GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Uncle Cecil Explains the Nielsens

POSTED BY: RADEGUND
UPDATED: Friday, February 21, 2003 09:21
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1157
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:42 AM

RADEGUND


Today's "Straight Dope" entry explains Nielsen ratings:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/030221.html

Radegund

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:54 AM

LOSTANGEL


Quote:

The sample size isn't a few hundred thousand people, though--for daily ratings, called "overnights," it's just 25,000 homes (5,000 for national programming, 20,000 for local stations), which collectively are supposed to reflect the viewing habits of 106 million U.S. households in 210 markets. That leaves a pretty wide margin for error, you might think, and you wouldn't be the only one.


Ack! To me this is not logical. That sample size is not nearly enough to project the viewing habits of the entire US.

Also, the part of the TV execs not signing up for the improved rating system because it told them what they didn't want to hear is PROOF that these people are ostrichs and short-sighted insecure people that don't have the courage or the desire to say,"Well, we're not as popular as we thought we were, how do we change it?"

TV executive

______________________
Lost Angel

WASH: Psychic, though? That sounds like something out of science fiction.
ZOE: We live in a space ship, dear.
WASH: So?


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 6:57 AM

BRTICK


Quote:

Nielsen Media Research, an offspring of the firm founded in 1923 by market research pioneer Arthur Nielsen, recently began introducing new sampling technology that it hopes will depict local TV viewership with much greater accuracy. Early results have been controversial, mainly because, in highly simplified terms, they consist of the following:

Q: Do people actually watch all this crap?

A: No."



glad I'm not the only one that thought that.


Keep Flying!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 21, 2003 9:21 AM

BROWNCOAT1

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.


I have always had trouble believing the Nielsen rating system could accurately depict the viewing habits of so many households w/ such a small sampling. A couple of people at the official board swear that the Nielsen system is sound and more accurate than any method. Personally, I think that is wishful thinking.

If this article is to be believed, it is a half hearted effort at getting a sampling of what people are watching. Personally it would be easier to contact cable providers and devise a system that would allow mass monitoring of what is being watched by viewers so they can get something a lot more accurate than Nielsen can provide.

"May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one."


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
What Is Beneath The Pyramids Of Giza?
Tue, April 1, 2025 03:01 - 7 posts
R.I.P. Leonard Nimoy
Mon, March 31, 2025 20:42 - 41 posts
Our Old Friend; ECGORDON
Wed, March 26, 2025 20:43 - 2 posts
Where are the Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Wed, March 26, 2025 06:26 - 77 posts
Firefly Raised the Bar for Science Fiction
Mon, March 24, 2025 13:29 - 29 posts
Twin Peaks Returns After 26 Years
Sun, March 23, 2025 20:11 - 5 posts
Halloween
Sat, March 22, 2025 04:32 - 44 posts
Has Hollywood given up on grown men/women?
Sat, March 22, 2025 04:10 - 13 posts
Browncoats of the Upper Midwest - Unite!
Wed, March 19, 2025 12:10 - 13 posts
Host the 2025 Browncoat Ball! - Request for Proposals
Tue, March 18, 2025 16:27 - 5 posts
Browncoat Ball 2025 tickets on sale! September 18-21, 2025 in Los Angeles, California
Tue, March 18, 2025 16:24 - 3 posts
Gene Hackman Died
Tue, March 11, 2025 18:53 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL