Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Fat old moose announces she's running for President
Sunday, April 19, 2015 2:47 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Sunday, April 19, 2015 2:53 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Sunday, April 19, 2015 3:22 PM
JONGSSTRAW
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: When you start off mis-characterizing my views or the views of others, the desire to even attempt an honest exchange drops greatly. The laying out of false premises as a starting point gets us no where.
Sunday, April 19, 2015 3:23 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 3:29 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 3:41 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:26 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Quote:]Originally posted by AURaptor: OK, folks. One more time .. by the numbers ... Both the UN and the United States had knowledge of Saddam's WMDs. The UN ordered Saddam to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to provide evidence of the destruction of his WMDs Before destroying his WMDs Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq. After Saddam kicked out the inspectors there was evidence that he began a program to hide his WMDs Saddam now claims that he destroyed his WMDs, after he kicked out the weapons inspectors. Saddam has never failed any evidence that he destroyed the WMDs. Three UN resolutions, Numbers 678, 687 and 1441 authorize either the UN or any member state to use force against Saddam Hussein if he fails to abide by his agreements to destroy his WMDs, and to document that destruction. The United States, Great Britain, Australia, Spain and about 38 other nations banded together to act against Saddam in compliance with those three UN resolutions. I have to say your 'facts' are highly ... hmmm ... untrue.
Quote:]Originally posted by AURaptor: OK, folks. One more time .. by the numbers ... Both the UN and the United States had knowledge of Saddam's WMDs. The UN ordered Saddam to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to provide evidence of the destruction of his WMDs Before destroying his WMDs Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq. After Saddam kicked out the inspectors there was evidence that he began a program to hide his WMDs Saddam now claims that he destroyed his WMDs, after he kicked out the weapons inspectors. Saddam has never failed any evidence that he destroyed the WMDs. Three UN resolutions, Numbers 678, 687 and 1441 authorize either the UN or any member state to use force against Saddam Hussein if he fails to abide by his agreements to destroy his WMDs, and to document that destruction. The United States, Great Britain, Australia, Spain and about 38 other nations banded together to act against Saddam in compliance with those three UN resolutions.
Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:32 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:]Originally posted by AURaptor: WHY DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS TIME AND TIME AGAIN? Well, the answer to that question is clear. We have to go over this time after time because there are certain people out there, we'll call them "liberals," who are still in a state of despair and shock over President Bush's successful removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the liberation of the Iraqi people. Day after day we read newS stories, columns and various opinion pieces from the Molly Ivins brigade trumpeting Bush's failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This presumably means that the entire Iraqi effort was illegitimate and, perhaps, that Bush ought to be defeated in 2004, at best, or impeached, at worst for his failure. OK, folks. One more time .. by the numbers ... Both the UN and the United States had knowledge of Saddam's WMDs. The UN ordered Saddam to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to provide evidence of the destruction of his WMDs Before destroying his WMDs Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq. After Saddam kicked out the inspectors there was evidence that he began a program to hide his WMDs Saddam now claims that he destroyed his WMDs, after he kicked out the weapons inspectors. Saddam has never failed any evidence that he destroyed the WMDs. Three UN resolutions, Numbers 678, 687 and 1441 authorize either the UN or any member state to use force against Saddam Hussein if he fails to abide by his agreements to destroy his WMDs, and to document that destruction. The United States, Great Britain, Australia, Spain and about 38 other nations banded together to act against Saddam in compliance with those three UN resolutions. It's just that easy. Any questions? Yes, just one question- How did you manage to get so derailed from reality on this topic? Yanno, I could do a point-by-point ... in fact, have done so quite a number of times already ...
Quote:]Originally posted by AURaptor: WHY DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS TIME AND TIME AGAIN? Well, the answer to that question is clear. We have to go over this time after time because there are certain people out there, we'll call them "liberals," who are still in a state of despair and shock over President Bush's successful removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the liberation of the Iraqi people. Day after day we read newS stories, columns and various opinion pieces from the Molly Ivins brigade trumpeting Bush's failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This presumably means that the entire Iraqi effort was illegitimate and, perhaps, that Bush ought to be defeated in 2004, at best, or impeached, at worst for his failure. OK, folks. One more time .. by the numbers ... Both the UN and the United States had knowledge of Saddam's WMDs. The UN ordered Saddam to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to destroy his WMDs. Saddam agreed to provide evidence of the destruction of his WMDs Before destroying his WMDs Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out of Iraq. After Saddam kicked out the inspectors there was evidence that he began a program to hide his WMDs Saddam now claims that he destroyed his WMDs, after he kicked out the weapons inspectors. Saddam has never failed any evidence that he destroyed the WMDs. Three UN resolutions, Numbers 678, 687 and 1441 authorize either the UN or any member state to use force against Saddam Hussein if he fails to abide by his agreements to destroy his WMDs, and to document that destruction. The United States, Great Britain, Australia, Spain and about 38 other nations banded together to act against Saddam in compliance with those three UN resolutions. It's just that easy. Any questions?
Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:34 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Sig - to the contrary, this should shine the light on the dirty little secret that it's not the GOP who is wedded to big business, but it's the Dems. -RAPPY Seriously? I could bring you quite a list of all the big businesses that the Republicans are chained to! And I could do the same for the Dems , including Wall Street. The myth that the GOP are for " big business " , the rich and the powerful , while the Dems are for the little guy, the poor and the great unwashed, is one of the bigger lies of our time.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Sig - to the contrary, this should shine the light on the dirty little secret that it's not the GOP who is wedded to big business, but it's the Dems. -RAPPY Seriously? I could bring you quite a list of all the big businesses that the Republicans are chained to!
Quote:Sig - to the contrary, this should shine the light on the dirty little secret that it's not the GOP who is wedded to big business, but it's the Dems. -RAPPY
Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:55 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 5:43 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 5:51 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 5:59 PM
MAGONSDAUGHTER
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: Wow! Figured that out all by yourself did ya? And only in a mere 10 years! It must be so frustrating and personally devastating for you not being able to communicate all friendly-like with the demented leftist psycho assholes here. Oh sorry .... my bad. There I go calling them names they deserve again. I'll just never learn! "You're a better man than I am Gunga Din."
Sunday, April 19, 2015 6:21 PM
Quote:Originally posted by MagonsWHORE Rich from you, seeing as you are currently the number one demented arsehole in here with NOTHING to add but insults and vitriol. I can't remember the last time you did anything but snarl obscenities. Get a life old man, you are losing the plot.
Sunday, April 19, 2015 7:10 PM
Sunday, April 19, 2015 8:35 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: So glad to live down to your expectations.
MOOSE
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: No need to insult moose like that.
Sunday, April 19, 2015 9:01 PM
WHOZIT
Quote:Originally posted by Moose: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: No need to insult moose like that. Yeah! WTF, Whozit?!?!
Monday, April 20, 2015 2:57 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:Seriously? I could bring you quite a list of all the big businesses that the Republicans are chained to!-SIGNY And I could do the same for the Dems , including Wall Street. The myth that the GOP are for " big business " , the rich and the powerful , while the Dems are for the little guy, the poor and the great unwashed, is one of the bigger lies of our time. - RAPPY
Monday, April 20, 2015 6:25 AM
Monday, April 20, 2015 11:20 AM
Monday, April 20, 2015 1:12 PM
REAVERFAN
Monday, April 20, 2015 1:24 PM
STORYMARK
Quote:And finally, on the 'infidelity' topic, I was wondering - is it only INDEFENSIBLE for democrats? Or is it also INDEFENSIBLE for republicans?
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Touched a nerve, I see. LOL Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts. " AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
Monday, April 20, 2015 7:33 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Magonsdaughter: Right, and the ludicrous idea that dems are socialist? It's laughable.
Monday, April 20, 2015 7:35 PM
Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: The funny thing is that Hillary will walk, not run, right into the white house, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. She's gonna win. By a landslide. The teanderthals don't stand a chance.
Monday, April 20, 2015 7:40 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: So, if the repubs are for big business - a fact you can't dispute with other facts - why are you for them? Is it because they're so bent on personal freedoms like gays getting married and women getting birth control, or the dismantlement of the surveillance state, or allowing people to freely join a union for mutual benefit? (That's irony - I feel I have to point that out with you.) Is it because they want to maintain clean drinking water, safe foods, and air that won't kill you when you breathe it? (This is more irony as well.) Is it because they have such a robust plan for medical care that will fix the problems of the old for-profit system? (This is yet more irony, since, as you know, they've failed to come up with that alternative they promised so many years ago.) What is it about their agenda you like, if being pro-business isn't it? And those question marks make them questions! And questions are looking for answers! Got any?
Monday, April 20, 2015 7:47 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Rightwingers here have no idea what "socialism" means. They think
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:37 PM
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 6:36 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by reaverfan: The funny thing is that Hillary will walk, not run, right into the white house, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. She's gonna win. By a landslide. The teanderthals don't stand a chance. She'll likely get primaried, if her health even allows her to see the convention. Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Monday, October 30, 2023 1:56 PM
JAYNEZTOWN
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL