Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
if you want to look up original scientific papers: http://scholar.google.com
Monday, March 13, 2017 12:11 AM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Sunday, March 19, 2017 4:33 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Sunday, March 19, 2017 4:52 PM
Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/86/21/1569/1062011/Induced-Abortion-and-Breast-Cancer-More-Scientific Induced Abortion and Breast Cancer: More Scientific Data Are Needed Lynn Rosenberg J Natl Cancer Inst (1994) The first link only states that there's not enough data to decide either way, AND it's from (1994). Do you think if you searched under google scholar you might come up with something newer than a 23 year old single article? What you're doing is anything but scientific, btw. You're cherry picking one thing from a plethora of information. And just because you linked a single, out of date, equivocal paper, doesn't mean you've made a valid point. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2010485/ Br J Cancer. 1981 Jan; 43(1): 72–76. PMCID: PMC2010485 Oral contraceptive use and early abortion as risk factors for breast cancer in young women. Meanwhile THIS ONE is even older! AND it confounds two items - oral contraceptives and early abortion. If you THINK you're making a point - you aren't. Except that you're not even close to looking at all the data to found an unbiased opinion. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199701093360201#t=article Mads Melbye, M.D., Jan Wohlfahrt, M.Sc., Jørgen H. Olsen, M.D., Morten Frisch, M.D., Tine Westergaard, M.D., Karin Helweg-Larsen, M.D., and Per Kragh Andersen, Ph.D. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:81-85January 9, 1997DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199701093360201 Now this one is the newest of the bunch, at a full 20 years old. That still mkes it far too old to be meaningful. But I guess you dodged a bullet with this moldy oldie, since it concluded abortion DECREASES the chance of breast cancer I hate to say this, but your extremely bad attempt at cherry picking facts has hoisted you on your own 'tard'.
Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:12 PM
Quote:were the valiant efforts to disprove the linkys
Wednesday, March 22, 2017 8:26 PM
SOCKPUPPET
Thursday, April 6, 2017 8:44 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Quote:were the valiant efforts to disprove the linkys which have been, in fact, disproved. That you couldn't find those facts with a great search engine is your problem. I don't know why you're thanking me for you making yourself look like an idiot. since 2010 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=breast+cancer+abortion+statistics&hl=en&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_ylo=2010&as_yhi= http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=breast+cancer+abortion+link&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_ylo=2010 does not support a link ... allegations of later sequelae—breast cancer and mental illness—were refuted ... Inaccurate medical information included mention of a link between breast cancer and abortion ...
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL