REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Health co-ops, created to foster competition and lower insurance costs, are in danger

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:11
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 749
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:51 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:


When the new health-care law was being cobbled together, Congress decided to establish a network of nonprofit insurance companies aimed at bringing competition to the marketplace, long dominated by major insurers.

But these co-ops, started as a great hope for lowering insurance costs, are already in danger.

While the debut of the Affordable Care Act this month has been marred by widespread computer problems, the difficulties the co-ops face have been less obvious to consumers. One co-op, however, has closed, another is struggling, and at least nine more have been projected to have financial problems, according to internal government reviews and a federal audit.

Their failure would leave taxpayers potentially on the hook for nearly $1 billion in defaulted loans and rob the marketplace of the kind of competition they were supposed to create. And if they become insolvent, policyholders in at least half the states where the co-ops operate could be stuck with medical bills.

Although the co-op plan originated in the Senate, resistance to the initial proposal quickly materialized on Capitol Hill, in part because of pressure from insurance industry lobbyists.

So Congress saddled its new creations with onerous restrictions that, experts say, doomed many co-ops to failure. Federal grants for the co-ops were converted to loans with tight repayment schedules; they were barred from using federal money for crucial marketing; and they were severely limited from selling insurance to large employers, which represent the most lucrative market.

And even as the Obama administration was setting up the program, White House officials, who had no pride of authorship and feared it would be risky, repeatedly suggested that funding for the co-ops be reduced, according to more than half a dozen people familiar with budget negotiations and the legislative debate. The funding was cut to a small fraction of what experts told Congress would be needed for the ventures to be viable.

Brian Cook, a spokesman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency overseeing the co-ops, said it is closely monitoring their progress and is “confident that co-ops will be an important option available to millions of consumers.”

But while the program was meant to be nationwide, only two dozen co-ops have begun selling insurance on the new health-care exchanges. The difficulties the co-ops are confronting pose a challenge to the new law that is largely separate from the troubled rollout of the exchanges this month. But the problems, in particular the malfunctioning federal Web site, are hitting the co-ops hard because they depend on the exchanges for business.

The co-ops differ from traditional insurers in their nonprofit status, consumer focus and organizational structure; they will be governed by boards controlled by policyholders.

Those co-ops that have opened their doors are scrambling to prevail against the odds, sending their small staffs door to door to educate people about what they do without violating a ban on explicit marketing. To get around what she called the “really difficult” restriction, Julia Hutchins, chief executive of the Colorado Health Insurance Cooperative, was reduced to dispatching scantily clad models into the streets of Denver to urge people to “get covered.’’



More at http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/health-co-ops-created-to-foster
-competition-and-lower-insurance-costs-are-facing-danger/2013/10/22/e1c961fe-3809-11e3-ae46-e4248e75c8ea_story.html


Looks like the "Pass it and then read it" philosophy of the ACA may end up with it having as many glitches as the healthcare.gov site. Seems like folks saw potential problems like this, but no one had the will to get them fixed in the rush to passage.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:11 AM

BYTEMITE


That's a shame. Co-ops would be a worlds better system than the predatory and uncaring insurance companies we have. Who pushed for restrictions to make the new co-ops unable to compete with them.

This should be disgusting to anyone who values the principles of a competitive free-market, as well as to people who care about the health and welfare of citizens.

At least Utah still has IHC.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
The Hunter Biden interview shows Democrats are party only for elites
Wed, July 23, 2025 19:01 - 2 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Wed, July 23, 2025 18:53 - 804 posts
Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
Wed, July 23, 2025 17:58 - 479 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, July 23, 2025 17:17 - 5690 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Wed, July 23, 2025 15:46 - 2611 posts
Moscow Burns / Coup In Progress
Wed, July 23, 2025 15:38 - 97 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, July 23, 2025 15:21 - 8655 posts
Boy sex ring/ties to Bush administration& Gunderson report Pt 2
Wed, July 23, 2025 15:04 - 41 posts
Boeing 737 Max
Wed, July 23, 2025 14:53 - 218 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine Now At 1 Million Killed Or Wounded
Wed, July 23, 2025 14:12 - 1252 posts
Trump Lied More Than 30,000 Times During His Presidency. No Wonder We’re Exhausted.
Wed, July 23, 2025 13:57 - 12 posts
Cry-Baby Trump
Wed, July 23, 2025 13:49 - 106 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL