Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:



BTW, what's Billocutus gonna do all day in the White House ... assimilate interns into his collective?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Wish

those humans aren't the whole species

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Not me and the people I know???

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:



BTW, what's Billocutus gonna do all day in the White House ... assimilate interns into his collective?

---

Something a little more worth while than you did with your life I sure.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Wish

That's true. OTOH you list is pretty specific. It'd be pretty easy to avoid THOSE things. But if you're looking for people who haven't done ANYthing stupid or mean - well, nobody's perfect.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

... but it was a hell of a lot better than dumbya.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

BTW, what's Billocutus gonna do all day in the White House ... assimilate interns into his collective?

---

---

1. That's not my quote . Jongs posted that. Get it right.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Something a little more worth while than you did with your life I sure.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
BTW, what's Billocutus gonna do all day in the White House ... assimilate interns into his collective?

---

Something a little more worth while than you did with your life I sure.

---

1. That's not my quote . Jongs posted that. Get it right.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Monica Lewinsky was 22 years old, a free adult in any state in the USofA and fully capable of making her own choices. Unless you want to make her choices for her, put her in a burqa, and lock her in the house unless accompanied by a husband or male relative.

Do you?

---

Quote:

---

BTW, at the time Chelsea was 15. That's a 7 year difference, not 'a couple' of years, which, in normal English, means two. But hey who's counting? Because apparently - NOT YOU!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
"The Bush family’s dealings illustrate some of the ways this S&L loot was extracted. In some loan transactions, money was simply siphoned out fraudulently to outsiders under lucrative arrangements with bank directors; Neil Bush’s record illustrates these type of transactions. In other instances, as exemplified by Jeb’s S&L dealings, loans were made for speculative investments or ventures without attempts to secure repayment if they were not profitable. Political connections often helped protect S&L misconduct;9 in the Bush’s case, George senior’s record demonstrated laxity toward the perpetrators, several of whom were in his own social circles."

"BACKGROUND ON THE S&L BAILOUT. The failure of hundreds of U.S. Savings and Loans during the 1980s, as detailed in such sources as Stephen Pizzo’s Inside Job1 and Pete Brewton’s Untold Story,2 cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $500 billion."

http://campaignwatch.org/more1.htm

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
YOU GUYS DON'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT MUCH AT ALL DO YA?

"The Bush family’s dealings illustrate some of the ways this S&L loot was extracted. In some loan transactions, money was simply siphoned out fraudulently to outsiders under lucrative arrangements with bank directors; Neil Bush’s record illustrates these type of transactions. In other instances, as exemplified by Jeb’s S&L dealings, loans were made for speculative investments or ventures without attempts to secure repayment if they were not profitable. Political connections often helped protect S&L misconduct;9 in the Bush’s case, George senior’s record demonstrated laxity toward the perpetrators, several of whom were in his own social circles."

"BACKGROUND ON THE S&L BAILOUT. The failure of hundreds of U.S. Savings and Loans during the 1980s, as detailed in such sources as Stephen Pizzo’s Inside Job1 and Pete Brewton’s Untold Story,2 cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $500 billion."

http://campaignwatch.org/more1.htm

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Infidelity is indefensible.


Sounds like this should go into rappy's New Testament of Sharia.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
YOU GUYS DON'T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT MUCH AT ALL DO YA?

"The Bush family’s dealings illustrate some of the ways this S&L loot was extracted. In some loan transactions, money was simply siphoned out fraudulently to outsiders under lucrative arrangements with bank directors; Neil Bush’s record illustrates these type of transactions. In other instances, as exemplified by Jeb’s S&L dealings, loans were made for speculative investments or ventures without attempts to secure repayment if they were not profitable. Political connections often helped protect S&L misconduct;9 in the Bush’s case, George senior’s record demonstrated laxity toward the perpetrators, several of whom were in his own social circles."

"BACKGROUND ON THE S&L BAILOUT. The failure of hundreds of U.S. Savings and Loans during the 1980s, as detailed in such sources as Stephen Pizzo’s Inside Job1 and Pete Brewton’s Untold Story,2 cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $500 billion."

http://campaignwatch.org/more1.htm

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THUGRRY:

I'm gay and a moron who don't have a clue about what I speak.

---

Quote:

---

]Originally posted by AURaptor:
Sig, you need to take it up w/ Neal Boortz, who is a lawyer and whine to him.

---

Quote:

---

I personally don't give a flying fornication over the matter. Or under it.

---

Quote:

---

WHY DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS TIME AND TIME AGAIN?

Well, the answer to that question is clear. We have to go over this time after time because there are certain people out there, we'll call them "liberals," who are still in a state of despair and shock over President Bush's successful removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the liberation of the Iraqi people.

Day after day we read newS stories, columns and various opinion pieces from the Molly Ivins brigade trumpeting Bush's failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This presumably means that the entire Iraqi effort was illegitimate and, perhaps, that Bush ought to be defeated in 2004, at best, or impeached, at worst for his failure.

OK, folks. One more time .. by the numbers ...
Both the UN and the United States had knowledge of Saddam's WMDs.
The UN ordered Saddam to destroy his WMDs.
Saddam agreed to destroy his WMDs.
Saddam agreed to provide evidence of the destruction of his WMDs
Before destroying his WMDs Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq.
After Saddam kicked out the inspectors there was evidence that he began a program to hide his WMDs
Saddam now claims that he destroyed his WMDs, after he kicked out the weapons inspectors.
Saddam has never failed any evidence that he destroyed the WMDs.
Three UN resolutions, Numbers 678, 687 and 1441 authorize either the UN or any member state to use force against Saddam Hussein if he fails to abide by his agreements to destroy his WMDs, and to document that destruction.
The United States, Great Britain, Australia, Spain and about 38 other nations banded together to act against Saddam in compliance with those three UN resolutions.

It's just that easy. Any questions?

---

Quote:

---

"Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this
resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under
relevant resolutions of the Council

---

Quote:

---

In her 2014 memoir “Hard Choices,” Clinton reiterated her support for human-rights advocates in China. She specifically criticized the Great Firewall, writing that after she made comments about the right to dissent in China in 2011, “censors went right to work erasing mentions of my message from the Internet.”

But the issue of Chinese repression — and Cisco’s role — was already known by then. In 2009, weeks after Clinton’s State Department had named Cisco a finalist for the secretary of state’s Awards for Corporate Excellence (ACE), a report from the Electronic Freedom Foundation noted “Cisco’s deep involvement” in building the Chinese government’s censorship system. The report pointed out that “Cisco engineers gave a presentation acknowledging the repressive uses for their technology.”

Daniel Wade, an attorney who represented Chinese dissidents in a lawsuit against Cisco, told IBTimes that “Cisco knew full well that its products were going to be used to suppress and facilitate the torture of democracy activists.”

“Crony capitalism has defined Clinton’s career, from her tenure on the board of Walmart, to the Wall Street execs whom she surrounded herself with at the State Department, to her allegiance to Cisco, even as it violated principles on which she staked her tenure,” said David Segal, executive director of the Internet freedom advocacy group Demand Progress.

---

Quote:

---

Sig - to the contrary, this should shine the light on the dirty little secret that it's not the GOP who is wedded to big business, but it's the Dems. -RAPPY

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Sig - to the contrary, this should shine the light on the dirty little secret that it's not the GOP who is wedded to big business, but it's the Dems. -RAPPY

---

Seriously? I could bring you quite a list of all the big businesses that the Republicans are chained to!

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

---