Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
You clam: Jewelstaitefan;
Incorrect. Ford was not the Veep at the time of any of the 3 proposed charges, or Articles of alleged misdeeds. Are you claiming another charge or Article specifying misdeeds which occurred at a time when Ford was Veep



I did not read further than this silly comment.

Vice President

Spiro Agnew (1969–1973)
Gerald Ford (1973–1974)

What I claimed was Ford was Nixon's Vice President.

Gerald Ford became Nixon's second Vice President after Agnew resigned in disgrace.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Glad you were entertained.

---

Funny you should react like that.

Your personna has undergone a large shift as late. Just like Sig. Just like Rappy.

Hmmm.




*-------------------------------------------------*
What trolls reveal about themselves when they troll:
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=57532
*-------------------------------------------------*

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:

I elect not to indulge the aforementioned clown, buffoon and or Illiterate beyond this point instead choosing to it let pass.

---

By posting this you are not letting it pass, Rap, oops! I mean, MIKER.
Sorry, all politically self-righteous & ultimately infallible peeps look the same to me.

I hope they're not paying you well for this nonsense.

---

Miker/Rap/Sig/JSF/etc apparently have nothing to do all day but post back and forth with trivial stupid insults that have no actual factual content.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
Now you are offering up other peoples opinions as prof of your argument. Read what you have just posted. It is about Nixon's innocents. Along with a personal opinion about me that I also found entertaining.

As I have said many times now including when I answered your quoted post the first time, it is Gerald Ford and others who say he is guilty. Take it up with them.

---

I have no idea which post you are referring to. This post and it's claims don't make sense, so I would respond to them if I knew what you meant.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:

Hey MAL4PREZ:


Mistakes do happen but not this time. When I did mistake your post for being hostel towards me, (the other post) you could have just pointed it out. After all you did recognize it as being a mistake and not directed at you? It does get a little confusing all these posts and all. So why did you respond the way you did????

I see with you it is self praise your into. I love reading how you have my personality figured out. How you are so hip to me. So, your the groups psychoanalyst. I have enjoyed watching you slink in and out of conversations. Reappearing long enough to school the rest of us on our delusions or ignorance as perceived by you, only to disappear again. A bit of a narcissist huh.

"Again I can do nothing but point and laugh. I have not argued with "Miker" before tonight. On purpose. To flush you out".

This is a quote form you and appears to me to be classic narcissistic behavior.


"Sig undergoes an extreme change in personality after I poke her/it about her years-old symbiosis with Rap".

Another quote from you. You're so hip to us all. Yep, the psychoanalyst. I love the way you explain to the other participants in the thread what you are up to and how you have proceeded so brilliantly, because with you that's what its really about is it not?


Which is why you have this link in your signature:

http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=57532
"Peer-reviewed scientific paper: Internet Trolls are Narcissistic, Machiavellian, psychopathic, and sadistic".

Yeah, you have to show all how you are so brilliant and can stalk your victim coming in for the kill with your super wit to expose our psychosis. You pick something here someone said and pick something there someone said, because really, offering some new insight into the discussion is not what you are about. Coming to the rescue is. Trying to be everyone's champion is. After the setup of pretending to offer some new truth( which is usually little more than something you have cut and pasted ), you character assonate the one you have picked for that particular performance.

"Trolls are Narcissistic", and judging from what you have written in the post I am responding to, I would say that title fits you just fine.

Your problem is, you have no arrows in you quiver.


Nope, not impressed at all.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
Goodnight.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
You got that right, very good.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:

The reason it is not called an Impeachment is because he accepted guilt of all charges and to just call it an Impeachment would be to lessen the graveness of history's final judgment against Richard Nixon.

In this thread you all keep saying Nixon has not accepted guilt, but Gerald Ford his Vice President at the time of the offence,

---

Incorrect. Ford was not the Veep at the time of any of the 3 proposed charges, or Articles of alleged misdeeds. Are you claiming another charge or Article specifying misdeeds which occurred at a time when Ford was Veep?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
Now you are offering up other peoples opinions as prof of your argument. Read what you have just posted. It is about Nixon's innocents. Along with a personal opinion about me that I also found entertaining.

As I have said many times now including when I answered your quoted post the first time, it is Gerald Ford and others who say he is guilty. Take it up with them.

---

I have no idea which post you are referring to. This post and it's claims don't make sense, so I would respond to them if I knew what you meant.

---

This is my post which is stamped 24 May, 2:34pm my time. In it I quote your post from 23 May, 5:44pm.
Your next post at 24 May, 2:43pm states that the post you are referring to in your 23 May, 5:44pm post is a post from 24 May, 2:06pm.
So you referred to a post which was not yet made?

---

You are a really funny guy. Show me where it shows a time stamp on the quotes in blue you have posted. DUH! You show me quotes with no time stamps and then proceed to put your own to them. That's great. Proves nothing.

I am still waiting for the documents showing all the White House Lawyers reigned with Nixon to prepare his defense. You have done nothing but change the subject since I ask you to produce them. When you produce them I will start responding to your posts. Show me documents showing they resigned.

WASH: Yes, Jayne. She’s a witch. She has had congress with the beast. JAYNE: She’s in Congress? WASH: How did your brain even learn human speech? I’m just so curious.

You know before I insult you I should ask your age?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
In this thread you all keep saying Nixon has not accepted guilt, but Gerald Ford his Vice President at the time of the offence,

---

---

---

You miss understand. While this whole process was taking place ford was first a vice president and then president. I never implied he was vice president during the break in.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
Show me the documents that support what you suggest. That all the White House lawyers resigned with Nixon and started preparing his defense?


Your quote:
"Incorrect. Nixon's White House Staff of lawyers was out of the game for a month between resignation and pardon. The lawyers of Nixon's White House were preparing to defend the false charges (Articles) when Nixon himself made the decision to resign in the best interests of the nation".

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by MIKER:
Now you are offering up other peoples opinions as prof of your argument. Read what you have just posted. It is about Nixon's innocents. Along with a personal opinion about me that I also found entertaining.

As I have said many times now including when I answered your quoted post the first time, it is Gerald Ford and others who say he is guilty. Take it up with them.

---

I have no idea which post you are referring to. This post and it's claims don't make sense, so I would respond to them if I knew what you meant.

---

This is my post which is stamped 24 May, 2:34pm my time. In it I quote your post from 23 May, 5:44pm.
Your next post at 24 May, 2:43pm states that the post you are referring to in your 23 May, 5:44pm post is a post from 24 May, 2:06pm.
So you referred to a post which was not yet made?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Hey Chris, even Ron Jeremy couldn't last this long!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Heh, I was in a movie with him. My dubious claim to fame. Never saw him on set though.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by chrisisall:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Hey Chris, even Ron Jeremy couldn't last this long!

---

Heh, I was in a movie with him. My dubious claim to fame. Never saw him on set though.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

You were catching? facing away from him?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:



Besides, all you really proved is that you're as big an assclown as the clueless douche you argued with for 200 posts.

---