, the story is clear.



http://aco.nato.int/saceur2013/blog/who-are-the-men-behind-the-masks.a
spx


It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2014 10:19 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Many times, when I see clips of what's going on in eastern Ukraine, I see exactly what the EU "leadership" doesn't want to talk about.


So yes, SOME of the separatist gunmen are recently militarily trained. Maybe they're Russian. Maybe they're defectors from the Ukrainian regular army (which is why the new government had to create a "national guard") But what I see quite often is just people: People in jeans and sneakers. Women, some with children, trying to block APCs. Old men with old military gear. Young men in a motley assortment of Kevlar parts... some with the knee protectors, some with chest pieces, some with camo jackets.

Some little green men... who get along really well with the locals



The occasional pro-Russian biker gang



Average people



Mariupol: People versus tanks



Lada versus tank, Donetsk



Unarmed woman stopping a line of APCs.... like Tienanmen Square



You will NEVER see this on mainstream western media, which allows our fearless leaders to cherry-pick the "facts" and create a misleading narrative.

-------------

SO, speaking of misleading narratives... Kiev objected STRONGLY to a vote taken in Crimea because of some "little green men"- who apparently never fired any weapons. OTOH, Kiev intends to hold elections in regions being flooded with APCs, tanks, and attack helicopters (mislabeled with UN insignia), and taking missile, artillery, small-arms and the occasional mortar fire, and call it "fair". That is a level of hypocrisy even I couldn't have predicted.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 23, 2014 9:38 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Yes, it's war. But war is not a legitimate election, and it doesn't deserve USA or EU support.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 24, 2014 5:45 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

You will NEVER see this on mainstream western media,

How do you know, you never watch mainstream western media!

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 24, 2014 8:13 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


How would YOU know? I have a list of newslinks that I scan pretty much every day. Reuters, cnn and msnbc are three of them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 24, 2014 8:37 PM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


You keep talking about Western media as someone who doesn't know what it says. I saw the 'Lada stops tank' video on the BBC the day it happened. I read recently about grandmothers stopping tanks as well. I have seen countless interviews with pro-Russian Ukrainians. I saw a BBC journalist go up and interview two of the little green men and one of them had a Ukrainian passport.

You may 'scan' Western news media, but mainly I think you get your view of what it says from what pro-Russia media tells you it says

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 24, 2014 9:48 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, one of the sources I DON'T regularly go to is BBC.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 24, 2014 11:22 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Apropros of nothing in particular....

Seems the Beliye Kolgotky* have returned to the field, and are hammering away at BOTH current "sides", but most specifically targeting foreign "advisors" of any kind - which settles one particular notion about their origin, if true.

I had always kinda wondered about that.

-Frem
*white tights, but more often known by the derisive bitch-cuckoos

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 20, 2022 9:22 AM

JAYNEZTOWN


'In Kyiv, I saw Ukrainians on the frontlines of a very real culture war'

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/nov/07/kyiv-ukrainians-
culture-war-russian-decolonisation


GOP claims Joe Biden was involved with Hunter Biden’s international business deals

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/hunter-biden-joe-biden
-business-deals-republican-house


Ukraine invasion — explained

https://www.npr.org/series/1082539802/russia-ukraine-invasion-explaine
d



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 27, 2024 5:28 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sat, December 21, 2024 19:06 - 256 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:55 - 69 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:29 - 4989 posts
Music II
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:22 - 135 posts
WMD proliferation the spread of chemical and bio weapons, as of the collapse of Syria
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:15 - 3 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Sat, December 21, 2024 18:11 - 6965 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, December 21, 2024 17:58 - 4901 posts
TERRORISM EXPANDS TO GERMANY ... and the USA, Hungary, and Sweden
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:20 - 36 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Sat, December 21, 2024 15:00 - 242 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, December 21, 2024 14:48 - 978 posts
Who hates Israel?
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:45 - 81 posts
French elections, and France in general
Sat, December 21, 2024 13:43 - 187 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL