REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Here we go...again...

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 711
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 5, 2011 5:43 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Sigh...we knew it was coming, didn't we? Yet another reason to get rid of the big fellas (especially Citi, BofA and Wells, in my opinion) and stick with a small, local bank who gives a damn whether they get customers or not!
Quote:

The fees keep coming. Citi is the latest big bank to slap customers with a round of fee hikes. This time, on its checking accounts.

Starting in December, customers who hold its mid-level Citibank Account will be charged $20 a month if they fail to maintain a minimum balance of $15,000 in their combined accounts. Previously, account holders had to carry a minimum balance of $6,000.

At the same time, customers who have the bank's EZ Checking account will start being charged $15 a month if they don't carry a minimum balance of $6,000. Citi (C (C, Fortune 500)) says it is phasing out the EZ Checking package, which currently carries no monthly fee, and is instead offering customers either the Citibank Account or its Basic Banking account, which also carries a fee.

Last month, Citi said it is hiking the fee on its Basic Banking account from $8 to $10. Customers will be able to avoid paying the $10 fee by either maintaining a minimum balance of $1,500 or by making one direct deposit and one automatic online payment through their checking account each month, said Citi.

Currently, account holders must make five online transactions per month in order to avoid paying the fee and there is no minimum balance requirement.

9 most annoying bank fees

Citi's fee hikes come just days after Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) announced it would charge a $5 fee for debit card purchases. Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), Sun Trust and Regions Financial (RF, Fortune 500) have all also rolled out similar fees in select markets in recent weeks.

"The regulatory environment has changed a great deal -- particularly with the Durbin Amendment -- and we're seeing the results of that now," said Claes Bell, banking reporter with Bankrate.com. Going forward, "we're going to see more large national banks announce fees."

With the new regulation that caps how much revenue banks can get from the swipe fees they collect from merchants, banks must look for other ways to cover that lost income, explained Nessa Feddis, vice president and senior counsel of the American Bankers Association.

"We don't expect to pay nothing to ride the train, it's the same thing with a checking account," she said. http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/04/pf/citi_fee/index.htm?hpt=hp_t2

I like that last one...how about them paying something to ride the train of making money off having OUR money?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 5, 2011 7:24 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Do "we" have to do away with them? How about just moving "our" money out of such banks?

I moved all my accounts to a credit union in the 90s, when there was still "NationsBank" and they told me they were going to start charging me $1 every time I went to a real live teller to make a deposit into my (non-interest-bearing) checking account.

Didn't sit well with me, the idea that they wanted to charge me money for ME letting them use MY money to go and dick around with. So I left. I've never once regretted that.


"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 5, 2011 7:38 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Misunderstanding; by "getting rid" of them, I meant just what you said; take our accounts to smaller banks or credit unions. Jeez, a dollar to see a live teller? That's truly insane!

What you said is what I meant; like I said elsewhere, I've been with a local bank for decades, and I KNOW they won't be pulling any of this shit...that's the way I want it. There is also the fact that, if enough people moved away from them, gee, we MIGHT actually get rid of them (hey, I can dream!), and send a message to all others not to behave as they have.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 5, 2011 10:42 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Don't like it ? Fine, find another bank. But if it really chaps your hide, blame DICK Durbin. It's his amendment which has caused all this, straight up.


" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:45 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Notice how credit unions haven't been involved whatever in any of this chicanery ?
Notice how folks are flocking to them in response to this bullshit, and the concept that they're probably a hell of a lot more trustworthy ?

Realize I invested heavily in such a possibility from the moment the big boys rapacious bullshit was exposed - kaaaCHING, once again, and all for the better cause that gives em the capital to weather the inevitable leglislative assault you KNOW is going to come their way once the big boys realize who they're losing to, can't compete, and go running to the government to use leglislation to fuck over their competitors.

Free market my ass.

In the meantime, imma be doubling-down on those investments, cause I see the local and mid-level credit unions winning the hell out of this one.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
Thu, September 11, 2025 10:37 - 589 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Thu, September 11, 2025 10:33 - 8933 posts
Matthew Dowd Fired From MSNBC for Charlie Kirk Comments
Thu, September 11, 2025 10:25 - 1 posts
For those who think I'm joking... Jesse Watters on Charlie Kirk Assassination: They Are At War With Us, How Much Political Violence Are We Going To Tolerate?
Thu, September 11, 2025 10:06 - 15 posts
Tribunal Time: Now that Charlie Kirk was assasinated, do we report Second to the Secret Service?
Thu, September 11, 2025 10:04 - 7 posts
Archive of Second spending all evening trying to justify the public execution of Charlie Kirk because he said things that Second does not agree with (09/10/2025)
Thu, September 11, 2025 10:03 - 5 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Thu, September 11, 2025 09:50 - 942 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Thu, September 11, 2025 08:59 - 3261 posts
Charlie Kirk Shot While Answering Question About Trans Shooters
Thu, September 11, 2025 04:34 - 10 posts
JFK On Conspiracies
Thu, September 11, 2025 02:56 - 30 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, September 10, 2025 23:56 - 5907 posts
Charlotte Murder Gets Federal Response
Wed, September 10, 2025 22:02 - 2 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL