Sign Up | Log In
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
Final Solution
Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:58 PM
RUXTON
Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:43 PM
MRGREEN
Sunday, January 19, 2003 11:38 PM
VICIOUS
Monday, January 20, 2003 9:19 AM
BROWNCOAT1
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
Monday, January 20, 2003 9:20 AM
JEFFNS
Quote:Originally posted by Vicious: Maybe someone else has already had this idea already, and I just haven't seen the posting, especially since I haven't really looked around at all. Why don't the fans pay for part of the show? It seems in most of the news I've read, the major complaint is the $2 million dollar production cost. At it's lowest point Firefly pulled, what, a 2.5 rating? That represents roughly 2.5 million homes and about 6 million people, right? Now, if we were real optimists, we could say ten percent of those people are true fans who want to see the show go on. At worst, we could be looking at 1%, although even that is optimistic. But let's go with it anyway. If we're lucky, there are 60,000 people who really want to see the show go on, and if we're really lucky, that's 600,000. Now I'm not exactly a statistician, and I'm really just coming up with these figures so as not to be too ridiculous. After all, in a perfect world, all 6 million would be true fans. But, if a certain amount of people were willing to donate a few dollars a week to some kind of fund, then that could possibly cut the production costs significantly to make the show more appealling to the networks. Of course, in this case, I'm being extremely optimistic, but I'd really like to see this show go on, and see the fans do more than advertise for the show. Television is really lacking good writing right now, and Firefly has some of the best. Television needs Firefly. -Vicious P.S. - I'm willing to pledge 5 dollars a week. Anyone else with me?
Monday, January 20, 2003 9:25 AM
LOSTANGEL
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL