Bush writes off poor kids by deadlockvictim

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Bush writes off poor kids

POSTED BY: DEADLOCKVICTIM
UPDATED: Saturday, July 21, 2007 04:31
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1174
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:42 AM

Bush: No Deal On Children's Health Plan
President Says He Objects On Philosophical Grounds
By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer_Thursday, July 19, 2007; Page A03
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/18/AR2007
071801434.html?hpid=topnews

Quote:
President Bush yesterday rejected entreaties by his Republican allies that he compromise with Democrats on legislation to renew a popular program that provides health coverage to poor children, saying that expanding the program would enlarge the role of the federal government at the expense of private insurance.

The president said he objects on philosophical grounds to a bipartisan Senate proposal to boost the State Children's Health Insurance Program by $35 billion over five years. Bush has proposed $5 billion in increased funding and has threatened to veto the Senate compromise and a more costly expansion being contemplated in the House.

Screw you kid… and I’m taking your dog, too.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 7:07 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
saying that expanding the program would enlarge the role of the federal government at the expense of private insurance.

Yeah, why get the government involved for a 5% adminsitrative cost when we can funnel money through "for profit" insurances, and not only have them screw OVER their customers but pay 30% "adminstrative" costs on top of that? Sounds lke a f*ckin good deal to me!

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 7:22 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!

The "children" aren't some endangered species. Where in the hell does the Constitution state that 'We the People' must pay for health care for other people's kids ? It's certainly not a FEDERAL power to do so. I fully support Bush's choice, though I'm confused as to why "Mr. Open Borders" would take a stance on THIS issue to stop expanding the size of Government. States and private organizations are more than welcome to help out, but not the Fed Gov't.

Not overly fond of how this issue is being spun, but that's to be expected. *sigh*

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:19 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT

Meanwhile, out here in California, the state budget, due JUly 1, hasn't passed because the Republicans are trying to *Q*U*I*E*T*L*Y* cut $400 million out of the education budget.

So we don't have to educate your poor kids either...

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:24 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

We're rapidly advancing to third-world status. I know my persistent anti-corporatism prolly bugs a lot of Libertarians, but you know what? Business has had it's shot for decades, especially in health care. With four times as many lobbysists as Congressmen, they've had all the opportunity to create an efficient shining model of free enterprise, and all they've done is prove that venality, corruption, ineffectiveness and greed doesn't work.

So f*ck 'em.

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:33 AM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
I know my persistent anti-corporatism prolly bugs a lot of Libertarians

Not this one.

He took the dog too

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:36 AM

CHRISISALL

Quote:
Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
M
So we don't have to educate your poor kids either...

"Have you ever actually owned a poor kid? Me neither. I don't think they even exist."
- Bush, in my imaginings.

Extrapolatin' Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:00 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Deadlock, Newold, Chrisis- do you three own a majority of stock in Depends or Poise or supmthin'? Cause my kilt's gettin' awful wet!

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:01 AM

DEADLOCKVICTIM

I think it’s a safe bet that a lot of people here don’t want a big, wasteful, free-for-all government that takes our tax dollars and blows it on every little entitlement that comes down the pike, but for crying out loud, if this country can’t help those among us who, through no fault of their own, need assistance, then what kind of nation have we become.

Just listen to politicians when they want to be elected to office. They go on and on about the future of this country and how they will, if elected, bring a better world to our children. Yet, when it comes down to a choice between money for more bombs and child welfare, you can bet the bombs will win.

You might say that there is nothing in the Constitution about taking care of someone else’s kids, and you don’t feel obligated, but I think morality goes a little farther than that. If I had a choice of where my tax dollars went, I would pick the welfare of my fellow humans not the destruction of life.

And one more thing, did anyone actually hear Bush say the word “philosophical”? I’ll bet he butchered it.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:08 AM

KANEMAN

Aur posted:
"Where in the hell does the Constitution state that 'We the People' must pay for health care for other people's kids ? It's certainly not a FEDERAL power to do so."

Nor are the Patriot act, homeland security, Fema, or the income tax constitutional.....funny you overlook those little gems.....Oh, Limbaugh needs his balls scratched you better get hopping......

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:17 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!

No, no, no, no. It goes: AND YOUR MANGY LITTLE DOG TOO !

Screw you kid… and I’m taking your dog, too.

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:20 AM

DEADLOCKVICTIM

come home, Toto, come home...

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:08 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:
Aur posted:
"Where in the hell does the Constitution state that 'We the People' must pay for health care for other people's kids ? It's certainly not a FEDERAL power to do so."

Nor are the Patriot act, homeland security, Fema, or the income tax constitutional.....funny you overlook those little gems.....Oh, Limbaugh needs his balls scratched you better get hopping......

Sorry, but FEMA, the P.A., Homeland Security, the Income Tax and Rush Limbaugh have absolutely nothing to do w/ this thread, so

off.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:31 PM

FREMDFIRMA

Thanks Deadlock, you prettymuch summed it up - pisses me off enough gettin reamed by the taxman as it is, but at the very least they could put it to better uses than the racket that is the imperial war machine.

Oh, and if you think YOU get reamed, have a look at just how badly an independant, self-employed cabbie driving on contract does....

I prolly make the least money of any employed person here, and yet take the largest tax hit too, so one can imagine my lack of sympathy for tax-sheltered corporations.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:52 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
No, no, no, no. It goes: AND YOUR MANGY LITTLE DOG TOO !

PFFFFWWAAAAAH!
Cough!
Sputter!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

---------------------------------
Always look upstream.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:41 PM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!

Rap,

"Where in the hell does the Constitution state that 'We the People' must pay for health care for other people's kids ? It's certainly not a FEDERAL power to do so."

Where in the hell does the Constitution say the US is a money economy ? Where does it say things should be bought and sold ? Where does it say people should work for others ?

I mean, really, I'd have a lot better case for supporting poor kids (promote the general welfare - HEY ! it says the Feds can run welfare !!!

) than I would for anything else.

So, yeah that was silly, it's how I joke. But the Federal government was formed to promote the general welfare, so i's obvously a function of government. The US as a bastion of capitalism ...

... not so much.

***************************************************************
"Global warming - it's not just a fact, it's a choice."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2007 5:14 PM

FREMDFIRMA

*waits for the inevitable commerce-clause capitalista arugment with a loaded 40lb ironjaw beartrap*

-F

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, July 21, 2007 3:37 AM

KANEMAN

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:
Aur posted:
"Where in the hell does the Constitution state that 'We the People' must pay for health care for other people's kids ? It's certainly not a FEDERAL power to do so."

Nor are the Patriot act, homeland security, Fema, or the income tax constitutional.....funny you overlook those little gems.....Oh, Limbaugh needs his balls scratched you better get hopping......

Sorry, but FEMA, the P.A., Homeland Security, the Income Tax and Rush Limbaugh have absolutely nothing to do w/ this thread, so off.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

You brought up the constitution. Just pointing out hypocrisy......

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, July 21, 2007 4:31 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!

I didn't overlook anything as I was responding to the thread. If you want to bring up OTHER issues, by all means, have at it. On this issue there's no hypocrisy at all, so your point is moot. Try again.

And by the way, not that you asked, but I do favor changing the income tax system. Preferably to the FAIR tax, but again, that's for another thread.

And Kaneman, Michael Moore needs his anus licked, you might want to get right on that.

People love a happy ending. So every episode, I will explain once again that I don't like people. And then Mal will shoot someone. Someone we like. And their puppy. - Joss

" They don't like it when you shoot at 'em. I worked that out myself. "

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE