Quote:

---

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
The National File this was a Blog, news website started by Alex Jones, Tom Pappert, Patrick Howley.

Black Athletic Director Creates AI Racist Rant to Incriminate White Principal
https://nationalfile.com/black-athletic-director-creates-ai-racist-ran
t-to-incriminate-white-principal/
A former Baltimore high school athletic director was arrested after using AI to incriminate the school's principal with racist comments.

---

Quote:

---

Many fell for the hoax, including Black Lives Matter activist Deray McKesson, who said on X that Eiswert should be fired immediately and lose his administrator licenses.

---

Quote:

---

Baltimore County Schools Superintendent Dr. Myriam Rogers told CBS News, “We are incredibly proud of the students and staff and how they stepped up to support one another … This has been a very difficult time for Pikesville High School community, principal Eiswert and his family, and team BCPS.” She agreed with the arrest of Darien and recommended termination.

---

Quote:

---

Baltimore County’s State Attorney Scott Shellenberger told the Post Millennial that this case was a first-of-its-kind and that things have changed to the point where we must “take a broader look at how this technology can be used and abused to harm other people.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
Sony Music warns AI companies against “unauthorized use” of its content
https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/17/24158887/sony-music-ai-training-let
ter/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Situational Awareness

By Scott Aaronson | June 8, 2024

https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=8047

My friend Leopold Aschenbrenner, who I got to know and respect on OpenAI’s Superalignment team, just released “Situational Awareness,” one of the most extraordinary documents I’ve ever read. With unusual clarity, concreteness, and seriousness, Leopold sets out his vision of how AI is going to transform civilization over the next 5-10 years.

Leopold foresaw the current AI boom, before most of us did, and apparently made a lot of money as a result. I don’t know how his latest predictions will look from the standpoint of 2030. In any case, though, it’s very hard for me to imagine anyone in the US national security establishment reading Leopold’s document without crapping their pants. Is that enough to convince you to read it?

Read it at https://situational-awareness.ai/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/situationa
lawareness.pdf

SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
The Decade Ahead
By Leopold Aschenbrenner | June 6, 2024

You can see the future first in San Francisco.

---

Quote:

---

The Dark Ages were not entirely dark. Advances in agriculture and building technology increased Medieval wealth and led to a wave of cathedral construction in Europe. However, it was a time of profound inequality. Elites captured virtually all economic gains. In Britain, as Canterbury Cathedral soared upward, peasants had no net increase in wealth between 1100 and 1300. Life expectancy hovered around 25 years. Chronic malnutrition was rampant.

“We’ve been struggling to share prosperity for a long time,” says MIT Professor Simon Johnson. “Every cathedral that your parents dragged you to see in Europe is a symbol of despair and expropriation, made possible by higher productivity.”

At a glance, this might not seem relevant to life in 2023. But Johnson and his MIT colleague Daron Acemoglu, both economists, think it is. Technology drives economic progress. As innovations take hold, one perpetual question is: Who benefits?

This applies, the scholars believe, to automation and artificial intelligence, which is the focus of a new book by Acemoglu and Johnson, “Power and Progress: Our 1000-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity,” published this week by PublicAffairs. In it, they examine who reaped the rewards from past innovations and who may gain from AI today, economically and politically.

“The book is about the choices we make with technology,” Johnson says. “That’s a very MIT type of theme. But a lot of people feel technology just descends on you, and you have to live with it.”

AI could develop as a beneficial force, Johnson says. However, he adds, “Many algorithms are being designed to try to replace humans as much as possible. We think that’s entirely wrong. The way we make progress with technology is by making machines useful to people, not displacing them. In the past we have had automation, but with new tasks for people to do and sufficient countervailing power in society.”

Today, AI is a tool of social control for some governments that also creates riches for a small number of people, according to Acemoglu and Johnson. “The current path of AI is neither good for the economy nor for democracy, and these two problems, unfortunately, reinforce each other,” they write.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Just as aside, I think I can tell AI generated videos from real ones. What distinguishes them is that in real world videos, there's a lot of random variation...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Just as aside, I think I can tell AI generated videos from real ones. What distinguishes them is that in real world videos, there's a lot of random variation...

---

Well... You think you can, anyhow.

Some of the stuff that people on YouTube are coming out with is pretty damn impressive.

The government didn't just let that type of technology out into the wild if they didn't have something far superior to work with themselves.

I think we're already beyond the point where it would be foolish to believe that we can decipher what is real and what isn't when it comes to videos and even audio files now.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The coomer autists are going to be the ones that really push this AI tech to the limits.

Victoria's Secret and other companies decided to put fat women and trannies in their fashion shows. By the time they decide they want to stop losing money and put beautiful women in their products again, they're not even going to have to pay real women to wear them anymore. I'll bet before 2035 we see the first completely virtual AI Victoria's Secret fashion show. It's way better for the bottom line if they have models that never age and they don't have to pay supermodels millions of dollars a year to wear their lingerie anymore. They can just pay super-nerds pennies on the dollar to put the whole production together on their computers while sitting at home.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
A.I. Johnny Cash sings "Barbie Girl"

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Not yet panicking about AI? You should be

The great discoveries of humanity have always taught us that we are not masters in our own house: Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the cosmos, Darwin spoiled our species’ idea of divine creation, Freud showed that we neither know nor control our desires. The humiliation by AI is subtler but just as profound: we have demonstrated that for intellectual activities we considered deeply human, we are not needed; these can be automated on a statistical basis, the “idle talk”, to use Heidegger’s term, literally gets by without us and sounds reasonable, witty, superficial and sympathetic – and only then do we truly understand that it has always been like this: most of the time, we communicate on autopilot.

Since I’ve been using the large language model, I can actually perceive it: I’m at a social event, making small talk, and suddenly, sensitised by GPT, I feel on my tongue how one word calls up the next, how one sentence leads to another, and I realise, it’s not me speaking, not me as an autonomous individual, it’s the conversation itself that is happening.

More at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/22/artifici
al-intelligence-panic-time-change

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Don't worry about it. You won't notice a change in your life at all, Second.

You have no autonomy and you completely lack the resources for critical thinking. You're little more than an inert sponge just sitting there and waiting for your new programming so you can suck it all up like water and dribble it out all over these boards.

It's why you basically disappeared for 2 or 3 days when the Media didn't know what the fuck to do or say. You were literally empty-headed during that time, because you've replaced your subconscious voice with the voices of the Legacy Media and the Narrative.

And any time you do talk, all you've done is repeat the same 3 or 4 pre-programmed things, dozens of times every single day for 8 years straight.

You are barely a step above A.I. yourself, with the only qualification putting you higher on the food chain being that you have a skin sack made up of around 70% water and electrical impulses. You're what those in the industry call wetware. You are just a highly-programmable computer trapped inside of a flesh body that we should probably assume was a human being at one point, although nobody left here at FireFlyFans.net would ever be able to provide proof of that having ever been the case. Least of all you.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

---

Quote:

---

The first paragraph you've shared is quite critical and derogatory towards someone or something, suggesting they lack autonomy and critical thinking skills, and are essentially a passive entity absorbing and regurgitating information without independent thought. It's also accusing this entity of being heavily influenced by mainstream media narratives and having a limited repertoire of responses. The language used is quite harsh and dismissive.

The second paragraph is a stark contrast, abruptly shifting to a statement about Donald Trump's well-being and future presidency. It's a sudden change in topic and tone from the preceding paragraph, offering a confident assertion without any explanation or context.

Overall, the first paragraph appears to criticize the perceived limitations or flaws of an entity, possibly an automated system or even a person, in a harsh and disdainful manner. The abrupt shift to the statement about Trump feels disconnected from the preceding critique and lacks supporting context or rationale.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
ChatGPT 3.5 commented on your comments:

Quote:

---

The first paragraph you've shared is quite critical and derogatory towards someone or something, suggesting they lack autonomy and critical thinking skills, and are essentially a passive entity absorbing and regurgitating information without independent thought. It's also accusing this entity of being heavily influenced by mainstream media narratives and having a limited repertoire of responses. The language used is quite harsh and dismissive.

---

---

It was all truth, with all the harshness and dismissiveness that you deserve.

Fact Check: The first paragraph made no mention about "mainstream media narratives".

Quote:

---

The second paragraph is a stark contrast, abruptly shifting to a statement about Donald Trump's well-being and future presidency. It's a sudden change in topic and tone from the preceding paragraph, offering a confident assertion without any explanation or context.

---

Speaking of offering a confident assertion without any explanation or context, who said anything about Trump? Or Trump's wellbeing? Or Trump's future presidency?

The second paragraph was about the mainstream media narratives that you gobble up and how empty your brain is when they don't offer you anything. The 3rd and 4th paragraphs were more or less just saying those same things in a different way.

I do find it interesting that ChatGPT seems to be aware that there was a time period there where the media was practically MIA. But two things happened during the time that Second and Ted weren't posting much here. Not long before Trump was shot in the ear, Joe Biden* had the worst debate performance of any presidential hopeful in the history of the country. Funny that a so-called "logical" computer matrix just automatically assumed Trump and dismissed Biden* in that assessment, innit?

Quote:

---

Overall, the first paragraph appears to criticize the perceived limitations or flaws of an entity, possibly an automated system or even a person, in a harsh and disdainful manner. The abrupt shift to the statement about Trump feels disconnected from the preceding critique and lacks supporting context or rationale.

---

https://chatgpt.com/

---

Chat GPT offers a critique lacking supporting context or rationale when it brings up Trump twice in order to defend Wetware, when none of the information that was fed to it mentioned Trump a single time.



It looks like Chat GPT was coded by people who will be out on the streets burning things down for the Democrat party once A.I. replaces them. Just the mere mention that the Legacy Media is a lie factory automatically makes a Trump connection here.

I wonder what they will need to change that code to spit out 20 years from now when Trump's no longer with us. Who will be the bogey man that they use to explain away any criticism of the current media narratives then?


Thanks for doing that research for us, Wetware.

Your copy and paste skills are extraordinary.



--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.