Red Dawn: Commie China builds 50-sq-mile Commie city in Commie Idaho by piratenews

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Red Dawn: Commie China builds 50-sq-mile Commie city in Commie Idaho

POSTED BY: PIRATENEWS
UPDATED: Saturday, June 11, 2011 04:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 6726
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, June 10, 2011 4:28 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

A 50 Square Mile Self-Sustaining City South Of Boise, Idaho

Quote:
The Chinese are looking for a beachhead in the United States," said Idaho Commerce Secretary Don Dietrich. "Idaho is ready to give them one."
-The Idaho Statesman

"From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave half of the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up” America, and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the world can do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us."
-Chi Haotian, Minster of Defense and vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission, 2005

"As far as Chinese goes, I resented it."
-Adam Tudyk, The Making of Firefly
(video censored by youtube)

Thanks to the trillions of dollars that the Chinese have made flooding our shores with cheap products, China is now in a position of tremendous economic power. So what is China going to do with all of that money? One thing that they have decided to do is to buy up pieces of the United States and set up "special economic zones" inside our country from which they can continue to extend their economic domination. One of these "special economic zones" would be just south of Boise, Idaho and the Idaho government is eager to give it to them. China National Machinery Industry Corporation (Sinomach for short) plans to construct a "technology zone" south of Boise Airport which would ultimately be up to 50 square miles in size. The Chinese Communist Party is the majority owner of Sinomach, so the 10,000 to 30,000 acre "self-sustaining city" that is being planned would essentially belong to the Chinese government. The planned "self-sustaining city" in Idaho would include manufacturing facilities, warehouses, retail centers and large numbers of homes for Chinese workers. Basically it would be a slice of communist China dropped right into the middle of the United States.

According to the Idaho Statesman, the idea would be to build a self-contained city with all services included. It would be modeled after the "special economic zones" that currently exist in China.

Perhaps the most famous of these "special economic zones" is Shenzhen. Back in the 1970s, Shenzhen was just a very small fishing village. Today it is a sprawling metropolis of over 14 million people.

If the Chinese have their way, we will soon be seeing these "special economic zones" pop up all over the United States.

So exactly who is "Sinomach"?

The following description of the company comes directly from the website of Sinomach....

With approval of the State Council, China National Machinery Industry Corporation (SINOMACH) was established in January 1997. SINO-MACH is a large scale, state-owned enterprise group under the supervision of the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission.

As you can see, Sinomach is basically an arm of the Chinese government.

The borrower is always the servant of the lender, and now China is buying up America.

The reality is that Sinomach is not looking only at Idaho. Sinomach is in discussions to develop "special economic zones" all over the United States.

Sinomach has recently dispatched delegations to Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania to explore the possibility of establishing "special economic zones" in those states.

Will such "self-contained communities" soon start appearing from coast to coast?

According to Dr. Jerome Corsi, the U.S. government has already set up 257 "foreign trade zones" across America. These "foreign trade zones" will apparently be given "special U.S. customs treatment" and will be used to promote global free trade....

"The FTZs tend to be located near airports, with easy access into the continental NAFTA and WTO multi-modal transportation systems being created to move free-trade goods cheaply, quickly and efficiently throughout the continent of North America."

So what do our politicians think about all of this?

Most of them are greatly in favor of it.

"Idaho’s the last state that should say we don’t want to do business with Asia," Idaho Lt. Gov. Brad Little said last year. "Asia’s where the money is."

So will all of this "foreign investment" really bring jobs back to the American people?

Perhaps a few, but the truth is that these "special economic zones" that the Chinese are setting up are designed to be self-contained communist Chinese communities. Some Americans will likely be employed in these areas, but not nearly as many as our politicians would have you to believe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendi_Deng

In addition, these "special economic zones" represent a massive national security threat. The communist Chinese could potentially be able to bring in and store massive amounts of military equipment virtually undetected.

In the days of the Cold War, we would have never dreamed of giving the Russians a 50 square mile city in the middle of Idaho.

But today we have become convinced that the communist Chinese want to be our great friends.

The following quote originally appeared in the Idaho Statesman, but has since apparently been taken down....

"The Chinese are looking for a beachhead in the United States," said Idaho Commerce Secretary Don Dietrich. "Idaho is ready to give them one."

Indeed.

If relations between the U.S. and China go south someday, we will deeply regret giving China so many open doors.

The truth is that you can never fully trust the communist Chinese. Their top military officers talk about a coming conflict with the United States all the time. China is extremely interested in North America. In fact, the Chinese and the Mexicans have even been holding talks on military cooperation.

But even if you don't consider the communist Chinese to be a military threat, you should be deeply concerned about the economic implications of what is happening.

Today, tens of millions of Americans are wondering why the economy is so bad.

Well, there are a lot of reasons, but the fact that we have sent China thousands of our factories, millions of our jobs and trillions of dollars of our national wealth is a major contributing factor.

If you do not know the truth about how badly the Chinese economy is wiping the floor with the Americen economy then you need to read this article: "40 Signs The Chinese Economy Is Beating The Living Daylights Out Of The U.S. Economy".

Beautiful new infrastructure is going up all over China today, and meanwhile many of our once great manufacturing cities are turning into rotted-out war zones.

China would not be what they are today if we had insisted that they abandon the communist system and respect basic human rights before we ever opened up trade with them.

But that did not happen. Instead we enthusiastically welcomed China into the WTO and we let the predatory Chinese system run wild.

In 2010, China had a "current account balance" of over 272 billion dollars, which was the largest in the world.

In 2010, the United States had a "current account balance" of negative 561 billion dollars. According to the CIA world factbook, that put us in last place in the entire world. In fact, our negative current account balance was more than 9 times larger than anyone else in the world. If you go check out this chart it will give you a really good idea of how nightmarish our trade situation has become.

The world is changing and nothing is ever going to be the same again.

Just ask the residents of Boise, Idaho - they are about to have a 50 square mile self-contained communist Chinese city plopped right into their backyard.

98 comments

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/china-wants-to-construct-a-5
0-square-mile-self-sustaining-city-south-of-boise-idaho

http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/12/31/1472023/chinese-company-eyes-
boise.html

http://www.sinomach.com.cn/templates/T_common_en/index.aspx?nodeid=147

http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/commentary-mainmenu-43/7443-chin
a-the-new-investment-savior

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=257721

Charlie Sheen in Red Dawn remake
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=11&t=48640

Red Dawn FOR REAL: Charlie Sheen questions official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=19100&mid=287689

Red Dawn delayed by MGM bankruptcy, USA Depression, missiles launched off US coasts by Commie China
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=47106

Red Dawn Redux
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=14&t=40268

Quote:
"On Earth-That-Was, the two ruling powers were once known as America and China. And pot was totally legal, though I probably won't stress that. In fact, forget I said it."
-Joss Whedon, Serenity: The Official Visual Companion, A Brief History of the Universe

http://cuttingthroughthematrix.com/CTTM2011/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_8
51_The_New_System_is_a_Morgue_for_Borg_June092011.mp3

Quote:
Youtube Comment: Jews control Communist China, just as they controlled Communist Russia, and just as they control the USA. Do you "think" our entire manufacturing industry simply found its own way to China? The Jews took control of our money (Federal Reserve). Purchased our media. Bought up our entire manufacturing industry. Relocated to China. Then convinced us we somehow "owe" the "Chinese" (it's not the Chinese, it's the JEWS).

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 10:35 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 2:10 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

'Red Dawn' Tweaked by Jews to Please China

The government of China routinely stifles dissent, imposes censorship, and engages in human rights violations. But despite the oppressive environment and hardship that the Chinese government has created, the Chinese people have somehow managed to develop a healthy appetite for Western cinema, and the Chinese market is a huge one.

Hollywood, being the big biz that it is, must always be concerned with the bottom line, and that means getting the most profits it can for its products.

Consequently, one Hollywood studio has seen fit to significantly alter its remake of the 1984 Cold War cult classic, “Red Dawn.” Changes were made out of concern for the sensibilities of the Chinese government, which ultimately decides whether or not a movie makes it in onto the Chinese screen.

In the “Red Dawn” original, the villains of the flick happened to be Russian. In the remake, though, the script had the villains undergoing an ethnic transformation, one in which they eventually emerged as Chinese.

That’s not good for the Chinese market.

After the film had already been shot, MGM, mindful that the distribution of the movie in China could be detrimentally impacted, went about making a change to the ethnicity of the villains once again. The dastardly ones were converted into North Koreans.

Through the magic of digital technology, the studio was able to tweak the footage during post-production at a reported cost of less than $1 million.

It wasn’t really a difficult decision for the Hollywood executives since North Korea doesn’t provide Hollywood with significant economic opportunity.

The original movie starred the late Patrick Swayze, his iconic movie dance partner Jennifer Grey and, believe it or not, Charlie Sheen. All played U.S. teens fighting invading Soviets.

It’s staggering how in such a short time the international film market has changed so dramatically. Back in 2009 the decision came down to make the new “Red Dawn” bad guys Chinese. However, the Chinese market has grown to approximately $1.5 billion a year since then, and it’s one of the fastest growing movie markets in the world.

The Chinese government already sent a message when it disallowed the distribution of “The Dark Knight” because a villain in the flick was Chinese.

Pursuant to a recent World Trade Organization ruling, the Chi-coms are initiating a policy of allowing more foreign films into the country, and in the future, MGM would no doubt be pleased as punch to distribute franchise films such as the “James Bond” series.

Interestingly, writers are concerned that their choices of villainous characters are being whittled away at by autocratic world leaders and PC police alike.

Guess soon they’ll only be picking villains from countries that have bad box-office numbers.

http://www.newsmax.com/Hirsen/reddawn-charliesheen-patrickswayze-holly
wood/2011/03/21/id/390148

Bowing to Obama, er, the Box Office, Red Dawn Switches from Chinese to North Korean Villains
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/03/16/bowing-to-the-box-office-red-dawn-
switches-from-chinese-to-north-korean-villains/

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 2:25 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht

I wish the US didn't care so much what China thought about everything. The problem is that they practically own us. If they didn't, if we hadn't let them, then the world would be a better place, at least the US would be.

Wolverines!

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 4:20 PM

DREAMTROVE

The first part sounds good.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 5:49 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

I bet Adobe After Effects could fix Red Dawn Resux...

How much bailout did MGM jews get?

MGM Bankrupt? The Hobbit Needs a Bailout

Just when all the news about The Hobbit put a shiny light on the progress, another dark shadow looms overhead. One even the Fellowship may not be able to rescue them from. Unless of course the Fellowship has a spare 3 billion dollars.

MGM appears to be on the brink of bankruptcy and recently begged their investors for a break so they could fund their upcoming films like the Hobbit.

It turns out that the studio is on the verge of bankruptcy.

The call was to make a desperate plea for money in the amount of $20 million in short term and another $150 million to get through the rest of the year. One major project that MGM needs to fund is Peter Jackson’s “The Hobbit” prequel.

So what happens when MGM can’t get their own bailout.

Does this mean the end of films opening with a lion’s roar?

Does this mean doom for The Hobbit films? I am sure there will be other studios more than willing to pick up the rights to The Hobbit should MGM close doors, but this just means more delays.

http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/mgm-bankrupt-the-hobbit-needs-a-bailou
t

MGM averts bankruptcy, gets $500 million finance bail out

Metro Goldwyn Mayer’s (MGM) lion will continue to roar. The company which made such classics as ‘The Wizard of Oz’ and ‘Gone With The Wind’ and owns the James Bond series managed to avert bankruptcy by arranging for a $500 milllion worth of financing.

The structure put in place gives the creditors who were owed $4 billion by the studio a stake in it. The $500 million was arranged by JP Morgan. Carl Icahn, who owns 20 per cent of MGM shares has given his support for restructuring the company. The management would be assumed by Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum, who run the Spyglass Entertainment film company, according to Reuters.

MGM’s troubles began when a consortium made up of Sony, TPG, Providence Equity partners and Comcast bought out the studio for $5 billion, it left the company in debt just at the time when the DVD market suffered a slow down and MGM’s huge library of movies stopped being its cash cow. Theater ticket sales went down too with a stalled economy. MGM’s sales of DVD and other home video products dropped 83 per cent over the last two years, says FT.com.

The company could not finance new movies too because of a cash crunch. Maybe now the studio will be able to raise finances to make the stalled James Bond movie.

The real state of affairs at the studio is indicated by the number of MGM movies among the top 100 movies of 2010, ranked by dollar value of tickets sold, according to Box Office Mojo - just one. Time Warner's Warner Brothers has 18 movies on the top-100 list.

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/94818/20101223/mgm-spyglass-entertainm
ent-sony-bankruptcy-stalled-jp-morgan-financing.htm

MGM Grand Hotel Casino in Macau, Communist China

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 6:48 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

I thought all you free-market folks would be greatly in favor of this kind of thing. After all, won't it bring down wages and earnings?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 10, 2011 7:05 PM

BYTEMITE

>_> I'm not going to comment on a Free Market, because I think the only market that's really free is one where poorer citizens keep rich citizens honest through the threat of rioting. And looting... I digress.

But, Kwicko, you might want to check your terminology here. Free Market is NOT the same thing as Free Trade, though undoubtedly the later term was coined to win support for it by fooling supporters of the Free Market.

But Free Trade is a bad thing. Free Trade is what the British Empire tried to put on the colonies, is the basis of the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement, is Frankfurt Bank control over the Euro, is what Isreal is trying to establish in the Middle East (MEFTA). It's a form of Imperialism where one nation basically says, "hey, we have the means to bully all the nations around us, let's set up a system where we set the currency rate and the economy, then screw over the other nations in the agreement, and then take out loans on the global economy by trading on the obscene profits!"

Meanwhile, Mexico starves and is gradually taken over by the drug lords.

Actually, rule of thumb: if the term "Free Trade" and "WTO" are involved with any policy, run the other direction. Possibly screaming.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, June 11, 2011 4:00 AM

DREAMTROVE

ETA: Dates, Free Market, mid 18th c.; Free Trade, mid 19th c.
ETA2: by the bitish govt I mean at the behest of the east india company. Im surprised that PN didnt follow this link: the company created the US, and IIRC HK, which is more or less what is now China. Knights of the British Empire, no doubt?

Free Market is the economic theory of Adam Smith iirc, that the people, and not the govt, should decide what services will be available and who will provide them by being free to decide which they will pay for.

The obstacles to the free market were (and still are) anywyq, anyone feel free to correct me if i'm wrong.. Prohibition, Licensure and Subsidy.

Prohibition is simply saying it can't be done. There will be no new embryonic stem cell lines, so there will be no industry, which unfairly protects a competing market, pharmaceuticals. Other prohibitions are more blantant, like on certain recreational drugs and certain herbal medicines.

Licensure is when the govt. Allows something, but decides who will be allowed to do it. Like when there was only AT&T for phone service, or that only ABC, NBC and CBS could broadcast VHF television. Aside from a lack of services, this leads to corruption, and in the case of China, blatant nepotism.

Subsidy is more than the forking over of money, it's the govt. seeing to it that there is more money available to one group than to another. This came up twice in threads in the last couple of days, once was Hardware pointed out he reason the was corn ethanol was because of corn subsidies, which exist because the Iowa caucus comes first in the election cycle; I just forgot the other, but I'll remember.

A fourth obstacle which is a subject of debate is regulation. The sticky thing about regulation is that, yes, it can be done to protect the environment or the consumer from market invisible risks like poisoning, it can also be used to enact any of the other three. Regulations were put on passenger rail that made it so difficult that no one could do it. That's effectively a prohibition. Regulations were put on the manufacture of cars to make it so expensive that only the chosen "big three" could make cares, which is effectively licensure. Regulations that determine what needs to be done in order to be elligible for funding will a second crushing blow to stem cell research, and have been used to crush other things, like electric cars, etc.

For me, I'd like to see reulation have to pass a test to prove that it is not a disguised form of one of the other three forms of controlled market policy before it is allowed. Sure, some things should be banned, but not products and services. Fracking, for instance, is not an industry or product, it is a technique used to get natural gas, natural gas is the product. Saying you can not use this environmentally devastating technique to get the product will not kill the industry or even raise the barrier to entry. It will just say certain people will not be able ti get rich at the expense of others, and you have no constitutional or free market right to get rich, only to provide the service.

Free Trade is a policy enacted by the British Govt. During the Opium wars with China to ensure that Turkish opium could be sold in China.

What it says basically is that a country with a free trade relationship with another country will forfeit the right to place tariffs, quotas or embargoes on the importation of any product from the other country.

To make matters a little trickier, a country can have a free trade relationship with a second country without the relationship being mutual. For instance, the US has a free trade policy with China, so we cannot tariff Chinese imports, but China does not have such a policy with the US, and so American goods are taxed at 50% when sold in China.

For the US, this is a constitutional issue, since the constitution tells us that tariffs should be the sole source of revenue for the US govt.

John,

Good story. Almost got through without saying jew. But I mean well constructed.

Also, your email is not working. I got mailer daemon responses from both piratenews.org and infowars,

Oh, and byte, your correct about the reason for the name, not the first or the last policy to mimick the name of a popular idea. Good points all,

Also, Israel. Sorry.

Mike

I got them confused too when i was reading about them, the news doesn't make the point clear; someone at RPUSA has to set me straight. Read the above.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, June 11, 2011 4:45 AM

DMAANLILEILTT

Just a minor point but out of all the cities in China you decide to photoshop in the name of the Vietnamese capital: Hanoi.

And you can't really claim foul when a different economic powerhouse tries to gain more influence since there was/is just as big a push for an American hegemony.

"I really am ruggedly handsome, aren't I?"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE