This is amazing to me. On the very day that the SEC begins an investigation of Goldman Sachs for fraud in the recent financial crisis, the Republicans st..."/>
Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Republicans unanimous in opposition to financial reform
Saturday, April 17, 2010 7:52 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:All 41 Senate Republicans Oppose Financial Reform Bill, Say Will Lead To 'Endless Taxpayer Bailouts' Every member of the Senate Republican Caucus has signed a letter, delivered to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, expressing opposition to the Democrats' financial regulatory reform bill, which they all claim will lead to more Wall Street bailouts. "We are united in our opposition to the partisan legislation reported by the Senate Banking Committee," the letter reads. "As currently constructed, this bill allows for endless taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street and establishes new and unlimited regulatory powers that will stifle small businesses and community banks." As of last night, 40 of the Senate's 41 Republicans had signed the letter. The lone holdout, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), said yesterday that she opposed the legislation but hadn't yet decided whether to sign, and it's not clear what convinced her. Though the letter is unequivocal about the GOP's opposition to the bill, it does not contain an explicit threat to use the Senate rules to block debate on the bill, if Reid tries to bring it to the floor. But though the letter does not draw that particular bright line, it markedly stiffens the caucus' position. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell made waves Tuesday by blasting the Dems' proposal, claiming it would institutionalize taxpayer funded bailouts of Wall Street. The assertion was widely disputed by both Democrats and experts, and more than 24 hours later, several Republicans were unwilling to endorse McConnell's take. One of them, Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), even suggested GOP leadership should tone down its rhetoric and try to reach consensus with Democrats. Now, it seems, they've all decided to endorse that line.
Quote:Democrats this week seized on parallels between Republican attacks on the financial regulation bill and a 17-page memo drafted in January by Republican wordsmith Frank Luntz designed to give the GOP the language to kill the Obama effort. Republicans say nonsense, but the echo is there. “A vote in favor of creating a permanent bailout fund for private companies is like committing hari-kari,” Luntz wrote. “Frankly, the single best way to kill any legislation is to link it to the Big Bank Bailout.” On Tuesday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) went to the Senate floor to declare, “This bill not only allows for taxpayer-funded bailouts of Wall Street banks, it institutionalizes them.” In his “Words That Work” advice, Luntz wrote: “If there is one thing we can all agree on, it’s that the bad decisions and harmful policies by Washington bureaucrats that in many ways led to the economic crash that must never be repeated.” McConnell said: “If there is one thing Americans agree on when it comes to financial reform, it is absolutely certain they agree on this: Never again–never again–should taxpayers be expected to bail out Wall Street from its own mistakes.” Luntz advised opponents stress the federal government’s role. McConnell singled out Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Reserve Board, Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. … Luntz said voter skepticism is based on “the simple belief the government cannot effectively regulate the financial markets at any level.” McConnell said the Senate legislation “gives the government a backdoor mechanism for propping up failing or failed institutions.” Such parallels moved Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.) to enter the Luntz memo into the Congressional Record, a permanent chronicle of Congress, including the financial regulation debate. “My father would have been proud that has son would have written a document worthy of the congressional record,” Luntz wrote in an email Thursday from Brussels, where his London-bound plane was diverted to avoid volcanic ash from Iceland. “I do think Republican opposition to bigger government and yet another bureaucracy is exactly where America stands right now.” Don Stewart, a spokesman and speech writer for McConnell, said neither he nor the senator had even heard of the Luntz memo until Dodd’s attack. “It doesn’t take a genius to realize people don’t like bailouts,” he said.
Quote:Listening to Republican senators mouth scripted lines opposing financial regulatory reforms is to hear them auditioning for jobs as industry lobbyists after Congress. Their eyes are locked on the next paycheck, not the recovery of the U.S. financial system in the wake of a devastating recession and near collapse of the economy. The New York Times tallied 70 former members of Congress hired by the financial-services industry, including the former Republican chair of the House Banking Committee. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky leads a chorus suggesting that legislation before the Senate and passed by the House would only invite more bank bailouts in the future. Instead, he insists upon — well, nothing. McConnell and his colleagues do not offer any suggestions or ideas about how to rein in the most reckless — and lucrative — behavior by commercial and investment banks. Nor do Republicans offer any leadership in providing American consumers and investors with trustworthy, accessible information about investment products, and their hazards to the treasury. How or why the GOP would oppose such elementary transparency must puzzle voters.
Quote:Wary of impending reforms following the financial crisisr, the financial sector — whose irresponsible behavior was a major factor in causing the global recession — donated heavily to members of both parties during last year’s election cycle. In all, the financial, insurance, and real estate industries (collectively known as “FIRE”) donated $476 million to federal campaigns in 2008, dwarfing nearly every other sector.
Quote:Even as the financial industry has sought to keep a low public profile, some of the country's largest banks have ramped up their spending on lobbying to fight off some of the stiffest regulatory proposals pending in Congress. Lobbying expenditures jumped 12% from 2008 to $29.8 million last year among the eight banks and private equity firms that spent the most to influence legislation, according to data compiled from disclosure forms filed with Congress. The biggest spender was JPMorgan Chase & Co., whose lobbying budget rose 12% to $6.2 million, enough for the firm to have more than 30 lobbyists working for it. Among other banks, spending on lobbying rose 27% at Wells Fargo & Co. and 16% at Morgan Stanley. "I have never seen such a scrum of bank lobbyists as I have in the last year -- and I've worked on quite a few bank issues over the years," said Ed Mierzwinski, a lobbyist for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a coalition of state consumer organizations. "It seems like everybody is out of work except for bank lobbyists."
Saturday, April 17, 2010 10:16 AM
OUT2THEBLACK
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: ...This is amazing to me. On the very day that the SEC begins an investigation of Goldman Sachs for fraud in the recent financial crisis... ...Is all this going to work yet again? Are Americans going to let themselves be manipulated yet again by talking points, disinformation, just plain lies and messages crafted to be misleading?
Saturday, April 17, 2010 10:35 AM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Saturday, April 17, 2010 11:47 AM
WHOZIT
Quote:Originally posted by out2theblack: Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: ...This is amazing to me. On the very day that the SEC begins an investigation of Goldman Sachs for fraud in the recent financial crisis... ...Is all this going to work yet again? Are Americans going to let themselves be manipulated yet again by talking points, disinformation, just plain lies and messages crafted to be misleading? "Rolling Stone" is no longger "alterinive media", they are now MSM. So what ever they print can not be trusted.....and they're stupid. Yep . What part is amazing ? That the same 'SEC' that turned a blind eye to Madoff making off with scores of BILLIONS despite the alarms of whistleblowere , didn't rein in Goldman Sachs ; or that Folk keep trusting 'the government' to rein in the MONEY POWER that controls THEM ? What amazes me is that Folk believe that taking a partisan side is going to help... [/QUO
Saturday, April 17, 2010 2:40 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Saturday, April 17, 2010 5:33 PM
STORYMARK
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I'm 100% behind the GOP...
Saturday, April 17, 2010 6:04 PM
Saturday, April 17, 2010 6:33 PM
SHINYGOODGUY
Saturday, April 17, 2010 8:00 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Sunday, April 18, 2010 6:16 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2:No, no, no, the CORPORATIONS...he's behind the CORPORATIONS...the GOP is just their wholly-owned subsidiary. Amazing some can be so blind they'd back the GOP in keeping Wall Street rich and planning the next crash to make themselves RICHER! Well, considering the source, yeah, not so amazing...
Sunday, April 18, 2010 6:57 AM
Monday, April 19, 2010 3:55 AM
Monday, April 19, 2010 4:54 AM
BYTEMITE
Monday, April 19, 2010 5:00 AM
Monday, April 19, 2010 5:15 AM
Quote:Consumer Financial Protection Agency: Creates an independent watchdog to ensure American consumers get the clear, accurate information they need to shop for mortgages, credit cards, and other financial products, while prohibiting hidden fees, abusive terms, and deceptive practices.
Quote:Ends Too Big to Fail: Prevents excessively large or complex financial companies from bringing down the economy by: creating a safe way to shut them down if they fail; imposing tough new capital and leverage requirements and requiring they write their own “funeral plans”; requiring industry to provide their own capital injections; updating the Fed’s lender of last resort authority to allow system-wide support but not prop up individual institutions; and establishing rigorous standards and supervision to protect the economy and American consumers, investors and businesses.
Quote:Protects Against Systemic Risks: Creates an independent agency with a board of regulators to identify and address systemic risks posed by large, complex companies, products, and activities before they threaten the stability of the financial system. The agency could require companies that threaten the economy to divest some of their holdings.
Quote:Single Federal Bank Regulator: Eliminates the convoluted system of multiple federal bank regulators to increase accountability and end unnecessary overlap, conflicting regulation, and “charter shopping;” keeps in place the healthy dual banking system that governs community banks.
Monday, April 19, 2010 5:31 AM
Quote:Consumer Protections in One Place: Consolidates consumer protection responsibilities currently handled by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission.
Quote:Independent: Led by a 5 member board with an independent director. The Chairman of the Financial Institutions Regulatory Administration will have a seat on the board.
Quote:A Watchdog with Real Teeth: Unites rule-writing, supervision, and enforcement for consumer protection in a single, stand-alone agency with broad authority to investigate and react to abuses as they develop.
Quote:Able to Act Fast: With this agency on the lookout for bad deals and schemes, consumers won’t have to wait for Congress to pass a law to be protected from bad business practices.
Quote:Regulates Shadow Banking Industry: Levels the playing field for insured banks by regulating the shadow banking industry, such as mortgage brokers and payday lenders, for the 1st time and ensures that companies offering customers the same products receive the same regulatory treatment.
Quote:Tougher State Laws: Allows states to pass tougher consumer protections that apply to all lenders, preventing federal regulations from preempting stronger state laws.
Monday, April 19, 2010 5:39 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:Originally posted by whozit: "Rolling Stone" is no longger "alterinive media", they are now MSM. So what ever they print can not be trusted.....and they're stupid.
Monday, April 19, 2010 5:48 AM
Quote:Strong and Independent: Governed by an independent chairman, appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, to provide insulation from political manipulation. The board will have 9 members including the federal financial regulators and two independent members. The board members' diverse areas of expertise will strengthen the board’s ability to identify and respond to emerging risks throughout the financial system.
Quote:Tough to Get Too Big: Writes increasingly strict rules for capital, leverage, liquidity, risk management and other requirements as companies grow in size and complexity, imposing significant costs on companies that pose risks to the financial system.
Quote:Break Up Large, Complex Companies: Gives the regulators the authority to break up large, complex companies if they pose a threat to the financial stability of the United States.
Quote:Close Gaps in Regulation: Identifies unregulated financial companies that pose systemic risk and assigns them to a federal regulator for supervision.
Monday, April 19, 2010 6:04 AM
Monday, April 19, 2010 6:14 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Shinygoodguy: And you don't think the Dimocrats are wholly owned by the trial lawyers and workers unions ? Really? Trial Lawyers? Who knew? The working stiff and unions I could see, but trial lawyers? I learn something new everyday. That's what I love about this site. Preach it, brother, preach it! SGG Tawabawho?
Monday, April 19, 2010 10:35 AM
Monday, April 19, 2010 4:51 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: Why is this sounding less and less good as I go? I'm getting a slick oily feeling like someone's tryin' to grease me.
Monday, April 19, 2010 6:59 PM
Monday, April 19, 2010 7:58 PM
Tuesday, April 20, 2010 6:49 AM
Thursday, November 10, 2022 8:12 AM
JAYNEZTOWN
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL