REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Is Greenpeace's prank on Shell oil a 'scam'?

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Thursday, July 19, 2012 09:25
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1291
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:12 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


It's all about this: http://arcticready.com/social/gallery?sort_by=value&sort_order=DES
C&page=1
Quote:

- If there's an official ranking for snarkiness, Greenpeace and the Yes Lab have got to be near the top this summer. Their snarky social media mash-up takes Greenpeace's campaign against Shell Arctic drilling to a whole new level.

It's a fake Shell website that encourages supporters to create ads that mock Shell's offshore drilling effort and to sign an anti-drilling petition.

Greenpeace teamed up with Yes Lab in June to create the fake website.

No matter which side you favor regarding offshore Alaska oil drilling, watching this fight is just plain fascinating. Just make sure you get out of the way when the fur starts flying.

The Greenpeace/Yes Lab social media campaign clearly points to a strategy to succeed in a cacophonous Internet where it's increasingly harder to be heard and credibility is often called into question.

Although Shell is none too happy, calling the campaign a "scam," Greenpeace says it has received no legal action from Shell nor threats of legal action.

Here's a sample of these mocking fake Shell ads:

"Unfortunately, we won't be able to take these icebergs with us to hell. Let's go."


This fake Shell ad was posted on arcticready.com

In June, Greenpeace and Yes Lab staged a fake party at Seattle's Space Needle made to look like a botched celebration for Shell. Viral video from the event also raised a lot of eyebrows.

"Just in case there is any remaining doubt, Shell did not host, nor participate in an event at the Space Needle," the oil company said in its statement. "The video does not involve Shell or any of its employees."

But what responsibilities - if any - do advocacy groups have to keep their online debates credible, authoritative, fair and above-board? Is satire - or even outright deception - a more powerful tool for winning hearts and minds? Or does blowback from that strategy pose too big a risk for an embarrassing PR disaster?

In a written statement, Shell encourages a "spirit of intelligent debate" about a "serious topic."

(Warning: here comes a "Batman" reference.) To quote The Joker: Why so serious?

Here's why: The stakes are high - 27 billion barrels high.

That's how much oil the U.S. government estimates might be in the region, and that's what's got Shell spending billions to get at it.

University of Minnesota law expert William McGeveran told Forbes that the law surrounding fake websites is "murky," but traditionally Shell "would have a pretty good case."

For what it's worth, Greenpeace offers an official description of its tactics on its website.

It says Greenpeace promotes "informed debate" and the use of "high-profile, non-violent conflict to raise the level and quality of public debate."

Does its fake website fall under that description? "We think it does," says Nichols.


Another fake Shell ad posted on arcticready.com

Does Greenpeace want to apologize if anyone was fooled into thinking the website was an authentic Shell site? Nichols didn't offer an apology when asked. "I think people will take it the way they want to take it."

"What we’re finding is that people who thought it was real and then discovered that Greenpeace and the Yes Men were behind it are overwhelmingly positive about the campaign."

Shell says, "we care that people are not deceived," in its statement.

Meanwhile, Greenpeace says it's over the moon about its new strategy. From Monday through Wednesday of this week, it says arcticready.com has racked up nearly 800,000 page views. The anti-drilling petition has grown to more than 10,000 signatures, Nichols says.

What social media tactics are next for the merry online pranksters of Greenpeace and Yes Lab?

"Right now, there are a few things in the works, but I'm not going to be able to tell you about them," Nichols says. "The aspect of surprise is important."

It asks at the bottom of the article: "What do you think? Is the Greenpeace/Yes Lab anti-drilling campaign beyond the pale?" My answer: Hell no! In this atmosphere of "anything goes", I applaud Greenpeace for taking it to them and fighting fire with fire, while being entertaining at the same time!

If the energy companies can put out fraudulent ads about "clean coal" and how natural gas can be obtained in "an environmentally-friendly way" and on and on, why not fight back? This bullshit about "Shell encourages a 'spirit of intelligent debate'" is precisely that: Bullshit. Their ads are misleading and very close to downright lying, and they know it. But gawd forbid anyone ELSE should do anything similar...!

I checked out the website: I think it's BRILLIANT! A few excerpts:
Quote:

So while climate change is a serious thing, and its effects, as scientists say, could wipe out a large chunk of humanity, such outcomes are a mere possibility—whereas the benefits from oil extraction are a certainty. Not only does oil certainly permit our civilization to continue, it is also certain that it could be used to help us transition to clean fuels, not to mention rebuild our infrastructure should climate disaster strike.

Everyone can appreciate how oil—the dinosaurs' parting gift to Man—can be used to help build a better future for everyone. Let's Go!

The fake site is all about people creating "ads" for them:
Quote:

So take a moment to add your own slogan to our beautiful new collection of images. The next place you see it might be your own rearview mirror.

Because tomorrow is yesterday, accelerated.

Let’s go.

Some of the "ads" are hysterical. I tried to pick some of the best:







I could go on all day. There are tons of them, created by individuals who "get it".

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:25 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important



Hello,

Seems like satire to me. And hence, protected speech.

--Anthony


Note to Self:
Raptor - woman testifying about birth control is a slut (the term fits.)
Six - Wow, isn't Niki quite the CUNT? And, yes, I spell that in all caps....
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.

“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Wed, November 6, 2024 05:00 - 4578 posts
Top Celebrity Meltdowns...and does the Media have some Leftwing Neo-Liberal Bias?
Wed, November 6, 2024 04:42 - 3 posts
FLEE CALIFORNIA!
Wed, November 6, 2024 04:36 - 150 posts
The worst Judges, Merchants of Law, Rogue Prosecutors, Bad Cops, Criminal Supporting Lawyers, Corrupted District Attorney in USA? and other Banana republic
Wed, November 6, 2024 04:33 - 46 posts
And in the faked news department: Jussie Smollett charged -found guilty of- falsely reporting a "hate" crime
Wed, November 6, 2024 04:31 - 50 posts
Petition: Take the Keys of the White House away from Allan Lichtman
Wed, November 6, 2024 04:25 - 3 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Wed, November 6, 2024 02:55 - 641 posts
The predictions thread
Wed, November 6, 2024 02:53 - 1183 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, November 5, 2024 23:43 - 4679 posts
With apologies to JSF: Favorite songs (3)
Tue, November 5, 2024 23:39 - 69 posts
Election fraud.
Tue, November 5, 2024 17:19 - 39 posts
Multiculturalism
Tue, November 5, 2024 17:16 - 53 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL