Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I give everything 50/50.

If there's one thing in the world we have a surplus of it's people. It sounds plausible to me.



Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I give everything 50/50.

If there's one thing in the world we have a surplus of it's people. It sounds plausible to me.



Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Man, yer walking on thin ice. I still say Ginsberg is a better candidate than you or I.



But anyway, why eradicate your own population? And let Kim Jung, Putin take over your land?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
They are doing it because no one told them they can't. EVERYTHING that comes in a jar will have to be refrigerated or frozen. Bread will have to switch to datem or be refrigerated (and too much datem causes stiffening of heart valves). Alcohol will have much shorter shelf life. Forget about dried potatoes or box mixes of anything.

It's EVERYWHERE.

This is WORSE than leaded gas...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
Try "veggie" pastas.

They don't taste any different and we can eat them where we can't eat the rest.

By going gluten free you've most likely gone low sulfite as well. Just about everything that has gluten is sulfited.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6363789/Does-toxic-air-caus
e-autism-Living-polluted-areas-boosts-risk-disorder-children.html

Well, sure. Anything burned creates sulfur gas, just another way to overdose every day...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Zeek:
I mean not to be rude but so what? It sounds like you're assuming mutation is bad. It's neutral.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Zeek:
I mean not to be rude but so what? It sounds like you're assuming mutation is bad. It's neutral.

---

Wow, you don't understand the subject matter AT ALL. Did you even LOOK at the other thread??

Did you see the article where 89% of people on the spectrum have problems processing sulfur and it causes health and neuro issues when you CAN'T?? How is that NEUTRAL?? WE created the problem, not nature, anyway. It doesn't play by the same rules...

And if you think THAT is a neutral process it's because you think YOU aren't affected, then I assure you you are related to someone that is having problems or you yourself are and don't know it... It would be statistically improbable for you not to be.

If you think we should just let people die than give anti-biotics or surgery...WHY DON'T YOU GO FIRST??? Oh, and no vaccines for you or your people, while we're at it... What, you WANT to live?? Sorry, you don't get to make that decision, the ruling class has decided you aren't worth it...

That's like ...supremacist thinking there. If someone gets sick they were meant to DIE and we should let them for the good of the species, huh?? What does their personal feelings, plans, will to live, or mental health matter??

Geez, Zeek.

http://mentalfloss.com/article/12500/11-historical-geniuses-and-their-
possible-mental-disorders

Imagine what the world would be today without some of these people.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Zeek:
You're right perfection doesn't exist in DNA. That's why I never said that.

Humans will adapt to the food supply but that means there will be people who aren't well suited for it. That's the way it works.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
25% is HUGE, for a vaccine the difference should be negligible, even accounting for variances in behavior (people who are "responsible and go to a doctor" generally WOULD have less children, but not 25% LESS) 10% would be reasonable, maybe...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


and the potential negatives of either side could be equally catastrophic.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


and the potential negatives of either side could be equally catastrophic.

---

The reason why we passed on it is because HPV only turns into cancer less than 2% of the time... it's a VIRUS and the vast majority of people will naturally defeat it.
There's actually a greater chance the female body will treat the vaccine like a bio-mimicry of other substances and cause damage, than there is that you will end up with cancer from the virus, from what I've read.

We already have a 100% chance of getting cancer, so it was a no-brainer NOT to get it for us. Not for lack of them pushing it in schools, doc's office, the docs themselves, tv, radio, and everything in between...

---

Quote:

---

You know, for 5 years at least, I have been saying that being fat is mostly a function of bad gut DNA, and now I am proved right. Other people on the 'net been saying it for years too. Science on this planet just is SOO FRUSTRATINGLY SLOW!

---