Most ice on Antarctica ever recorded. by JEWELSTAITEFAN

America loves a winner!

We've been over this before.

It's not the right KIND of ice, so that means more of it is a bad thing.

Don't you get how this works ?

Sheesh.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 6:56 PM

JONGSSTRAW

See son ... shaken, not stirred.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 7:03 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:

See son ... shaken, not stirred.

Gary Larson would smack you good and hard for that one, Jongs.

No polar bears in Antarctica.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 7:11 PM

JONGSSTRAW

An oldie, but still a goodie ...

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:30 PM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
We've been over this before.

It's not the right KIND of ice

Wow, you're correct again (it DOES happen!).
Record cover of ice.
Thick ice would designate VOLUME.
Good work, brother.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:45 PM

There is good cholesterol and there is bad cholesterol.....

Was going to say that to make fun of different kinds of ice until Chris's post....

I bet it needs to get a lot warmer to melt the eons old ice that is so compact it's making Ice Diamonds than the ice that was made this year.

I'm a pragmatic man. This makes sense to me.

I'm not agreeing with one side or the other, since none of us actually know the answer. I'm just saying that this particular point that Chris is making holds water. (Accidental pun)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:48 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
An oldie, but still a goodie ...

I would pay serious money, and maybe even donate a body part or two, to see that happen for reals.

Quote:

I'm not agreeing with one side or the other, since none of us actually know the answer. I'm just saying that this particular point that Chris is making holds water. (Accidental pun)

And what about the particular point of 2012 NOT being the hottest year on record ?

Or should that question not be asked in the wrong thread ?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:56 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
And what about the particular point of 2012 NOT being the hottest year on record ?

Or should that question not be asked in the wrong thread ?

I am only talking about the fresh makeup of new ice that was on record.

I know nothing of how cold or hot it was in millions of different places year round and how they all added up and divided into the warmest or coolest year on record.

I was only talking about the "wrong kind of ice" statement.

I don't know what the facts are, otherwise, but I'd stake my life that the difference between the existing "eons old" ice and the little bit of surface ice cover created in a single year is staggering.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 9:29 PM

STORYMARK

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
We've been over this before.

It's not the right KIND of ice, so that means more of it is a bad thing.

Your willfull stupidity knows no bounds.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 9:41 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
We've been over this before.

It's not the right KIND of ice
Wow, you're correct again (it DOES happen!).
Record cover of ice.
Thick ice would designate VOLUME.
Good work, brother.

Funny to see Storybook get so bent over this.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 9:54 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Funny to see Storybook get so bent over this.

I don't think any of us have ever changed any one elses mind since the RWED started :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 10:08 PM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I don't think any of us have ever changed any one elses mind since the RWED started :)

Mine has been changed pretty radically.
I used to be a LOT more Liberal.

I've been made to see that it's more of a power struggle than actual idealogical differences.
I'm an INDEPENDENT now. My coat is kind of a brownish colour.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 10:33 PM

America loves a winner!

was it on sale ?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 3, 2014 10:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I don't think any of us have ever changed any one elses mind since the RWED started :)
Mine has been changed pretty radically.
I used to be a LOT more Liberal.

I've been made to see that it's more of a power struggle than actual idealogical differences.
I'm an INDEPENDENT now. My coat is kind of a brownish colour.

Yeah.... I was a lot more Conservative before too....

How many generations are just going to continue to root for assholes that don't even pretend not to screw us over anymore?

Do what you gotta do. Me? I'll just continue to be the fool on the hill....

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, July 4, 2014 12:24 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Yanno what I really like about this thread too? The complete absence of verifiable facts and the total presence of dog-whistle reality. Just heard? Uhm, what exactly did you hear? Who said it? Where can we check it out? NADA. That's GREAT!/ sarcasm

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Just heard about this. Comes from another libtard scientist. He claims the reason Antarctica has more ice than ever before is......Global Warming.

SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, July 4, 2014 12:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:

Yanno what I really like about this thread too? The complete absence of verifiable facts and the total presence of dog-whistle reality. Just heard? Uhm, what exactly did you hear? Who said it? Where can we check it out? NADA. That's GREAT!/ sarcasm \

Yeah....

Just about every thread on here...

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, July 4, 2014 7:50 AM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Just heard about this. Comes from another libtard scientist. He claims the reason Antarctica has more ice than ever before is......Global Warming.

The story is old. 2010. www.skepticalscience.com/archive.php?r=239

It was published in National Geographic News in October 13, 2012 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/10/121013-antarctica-sea-
ice-record-high-science-global-warming/

The story gets repeated in 2013 www.universetoday.com/105952/antarctic-sea-ice-takes-over-more-of-the-
ocean-than-ever-before/

If you are the CEO of Exxon-Mobile Oil and read only Forbes then you can probably come to only the same conclusions as this article from 2012 www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/09/19/antarctic-sea-ice-sets-ano
ther-record/

You obviously aren't a CEO because you heard the story far too late.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2014 7:16 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
We've been over this before.

It's not the right KIND of ice
Wow, you're correct again (it DOES happen!).
Record cover of ice.
Thick ice would designate VOLUME.
Good work, brother.

chrisisall woke up again? Or is he off his meds this week? Or on his meds?
Nice to see ya experiencing clarity.

waves

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2014 7:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Just heard about this. Comes from another libtard scientist. He claims the reason Antarctica has more ice than ever before is......Global Warming.
The story is old. 2010. www.skepticalscience.com/archive.php?r=239

It was published in National Geographic News in October 13, 2012 http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/10/121013-antarctica-sea-
ice-record-high-science-global-warming/

The story gets repeated in 2013 www.universetoday.com/105952/antarctic-sea-ice-takes-over-more-of-the-
ocean-than-ever-before/

If you are the CEO of Exxon-Mobile Oil and read only Forbes then you can probably come to only the same conclusions as this article from 2012 www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/09/19/antarctic-sea-ice-sets-ano
ther-record/

You obviously aren't a CEO because you heard the story far too late.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

Thanks for looking up the linkys. But won't this foul the mood of any skeptics? They would have been able to look that up, right?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, July 7, 2014 7:45 PM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
We've been over this before.

It's not the right KIND of ice
Wow, you're correct again (it DOES happen!).
Record cover of ice.
Thick ice would designate VOLUME.
Good work, brother.

chrisisall woke up again? Or is he off his meds this week? Or on his meds?
Nice to see ya experiencing clarity.

waves

LOL, I see clarification is in dire need.

Wow, you're correct again [about it not being the 'RIGHT' kind of ice (sarcasm)] (it DOES happen!).
Record cover of ice.
Thick ice would designate VOLUME [ 'cause, yanno, THIN ice like what was observed... DOESN'T].
Good work, brother[more sarcasm].

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, July 8, 2014 1:54 PM

STORYMARK

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:

Yanno what I really like about this thread too? The complete absence of verifiable facts and the total presence of dog-whistle reality. Just heard? Uhm, what exactly did you hear? Who said it? Where can we check it out? NADA. That's GREAT!/ sarcasm
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Just heard about this. Comes from another libtard scientist. He claims the reason Antarctica has more ice than ever before is......Global Warming.

They're actually proud of their ignorance. That, and I think they'd actually rather let civilization end, full stop, rather than admit that "libruls" were right.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, July 8, 2014 2:45 PM

REAVERFAN

Science means nothing to these guys. They prefer to unquestioningly swallow the propaganda fed to them by reichwing-funded sources.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, July 8, 2014 4:22 PM

America loves a winner!

Thin ice means it's warmer.

Right.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, July 8, 2014 4:23 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Science means nothing to these guys. They prefer to unquestioningly swallow the propaganda fed to them by reichwing-funded sources.

There's that word again.. 'realm' wing.

Wonder if RF will ever get around to explaining just what the fuck that's suppose to mean.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, July 9, 2014 1:48 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Science means nothing to these guys. They prefer to unquestioningly swallow the propaganda fed to them by reichwing-funded sources.

There's that word again.. 'realm' wing.

Wonder if RF will ever get around to explaining just what the fuck that's suppose to mean.

It seems to mean he cannot spell and cannot comprehend a dictionary.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, July 9, 2014 1:52 PM